09-20-2007 Workshop
City Commission
Workshop Meeting
, >.' > -, ,~,~-"--,.
,'~ ,." ~., ."
September 20, 2007
9AM
Executive Conference Room
19200 We~t CountrY Cluh Drive A ventura Fl111 RO
AGENDA
1. Annexation of Unincorporated Areas West of City
(City Manager)*
2. Proposed Land Swap - 21300 Biscayne Boulevard
(City Manager)*
Future Action Required: Ordinance
3. Library Interlocal Agreement (City Manager)*
Future Action Required: Resolution
4. Addition of Public School Element to City of Aventura
Comprehensive Plan (City Manager)*
Future Action Required: Ordinance
5. City's Go Green Initiatives (City Manager)*
6. Newsletter- Super Homestead Property Tax Reform Vote-
January 2008 (Mayor Gottlieb)
7. Adjournment
* Back-up Information Exists
This meeting is open to the public. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all persons who are
disabled and who need special accommodations to participate in this meeting because of that disability should contact the
Office of the City Clerk, 305-466-8901, not later than two days prior to such proceeding.
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Commission
FROM: Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM, C'
DATE: September 10,2007
SUBJECT: Annexation of Unincorporated Areas West of City
Recently the County Commission has focused on legislation and studies that would
suspend the consideration of incorporating new cities in favor of maximizing
annexations of proposed areas into existing cities. The County has contacted the City to
determine if we would be interested in annexing part or the entire unincorporated area
included in the North East MAC. See attached Exhibit 1.
BACKGROUND
In September 2004, the City prepared an Annexation Feasibility Study of the North East
Mac area to determine the fiscal feasibility of annexing the subject area. (see attached).
The study was requested after representatives from the unincorporated area west of
the City formally petitioned the City Commission in May 2004 to annex into the
corporate boundaries of the City of Aventura. The rroposed area of annexation is
generally described as follows: to the north - NE 215t Street or County Line Road; to
the east - the Florida East Coast Railroad along West Dixie; to the south - the
boundaries of the City of North Miami Beach; and to the west - Interstate 95 from NE
215th Street south to Snake Creek canal. One of the major concerns addressed was to
determine if the current residents of the City of Aventura would need to financially
subsidize the proposed annexed area.
The study concluded that the City would experience a significant negative fiscal impact
on it's budget if the Northeast MAC area were annexed to the City and the City used the
available identified revenue sources and provided the same level of services as it
provides to the residents and businesses in the current boundaries of the City. The first
year deficit was projected to be $1,032,445, an amount that equaled to about 20% of
the revenues anticipated from the annexed area. The County Code relating to electric
franchise and utility tax revenues adversely affected the revenue projections by
$1,403,700. Without overcoming those obstacles, it was not prudent from a financial
standpoint to annex the area identified as the Northeast MAC. Based on the results of
the study, the City Commission declined to further consider the annexation request.
It appears the County is willing to reconsider the negative effects of the electric
franchise and utility tax revenues.
I have placed this item on the Workshop Agenda to determine if the City Commission
would be interested in annexing part or the entire unincorporated area included in the
North East MAC. If the Commission is interested in pursuing this maUer, I would
recommend the following:
. That the annexation study be updated;
. That the new study include a proposed area for consideration;
. That we proceed slowly in light of the property tax super exemptions statewide
vote in January.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
EMSI
EXHIBIT I
BROWARD COUNTY
LINE
I
-r:-~~Jl
----I I
~ ---1 \
---T1
---i I
x----" I
4__,L-j
t-1 \ .
--11
NE -aE
;::'..,1"-.:;;
Jj^('
rtL{..I'
~(;;=
:J{ T\...
)> ,
<:
o
MIAMI.'
~iiiW
ADA Coordination
Agenda Coordination
AnimalSelilices
Art in Public Places
Audit and Management Services
Aviation
Building
Building Code Compliance
Business Development
Capital Improvements
Citizens' Independent Transportation Trust
Commission on Ethics and Public Trust
Commun ications
Community Action Agency
Community & Economic Development
Community Relations
Consumer Services
Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cultural Affairs
Elections
Emergency Management
Employee Relations
Empowerment Trust
Enterprise Technology Services
Environmental Resources Management
Fair Employment Practices
Finance
Fire Rescue
General Services Administration
Historic Preservation
Homeless Trust
Housing Agency
Housing Finance Authority
Human Services
Independent Review Panel
International Trade Consortium
Juvenile Assessment Center
Medical Examiner
Metro-Miami Action Plan
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Park and Recreation
Planning and Zoning
Police
Procurement Management
Property Appraisal
Public Library System
Public Works
Safe Neighborhood Parks
Seaport
Sol id Waste Management
Strategic Business Management
Team Metro
Transit
Task Force on Urban Economic Revitalization
Vizcaya Museum And Gardens
Water & Sewer
Strategic Business Management
111 NW 1 st Street. 22nd Floor
Miami, Florida 33128-1994
T 305-375-5143 F 305-375-5168
miamidade.gov
August 3, 2007
Eric M. Soroka
City Manager
City of Aventura
19200 W. County Club Drive
Aventura, FL 33180
Re: Annexation of Unincorporated Miami-Dade County
Dear Mr. Soroka:
On March 29, 2007, the Board of County Commissioners' Government Operations and
Environment Committee held Incorporation/Annexation and Mitigation workshops to
address issues relating to incorporation and annexation. The Committee instructed the
County Attorney's Office to draft an ordinance suspending consideration of proposed
incorporations and directing the County Manager to provide a report to the Board
regarding efforts to maximize annexations into existing municipalities. A public hearing to
consider the attached ordinance was held on July 11th and it was forwarded to the
September 4th BCC meeting with a favorable recommendation.
I am writing to inform you of the incorporation effort by the Northeast Dade Municipal
Advisory Committee, located west of your city, and to assess whether your municipality is
interested in annexing part or the entire unincorporated area covered by the proposed
incorporation. The specific boundaries of the proposed incorporation and their relation to
your municipality are identified on the enclosed map.
Please advise us in writing of your interest to annex any area adjacent to your
municipality no later than September 15, 2007.
Should you have any questions, on the proposed ordinance, the incorporation efforts of
the Northeast Municipal Advisory Committee, and the County's annexation procedures,
please call me at 305-375-5143 or Jorge Fernandez of my office at 305-375-1543.
Sincerely,
~
Jennifer Glazer-Moon
Director
Enclosure
c: Jorge M. Fernandez, Jr., Program Coordinator
Office of Strategic Business Management
AU6 0 6 2007
OFFICE OF THe:
CITY MANAGER
."
~ ~
-g ~ 0
~~~
~ I I
f-q
~ ~~ :: ::
~~ia t~.~
E~~ 11 ~~
H~~lq,
.~;:o~<..
=Jl$".....>I"g~
. ~>,~ r;a 1m
H~~~,.~
; ! 'I!~ "S ~~
Ct.!"'.El ~ g~
il~ e,si
CL".. ~
~~J &
F
-$-,~
C'":-t "
~ ~-
~
\.5 '~,
..
~
..
z
..
z
NE 19TH AV
t-
o>
Ii;
....
..
z
..
t-
'"
~
..
z
^" H~t~ 3N
^" H~t\ 3N
NE 12TH AV
NE 12TH AV
Ii;
'"
~
Ii;
'"
~
..
z
Approved
Veto
Override
Mavor
Agenda Item No 7 (A)
09-04-07
ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE RELATING TO INCORPORATIONS;
SUSPENDING CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED
INCORPORATIONS UNTIL RECEIPT AND
CONSIDERATION OF THE COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT
UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT TO THIS ORDINANCE;
DIRECTING THE COUNTY MANAGER TO PROVIDE A
REPORT TO THE BOARD REGARDING EFFORTS TO
MAXIMIZE ANNEXATIONS AND UPDATED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION RELATED TO THE NORTH CENTRAL
DADE MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COMMITIEE STUDY
AREA; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY, EXCLUSION FROM
THE CODE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, there are several Municipal Advisory Committees interested m
incorporating their respective areas; and
WHEREAS, proposed State of Florida legislative initiatives relating to property tax
reform, if enacted, may have an affect on the fiscal viability of local governments in the future;
and
WHEREAS, annexation is preferred over incorporation since the unincorporated area at
issue may be annexed to an existing city with established resources and services, and since less
financial resources are required than those needed to establish a self-sufficient municipality; and
WHEREAS, incorporation of a municipality is a discretionary decision of the County
Commission, pursuant to the Home Rule Amendment to the Florida Constitution and the
Miami-Dade County Home Rule Charter; and
C:IWPIORD'A61HIOC
l(
Agenda Item No. 7(A)
Page 2
WHEREAS, it is appropriate that the Board evaluate whether proposed incorporations
may be pursued as annexations, particularly in light of current circumstances relating to property
tax reform; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best. interest of the County and its citizens to make these
decisions advisedly and in an informed manner following comprehensive study and deliberation,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1.
Notwithstanding any other provision.in the Code of Miami-Dade County
to the contrary, proposed incorporations shall not be processed by the Clerk of the Board of
County Commissioners or County staff or presented to or considered by the Board of County
Commissioners, any committee comprised of County Commissioners, or the Planning Advisory
Board, until such time as the report of the County Manager as described in Section 2 of this
ordinance is presented to and considered by the Board of County Commissioners.
Section 2.
The County Manager is hereby directed to prepare a report indicating the
interest of municipalities surrounding or proximate to the unincorporated areas represented by
existing Municipal Advisory Committees in an effort to maximize annexations as the preferred
method to pursue boundary changes to the unincorporated area; and provide updated fInancial
information related to the North Central Municipal Advisory Committee Study Area. Such
written report shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners within ninety (90) days
of the effective date of this ordinance.
Section 3.
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or provision of this ordinance
is held invalid,. the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected by such invalidity.
Section 4.
It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners, and it is hereby
C:\Jf'1''ORD\Atijj.DOC
5
Agenda Item No. 7 (A)
Page 3
ordained that the provisions of this ordinance, including any sunset provision, shall be excluded
from the Code of Miami-Dade County, Florida.
Section 5.
This ordinance shall become effective ten (10) days after the date of
enactment unless vetoed by the Mayor, and if vetoed, shall become effective only upon an
override by this Board.
PASSED AND ADOPTED:
Prepared by:
~
CJ5/G'!C-
Approved by County Attorney as
to form and legal sufficiency:
Cynthia Johnson Stacks/Craig H. Coller
Sponsored by the Governmental Operations and Environment Committee
C:iIf'P1ORDW6/S.DOC
~
ANNEXATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
NORTHEAST DADE
BROWARD COUNTY
LINE
Annexation Feasibility Study Committee
Eric M. Soroka, City Manager
Harry M. Kilgore, Finance Support Services Director
Robert M. Sherman, Community Services Director
Thomas Ribel, Police Chief
Steve Steinberg, Deputy Police Chief
Joanne Carr, Planning Director
Prepared by: City of Aventura
Office of the City Manager
September 2004
CITY OF A VENTURA
ANNEXATION FEASIBILITY STUDY
NORTHEAST DADE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPIC
Summary
PAGE NO.
1
Introduction
2
Profile of the Area
3
Miami-Dade County Annexation Requirements
4
Economic Feasibility Conclusion and Summary
4
Revenue Projections
6
Operating and Maintenance Cost and Staffing
Office of the City Manager
Finance Support Services Department
Legal Department
Police Department
Community Development Department
Community Services Department
Non-Departmental
Capital Budget
9
9
9
10
10
12
12
13
14
Exhibit A - Budget Detail
15
Exhibit B -Five Year Projections
36
Exhibit C - Miami-Dade County Code Annexation Requirements
37
Map A - North East MAC
44
North East Dade Annexation Study
1
INTRODUCTION
The City Commission of the City of Aventura requested the City Administration to
prepare a Study to determine the feasibility of annexing the area known as the
Northeast MAC. The study was requested after representatives from the
unincorporated area west of the City formally petitioned the City Commission in
May 2004 to annex into the corporate boundaries of the City of Aventura. The
proposed area of annexation is generally described as follow: to the north - NE
215th Street or County Line Road; to the east - the Florida East Coast Railroad
along West Dixie; to the south - the boundaries of the City of North Miami Beach;
and to the west - Interstate 95 from NE 215th Street south to Snake Creek canal.
A map of the area is contained below.
North East Miami-Dade County
3.2 Square Miles
8ROWARD COUNTY
LINE
This Study focused on the economic feasibility of annexing the proposed area.
The purpose of study was to determine if the revenues generated within the
proposed annexed area could pay for the cost of providing services to the area.
This included the following components:
. Revenue analysis
. Service levels and costs
. Infrastructure needs
. Five Year financial projections.
One of the major concerns addressed was to determine if the current residents of
the City of Aventura would need to financially subsidize the proposed annexed
area.
North East Dade Annexation Study
2
PROFILE OF THE AREA
The estimated 2000 population of the area is 16,736 persons. Table 1 reports
selected demographic and economic characteristics of the area. The majority of
the population in the Northeast area is white, non- Hispanic.
Population Characteristics. 2000
Percent White, Not Hispanic
Percent Black, Not Hispanic
Percent Other, Not Hispanic
Percent Hispanic Origin
City
27,000
75%
2%
2%
21%
Income
Median Household Income
Per-capita Income
$40,332
$25,632
Housina
Percent Owner Occupied 34.9
Percent Single Unit detached 85.0
Estimated number of units 7700
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1 and Summary File 3. Miami-Dade
County,
DEVELOPMENT PROFILE OF THE AREA
The Northeast area covers 2,024 acres and its land use profile is shown in Table
3.
Land Use
Table 3
2001 Land Uses
Northeast
%
Residential
Commercial/Office
Industrial/Utilities
Parks/Recreations*
Institutional
Ag ri cu Itu ra I
Vacant
*Includes inland waters
Source: Miami-Dade Department of Planning and Zoning, 2003.
40.6 '
3.4
20.0
30.3
3.4
0.0
2.3
North East Dade Annexation Study
3
MIAMI DADE COUNTY ANNEXATION REQUIREMENTS
The pertinent sections of the Miami-Dade County Code which outlines the
process for annexation initiated by a City is included in Exhibit C The following
are the important points contained in the Code:
. The Miami-Dade County Commission along with a majority of the
registered voters in the annexation area must approve an annexation
petition.
. The County Planning Advisory Board is required to review all annexation
petitions.
. The County shall retain all electric franchise revenues in the annexation
area during the full term of the County franchise with FPL.
. The County shall retain all utility tax and cigarette tax revenues in the
annexation area forever.
. The County may require that all garbage collection and disposal service
for the annexation area remain with the County.
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY
The City of Aventura would experience a significant negative fiscal impact on its'
budget if the Northeast MAC area were annexed to the City and the City used the
available identified revenue sources and provided the same level of services as it
provides to the residents and businesses in the current boundaries of the City.
The first year deficit is projected to be $1,032,445 an amount that equals about
20% of the revenues anticipated from the annexed area.
The following chart is a summary and overview of the estimated revenues and
expenditure associated with the proposed annexed area.
Revenues
General Fund
Transportation Fund
Stormwater Utilitv Fund
Subtotal
$4,671,924
572,593
307.354
$5,551,870
Expend itu res
Revenues over (under) Expenditures
$5,075,830
1.508.485
$6,584,315
($1,032,445)
Operating
Capital
Subtotal
The General fund revenues do not provide a sufficient revenue source to offset
the additional costs required to serve the proposed annexed areas. Furthermore,
a large portion of revenues derived from the Transportation Fund and
Stormwater Fund are required to be earmarked for capital expenditures.
North East Dade Annexation Study
4
However, one could argue that once the start-up costs are over, capital costs
could be reduced which would free up funds to offset annual operating costs. In
order to evaluate this approach the following chart was prepared showing a five
year projection of revenues and expenditures.
.btrlrl~~Cltion ~!IJ~Y
Fi~'y'~ar ~E~~eC~iOn
^^^^^~^~4.oc^""
2004/05 2005/06
2006/07
2007/08 2008/09
TAL PROJECTED AVAILABLE RESOURCES
" $5,551 ,870~$5,448,534" $5,676,984" $5,915,983 "~$6, 166~564
JECTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES' 5,075,830 5,425,901' 5,874,489' 6,360,938r~ 6;802,372
SUBTOTAL 476,040 22,633 (197,505) .....(444,~5~L~ (6~~!.~g8)
A detailed spreadsheet that outlines how the five year projection was developed
is contained in Exhibit A. The five year projections were based on a six percent
(6%) growth factor for development and property value increases and three and
one half percent (3.5%) for most other revenue sources. Expenditures were
estimated to grow between 7% - 8% during the first five years of acquiring the
annexed area.
The chart above clearly illustrates that the projected revenues cannot support the
required operating expenditures. This does not take into consideration the need
to continue to expend at least $500,000 annually for capital improvements after
the start up years.
The County's' Code relating to electric franchise and utility tax revenues
adversely affected the revenue projections by $1,403,700. Without overcoming
these obstacles it is not prudent from a financial standpoint to annex the area
identified as the Northeast MAC
North East Dade Annexation Study
5
REVENUE PROJECTIONS
This section of the report reviews the sources and amounts of revenues that
would be generated from the proposed annexed area. The Miami-Dade County's
Office of Management and Budget was consulted regarding the revenue
assumptions and estimates.
The revenue projections were based on the following assumptions:
. Per Ordinance, the County will retain all electric franchise revenues in the
annexation area during the full term of the County franchise with FPL. This
amounted to an estimated annual loss of $410,000.
. Per Ordinance, the County, they will retain all utility tax and cigarette tax
revenues in the annexation area. This amounted to an estimated annual
loss of $993,700.
. The City's lower tax rate was used to develop the ad valorem tax amount.
This produced $139,000 less in revenue compared to the County's tax
rate.
. Per Ordinance, the County will only transmit transit tax revenue based on
the population figure over 10,000 rather then the total population normally
utilized for calculating the revenue estimate. This amounted to an
estimated annual loss of $472,000.
. Both the Street Lighting Improvement Districts and Security Guard Special
Taxing Districts that currently are in place to provide service to the
proposed annexed area will remain in effect. The City of Aventura
dissolved the Street Lighting Improvement Districts after incorporation. If
this action was taken with the proposed annexed areas, it would
negatively impact the budget by $55,000.
. The 2004/05 projection assumes that the current assessment of $333,000
for security roving patrol in the annexed area would be in effect for one
year to defer costs of purchasing police equipment. After this time period it
would be eliminated.
Table 1 lists the projected revenues by summary category of $5,518,112 that
would be generated in the annexation area. A detailed budget including all
projected line item revenues is contained in Exhibit A. The basis for each
revenue forecast is explained below.
Locally Levied Taxes
Licenses and Permits
Intergovernmental Revenues
Charges for Service
Fines and Forfeitures
Miscellaneous Revenues
Total
North East Dade Annexation Study
6
Ad Valorem Taxes
On the whole, potential property tax revenue represents the single largest source
of revenue. The estimate for the property tax revenue is based on applying the
City's tax rate of 2.2270 on the taxable assessed value of the annexed area of
826,397,969. Assuming a 95% collection rate the amount generated by this
source is estimated to be $1,782,127. This represents $556,000 per square mile.
By contrast the City generates $3,674,000 per square mile.
Franchise Fees
Towing Franchise Fees are estimated to be $5,000 based number of projected
tows in the area. Gas Franchise Fees are projected to $34,000 based on county
estimate.
Unified Communications Tax
The estimate of $833,000 was developed by utilizing the City's per capital figure
of $49.00 multiplier by the population figure of 17,000 for the proposed annexed
area.
City Occupational License
Occupational licenses are projected to be $54,000 based on county estimates.
Building/Engineering Permits
Building/Engineering Permits is projected to be $252,000 based on county
estimates.
State Revenue Sharing
The estimate of $165,593 was developed by utilizing the City's per capital figure
of $9.74 multiplier by the population figure of 17,000 for the proposed annexed
area.
Half Cent Sales Tax
The estimate of $972,778 was developed by utilizing the City's per capital figure
of $57.22 multiplier by the population figure of 17,000 for the proposed annexed
area.
Charges for Service
Assumes current assessment of $333,000 for security roving patrol in the
annexed area would be in effect for one year to defer costs of purchasing police
equipment. The other revenue figures are based on city estimates of recreation
programs which are offset by expenditures. Total estimate for this revenue
source is $375,500.
Fines and Forfeitures
The estimate of $125,926 for County Court Fines was developed by utilizing the
City's per capital figure of $7.41 multiplier by the population figure of 17,000 for
the proposed annexed area. The Code Violation Fine revenue was based on City
projections of similar area of enforcement.
Miscellaneous Revenues
Interest earnings were estimated at $25,000 and a "catch all" line item for Misc.
Revenues included an estimate of $35,000 based on City experience.
North East Dade Annexation Study
7
Transportation and Street Maintenance Fund
This fund is normally established to account for restricted revenues and
expenditures which by State Statute and County Transit System Surtax
Ordinance are designated for transportation enhancements, street maintenance
and construction costs. Expenditures are accounted for in this fund by
designating specific operating line items or Capital projects. Revenues are
projected to be $572,593. The estimate for each revenue were developed by
utilizing the city's per capital revenue figure and applying it to the population Of
17,000. Per Ordinance, the County will only transmit transit tax revenue based on
the population figure over 10,000 rather then the total population normally utilized
for calculating the revenue estimate. This generated $194,185.
The funds will be used to support the following major first year operating costs
and capital projects:
. Implementation of transit system services - $100,000
. Road maintenance - $82,000
. Right-of way maintenance - $125,000
. Engineering services -$12,000
. Signage - $12,000
. Sidewalk improvements - $91,731
. Street Lighting improvements - $50,000
. Road improvements -$100,000
Stormwater Utility Fund
This fund is used to account for revenues and expenditures specifically
earmarked for the construction and maintenance of the stormwater drainage
system. By applying the city's stormwater utility fee of $2.50 to the 10,562 ERUs
in the proposed annexed area, less a 3% uncollectible, $307,354 would be
generated for drainage maintenance and improvements. The county's rate is
$4.00/ERU.
Annual maintenance expenditures are estimated at $25,000. Therefore,
$282,354 will be available for drainage capital improvements.
North East Dade Annexation Study
8
OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE COST AND STAFFING
This section of the report analyzes the annual cost and staffing of operating and
maintaining services that the City of Aventura would provide to the Northeast
MAC area in the event if annexation. The costs associated with each service
area were developed on the basis of providing the same level of services to the
annexed area as the Aventura residents currently enjoy. In order to forecast
costs with a high degree of reliability, expenditure estimates were based on costs
per unit of service and actual personnel costs experienced by the City of
Aventura. The analysis also includes direct and indirect costs of service. Table 2
lists the estimated costs for operations and maintenance as well as the additional
employees that the City of Aventura would need to hire to serve the annexation
area. A detailed budget including all projected line item costs is contained in
Exhibit A. The basis for each service area forecast is explained below.
Table 2: Projected Operating and Maintenance Costs of Annexation Areas
New Emplovees Cost
o 42,500
2 156,250
o 65,000
43 3,386,904
4 439,973
9 664,203
o 321,000
58 5,075,830
Office of the City Manager
Finance Support Services
Legal
Police
Community Development
Community Services
Non- Departmental
Total
It was determined that the operating costs associated with the City Commission
and City Clerk's Department would not be significantly impacted by the
annexation.
Office of the City Manager
This department does not require any additional personnel to serve the
proposed area to be annexed. The projected budget amount of $42,500
relates to the costs associated with; the personnel function for the 58
additional employees; distribution of quarterly newsletters and web page
revisions.
Finance Support Services
The total cost for this Department is estimated at $156,250. Based on the 58
anticipated new employees and estimated additional financial transactions to
serve the proposed annexed area the following new employees would be
required:
· Accountant! Bookkeeper
· Network Administrator
North East Dade Annexation Study
9
The personnel costs account for $143,250 of the total. The remaining amount
includes additional operating costs generated by the new employees and
audit costs.
Legal
The City of Aventura contracts its legal services to a private law firm. It is
anticipated that the additional legal services costs for the proposed annexed
area would be $65,000. This includes costs associated with day to day legal
issues, zoning matters and service contracts.
Police
The City of Aventura's Police Department has a total of 110 positions. Of that
number, 76 are sworn officers. The department provides a full range of
services including road patrol, SWAT, marine patrol, criminal investigations,
preventive patrol, bike patrol, crime prevention, traffic enforcement, school
resource services and dispatch functions. Based on applying our current
standards of service it is estimated that the cost for providing Police services
to the proposed annexed area would be $3,386,904. The determination of this
figure is based on the following analysis:
A. Determination of Staffing levels
It is first necessary to develop the uniformed road patrol requirements in order
to determine the overall staffing levels. Currently the City of Aventura has a
ratio of 2.7 sworn personnel for every 1000 citizens. If this ratio was applied to
the annexed area 45 additional sworn police officers would be required.
However, a more appropriate calculation in light of the impact of the mall on
the City's staffing levels is to utilize the Workload Assessment Uniform Patrol
Formula based on calls for service generated in the proposed annexed areas.
In 2002 there were 13,977 calls for service in the proposed annexed area.
The Workload Assessment Uniform Patrol Formula provides that 2 hours of
patrol time for each hour of obligated time and each call on average takes
one hour.
Workload Assessment Uniform Patrol Formula
Obligated Time:13,977 + Patrol Time: 27,954 = 41,931 total hours need per
year.
41,931 dived by 8 hours/day =5241.38 divided by 365 days .year = 14.35
units per day.
Based on the formula a minimum of 14 uniformed patrol officers a day would
be required. However, in order to cover days off, vacations, sick leave etc. 21
uniform patrol officers would be required to cover all three shifts. (shifts A, B,
& C). This would provide 7 patrol officers per shift.
North East Dade Annexation Study
10
B. Staffing levels
The following is a general overview of the staffing requirements to serve the
proposed annexed area:
. 21 Road Patrol
· 3 Sergeants - One sergeant to supervise each shift
· 2 Lieutenants - Required to supervise sergeants and officers and
perform technical and administrative functions.
· 3 Detectives -Needed to handle additional volume of calls.
· 1 Crime Scene Technician - Required to handle additional work
load.
· 3 Police Service Aides - Required to handle increases in traffic
related incidents.
· 2 Traffic Officers - Required to handle increases in traffic related
incidents.
· 1 Records Clerk - Required to handle additional work load
· 3 Community Police Officers - One assigned to each zone.
· 2 Street Crimes Officers - To assist in suppressing burglaries,
thefts and robberies in the annexed area.
· 2 School Resource Officers - To provide services to the 3 public
schools in the area.
Total new employees: 43 (38 sworn officers)
C. Operating Costs
Operating costs for police services were developed by extrapolating the City's
budget figures based on workload, population and service calls for the
proposed annexed area. Funds were included to provide crossing guards at
the public school locations and to insure the use of state of the art technology
currently employed by the City's police services.
D. Police Zones
Based on geographic boundaries, population and calls for service it is
necessary to break down the annexed area into three zones. The 2002 Calls
for service by zone were:
. Zone 4: 2,786
. Zone 5: 6,031
. Zone:6: 5,160
Although Zone 4 had approximately half the calls of the other two zones it
encompasses four of the area schools and the heavy traffic on Ives Daily
Road justify the zones geographic area.
North East Dade Annexation Study
11
Proposed Breakdown of Zones
Community Development
There are 3 main service areas for the Community Development Department
in the City of Aventura. The same 3 areas were analyzed as drivers for
calculating costs for the proposed annexation area.
The City of Aventura contracts its building review and inspections to a private
firm. Based on estimates provide by Miami-Dade County it is anticipated that
$250,000 would be generated in expenses with a like amount of revenue to
offset the costs. An additional Customer Service Representative position
would be required to address the increased workload relating to the permitting
function.
Code enforcement services ensure that the use of residential property and
businesses conforms to the City's code of permitted and prohibited uses. It is
an important function to ensure that property values are maintained. It is
anticipated that 2 Code Compliance Officers would be necessary to provide
the level of service required for the annexed area.
It is anticipated that a additional Planner position would be necessary to
process the planning and zoning related applications for new construction and
redevelopment associated with the proposed annexed area.
Community Services
The City of Aventura's Community Services Department provides a variety of
public services through the following Divisions:
North East Dade Annexation Study
12
Public Works Division:
Street and sidewalk maintenance, stormwater drainage maintenance,
citywide beautification and landscape maintenance, street furniture
maintenance, facility management and janitorial services, building security,
fleet management for non-police vehicles, public works permitting, utility
coordination, GIS mapping, and special event support, and audio visual
services.
Parks and Recreation Division:
Operation of all City parks and the Community Recreation Center, planning
and coordinating special events, recreation programming at the Community
Recreation Center, youth and adult athletics, senior programming, tennis
lessons, summer and holiday camps, public transportation management, and
special event permitting to community groups.
The majority of these services are provided using the private sector through
contract administration. This concept would be extended to the proposed
annexed area.
The following park sites would become the responsibility of the City of
Aventura if the proposed annexation occurred:
Highland Oaks Park NE 203 St. and 24th Ave. 30 acres
Ojus Park 18995 W. Dixie Hwy. 1.63
Two fulltime park supervisors and 6 part-time park attendants are anticipated
to operate the two park locations. All maintenance and recreational
programming would be contracted out.
All public works and street maintenance costs would be contracted as well
based on current City standards. One fulltime maintenance position is
included to respond to service needs. It is estimated that contractual
maintenance services, utilities for public works and parks functions would cost
$361,000. Personnel costs account for $183,000.
A total of $100,000 was also included to establish a free shuttle bus service to
be funded by revenues from the Peoples Transit Program. Funds are also
included to provide recreational programming at the park locations. It is
anticipated that most recreational programming would be offset by user fees.
Non-Departmental
Non-Departmental Costs are estimated to be $321,000. Major expenses in
this category are as follows:
. Liability insurance $225,000
· Communication Services 50,000
· Contingency 25,000
· Other Operating Supplies 15,000
North East Dade Annexation Study
13
First Year Proposed Capital Budget
The following represents the proposed capital budget needs for the first year
of operations displayed on a fund bases. A total of $1,508,485 of capital costs
was identified in the development of the budget. A detailed budget including
all projected line item revenues is contained in Exhibit A.
A. General Fund
Police Department - $874,400 - The cost projection of $678,000 for police
vehicle requirements was based on a phase-in program over two to three
years. The first year assumes the purchase of 20 vehicles including radios,
computer modems and equipment. The cost of providing laptop and desk
computers for all additional employees is estimated to be $78,000. Radios for
all required personnel are estimated at $118,400.
Finance Support Services - $8,000 -Estimated cost for computers and
equipment for additional employees.
Community Development - $52,000 - Estimated cost for computers,
vehicles and equipment for additional employees.
Community Services - $50,000 - Estimated cost for design and preparation
of bid specifications for start up beatification program.
B. Transportation Fund
After funding operating costs restricted by revenues received in the
Transportation Fund, for the first year a total of $241,731 was available for the
following recommended capital projects.
. Sidewalk improvements -$91,731
. Street Lighting Improvements
. Road Improvements -$100,000
It should be pointed that greater capital needs were identified for the
proposed annexed area than were actually provided for in the first year
budget. It is anticipated that they would be addressed over a five to seven
year period.
C. Stormwater Utility Fund
After funding operating costs restricted by revenues received in the
Stormwater Utility Fund, for the first year a total of $282,354 was available for
drainage capital projects. It should be pointed that greater capital needs were
identified for the proposed annexed area than were actually provided for in
the first year budget. It is anticipated that they would be addressed over a five
to seven year period.
North East Dade Annexation Study
14
Exhibit A
4,671,924
572,593
307,354
. ,551.87.1il
$
Services
Services
Non - Departmental
439,9 .
~, , . ~~~'~'~'~".i
664,203 '
".. '"" ...uuuuuU~U~~~~~~~~~~H.'"H.. .'1
321,000i
,~j
8,000!
0'
North East Dade Annexation Study
15
COMPARATIVE PERSONNEL SUMMARY
Needed to
Annexed Area
Services
North East Dade Annexation Study
16
Police Services Assessment
Review Fees
Bfe nts
& Recreation fees
Misc. Revenues
North East Dade Annexation Study
17
North East Dade Annexation Study
18
I
. I
i""""""""'-"=-^'~~-~'-~'~'~H..t~._.~_._~"",,,
11000/2999 I Personal Services
i3000/399~ Contractual Services
14000/4999 Other Charges & Services
: 5000/5399 Commodities ........
,5400/5499 Other Operating Expenses
j..",",
North East Dade Annexation Study
19
1
North East Dade Annexation Study
20
OTHER CHARGES & SERVICES
Communication Services
Printin.~& Bin~il1~
J\~ver~sing
Other Current Charges
North East Dade Annexation Study
21
BUDGETARY ACCOUNT SUMMARY
North East Dade Annexation Study
22
Asst.
Advoca te
Fleet Mana er/Quartermaster
Total
Position Title
Police Chief
Executive Assistant
Chief of Police
Lieutenants
Commander
Police Officers
Scene Tech
Police Service Aides
Detectives
Crime Prev Specialist
Pol/Crime Prev Off
Records
Records Clerk
North East Dade Annexation Study
23
R&M- Vehicles
4645 . ~!JIc:~SLJiPIllEll1t~.,.,
,~M - ()ffi.ce E:qu.iPIllElnt ..
. Printing & Binding
North East Dade Annexation Study
24
5290
Subsc:~!ions & Mem
Conferences & Seminars
North East Dade Annexation Study
25
1000/2999 Personal Services
~=.~.~='.W' '~"..'_._.=..W.'...W~"'H' ,
3000/3999 Contractual Services
4000/4999 _()tI1~E_~~_arge.s~..~~!",ic~13
5000/5399 Commodities
99 ating Expenses
Director
Officer
Customer Service
Customer Service Rep II
4201
Total
North East Dade Annexation Study
26
13190
4001
4101 'Communication Services
'^' "'" "^'''---T^''''
4610 IR&M- Vehicles
""~~~~~o.,"w_._,
464~"^~,,,~~M- Equip~ent"",,^
4701~~"^,,J Prillting
4730 IRecords Retention
North East Dade Annexation Study
27
Worker
Tech/CAD
from
Fund
Park
Park Attendant
61
Facilities Manager
fo Officer
8
Salaries
108,650
3,000
2101
2201
2301 Health!Life &Disability
2401
North East Dade Annexation Study
28
COI'ITRACTUAL SERVICES
Prof. Servi<:~s:~~I1~scape Arch.
LandsclTree Maint Svc-Parks
5450
North East Dade Annexation Study
29
50,000
3,000
2,000
225,0~~
1,000.
North East Dade Annexation Study
30
'I .."".."......,.,,.,,....,...,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
....J Police Del2artment
...,,_h'~hicl~~,.~
.......... I Ve bi c;l~~.q~iJ~.r:!!~nt ..
... . .. .LRad i 0 ....................
I Modem
==_lg.9r1,p.LJt~~~.~~,... ....+
I Radios
I
^'.w.""",,._+"'"~".="'..,., ,,_,,==-=_"""~=,>"""""**""_",J""""WW_"
i Community Development
mlCOl"!lput~~~ .
IVehicles
... rEq~uiprT1e nt~'"
4
2
North East Dade Annexation Study
31
North East Dade Annexation Study
32
3351200
3353001
3353010
3383801
Intergovernmental Revenues
State Revenue Sharing
Local Option Cap. Impr. Gas Tax
Local Option Gas Tax
North East Dade Annexation Study
33
North East Dade Annexation Study
34
3110
Stormwater Utility Fees - It is proposed to maintain the Stormwater fee at $2.50 /ERU
to fund the required drainage improvements. The following represents the computation
of the revenues derived from Stormwater Utility Fees:
Customer Data:
No. of Billable ERUs
Rate Per E RU
Revenues:
Gross Stormwater
Less: Uncollectibles
Yields: Net Stormwater Reven
North East Dade Annexation Study
35
Exhibit B
.... . ....... ....... .. .. ....~..... .... Anll.~lC:cation~~u(jy ... . .... ........... ........ .....u
PROJECTION OF RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES
2004/2005
CURRENT YEAR REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR
GENERAL GOVERMENT SERVICES
AD VALOREM TAXES
~^ "'U"'O""'''''~'''''''''''~"'^-'"^'-'~"""^ ,^,~~"_k",
FRANCHISE FEES
uUNIFIEDeOMMUNICA TIONTAX
CITY OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES
. BUILDiNGREI.A TED REVENUE
ST A TEuSHARED REVENUES-UNRESTRICTED
HALF CENT SALES TAX
FINES & FORFEITURES
CHARGES FOR SERVICES
"Mise: REVENUES
COUNTY'OCCUP A TIONALuLICENSES
375,500
60,000
5,000
TOTAL CURRENT YEAR REVENUES
$4!~.~1,924
TRANSPORTATION FUND
STORMWATER UTILITY
572,593
307,354
", "=__'mnF^> ,--,-- "____M______~~=_"""
TOTAL AVAILABLE
2005/2006
2006/2007
2007/2008
2008/2009
$2,122,~2 J $2,249,8951(a)"
42,616: . 43,8951(b)' .
910,242 : 937,549~{b) .
59,007 . 60,17'7" (b)
279,397 1 289,176 (c)
185,81~L=~u 192,316 (c)
1,078,.536. 1,116,285 (c)
145,160 : 150,241 (c)
59,606 . 61,692 (e)""
.. 66,523 68,851 (ej
5,000 5,
$1,889,05
40, 170
857,990 r
55,620
.' ~260,82
173.45
1,006,82
135,508 :
55,642
62,100
5,000
$4,542,189
'U~~.:..743,448
'S89}?1
316,575 :
""___n___ __M__________~^^M
607.464
326rg~.2
$ 5,551,870 $ 5,448,534' $ 5,676,984 $
6,166,064 :
(a) Assumes a 60/0 Annuallncrease
(b)A.s~.u.rnEl!l a3% Annual Increase
r---~w'"
I
..Jc:) Ass~mes a 3,5% Annual Increase
_ .. ~f1l1exi:ltion~!!l~Y... ..=-
PROJECTION OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES FOR GENERAL GOVERf\JMENT SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
c:ityc:ommiliiSion ....
()ffic::e oft~~c:ityManager
. Financ~SLlee()r1:Services
1~~gClI
City C!!rIt..
Public.~afety .. .. .....
C()m mLlnity D~~eloPl11e nt
. Com 111 unity .~..~ rvi ces
r Non ,:...[:)!'If:1.Cl.r1:I11e n~I....... ..~.,
TOTAL PROJECTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES
'''GENERACG'OVERNMENTAL SERViCES
2004/05
.$
42,500 .
156,250
-~~~------' "",
65,000
o
3,386,904
439,
-~-"iF~~- 664,2
321,000
$
5,075,830 $
2005/06
2006/07
'~'1"
I
...."-cct.,.,,,
2007/081
$
2008/09
!
$
$
$
47,753
"_____n'n'n__nn_ ______"d
~~75,562 .
67,626
0:
.. .3,950,14~.:~.
503,725 1
760,446
369,230
5,425,901 $ 5,874,489 $
50,618 .
186,096
68,979
o
4,305,659
538,986
813,678
---"-~''''
396,923
5:f65s"1
19712621
. ....70:358..
o
""...,....,.....4'~~~:~f~
870,635 ;
426,69i1
45,050
165,625
66,300
O.
6,360,938 ; $ 6,802,372
::::"..1_,::::::
"""~~""'"" ''''''',,:'~" ~~^ "m"um'~:::"""'U
Annexation Study......
Fi\e.Year Projecti()~
2004/05
. TA[PRoJECTE: D AVAiLlAB LERE's60RCES
PROJECTED OPERATING EXPENDllURES
SUBTOTAL
:
m~~4^"
I
......... . .."
5,075,830 i
476,040
North East Dade Annexation Study
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
..= ..'r"~'
,~~Q.:~ ....~.5,44a,53;.(:.... $5'El!~;,~~J. $5,915,98~ .$6,1El~:
...,~ ,.
5,425,901
22,633
5,874,489 I" 6,360,938 . 6,802,372
(197,50?2L... (444,955) ....._(6~6,~08)
36
Exhibit C
Miami-Dade County Code Annexation Requirements
Any proposed boundary change desired by the governing body of a
municipality shall be initiated by resolution of such governing body adopted
after a public hearing held pursuant to written notice mailed to all owners of
property within the area and within six hundred (600) feet thereof in such
proposed boundary changes, according to the current tax assessment roll,
and pursuant to published notice; provided, however, that no notice shall be
required when all owners of property within the area and within six hundred
(600) feet thereof shall consent in writing to the proposed boundary change.
The cost of such notice shall be paid by the governing body of the
municipality. Three (3) duly certified copies of such resolution requesting the
proposed boundary changes, together with proof of compliance with the
notice requirements aforesaid, shall be filed with the Clerk of the County
Commission, and shall be accompanied by the following:
(A) An accurate legal description of the lands or land area involved in
such proposed boundary change.
(8) A map or survey sketch accurately showing the location of the area
involved, the existing boundaries of the municipality or municipalities
affected, and indicating the relation of the area involved to the existing
municipal boundaries.
(C) Certificate of the County Supervisor of Registration certifying that the
area involved in the proposed boundary change contains either more than
two hundred fifty (250) residents who are qualified electors, or less than two
hundred fifty (250) residents who are qualified electors.
(D) A brief statement setting forth the grounds or reasons for the
proposed boundary changes.
(E) In the event any municipality other than the municipality initiating the
proposed boundary change is materially affected thereby, a resolution of the
governing body of such affected municipality or municipalities consenting to
the proposed boundary changes shall be obtained and duly certified copy
thereof furnished to the Clerk of the County Commission.
(F) In addition to the foregoing, there shall be filed with the Clerk of the
County Commission the following information:
(1) Land use plan and zoning. The municipality shall present a general
land use plan and a map showing proposed zoning for the subject area
which, if annexed, will be enacted by the municipality. This information shall
be submitted regardless of size of area or state of existing development.
(2) List of services to be provided. In this section the municipality shall
describe in detail the character and amount of services which the
municipality would provide to the area if annexed. The discussion of service
levels shall take into account not only existing development but changes in
the character and extent of development which may be reasonably
anticipated in the near future based on the land use plan and zoning for the
area as submitted by the municipality in accordance with (1) above. The
North East Dade Annexation Study
37
statements pertaining to the various ser vices shall be set forth under the
headings listed below. The character and amount of services now being
received in the area sought for annexation shall be set forth for comparative
purposes.
(a) Police protection.
(b) Fire protection.
(c) Water supply and distribution.
(d) Facilities for the collection and treatment of sewage.
(e) Garbage and refuse collection and disposal.
(f) Street lighting.
(g) Street construction and maintenance.
(h) Park and recreation facilities and services.
(i) Building inspection.
0) Zoning administration.
(k) Local planning services.
(I) Special services not listed above.
(m) General government.
(3) Timetable for supplying the services listed above. For each of the
services listed the time schedule for the provision of that service shall be set
forth. The timetable shall be in terms of how soon after the annexation
ordinance is finally adopted will the service be provided. If changes in the
character and extent of the development in the area can reasonably be
anticipated, these changes shall be taken into account in the proposed
timetable.
(4) Financing of the services listed above. ~'or each of the services listed
above, estimates of the costs of providing, maintaining and operating the
service shall be set forth along with the methods used in making the
estimates. The sources of funds which the municipality would utilize in
providing, maintaining and operating the services listed shall be stated for
each service and the effect this will have on the remainder of the
municipality shall be analyzed.
(5) The tax load on the area to be annexed. This section of the report
shall discuss in narrative form, including estimated figures, the direct and
indirect tax revenue from the area sought for annexation after annexation
compared with the current period before annexation. Particularly this section
shall clearly and concisely appraise the tax impact on the property owners
and others residing and/or doing business in the area, and on those residing
and/or doing business within the municipality. Methods utilized in making
estimates contained in this section shall be fully and clearly set forth.
(G) Certificate of the Director of the Department of Planning and Zoning
certifying that in the Director's sole determination an area proposed for
annexation or separation having two hundred and fifty (250) or fewer
registered electors is more than fifty (50) percent developed residential. This
certification will determine whether an election of registered electors will be
required as provided in Section 20-9.
North East Dade Annexation Study
38
(H) A petition filed with the Clerk of the County Commission indicating the
consent of twenty-five (25) percent plus one (1) of the electors in the area
proposed for annexation provided however, no petition shall be required
where the property proposed for annexation is vacant or where there are
two hundred fifty (250) or less resident electors
Sec. 20-5. Initial consideration of proposed boundary changes.
The Clerk of the County Commission, upon receipt of a request for
boundary change filed in compliance with Section 20-3 or Section 20-4
hereof, shall cause such matter to be placed upon the official agenda of an
ensuing regular meeting of the County Commission, and shall notify the
person, group or municipality initiating the boundary change of the date of
the regular meeting at which such matter will be considered by the County
Commission. A representative of the petitioners or of such municipality, as
the case may be, may be heard briefly by the County Commission in
respect to the merits or propriety of the request for such boundary change.
The County Commission shall refer such proposed boundary change to the
County Planning Advisory Board for review, study, consideration and
recommendations.
Sec. 20-6. Consideration by Planning Advisory Board.
(a) The Planning Advisory Board, upon receipt of a petition or resolution
referred by the County Commission and the recommendation of the
Boundaries Commission, shall study, review and consider the request for
boundary changes embodied therein. The Planning Advisory Board, in its
discretion, may conduct a public hearing in respect to such proposed
boundary changes and hear from all interested persons; the Board may
require the petitioners or the municipality to furnish any additional
information, data or instruments deemed necessary or desirable for
consideration of such request. If the Planning Advisory Board conducts a
public hearing in respect to such proposed boundary changes, it shall give
written notice of such hearing to all owners of property within the area and
within six hundred (600) feet thereof. The cost of such notice shall be paid
by the individual, group or municipality initiating the proposed change.
Before the Planning Advisory Board studies and reviews the request, the
annexation report will be reviewed by the appropriate County personnel and
by the Boundaries Commission. The statements contained in the
annexation report pertaining to the quality, quantity, cost and timing of the
services the municipality will extend to the areas requested for annexation
will be reviewed by the appropriate County department to determine if the
services proposed are adequate. The statements pertaining to the financing
of the services and analysis of the tax load on the area to be annexed will
be reviewed by the Miami-Dade County Budget Officer. Upon completion of
these reviews, the entire application will be processed by the Boundaries
Commission and the Planning Advisory Board and then forwarded to the
County Manager's office for his review and recommendation prior to
submittal to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration.
North East Dade Annexation Study
39
(b) The Planning Advisory Board shall make written recommendations to
the County Commission concerning such proposed boundary changes.
Copies of such recommendations shall be filed with the Clerk of the County
Commission, and copies shall be mailed to a representative of the
petitioners or the municipality.
Sec. 20-7. Public hearing.
The Clerk of the County Commission, upon receipt of the recommendations
of the Planning Advisory Board and the Boundaries Commission, shall set
the matter of such proposed boundary changes for public hearing at a
regular meeting of the County Commission and cause notice of such public
hearing to be published in a daily newspaper of general circulation in Miami-
Dade County at least once not less than one (1) week prior to the date of
such public hearing. Notice of such public hearing shall be furnished to a
representative of the petitioner or the municipality initiating the proposed
boundary change and to all property owners within the area and within six
hundred (600) feet thereof. The cost of such notice shall be paid by the
individual, group or municipality initiating the proposed change. At such
public hearing, the County Commission shall review and consider the
recommendations of the Planning Advisory Board, and shall afford to all
interested persons an opportunity to be heard upon the merits and propriet y
of the proposed boundary changes.
(A) At the conclusion of the public hearing the Board of County
Commissioners, in evaluating the appropriateness of a petition for boundary
change shall consider the following guidelines:
(1) The suitability of the proposed boundaries, in conjunction with the
existing municipality, provide for a municipal community of interest that is
both cohesive and inclusive. The proposed annexation area should:
(a) Not divide a U.S. Census Designated Place, to the extent feasible.
(b) Include adjacent areas of ethnic minority and lower income residents
in which a majority of those residents have so petitioned.
(c) Have contiguity and not create any unincorporated enclave area(s).
An unincorporated enclave area is defined as an area that would be 1)
surrounded on more than eighty (80) percent of its boundary by one (1) or
more municipalities and 2) of a size that could not be serviced efficiently or
effectively.
(d) Have natural or built barriers as boundaries, to the extent feasible,
and
(2) The existing and proposed projected property tax cost for municipal-
level services to average homeowners in the area as currently
unincorporated and as included as part of the annexing municipality,
(3) The proposed annexation area is totally contained within the Urban
Development Boundary depicted on the future Land Use Plan map of the
Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan,
North East Dade Annexation Study
40
(4) The impact of the proposal on the revenue base of the unincorporated
area, and on the ability of the County to efficiently and effectively provide
services to adjacent remaining unincorporated areas,
(5) The financial impacts of the proposed boundary change on the
remaining unincorporated areas of Miami-Dade County. Specifically in order
to insure fiscal equity the per capita taxable property value of the proposed
annexation area should fall between twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00)
and forty-eight thousand dollars ($48,000.00) in order to assure that fiscal
viability is maintained in the unincorporated area. The range of per capita
taxable value shall not apply to the annexation of unincorporated enclave
areas that are surrounded by more than eighty (80) percent of their
boundary by one (1) or more municipalities and are of a size that can not be
served efficiently or effectively.
(6) Any other factor that arises by virtue of recommendations of the
Boundaries Commission, pursuant to Section 20-30 of the Code.
(7) Any other factor that arises by virtue of any special or unique
circumstances of a given area.
(B) At the conclusion of such public hearing, the County Commission, in
the exercise of its discretion, may deny the requested boundary change, by
motion, or may direct the County Attorney to prepare an appropriate
ordinance accomplishing the proposed boundary change, which ordinance
shall be placed on the official agenda of a subsequent regular meeting of
the County Commission for consideration and adoption on first reading, or
the County Commission may defer such requested boundary change for
further consider ation at a subsequent meeting, at which no public hearing
or discussion by others than members of the County Commission shall be
required.
Sec. 20-8.1. Retention of electric franchise revenues.
Any changes in the boundaries of municipalities involving the annexation of
unincorporated areas of the County shall be made subject to the provisions
of Ordinance No. 89-81 granting an electric franchise to the Florida Power &
Light Company, and shall be effective only upon the condition and with the
reservation herein stated that the County shall continue to collect and
receive all electric franchise revenues accruing within such annexed areas
from the effective date of Ordinance No. 89-81 during the full term of the
County franchise in the same manner as though such annexed areas
remained a part of the unincorporated areas of the County. Every ordinance
enacted to effectuate the annexation of unincorporated areas of the County
to a municipality shall expressly set forth such condition, unless the Board of
County Commissioners, for good cause, shall waive such condition by two-
thirds vote of the entire membership of the board
Sec. 20-8.2. Retention of all utility tax revenues.
Any changes in the boundaries of municipalities involving the annexation of
unincorporated areas of the County, and shall be effective only upon the
North East Dade Annexation Study
41
condition and with the reservation that the County shall forever continue to
collect and receive all utility tax revenues accruing within such annexed
areas in the same manner as though such annexed areas remained a part
of the unincorporated areas of the County. Every ordinance enacted to
effectuate the annexation of unincorporated areas of the County to a
municipality shall expressly set forth such condition.
Sec. 20-8.3. Retention of cigarette tax revenues.
Any changes in the boundaries of municipalities involving the annexation of
unincorporated areas of the County shall be made subject to the provisions
of Ordinance No. 69-7 [Sec. 29-2], imposing an excise tax on the retail sale
of cigarettes in the unincorporated area of Miami-Dade County pursuant to
the provisions of Article VIII, Section 6(f), Florida Constitution, and Section
210.03, Florida Statutes, and shall be effective only upon the condition and
with the reservation that the County shall continue t 0 collect and receive all
cigarette tax revenues accruing within such annexed areas in the same
manner as though such annexed areas remained a part of the
unincorporated areas of the County. Every ordinance enacted to effectuate
the annexation of unincorporated areas of the County to a municipality shall
expressly set forth such condition.
Sec. 20-8.4. Retention of garbage and refuse collection and disposal.
Any changes in the boundaries of municipalities involving the annexation of
unincorporated areas of the County shall be effective only upon the
condition and with the reservation that the County shall either forever
continue to collect and dispose of all residential waste in such annexation
areas in the same manner as though such annexed areas remained part of
the unincorporated areas of the County, unless the authority to collect such
waste is delegated by the County to the governing body of the municipality
throughout a twenty (20) year interlocal agrement which provides for
collection services, and a twenty (20) year interlocal agreement which
provides for disposal services in substantially the form approved by
Resolution No. R-1198-95. Every ordinance enacted to effectuate the
annexation of unincorporated areas of the County to a municipality shall
expressly set forth such condition.
Sec. 20-9. Election on proposed boundary changes; required.
(a) If a boundary change involves the annexation or separation of an area
having two hundred fifty (250) or fewer resident electors, and the area is
more than fifty (50) percent developed residential, no proposed boundary
change shall be accomplished unless a majority of resident electors voting
at such an election approve such boundary change. All costs of such
elections shall be paid in advance by the persons, group or municipality
initiating the proposed boundary change. If a boundary change involves the
annexation or separation of an area having two hundred fifty (250) or fewer
resident electors, and the area is less than fifty (50) percent developed
North East Dade Annexation Study
42
residential, the Commission may by ordinance effect the boundary change
in accordance with Section 5.04.B of the Home Rule Charter. The
determination of whether an area is more or less than fifty (50) percent
developed residential shall be made in the sole discretion of the Director of
the Department of Planning and Zoning.
(b) In the event that a boundary change involves the annexation or
separation of an area of which more than two hundred fifty (250) residents
are electors, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to Section
5.04(B) of the Home Rule Charter of Miami-Dade County, Florida, may call
an election to be held for the purpose of submitting to these electors the
question whether the proposed boundary change shall be approved or
disapproved. All costs of such elections shall be paid in advance by the
persons, group or municipality initiating the proposed boundary change.
)
':..
North East Dade Annexation Study
43
MAPA
I"
M. iaml.. - .~.e. C. O. unty
North East MAC
~c ."..... $;
I
~l~
I---
I---
..
ir-
t:Y 11 L-
,C::::l U~ ~
~'--R-~J
r ~: =!t::::J!::
~_ 1
~ ..'1 ").., I /
11m ~ ~ ,..~ \~v
~~"
I........-J
......---
'3 TE
~l
,j \
\ \ r
!>l?/,
Y'
~..
~<
\., '"
''\1
'\. l:r""..
'\. ~"
~~,
..'1--
=l~
a
< 1
\\ \ ~17SK8T
L 'I
_+,
Legend
B.-Mtt €au MAC eoma."Wy' /"'"."/ :M~R\:}:30
"":iIli:JH"1'<~ ^'-
North East Dade Annexation Study
l~
.'!j
~
~~--- '" '
44
lIT
)
11 \
" 11>;""
;l
?Ii
"St
I I I j
. , t.1 mJ';;J,.
~_"II<I""IIii><<"Iil!h:............l:llt.r-",
._~oii;
.,.~~.~
""",,'ll>>)
-I
-
-
....
h
~
"'"
~
L
-
Property tax-cut plan support wanes - 09/12/2007 - MiamiHerald.com
rag\; 1 VI ,
MiamiHera\d.com m
Posted on Wed, Sep. 12,2007
{1e1vl ~ I
~ -;>.a ~ 0 1
lD~rn~
-----
Property tax-cut plan support wanes
BY MARY ELLEN KLAS
Florida voters are growing so distrustful of government and its promises to lower property taxes and insurance
that support for a proposed constitutional amendment to create a supersized homestead exemption is dropping, a
new poll shows.
The Quinnipiac University poll released Tuesday shows that only 47 percent of Florida voters support the
proposal, down from a 57 percent approval rating in July, and far below the 60 percent threshold needed to
become law. Meanwhile, a growing number of voters oppose the measure -- 22 percent, up from the 17 percent
opposed to it in July.
"Supporters, however, can take some heart that there remains a strong desire for more tax cuts and not that much
sympathy for local government claims they can't lose the revenue," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the
Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
The declining popularity of the proposed amendment follows the arrival of property tax bills in the mail this
month that include tax cuts smaller than many homeowners expected when Gov. Charlie Crist and legislators
signed the bill in June and proclaimed it "the largest tax cut in state history."
Many cities and counties throughout the state voted to sidestep the deepest cuts and maintain local tax revenues
at current or slightly reduced levels by conducting extraordinary votes by their governing boards.
The declining poll numbers also took their toll on Crist, who enjoyed a record-high approval rating of?3 percent
in the July 19 Quinnipiac poll. This month, his approval rating slipped to 65 percent, with 49 percent of
respondents saying this year's property tax cut was not enough.
Crist said Tuesday the slide "just doesn't" concern him. "Sixty-five? IfI'm depressed about that there's
something wrong with me."
Fifty-five percent of respondents said Crist has kept his campaign promises, but most -- 62 percent -- were
skeptical that property taxes will come down significantly during his term as governor.
Most respondents, however, said they need to learn more, with 65 percent saying the property tax amendment
"could use a lot more explanation."
Brown noted that supporters of the tax-cut plan may benefit from the Democratic National Committee decision
to punish Democrats in the presidential primary. If fewer Democrats turn out to vote, he said, it could affect the
outcome because "Republicans like this tax-cut plan more than Democrats."
The poll surveyed 1,141 voters from Sept. 3 -9. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.
Miami Herald staff writer Gary Fineout contributed to this report.
cg 2007 Miami Herald Media Company. All Rights Reserved.
http://www.miamiherald.com
http://www.miamiherald.com/4 5 8/v -print/ story /234443 .html
9/19/2007
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM, City.
TO: City Commission
DATE: September 6, 2007
SUBJECT: Proposed Land Swap - 21300 Biscayne Boulevard
Stan Price, who represents Roy R. Lusting Trustee the owner of two frontage parcels of
vacant land at 214400 Biscayne Boulevard, presented a proposal to the City regarding
a land swap of the City owned land at 213000 Biscayne Boulevard. The owner is willing
to trade a portion of the Lustig piece with the City in exchange for the City's parcel
located at 21300 Biscayne Boulevard under the following terms and conditions:
1. Pay the City of Aventura $1,500,000;
2. Dedicate a portion of the Lustig piece to the City of Aventura to allow for the
construction of NE 213th Street to be extended west of Biscayne Blvd. (US-1)
as a five-lane street. It is assumed that the City of Aventura has alread~
dedicated the remaining portion of the property necessary to extend NE 213
Street west from Biscayne Blvd. (US-1) to NE 29th Court from property
already owned by the City;
3. Roy R. Lustig, Trustee will pay for and construct the new street, NE 213th
Street, between Biscayne Blvd (US-1) and NE 29th Court. Construction will
commence within three years or upon the issuance of building permits for
construction on either the City piece or the remaining portion of the Lustig
piece, whichever is sooner;
4. The foregoing shall be subject to the execution of an acceptable contract
which shall include among other items the date of closing, etc;
5. It is Lustig's estimate that the market value of the portion of the Lustig piece
to be dedicated to the City of Aventura for construction of NE 213th Street
could be as much as $1,000,000;
6. It is Lustig's estimate that the approximate cost to him, for the construction of
the new NE 213th Street could be as much as $250,000.
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposal and it is his opinion that the City
Commission has the discretion to engage in the proposed land exchange in lieu of
again placing the City parcel out to bid, if so desired, so long as each of the
following conditions are met:
1. The City Commission by Resolution declares the City parcel to be surplus as
no longer needed by the City as required by City Code Sec. 2-258. This has
already been adopted.
2. That the Contract for the property exchange is approved by Ordinance as
required by City Charter Sec. 4.03 (7)
3. That a simple appraisal, at the cost to the buyer, should be obtained so that
the value of the parcel to be conveyed to the City is satisfactorily
documented.
I have placed this matter on the Workshop Agenda for discussion and direction from the
City Commission.
EMS/act
SITE SKETCH
fI1 CRAVEN -THOMPSON a ASSOCIATES. INC.
~ ENGINEERS · PlANNERS · SURVEYORS
IiJI(; 3563 N,,*, 5~ STREEt I'ClRT L.6.U'ERliAlE, FlORIDA 3330!l (1l54) 739-6400
,IIY.: (9~) 730-G4OO
~~~~~ ft~~=~~~~~
.., ....... 1'1'''1*''1, '" _at. .. 10 """""tb1 _ to, .............
_..~..._.~
SKETCH TO ACCOUPANY DESCRIPTION
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
&'
~~
~/.
f!r$~l~
.n',} ~~~~7
~~~:$~
.J" ,
;
~ H~"IJ'1'
~
I) 20 40
L . j
SCAlE 1'..40'
fl
I 5
I
it
i~
~t
lit
~
'~,
nl;(1(J'
}IE. 213 SlRf::1:r
SOtftIf ~ V!1r ,
POfNT OF COfIftIE.'HCDIET
INIFI'/!EC1KJH :rtXfM ~y
J.IJf f AI'fP IU1' RfQfr OF llilty
M'6l1i11!' IItJtAIV#tf)
lA'CII 1tS O1i!d/or RE'llSlONS DArt
SHEET :I Of 2 SHEETS
ill' (K'l) !I9l1 ",. _,_ ... atA_",....._ .. _1'1:$. lie:. -...
~::.r.. ':.:::.. "=~= .r.=.,.. to
_..--.. ....;::.:. .... _. .. "". 11>'-' .. ul lor..
...... ...It.... _ __ _... ""'*'''''.... _..,._
....... """,pr- - ..,.".,...
~'-: =- _ _......_ lot ~.!_...;.Iot
C, \:lMf\OTOf O.l\flM'l\sn-N€ 2T3 Sf l'IfDICA JION'.DUIG
OlEClCEO 1rI': .NIl ',Lilli/!' PG.H/A DIllED, O'/lll!OS
.leu NO.: 01-<<1103
l)ItA~ (N: E:iKl
R-O-W Dedication
Subject Parcel
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM, Cit
TO: City Commission
DATE: September 14,2007
SUBJECT: Proposed Library Agreement
Attached hereto is the draft of the Library Interlocal Agreement between the City and
Miami - Dade County. This item will appear on the October meeting agenda for the City
and County. As you are aware the City will be responsible for the design and
construction of the reconstruction of the County Library branch located at 2930
Aventura Boulevard. The purpose of the Agreement is to outline the responsibilities of
both parties.
The fo:lowing is an outline of the major points contained in the Agreement:
1. The City, in conjunction with the County, will design the proposed 26,000 square
feet library facility. The City will obtain the County's approval of the design of the
Library prior to proceeding with construction of the combined facility.
2. The County and the City agree to design and build a multi-use facility to include
the Northeast Branch Library and a Performing Arts Center in the same
boundaries. The total design, construction, furniture, fixtures, infrastructure and
operational costs for the Performing Arts Center shall be borne solely by the City.
3. The City shall not commence construction of the Library Building without first
obtaining the County's written approval of the site plan and exterior plan of the
Library Building.
4. The County shall provide and install all additional lighting, furniture, shelving,
books, window treatments, supplies, and equipment, including computer
equipment, for the Library Building, and shall have full discretion in the selection
and approval thereof.
5. The County shall be responsible for full maintenance and repair of the interior of
the Library Building, the Library's parking facility, all exterior electricity and
lighting fixtures, all landscaping of the Library, and all exterior maintenance or
repair , any structural maintenance or repair, including the roof, for the Library
Building.
6. County will provide up to $12.5 million for demolition of existing building, capital
development of the Library Building, including site plan, design, architectural and
engineering services, and construction of the building and landscaping and
parking. The County will provide up to 5% of the funds in the form of advance
payment, to be made within thirty (30) days of the City's selection of the project
Architect. Thereafter, the County will provide payment to the City on a
reimbursement basis.
7. The City agrees to abide by the Administrative Rules of the Building Better
Communities General Obligation Bond Program.
8. Miami-Dade County Public Library System will operate the library and will pay the
full yearly operating costs. The Library and the City agree that the Library will
commence operations ninety days after a certificate of occupancy is issued for
the Library Building. The County reserves the right not commence operation of
the library within the above stated time if budgetary constraints prohibit the
Library System from funding operational costs.
9. The terms of this Interlocal Agreement shall continue unless written notice is
given by either party to the other at least six (6) months in advance of the date of
the year in which the Library is proposed to be or the Agreement is proposed to
be terminated. In the event the County terminates this Interlocal Agreement
before original term expires, the County shall provide the City with a payment
equal to the balance needed to payoff the City's design and/or construction
debt.
10. The City shall set aside appropriate funding for the Art in Public Places Program,
as set forth in section 2-11.15 of the Code of Miami-Dade County. The funding
allocated for the Art in Public Places Program is equal to 1.5 % of the capital
commitment amount. The City will be allowed to utilize the amount necessary to
comply with section 2-11.15 out of the capital commitment portion.
11. At the completion of the design development of the Library with the adjoining
Performing Arts Center, the County will develop an amendment to this Interlocal
Agreement detailing all parties' duties and responsibilities that will be presented
to the respective Governing Bodies. This Amendment shall include a guarantee
or lease to the City for the premises upon which the PAC shall be constructed for
a period of ninety-nine (99) years at a maximum sum of Ten (10) Dollars a year.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
EMS/
DRAFT
LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
This Library Interlocal Agreement ("Agreement") is executed by and
between the City of Aventura, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida (the
"City") and Miami-Dade County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
(the "County" or the "Library") (collectively, "Parties"), and is entered into this
day of, 2007 (the "Agreement").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Hurricane Wilma destroyed the roof of the Northeast Library
located at 2930 A ventura Boulevard and caused severe damage to the inside of the
building, making it difficult to rehabilitate the existing facility; and
WHEREAS, the County, desires to reconstruct the Northeast Library
Building at the existing library location and continue to provide Library Service to
the City of Aventura which is part of the Miami-Dade Public Library Taxing
District; and
WHEREAS, the reconstructed Library branch would be a maximum of
26,000 square feet to be located at 2930 A ventura Boulevard, A ventura, Florida
33180
In consideration of mutual covenants contained herein the Parties agree as
follows:
1. Desie:n and Construction of the Library Buildine:
A. The City in conjunction with the County will design the library
facility. The City will obtain the County's approval of the design of the
Library prior to proceeding with construction of the combined facility.
B. The City shall reconstruct for the County a facility of approximately,
26,000 contiguous square feet for use as a branch Library of the
Miami-Dade Public Library System.
City
County
Page 1 of 10
DRAFT
C. The County and the City agree to design and build a multi-use facility to
include the Northeast Branch Library and a Performing Arts Center in the
same boundaries. The total design, construction furniture, fixtures,
infrastructure and operational costs for the Performing Arts Center shall be
borne solely by the City.
2. Oblie:ations of the City
A. Construction. The City shall reconstruct the Library Building, as
further described in this Section, to be approximately 26,000 contiguous
square feet within which Miami-Dade Public Library System shall resume
operation of the Northeast branch Library, subject to the conditions set
forth herein. The City shall not commence construction of the Library
Building without first obtaining the County's written approval of the site
plan and exterior plan of the Library Building, which approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. The City agrees to construct the Library Building
consistent with the requirements of federal, state, and local law, including
but not limited to the requirements contained in the Florida Building Code
and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
B. Interior. The City agrees to fully construct, partition, and prepare the
interior of the Library Building in accordance with the plans and
specifications prepared and approved by the County and the City. The
City further agrees to turn over to the County the Library Building ready
for immediate occupancy, and for equipping by the County as is more
fully set out in this Section. In order to minimize unnecessary costs of
construction, the County agrees to submit to the City an Interior Design
Plan, which shall include all necessary interior design information for
the City so that the City shall meet the following requirements:
1. fully partition, and paint the interior of the Library Building;
2. furnish and install all interior doors and interior finishes;
3. furnish and install a finished ceiling, including all overhead
lighting fixtures;
4. furnish and install an independent fully functional HV AC air
conditioning system for the Library Building;
City
County
Page 2 of 10
DRAFT
5. furnish and install all safety devices required by the Florida
Building Code or other applicable laws, rules, or regulations,
including but not limited to: all fire alarms, sprinkler systems,
fire extinguishers, and exit signs;
6. furnish and install wiring needed by the Library Building for
electric, data communication and connectivity to the
Library's Wide Area Network, telephone, and cable service;
7. furnish and install a separate electric and water use meters for
the Library Building;
8. furnish and install a burglar alarm system at the Library
Building;
9. allow for the installation of an exterior freestanding book
drop at a location that is mutually agreeable to the parties.
10. provide dimensioned floor patterns and tile patterns
(including floor treatments), as required.
C. The City shall submit construction documents of the Library
Building for County review and approval at 25%, 50%, 75% and
100% completion. The County shall review and provide relevant
comments on the plans within 21 business days of each submittal
(25%, 50%, 75 %, and 100%). The City shall undertake the interior
improvements described in Section 2( c) only upon submission by the
County, in writing, of its design plan for the interior space ("Interior
Design Plan"). It is expressly understood that any interior
construction reasonably required for the operation of the Library
Building contained in the Interior Design Plan but not specifically
identified in this Section or Section 3 below shall be the sole
responsibility of the City.
3. County's Oblie:ations.
Design Plan. The County agrees to submit its Interior Design Plan to the
City for approval no later than thirty (30) days following receipt of the 25%
construction documents for the Library Building, as described in Section 2
(C) above. The City's approval of the Interior Design Plan shall not be
unreasonably withheld. Disapproval of the Interior Design Plan may be
based upon fiscal or financial considerations and not aesthetic
considerations. Any reasonable additional costs relating to the County's
failure to submit the complete Interior Design Plan contemplated by Section
City
County
Page 3 of 10
DRAFT
2 and 3 of this Agreement shall be borne by the County. The Interior
Design Plan shall include the specifications delineated in Section 2 (B)
above.
4. Furniture. Supplies & Equipment
The County shall provide and install all additional lighting, furniture,
shelving, books, window treatments, supplies, and equipment, including
computer equipment, for the Library Building, and shall have full discretion
in the selection and approval thereof.
5. Maintenance
The County shall be responsible for full maintenance and repair of the
interior of the Library Building, including the maintenance and repair of all
flooring, wiring, or other interior construction furnished and/or installed by
the City under Section 2 after the warranty period has expired. The County
shall be responsible for maintaining the HV AC unites) after the warranty
period on the HV AC unites) has expired. The City shall not be responsible
for any interior maintenance or repair to the Library Building except that
except that the City shall use its best efforts to require that all warranty
services are provided by the respective contractor or vendor. The County
shall be responsible for any non- warranty items.
The County shall be responsible for maintaining and repairing the Library's
parking facility, all exterior electricity and lighting fixtures, all landscaping
of the Library, and all exterior maintenance or repair , any structural
maintenance or repair, including the roof, for the Library Building.
The County shall be responsible for all utilities consumed by the County.
The County shall provide its own janitorial and custodial services to serve
the needs of the Library Building. The County and the City may enter into
a Supplemental Service Agreement to address the provision of additional
services, such as security or landscaping.
6. Capital Commitment
City
County
Page 4 of 10
DRAFT
A. In consideration for the City's agreement to construct the Library
Building the County will provide up to $12.5 million dollars for
demolition of existing building, capital development of the
Library Building, including site plan, design, architectural and
engineering services, and construction of the building and
landscaping and parking (the "Capital Development Maximum
Contribution").
B. The County will provide up to 5% of the Capital Development
Maximum Contribution in the fonn of advance payment, to be
made within thirty (30) days of the City's selection of the project
Architect. Thereafter, the County will provide payment to the
City on a reimbursement basis (the "reimbursement requests").
C. The City agrees to abide by the Administrative Rules of the
Building Better Communities General Obligation Bond Program.
D. In no event, shall County funds be advanced directly to any
subcontractor.
E. The County shall not be held responsible for any additional design
or construction change orders initiated by the City due to design
omission changes, design error changes, regulatory changes,
and/ot unforeseen/unforeseeable changes. The County retains the
right to initiate change orders as needed to enhance the Library
portion of the project, which shall be funded separately from the
above aforementioned $12 million.
7. Operation.
A. Miami-Dade County Public Library System will operate the library and
will pay the full yearly operating costs. The Library and the City agree that
the Library will commence operations ninety days after a certificate of
occupancy is issued for the Library Building and acceptance of the Library
Building by the County. During said ninety (90) day period, the Library
will hire staff; install shelving and purchase and install library materials and
City
County
Page 5 of 10
DRAFT
equipment. The Library reserves the right not commence operation of the
library within the above stated time if budgetary constraints prohibit the
Library System from funding operational costs.
C. The Library reserves the right to establish and amend the operating
hours of the branch Library as needed, and such hours may be changed at
the sole option of the County without formal amendment of this Interlocal
Agreement. The library branch will be operated in accordance with all rules
and regulations of the Miami-Dade Public Library System. In addition, the
Miami-Dade Public Library System will have control of all operation, use
and programming with regards to this library branch.
D. The City shall ensure the County's quiet enjoyment of the Library
Building as related to any City use or activities.
8. Rie:ht to Cancel.
The terms of this Interlocal Agreement shall continue unless written notice
is given by either party to the other at least six (6) months in advance of the
date of the year in which the Library is proposed to be or the Agreement is
proposed to be terminated. The County Manager and the City Manager
shall have the authority to cancel this Agreement in the name of the County
and the City respectively as provided herein, upon approval by their
respective governing body. The party that chooses to terminate this
Agreement shall be responsible for paying the reasonable and direct costs
and expenses incurred by the other party as a result of the termination. At
the conclusion of this Interlocal Agreement, the contents of the Library
Building shall remain the property of the County. In the event the County
terminates this Interlocal Agreement before original term expires, the
County shall provide the City with a payment equal to the balance needed
to pay off the City's design and/or construction debt.
9. Indemnification.
The County shall indemnifY and hold harmless the City to the extent and
within the limitations of Section 768.28, Fla. Stat., subject to the provisions
City
County
Page 6 of 10
DRAFT
of the Statute whereby the County shall not be held liable to pay a personal
injury or property damage claim or judgment by anyone person which
exceeds the sum of $100,000, or any claim or judgments or portions
thereof, which, when totaled with all other occurrences, exceeds the sum of
$200,000, from any and all personal injury or property damage claims,
liabilities, losses, and causes of action which may arise solely as a result of
the negligence of the County.
The City shall indemnify and hold harmless the County to the extent and
within the limitations of Section 768.28, Fla. Stat., subject to the provisions
of the Statute whereby the City shall not be held liable to pay a personal
injury or property damage claim or judgment by anyone person which
exceeds the sum of $100,000, or any claim or judgments or portions
thereof, which, when totaled with all other occurrences, exceeds the sum of
$200,000, from any and all personal injury or property damage claims,
liabilities, losses, and causes of action which may arise solely as a result of
the negligence of the City.
10. Librarv Access.
It is agreed that the completed Library Building shall be open to use by all
County residents, regardless of residency within the City
11. N amine: and Sie:nae:e.
Upon completion, the Library Building shall be named "Miami-Dade
Public Library System Northeast Branch." The County shall provide and
the City shall allow signage that is in accordance with County branding
standards for signage at Library facilities.
12. Prohibited Use of Funds.
The City shall not utilize funds provided under this Agreement to retain
legal counsel for any action or proceeding against the County or any of its
agents, instrumentalities, employees or officials.
13. Compliance with Laws.
City
County
Page 7 of 10
DRAFT
The City agrees to abide by and be governed by Miami-Dade County
Ordinance No. 72-82 (Conflict of Interest Ordinance codified at Section 2-
11.1 et al. of the Code of Miami-Dade County), as amended, which is
incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein, in connection
with its contract obligations hereunder.
The City agrees to abide by and be governed by all applicable federal, state,
and local laws, including but not limited to the Americans with Disabilities
Act The City shall set aside appropriate funding for the Art in Public
Places Program, as set forth in section 2-11.15 of the Code of Miami-Dade
County. The funding allocated for the Art in Public Places Program is equal
to 1.5 % of the capital commitment amount. The City will be allowed to
utilize the amount necessary to comply with section 2-11.15 out of the
capital commitment portion.
14 . Notices.
It is expressly understood that the Library Director and the City Manager
have the authority to make submissions and provide approvals as required
under this Agreement. It is understood and agreed between the Parties that
written notice addressed to the following at the addresses shown shall
constitute sufficient notice under this Agreement:
To the Library Department:
Raymond Santiago, Director
c/o Miami-Dade County
Library Department
101 W. Flagler Street
Miami, Florida 33130
To City:
Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM
City Manager
City of A ventura
19200 West Country Club Drive
Aventura, F133180
City
County
Page 8 of 10
DRAFT
15. Autonomv.
The Parties agree that this Agreement recognizes the autonomy of, and
stipulates or implies no affiliation between, the contracting Parties. It is
expressly understood that the City is not an agent or instrumentality of the
County. Furthermore, the City's agents and employees are not agents or
employees of the County as a result of this Agreement.
16. Entirety of Aereement.
The Parties agree that this Agreement and Exhibits hereto set forth the
entire agreement between the Parties, with respect to the development and
use of the Library Building between the County from the City, and in that
regard there are no promises or understandings other than those stated in
this Agreement. None of the provisions, terms and conditions contained in
this Interlocal Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or
otherwise altered, except by the County Manager and City Manager, or
where appropriate the Board of County Commissioners and the City
Commission.
At the completion of the design development of the Library with the
adjoining Performing Arts Center!, the County will develop an amendment
to this Interlocal Agreement detailing all parties' duties and responsibilities
that will be presented to the respective Governing Bodies. This
Amendment shall include a guarantee or lease to the City for the premises
upon which the PAC shall be constructed for a period of ninety-nine (99)
years at a maximum sum ofTen (10) Dollars a year.
17. Amendments.
Any amendments to this Agreement must be effected in writing.
18. Force Maieure
Neither Party shall have any liability to the other hereunder by reason of
any delay or failure to perform any obligation or covenant if the delay or
failure to perform is occasioned by force majeure, meaning any act of God,
City
County
Page 9 of 10
DRAFT
storm, fire, casualty, unanticipated work stoppage, strike, lockout, labor
dispute, civil disturbance, riot, war, national emergency, act of government,
act of public enemy, or other cause of similar or dissimilar nature beyond
its reasonable control during the period of such force majeure.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands and
affixed their respective seals the day and year first above written.
City of A ventura
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
By:
Eric M. Soroka, ICMA, CM
City Manager
David Wolpin, Esq. City Attorney
Attest
Teresa M. Soroka, MMC
City Clerk
Miami-Dade County
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency:
George M. Burgess
County Manager
Diamela del Castillo
Assistant County Attorney
City
County
Page 10 of 10
CITY OF AVENTURA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
BY Joanne Carr, AIC
Planning Director
TO: City Commission
FROM: Eric M. Soroka,
City Manager
DATE: September 11, 2007
SUBJECT: Addition of Education Element to City of Aventura
Comprehensive Plan
In 2005, the Florida Legislature mandated that public school concurrency be adopted
by all Florida school boards, counties and non-exempt municipalities by the end of
2008. See, Sections 163.3177(12)(i) and 163.3180(13), Florida Statutes. "School
concurrency" means that public school facilities will be required to be in place at the
time that the impacts of residential development are felt, similar to the existing
concurrency requirements for water, sewer, roads, drainage, parks and recreation
and other public facilities. Public school concurrency will be tested at the time of
subdivision or site plan approval (or functional equivalent), and is a function of the
size, type and location of the residential development. School concurrency will
replace the voluntary mitigation policy that the Miami-Dade County School Board has
been applying for the past several years.
City staff has been working with the staffs of the School Board, Miami-Dade County
and other non-exempt municipalities for over a year to advise the School
Concurrency Task Force and develop the Comprehensive Plan amendments that
are necessary to implement public school concurrency. In order to implement public
school concurrency, the City is required to adopt a new element in the
Comprehensive Plan called the Education Element and amend the Capital
Improvement and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements to include policies that
support the new element. In addition to the plan amendments required by State
statute, City staff is proposing new Comprehensive Plan policies relating to the
Aventura City of Excellence School ("ACES"), the City's municipal charter school.
Based on the data and analysis supporting the proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments, the proposed level of service (LOS) standard for all County public
school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH)
Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). The Florida Inventory of School Houses
1
(FISH) is a state report containing an estimate of the capacity of all public school
facilities in the state. This LOS standard is measured by and applicable in each
public school concurrency service area (CSA) , which is defined as the public school
attendance boundary established by the Miami-Dade County Public Schools for each
school. The intent is to revisit the LOS standard after the full implementation of the
class-size reduction constitutional amendment in 2010, and determine whether it
would be financially feasible to change it to 100% utilization of permanent Florida
Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity (Without Relocatable Classrooms).
Pursuant to state law and the Department of Community Affairs' schedule, public
school concurrency is required to become effective in the County by January 1, 2008.
Therefore, effective January 1, 2008, the City will require all residential subdivision
approvals and site plans that are neither exempt nor vested to undergo public school
concurrency review.
Each such new development in the City will be reviewed by the School Board to
determine if there is capacity available at the affected schools (elementary, middle
and high school) or at contiguous schools. A credit will be provided against the
impact of proposed development for the districtwide capacity of those charter and
magnet schools that are not operating over 100% FISH capacity. Together, charter
and magnet schools, currently represent a combined total of 7% of the district
enrollment. If capacity is not available for the development, then the applicant will be
invited to propose proportionate share mitigation. If the proposal is acceptable, it
must be implemented via a tri-party agreement with the applicant, the City and the
School Board. If not, the development could end up being delayed or denied due to
the lack of school capacity.
City staff has included policies in our proposed Education Element to support a
request made by staff to the School Board to allow proportionate share mitigation to
be paid to the City rather than the School Board to support our charter school. To
date, School Board staff has advised that they will not recommend the City's request.
A request for all charter schools to be eligible for proportionate share mitigation has
been made by the Builders Association of South Florida, and this request is being
considered by a sub-committee of the School Concurrency Task Force. If this
request is accepted, ACES would be eligible for mitigation. Even if a more limited
version of this request is accepted, it could be tailored to make ACES eligible. At this
point, the City Commission may need to intervene in this matter.
The new Level of Service (LOS) standards and other new procedures, policies and
requirements contained in this Education Element will be incorporated, where
appropriate, into the existing Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning
between the School Board, the County and Miami-Dade municipalities. The draft of
the revised agreement will be transmitted with the Education Element, as supportive
data and analysis. At the time the Education Element is being considered for
adoption, the Agreement will be presented to City Commission for approval.
2
The City Attorney's office will be making a presentation on this report.
3
Add a new Education Element to the City of Aventura Comprehensive
Plan, as follows:
EDUCATION ELEMENT
EDUCA liON GOAL
Develop, operate and maintain a system of public education in co-operation with Miami-Dade
County Public Schools and other appropriate governmental agencies, which will strive to improve
the quality and quantity of public educational facilities available to the citizenry of the City of
Aventura.
OBJECTIVE 1
Work towards the reduction of the overcrowding which currently exists in Miami-Dade County
Public Schools, while striving to attain an optimum level of service pursuant to Objective 2. Work in
co-operation with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and other appropriate governmental
agencies to provide additional solutions to overcrowding so that countywide enrollment in Miami-
Dade County's public schools will meet state requirements for class size by September 1, 2010.
Measure: Annual review by Miami-Dade County Public Schools to compare official enrollment of
the school system with the number of student stations available to determine the current operating
level of service.
Policy 1.1
Continue to work with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in its efforts to continue to provide new
permanent student stations.
Policy 1.2
Continue to work with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in the City's efforts to operate, maintain
and expand alternative educational facilities to relieve overcrowding at public schools, in so far as
funding and rules permit.
Policy 1.3
Cooperate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in their efforts to maintain and/or improve the
established level of service (LOS) standards, for Public Educational Facilities, as established for
the purposes of public school concurrency.
Policy 1.4
Miami-Dade County Public Schools' comments shall be sought and considered on comprehensive
plan amendments and other land use and zoning decisions which will increase residential density,
in order to be consistent with the terms of the state mandated Interlocal Agreement pursuant to
Sections 1013.33, 163.3174 and 163.31777, Florida Statutes.
OBJECTIVE 2
The City shall coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school
facilities consistent with the adopted level of service standards (LOS) for public school
concurrency.
Measure: Annual review, in cooperation with all parties to the Interlocal Agreement for Public
School Facility Planning, of the latest adopted Miami-Dade County Public Schools Facility Work
Program to determine if the adopted concurrency level of service standards are being met.
Policy 2.1
Upon public school concurrency becoming effective, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard
for all Miami-Dade County public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School
Houses (FISH) Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard shall be applicable in
each public school concurrency service, area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance
boundary established by Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
All public school facilities should continue to maintain or decrease their percent utilization of FISH
capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of
Permanent FISH capacity (No Relocatable Classrooms) should no longer utilize relocatable
classrooms except as an operational solution.
Level of Service standards for public school facilities shall apply to those traditional educational
facilities, owned and operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools, that are required to serve
the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. Level of Service
standards do not apply to magnet schools, charter schools and other educational facilities that
may have districtwide attendance boundaries; however, their capacity is credited against the
impact of development. No credit against the impact of development shall be given for such
districtwide educational facilities if their enrollment is at, or above, 100% FISH capacity (with
Relocatable Classrooms).
Relocatable classrooms may be used by Miami-Dade County Public Schools as an operational
solution to achieve the level of service standard during replacement, remodeling, renovation or
expansion of a public school facility; and in the event of a disaster or emergency which prevents
the School Board from using a portion of the affected school facility.
Policy 2.2
If demonstrated to be feasible, Miami-Dade County Public Schools and the City of Aventura will
strive for all public school facilities to achieve 100% utilization of Permanent FISH (No Relocatable
Classrooms) capacity by January 1, 2018. To this end, beginning January 1, 2013 the Miami-Dade
County Public Schools should not use relocatable classrooms to provide additional FISH capacity
at any school except as an operational solution. Additionally, if feasible, beginning January 1, 2013
the Miami-Dade County Public Schools will implement a schedule to eliminate all remaining
relocatable classrooms by January 1, 2018.
By December 2010, the City in cooperation with Miami-Dade County Public Schools will assess
the viability of modifying the adopted LOS standard to 100% utilization of Permanent FISH for all
CSAs.
Policy 2.3
In the event the adopted LOS standard of a CSA cannot be met as a result of a proposed
development's impact, the development may proceed provided at least one of the following
conditions is met:
a) The development's impact can be shifted to one or more contiguous CSAs that have available
capacity and is located, either in whole or in part, within the same Educational Impact Fee Benefit
District as the proposed development; or
b) The development's impact is mitigated, proportionate to the demand for public schools it
created, through a combination of one or more appropriate proportionate share mitigation options,
as defined in Section 163.3180 (13)( e) 1, Florida Statutes, which shall be enforced by a legally
binding agreement with the City and Miami-Dade County Public Schools; or
c) The development's impacts are phased to occur when sufficient capacity will be available.
If none of the above conditions is met, the development shall not be approved.
OBJECTIVE 3
Obtain suitable sites for the development and expansion of public school facilities.
Measure: Annual inventory and assessment by Miami-Dade Public County Schools of its property.
Policy 3.1
In the selection of sites for future educational facility development, the City encourages Miami-
Dade County Public Schools to consider whether a school is in close proximity to residential areas
and is in a location that would provide a logical focal point for community activities.
Policy 3.2
Where possible, Miami-Dade County Public Schools should seek sites which are adjacent to
existing or planned public recreation areas, community centers, libraries, or other compatible civic
uses for the purpose of encouraging joint use facilities or the creation of logical
focal points for community activity.
Policy 3.3
When considering a site for possible use as a school facility, Miami-Dade County Public Schools
should review the adequacy and proximity of other public facilities and services necessary to the
site such as roadway access, transportation, fire flow and portable water, sanitary sewers,
drainage, solid waste, police and fire services, and means by which to assure safe access to
schools, including sidewalks, bicycle paths, turn lanes, and signalization.
Policy 3.4
When considering a site for possible use as an educational facility Miami-Dade County Public
Schools should consider whether the present and projected surrounding land uses are compatible
with the operation of an educational facility.
Policy 3.5
The City of Aventura shall continue to cooperate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools in
utilizing Miami-Dade County Public Schools as emergency shelters during emergencies.
OBJECTIVE 4
Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the City and other appropriate jurisdictions shall establish and
implement mechanism(s) for on-going coordination and communication to ensure the adequate
provision of public school facilities.
Measure: Number of coordination and communication mechanisms, including Interlocal
Agreements, established and implemented.
Policy 4.1
The City shall coordinate and cooperate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools, the County, the
State and other appropriate agencies to develop or modify rules and regulations in order to
simplify and expedite proposed new educational facility developments and renovations.
Policy 4.2
The location of future school facilities should occur where capacity of other public facilities and
services is available to accommodate the infrastructure needs of the school facility.
Policy 4.3
Miami-Dade County Public Schools should coordinate school capital improvement plans with the
planned capital improvement projects of the City and other County and municipal agencies.
Policy 4.4
The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and the County to provide for
pedestrian and traffic safety in the area of schools and signalization for school facilities.
Policy 4.5
The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade County Public Schools and the County to annually
review this Element and make amendments if necessary.
OBJECTIVE 5
The City shall continue to operate and maintain the municipally-owned Aventura City of Excellence
School (ACES).
Measure: Continued operation and maintenance of the Aventura City of Excellence School
(ACES).
Policy 5.1
The City and Miami-Dade County Public Schools shall follow the procedures established in the
adopted Charter School Contract, as amended from time to time, for operation, maintenance and
funding of the Aventura City of Excellence School, which school is built to SREF standards of the
Florida Building Code.
Policy 5.2
The mission of the School is to provide the residents of the City of Aventura an educational choice
for their children within the City limits while alleviating some of the County's growing educational
needs. The school will serve students in Grades Kindergarten through Eight.
Policy 5.3
The City shall consider a proposal for proportionate share mitigation that provides improvement for
ACES, if the development is located within the City.
Policy 5.4
The Level of Service (LOS) standard of Policy 2.1 of this Element is hereby adopted as the LOS
standard for ACES.
Policy 5.5
The City shall use Florida Department of Education design criteria to calculate the capacity of
ACES.
Policy 5.6
The City shall strive to enroll a student population of 100% of the capacity in the adopted Charter
School Contract for ACES.
Education Element Map Series
Consistent with Section 163.3177(12)(g), Florida Statutes, maps showing existing and future
conditions are included in the element. A map series - Figures 1 Band 2B - has been included
which indicates the location of existing and proposed public schools and ancillary facilities over the
5-year planning period. This map series was prepared by Miami-Dade County and is included,
along with maps for existing and proposed public schools in four areas of the County that are
generally equivalent to the proposed Educational Impact Fee Benefit District, in the County's
Education Element. The map has been revised by the City of Aventura to show the location of the
Aventura City of Excellence School (ACES).
Map locations of future public school facilities are general and do not prescribe a land use on a
particular parcel of land.
Figure 1 B - Existing Educational and Ancillary Facilities
Located in the Northeast Area - 2007
Revised to show Aventura City of Excellence School
Figure 2B - Proposed Education and Ancillary Facilities
Located in the Northeast Area - 2012/13
Figure 1 B - Existing Educational and Ancillary Facilities
Located in the Northeast Area - 2007
G~~~~
CAROL
CITYES
...
G~~~~~
PARKV1E\N
PA ~~. ~S
DR MICHAEL
M KRlf"5H
FLORIDA TP
SKYW<Y
~
NORTH
COUNTY ES
...
~
CHARLES DAVID
WYCHE JR ES....
MIAMI
GA~NSESH~RK~~S BRr
LAKE CAROL . ~
STE~~ Es;.'o/fiS MS CITY hiS MIACITY -:Ol
TRANSPORTATION
J~~U~:"~:~~~R~I'>HER NORTH
SR 82 EX
~E ~~~~;
GlADES S ...
OPA LOCKA EX
BENJAMIN
FRANKLIN ES
...
'"
01
m
><
z
~
...
HUBERT 0
SIBLEY ES
N
...,
-l
:c
~
. HORACE
Mll.NN MS
N
I
Miles
112TH HY
... Elementary
. K-8 Center
. Middle eAventura City of
Excellence
* Senior Charter School
+ Other Educational Facilities
. Ancillary Facilities
Major Highways
Northeast Benefit District
'"
I\)
13
Figure 2B - Proposed Educational and Ancillary Facilities
Located in the Northeast Area - 2012/2013
NORTH GLPOE EsA
p ~.s
S~
~'~
U ~ADIE IVESCOlolMUNITYEO
SKWiAYES
..
ROBER RENICK
ED CATION
NOOTHC~UNTYES ENTER+
NORWOOD ES
..
MIAMI GAADENS ES
CHARLES OA'-10'" ...
IIVYCHEJRES
"BRENT
tBAASMAHPWI<INS E
~":~~~6~;ITYSH* 0
~LN<ESTE\of:NSMS
LAKESTEVENSEV
SJS"eB1O
..
CAROlCITYES
M'rfiTLEOflO\of::fSA
GRE'r?>JOLDS PARKES"'~.C
OfRTRUDEI<
EDELM,l,NfS,lIB1lJ...
PAlW ES NORTH
.. MiMi!
JOHN F KENNEDYMS BEACH SH
.*
SR >126 EX
TR.aNSPORTATION
CENIERNOI'lTH
..
JilN ~.aNN OPPORTIlNITY
EDUc,.;UONCENTER
..
..
FULFORDES
... OAK GRO\'{' ES
FOR:~~~ ~~~~G~~~~NORTHOAD S
AR,IllN PARKES
BISCAYNEG.lROENSE ..
THOIllASJEfFEFi:SONM.
UNOALENTIN
K-l3C.NTER
~\
~---r
BENJ...IMINFRANKllII ES..a.
HUBERT 0 SEl YES...
RUTHK~oD
fJIIYH""'BORES
N
t
IIoIIHIlI SHORES ES.&
Miles
~
~
'"
I
I
HORACE'" IIIMS.
SOURCE: MIAMI.QADE COUNTY,
PUBLIC SCHOOLS SYSTEM, 2007
i
I
j'"
'"
~"
:<
.)
/l
05
f
"Blse
1'D'1 D"
1:'IO"1;.\J';
TREASURE ISLANDES.
~
v..
z
:J
:5
u
ll^TE HY
Legend
.. Elementary School
. K-8 Center
. Middle School
* Senior High School
. Other Educational Facilities
. Ancillary Facilities
Area
Highways
0 2008-2013 School Openings
17
AMENDMENT TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT
Amend Policy 2.4 of the Capital Improvements Element to add Level of Service Standard
for education, as follows:
Policy 2.4
The Five-Year Capital Improvements Program, or the City's contract providers as appropriate,
shall incorporate the identified capital investments from each functional element and will be based
on the following LOS standards:
Potable Water Supply ... Fire Protection ...
Public Schools
The City shall coordinate new residential development with the future availability of public school
facilities consistent wit the adopted level of service standards for public school concurrency. by
reviewino residential plats, site plans and their functional equivalent for their impact on level of
service standards.
Upon public school concurrency becomino effective, the adopted level of service (LOS) standard
for all Miami-Dade County public school facilities is 100% utilization of Florida Inventory of School
Houses (FISH) Capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). This LOS standard shall be applicable in
each public school concurrency service area (CSA), defined as the public school attendance
boundary established by Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
All public school facilities should continue to maintain or decrease their percent utilization of FISH
capacity (With Relocatable Classrooms). Public school facilities that achieve 100% utilization of
Permanent FISH capacity (No Relocatable Classrooms) should no lonoer utilize relocatable
classrooms except as an operational solution.
Level of Service standards for public school facilities shall apply to those traditional educational
facilities. owned and operated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools. that are required to serve
the residential development within their established Concurrency Service Area. Level of Service
standards do not apply to maonet schools, charter schools and other educational facilities that
may have districtwide attendance boundaries; however, their capacity is credited aoainst the
impact of development. No credit aoainst the impact of development shall be oiven for such
districtwide educational facilities if their enrollment is at. or above. 100% FISH capacity (with
Relocatable Classrooms).
Relocatable classrooms may be used by Miami-Dade County Public Schools as an operational
solution to achieve the level of service standard durino replacement. remodelino. renovation or
expansion of a public school facility: and in the event of a disaster or emeroency which prevents
the School Board from usino a portion of the affected school facility.
Add a new Policy 4.18, as follows:
Policy 4.18
To address financial feasibility associated with school concurrency, Miami-Dade County Public
Schools Facilities Work ProQram for educational facilities. as formally adopted by Miami-Dade
County Public Schools in September. 2007, is hereby adopted by reference as part of the Capital
Improvement Element.
Renumber and amend existing Policy 4.18 as Policy 4. 19, as follows:
Policy 4.18~
The City of Aventura 2005/06 2009/102007/08 - 2011/12 Capital Improvement Program and the
Capital Improvements Schedule included therein, contains a schedule of projects that the City
shall implement in order to meet its adopted Level of service standards and ensure the financial
feasibility of this Comprehensive Plan. The 2005106 2009/102007/08 - 2011/12 Capital
Improvements Program is hereby adopted by reference as part of the Capital Improvement
Element.
Amend Concurrency Management System section of Capital Improvements Element to
add public school concurrency, revise existing wording consistent with public school
concurrency and renumber existing policies, as follows:
Concurrency Management System
A key component of the Growth Management Act is the concurrency management system.
Section 163.3202 F.S. requires local governments to amend its land development regulations to
incorporate specific and detailed provisions which shall provide that public facilities and services
meet or exceed the LOS standards established in the Plan's Capital Improvements Element and
are available when needed for the development, or that the development orders or permits are
conditioned on the availability of these public facilities and services necessary to serve the
development. Chapter 163.3164, F.S. defines 'development order' to include any zoning action,
subdivision approval, certification, permit, or any other official action of local government having
the effect of permitting the development of land. A variety of such development orders are
typically issued by local governments. These include zoning district boundary changes, variances,
unusual use, and site plan approval; environmental permits and certifications; tentative and final
subdivision plat approval; building permits, and certificates of use and occupancy.
In order to implement the concurrency requirements mandated by Chapter 163, F.S. the City of
Aventura shall enact by ordinance, a concurrency management system which accomplishes the
statutory requirements. Administration of the required program involves the establishment of
methods and capabilities to monitor outstanding development commitments and service demands
posed by such commitments, plus the existing, programmed and projected capacities of all
pertinent urban service facilities or systems.
The Aventura concurrency management system shall make appropriate concurrency
determinations in conjunction with the following development approval activities:
1) at the time of zoning actions, site plan approvals and subdivision approvals;
2) prior to the issuance of building permits; and,
3) prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy.
In general, no zoning action authorizing a new use or the expansion of an existing use and no
subdivision plat or site plan shall be approved unless the facilities necessary to maintain level of
service standards exist or are projected to exist when necessary to serve the development. Zoning
approvals shall be based on inclusion of necessary facilities in the applicable Element of the Plan,
or in the plan or work program of the agency having jurisdictional responsibility for provision of the
facilities. Such findings shall be included in staff recommendations to the City Commission, or
other applicable board. If the foregoing plans and programs indicate a low probability that
concurrency will be met, but the necessary facilities are technically feasible, such rezoning action
should be preceded by an amendment to the appropriate plan or work program to add the
necessary facilities. Alternatively, such zoning may be approved if the applicant executes a written
agreement to provide the necessary facilities on a timely basis. All such development approvals
prior to the 'Principal Concurrency Determination' will contain a notice reserving the right of the
City to make its principal concurrency determination prior to the issuance of building permits.
A principal concurrency determination will be required prior to obtaining any subsequent
development order. It is intended that at least one principal concurrency determination be made at
an early stage in the development planning process, prior to the point at which major expenses are
incurred in reliance on development approval. Principal concurrency determinations will be made
prior to the approval of subdivision plats or, in instances where plat approvals are not required or
have predated the effective date of the concurrency requirement, a principal concurrency
determination will be made prior to issuance of a building permit. A principal concurrency
determination made at final plat approval will serve as the determination of requested building
permits where said permits are issued within two (2) years after the date of final plat approval.
Where the applicant demonstrates that development has commenced on a timely basis and is
continuing in good faith, this period may be extended but in no case shall this period exceed five
(5) years after final plat approval. Administrative procedures for demonstrating that development
has commenced on a timely basis and is continuing in good faith shall be established in the land
development regulations.
· Except as provided below, in no instance shall a building permit be issued authorizing
construction of a new building or expansion of an existing building unless facilities
necessary to maintain LOS standards are existing and available or are assured to be
existing and available within the following timeframes~ rel:lti'le to the date of issuance of :I
certific:lte of use :lnd occup:lncy (CO)
1) Necessary water, sewer, solid waste and drainage facilities must be in place and
available at the time of issuance of a CO;
2) Necessary park land must be dedicated to and accepted by the City no later than
the date of issuance of the first CO for that development or funds in the amount of
the developer's fair share shall be committed prior to the issuance of the first CO
unless the developer has entered into a binding agreement to dedicate an improved
park site within twelve months after issuance of the first CO;
3) Necessary transportation facilities must be contracted for construction no later than
36 months after issuance of a CO
· Assurance that the facilities (the term facilities shall mean or shall include land, and
the phrase 'construction of facilities' shall mean acquisition of land, when applicable
to a Plan LOS standard) will be constructed, or acquired and available, within the
timeframes established in the above paragraph shall be provided by the following
means:
(4) Necessary public school facilities must be in place or under actual construction
within 3 years after issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval or the
functional equivalent. or assured by a proportionate share mitiaation aareement.
4~) The necessary facilities are under construction at the time the building permit is
issued;
aQ) The necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract
for the construction of the facilities or the provision of services at the time the
building permit is issued;
eZ) The necessary facilities are funded and programmed in the first year of the
implementing agencies adopted capital budget or are programmed in the CIE for
the construction or acquisition; the necessary facilities shall not be deferred or
deleted from the CIE work program or adopted one-year capital budget unless the
dependent building permit expires or is rescinded prior to the issuance of a
certificate of use or occupancy;
+~) The necessary facilities are programmed, in the five year first three (3) years of a
capital facility plan or work program of the State agency having operational
responsibility for affected facilities, for construction or acquisition;
g~) The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed, in an enforceable
development agreement, to be provided by the developer. An enforceable
development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development
agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, F.S. or an agreement or development
order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, F.S.; or
910) Timely provision of the necessary facilities will be guaranteed by some other means
or instrument providing substantially equivalent assurances.
4(11) Where solid waste disposal facilities are to be available for years 3 through 5
pursuant to the adopted LOS standard are not in place and available prior to the
issuance of a CO, a commitment for that capacity to be in place and available to
accommodate projected demand in those future years shall be made through the
means above, prior to the issuance of a CO.
4412) A proposed development will not be denied a concurrency approval for
transportation facilities provided that the development is otherwise consistent with
the adopted Comprehensive Plan and it meets the following criteria pursuant to
Section 163.3180, F.S.:
· The proposed development is located within the Urban Infill Area (UIA), as
adopted and described in the 1997 Miami-Dade County Comprehensive
Development Master Plan Capital Improvements Element and the
Transportation Element, Traffic Circulation Subelement Policy 1 B.
It is anticipated that after building permits are issued, determinations of concurrency prior to the
issuance of COs may simply involve review and verification of compliance with terms and
conditions set forth in the foregoing paragraphs.
The concurrency management system is solely used to implement minimum level of service
standards. In the review of applications for development orders, neither the satisfaction of these
minimum standards, nor exceptions from them, shall preempt the City of Aventura from
considerations of any other standards nor criterion set forth in the applicable development
regulations.
AMENDMENT TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Add a new Policy 1.21 regarding level of service standards for public school facilities to
the Intergovernmental Coordination Element and renumber existing Policies 1.21 to 1.24
as follows:
Policy 1.21
The City shall coordinate with Miami-Dade Public Schools and other parties to the adopted
Interlocal Aareement for Public School Facility Plannina to establish LOS standards for public
school facilities and any amendments affectina public school concurrency.
Policy 441-1.22
The City will annually review Miami-Dade County Public School's Tentative District Educational
Facilities Plan and the 5-Year Workplan, as provided for in the "Interlocal Agreement for Public
School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County". This review will include an analysis of the
Tentative District Educational Facilities Plan and the 5-Year Workplan's consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, and the identification of any necessary Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Policy 4-.-221.23
The City shall continue to coordinate with the State and other agencies, as appropriate, in
achieving the goals, objectives, and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan.
Policy ~1.24
The City shall continue to coordinate with the South Florida Regional Planning Council, and other
agencies as appropriate, in achieving the goals, objectives, and policies of the South Florida
Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
Policy 4-.241.25
The City shall coordinate, as appropriate, with the State of Florida, South Florida Regional
Planning Council, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, and other agencies in the adoption of a
Public Schools Element into the Comprehensive Plan by 2008. Areas to be addressed in the
Public Schools Element include, but are not limited to, public school concurrency requirements,
coordination with other jurisdiction in the development and implementation of uniform school
concurrency procedures, proportionate share school impact mitigation options for developers, the
collocation of schools with other public facilities, the location of schools proximate to residential
areas, the use of schools as emergency shelters, the location of existing and planned school
facilities (including maps).
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM, C'
TO: City Commission
DATE: September 6, 2007
SUBJECT: City Programs to Promote Green Initiatives
This report has been prepared to advise the City Commission on several programs that
have been or will be implemented in the near future to promote "Green" initiatives. As
you are aware, many states and cities are adopting similar initiatives in order to save
energy, conserve precious natural resources and reduce our impact on climate change.
These initiatives over time will also reduce our annual operating cost and impacts on
the environment.
The following is an outline of the City's Go Green Initiatives:
. Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) will be implemented as a priority
over the next several months where it has been determined to be feasible by the
using department. EPP is the procurement of goods and services that have a
reduced impact on human health and the environment as compared to other
goods and services serving the same purpose.
. Expansion of City Government operations recycling program is in process and
should be on line over the next two weeks. This will provide for additional
opportunities to recycle most paper products produced by the school and our
operations.
. Expansion of paperless technology has allowed the city operations to reduce the
amount of paper. As you are aware over the past six months many documents
have gone from paperless to electronic and several other initiatives are being
reviewed for possible implication in the future.
. The Records Management Program has been accelerated to reduce the storage
of documents. By scanning old documents in electronic form and destroying old
hard copy records in accordance with the state laws, we have eliminated the
need for 1500 square feet of storage and reducing energy costs.
. Energy efficient vehicles are being reviewed for possible replacement of the
Community Services and Code Enforcement operation fleet. This included
replacing vehicles with hybrids and flexible fuel all purpose vehicles. City policies
have been adopted to encourage City employees to implement fuel management
and energy savings practices.
. Several programs have been instituted to reduce energy cost and reduce the
impact our environment. The use of environmentally responsible replacements
for light bulbs and other building materials has been in practice over the past
year. We continue to monitor and reduce water consumption in the City's
irrigation systems on a year round basis.
. Promoting environmental awareness to our students at the Charter School
continues to be a priority. The science curriculum in all grades includes
environmental awareness education. The sixth grade garden project is an
excellent example of a project that introduce recycling and composting concepts.
. An article in the next newsletter will address promoting individual condominiums
and homeowners associations to institute or expand recycling programs. We
also intend to feature and recognize successful programs in upcoming
newsletters.
As you see much has been started to implement our Go Green initiatives and we plan
to continue to expand the program in the future.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
EMS/