2002-11ORDINANCE NO. 2002-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA,
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING PROTESTS
CONCERNING BIDS (BIDS), REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
(RFP'S), REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ'S), REQUEST
FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST (RFLI'S), AND PURCHASE
ORDERS BASED ON WRITTEN OR ORAL QUOTATIONS, BY
AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
AVENTURA ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION"; BY AMENDING
ARTICLE IV ENTITLED "FINANCE" DIVISION 3 ENTITLED
"PURCHASING"; BY CREATING SECTION 2-259 ENTITLED
"AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE PROTESTED BIDS AND
PROPOSED AWARDS"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE; AND PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, from time to time the City procures goods and services
through Invitation for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications,
Requests for Letters of Interest, and pumhase orders based on written or oral
quotations, in accordance with the public bidding procedures set forth in Florida
law and the Code of the City of Aventura (the "City Code"); and
WHEREAS, such process may lead to protested bids and proposed
awards; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Commission that procedural and
technical issues related to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests
for Qualifications, Requests for Letters of Interest, and pumhase orders based on
written or oral quotations, be decided by the City Manager and the City Attorney,
and that their determinations with respect to said procedural and technical issues
shall be deemed final; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City and all respondents to
Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications,
Requests for Letters of Interest, and pumhase orders based on written or oral
quotations, to have a clear and unequivocal procedure for resolving such
protests in a timely and expeditious manner.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, as follows:
Section 1. There is hereby created and added to Article IV "Finance"
Division 3 ~Purchasing" of Chapter 2 "Administration" of the City Code a new
Section 2-259 "Authority to Resolve Protested Bids and Proposed Awards",
which shall read as follows:
Ordinance No. 2002-11
Page 2
Section 2-259. Authority to Resolve Protested Bids and Proposed Awards.
(a) Right to Protest. Any actual bidder, or qualified proposer
(hereinafter collectively referred to as the "bidder") who has a substantial
interest in, and is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or proposed
award of, a request for proposals ("RFP"), request for qualifications
("RFQ'), request for letters of interest ("RFLI') or invitation for bid for goods
and/or services ("hereinafter, collectively referred to as the bid") may
pretest to the City Manager or his or her designee. Protests arising from
the decisions and votes of any evaluation or selection committee shall be
limited to pretests based upon alleged deviation(s) from established
purchasing procedures set forth in this Code, any written guidelines issued
by the City, and the specifications, requirements and/or terms set forth in
any bid. This section shall not be applicable if the bid specifications
expressly so state.
Any protest concerning the bid specification
requirements, and/or terms must be made within
three business days (for the purposes of this
ordinance, "business day" means a day other than
Saturday, Sunday or a national holiday), from the time
the facts become known and, in any case, at least two
business days prior to the opening of the bids. Such
protest must be made in writing to the City Manager
or his or her designee, and such protest shall state
the particular grounds on which it is based and shall
include all pertinent documents and evidence. No bid
protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the
requirements of this section. Failure to timely protest
bid specifications, requirements and/or terms is a
waiver of the ability to protest the specifications,
requirements and/or terms.
(2)
Any pretest after the bid opening, including
challenges to actions of any evaluation or selection
committee as provided in subsection (a) above, shall
be submitted in writing to the City Manager, or his or
her designee. The City will allow such bid protest to
be submitted anytime until two (2) business days
following the release of the City Manager's written
recommendation to the City Commission, as same is
set forth and released in the City Commission agenda
packet, for award of the bid in question. Such pretest
shall state the particular grounds on which it is based
and shall include all pertinent documents and
Ordinance No. 2002-11
Page 3
evidence. No bid protest shall be accepted unless it
complies with the requirements of this section. All
actual bidders shall be notified in writing (which may
be transmitted by electronic communication, such as
facsimile transmission and/or e-mail), following the
release of the City Manager's written recommendation
to the City Commission
(3)
Any bidder who is aggrieved in connection with the
solicitation or proposed award of a pumhase order
based on an oral or written quotation may protest to
the City Manager or his or her designee anytime
during the procurement process, up to the time of the
award of the pumhase order, but not after such time.
Such protest shall be made in writing and state the
particular grounds on which it is based and shall
include all pertinent documents and evidence. No bid
protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the
requirements of this section.
(4)
The City may require reasonable reimbursement for
expenses incurred in processing any protest
hereunder, which expenses shall include, but not be
limited to, staff time, legal fees and expenses
(including expert witness fees), reproduction of
documents and other out-of-pocket expenses.
(b) Authority to Resolve Protests. The City Manager or his or her
designee shall have the authority to settle and resolve a protest as
outlined herein.
(c) Responsiveness. Prior to any decision being rendered under this
Ordinance with respect to a bid protest, the City Manager and the City
Attorney, or their respective designees, shall certify whether the
submission of the bidder to the bid in question is responsive. The parties
to the protest shall be bound by the determination of the City Manager and
the City Attorney with regard to the issue of responsiveness.
(d) Decision and Appeal Procedures. If the bid protest is not resolved
by mutual agreement, the City Manager and the City Attorney, or their
respective designees, shall promptly issue a decision in writing. The
decision shall specifically state the reasons for the action taken and inform
the protestor of his or her right to challenge the decision. Any person
aggrieved by any action or decision of the City Manager, the City Attorney,
or their respective designees, with regard to any decision rendered under
this section may seek judicial review of said decision by filing an original
Ordinance No. 2002-1 '1
Page 4
action against City in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in
and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, within thirty (30) days of the decision
in accordance with the applicable court rules. Any action not brought in
good faith shall be subject to sanctions including damages suffered by the
City and attorney's fees incurred by the City in defense of such wrongful
action. This paragraph shall not waive standing requirements which are
otherwise provided by law.
(e) Distribution. A copy of each decision by the City Manager and the
City Attorney shall be mailed or otherwise furnished promptly to the
protestor.
(f) Stay of Procurements During Protests. In the event of a timely
protest under paragraph (a) of this section, the City shall not proceed
further with the solicitation or with the award pursuant to such bid until a
decision is issued under paragraph (e) above, unless a wdtten
determination is made by the City Manager, that the award pursuant to
such bid must be made without delay in order to protect a substantial
interest of the City.
(g) Remedy. The institution and filing of a protest under this Code is
an administrative remedy that shall be employed prior to the institution and
filing of any civil action against the City concerning the subject matter of the
protest.
(h) Protests Barred. Protests not timely made under this section shall
be barred. Any basis or ground for a protest not set forth in the letter of
protest required under this section shall be deemed waived.
(i) Report. At the time the City Manager's written recommendation for
award of a bid is presented at a meeting of the Mayor and City
Commission, the City Attorney, or his or her designee, shall present a
report to inform the Mayor and City Commission of any legal issues
relative to any bid protest filed in connection with the bid in question. The
Commission agenda item concerning a proposed bid award, for which
there is any unresolved protest, shall include the written protest,
documentary materials which reflect the issues involved in the protest, all
bids submitted, and any other materials which the City Manager finds will
enable the Commission to be fully informed on the matter.
(j) Finality. The determination of the City Manager and the City
Attorney with regard to all procedural and technical matters shall be final.
(k) No waiver. Nothing in this section shall waive City's sovereign
immunity pursuant to section 768.28, F.S.
Ordinance No. 2002-11
Page 5
Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to
be severable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall
for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this
Ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this
Ordinance shall stand notwithstanding the invalidity of any part.
Section 3. Inclusion in the Code. It is the intention of the City
Commission, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall
become and be made a part of the Code of the City of Aventura; that the sections
of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such
intentions; and that the word "Ordinance" shall be changed to "Section" or other
appropriate word.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately
upon adoption on second reading.
The foregoing Ordinance was offered by Vice Mayor Rogers-Libert, who
moved its adoption on first reading. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Holzberb, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Arthur Berger yes
Commissioner Jay R. Beskin yes
Commissioner Ken Cohen yes
Commissioner Manny Grossman yes
Commissioner Harry Holzberg yes
Vice Mayor Patricia Rogers-Libert yes
Mayor Jeffrey M. Perlow yes
The foregoing Ordinance was offered by Commissioner Beskin, who moved
its adoption on second reading. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Cohen, and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:
Ordinance No. 2002-1_~_z
Page O
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Arthur Berger
Jay R. Beskin
Ken Cohen
Manny Grossman
Harry Holzberg
Patricia Rogers-Libert
Mayor Jeffrey M. Perlow
absent
yes
yes
absent from the room
absent from the room
yes
PASSED on first reading this 5th day of March, 2002.
PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this 2~of Apdl, 2002.
~F~'R-EY ~. PERLOW, MAYOR
ATTFz~IST: ~
TI~F~C:SA M. S(~9,~,, C~
Ck37Y CLERK ~ '
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CITY ATTORNEY