10-29-1999 CC Workshop MeetingA nt:C d
ufa
2999NE191~gtroetSuRe500 Ave~ura. FL33180
City Commission
Workshop Meeting
October 29,1999 9:00 A.M.
Executive Conference Room
AGENDA
1. Library Committee Update
2, Town Center Meeting Update
3. Aventura Blvd Entrance Feature
4. Waterways Park Improvements
s. Telecommunications Ordinance
6. Cultural Arts Center Feasibility Study
Update
? Hospital District Property
8. Defibrillators (Commissioner Cohen)
9. Dade League Representative (Commissioner
Cohen)
10. Board Reports
Next Meeting November 23, 1999
· Legislative Session Priorities
This meeting is open to the public. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all persons who are
disabled and who need special accommodations to participate in this meeting because of that disability should contact
the Office of the City Clerk, 305-466-8901, not later than two days prior to such proceeding.
CITY OF AVENTURA
CITY COMMISSION SUB COMMITTEE MEETING
OCTOBER 8, 1999 3:30 P.M.
Aventura Government Center
2999 NE 191s~ Street Suite 500
Aventura, Florida 33180
At the request of Mayor Arthur I. Snyder, a meeting was held with
Commissioners Jay R. Beskin (chair), Jeffrey M. Perlow, Vice Mayor Arthur
Berger and the City Manager to discuss issues relating to the Library. The
meeting was called to order at 3:40 p.m. by Commissioner Beskin. Those
present at the meeting were Commissioners Beskin, Perlow, Vice Mayor Berger
and City Manager Eric M. Soroka. Also in attendance were City Clerk Teresa M.
Soroka, Commissioners Harry Holzberg and Patricia Rogers-Libert.
Possible alternatives and considerations were outlined and discussed. It was the
consensus of the Committee that the first pdority would be to determine what the
City wants in a Library. The Committee requested that the City Manager obtain
demographics concerning the users of the North Dade Regional Library from
Miami-Dade County. Board members recommended that the Committee hold 2-
3 Town Hall Meetings to obtain public input, with Library Consultant as facilitator.
It was suggested that the meetings be scheduled as follows:
Waterways
Coronado
Point East
mid-November
December/January
mid-November
Information obtained from public headngs and the Commission to be provided to
Consultant for preparation of cost analysis.
There being no further discussion, the meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m.
THE CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Eric M' Sor°ka' Ci ~ ~h~c~ "C~y Manager~
Jules Bevis, Assist'ant to~'~
October 19, 1999
Northeast Dade Library Statistics
At the request of the City Commission Subcommittee on the Library, I requested the
subject statistics from Raymond Santiago, Director of the Miami-Dade County Library
System. Mr. Santiago informed me that statistics on who uses a particular branch are
not available.
According to Mr. Santiago, each book (or other library material) is assigned a bar code,
and each library card has a bar code. When a user checks out a book, these bar
codes are linked to one another. However, when the book is returned, the link is
deleted from the system. This makes it impossible to gather statistics over a period of
time for any one library branch. You would only be able to take a "snapshot" of who
had books checked out today. Furthermore, addresses associated with each library
card could not be given to us because library circulation records are confidential and
protected by Florida State Statute.
Mr. Santiago informed me that the best they could do would be to pull up how many
residents within a particular zip code have library cards, and then look at the last
activity on those cards. For instance, in the 33180 zip code area there are
approximately 10,000 library cardholders and 5,000 of those cardholders have checked
out a book within the last two years. This data does not indicate which branch they
used, and it also does not reflect patrons who might have visited the branch and simply
used the internet, read a magazine or researched an issue without checking out any
materials.
Mr. Santiago suggested we conduct an informal survey at the Northeast branch to find
out who uses it. Please let me know if you need any additional information.
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
City C°mmissi°n ~. L.'
Eric M Soroka, City~a~.~r
October 25, 1999 ~
Town Center Redevelopment Update
The Property Manager for Loehmann's Fashion Island has met with the owners
regarding the City's Town Center Redevelopment Concept. They are interested in the
overall concept, but they are not ready to make any formal commitments at this time.
They would be interested in the City proceeding with the feasibility study. However, they
are not inclined to assist in funding the study.
~=~P-JVED
Realty Group, [nc.
October 26, 1999
Brenda Kelley, Dir. of
Community Development Dept.
The City of Aventura
2999 NE 191~t Street
Aventura, FL 33180
Via Fax: {30,5) 466-8949
TOWN CENTER CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT
LOEHMANN'8 FASHION 18LAND, AVENTURA, FL
Dear Brenda:
I have shared your proposed Town Center Conceptual Development plans
with SEC Commercial Realty Group, thc management of Loehmann's
Fashion Island and Prudential Insurance Company of America, the
owners.
Everyone agrees that the concept is intriguing and would benefit the
community. As a main component for Town Center, we encourage the
City of Aventura to proceed at its own costs with the marketing study
and additional master plans. Once completed, we will be able to better
asses the viability of the project.
The owners have a fiduciary responsibility to maintain an annual ten
percent return on its investment for its portfolio investors. Any public-
private redevelopment of Loehmann's Fashion Island must keep this in
mind.
Best regards,
S~EALTY_
F1/ank J. Colatosti, CSM
General Manager
FOC / mz
/3 AVFNTURA: 2855 N.[. 187 S~[REEI * AVENTURA. ~:L 33180 · TELEPHONE (305) 932-0520 · FAX (305) 932-2753
~'1 BOCA RATON: 7050 W. PALMETTO PARK RD,, #51 * ~OCA RATON, FL 33433 · TELEPHONE (560 347-0888 · FAX (561) 347-1669
C] CORAL GABLES: 1541 SUNSET DR., SUITE 300. CORAL GABLES, FL 33143 · TELEPHONE (305) 666-2140 ,, FAX (305) 667-1586
D SARASOTA: 240 Nr W,A. SH! .N.,G. TON BLVD., SUITE 320 t SARA.SOTA, FL 34236. · TELEPHONE (94.1) 955-2022,. FAX (941) 955:3505
Licensed Real Estate Broker
510 9417 LEIBOIITZ ~SS~CI~TEi ~/o~,;u~ lb:4i F.~!ul~u/
LEIBOWITZ &ASSOCIATES, P.A.
JOSEPH A. BELISLE
ILA L. FELD
ALLISON K. HIFT
MATTHEWL. LEI~OWITZ
SUITE 1450
SUNTRUSTINTERNATIt0NAL
CENTER
ONE SOUTHEASTTHIR0 AVENUE
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-1715
TELEPHONE (305) 530-1322
TELECOPIER (305) 530-9417
E-MAIL: broadlaw~aol.com
FA(~SIMILETRANSMITTAL
DATE: _October S_ 1999
TO: Erie Soroka
COMPANY NAME: City0fAvenl;ura
TELECOPIER NO:_ (305~ 466-8919
FROM: ~raulio L.
RE:
MESSAGE:
CL[ENTNO:~400
THIS TRANSMISSION CONSISTS OF._.~..~ PAGES, INCLUDING THIS
TRANSMITTAL PAGE. IF ALL THE PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED,
PLEASE CALL -~Mar ~1, AT (305) 530-1322.
A HARD COPY WILL FOLLOW BY:
Overnight Delivery AHard CopyWlll Not Follow
U.S. Mail
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
TIlE INI~ORMATION IN Tills FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION I$ INTENDED ONLY FOR TIlE FER$ONAL
AND CONFIDENT[AL USE OFTREDESIGNATEDRECI~IENTS NAMED ABOV£. TH[SMES~AGg MAY BE
AN ATTORNEY.CLIENT COMMUNICATION ANDAS SUCH IS PRIVILEGED. IF T~E READER OF T~IS
RECEIVgO IH[~ DOCUMENt IN ERROR, AND ANY REVIEW. DISSEMINATION, ~gI~IIUIION OR
COPYINGO~HISM~$$AG~IS$TRICILY~RORI~iTEO. IFYOUHAVERECEIVEDTHtSDOCUMENT
INERROR, PLEAS~NOTIFYTHISOFF~CE IMMEDI~TELYVIATELEPHO~E, AND RETURN THE
ORIG~NALMESSAGE TO TREABOVEADDRESS 9YMAIL- ~HANKvt~rr ..
II
LEI~OWlTZ & ASSOC~&~S,
October 8, 1999
Faic Soroka
City Mana~uer
City of Aventura
t999 NE tgi" Sa'ret
Suite 500
Aveneara, FL 33180
RE: /5xgposed Tclecommunical/ons Ord~aaace
Dear Mr. Soro 'ka:
At the Commission Workshop on September 99, 1999, the Law Firm was directed ta produce
a comparison of provisions conhahaed wflhin the exis&~g BellSouth limtcl~e ,'md relevant sec~ons of
the proposed telecommunications ordimm~e trader consideration by tile City ol"Aveatura.
Enclosed please find that comparisot~ for your recvicw. As yt:m c~au see, we ]lave pointed out
certain sections of thc BellSouth fianchise whcxe the City's interests may not be ,adequately' protectcd,
and co~ttrasted them with corresponding portions of the proposed ordinance. In addition, we have
-also listed ccrlam sec6ons of thc proposed ordixiance which are not addressed by tltc existing
BdlSouth fianct~e.
As was discussed at the workshop, in the absertcc of the City's adop6on of a more
comprehensive telecomraunicalions ord/nancc, the existing Belk$outh franchise will establish thc
bcncbax~ark against which other fi.'anchises with telecommunications prov/ders will be negotiated. The
proposed telecommunkatiom o~xlinance seeks to se~te flu'cc ftmdmnental purposes: (1) esbablis]l thc
level of playing field for access m the Cit3% rlgt~-ol:way by compel/live telecomntunk.alions service
providers; (~) establish mason,able regulations for access to thc City's rights-of-way; and (3) fix the
nondiscriminatory compensation to be p~d by telecommmfica6ons sea-icc providers [o t}~e (2ity for
access to thc righ~of~ways.
530 9~i7 L~IBO~iTZ
Leacr to F~c Soroka
October 8, 1999
P~ge ~2
CC:
M~Lhew L Leibowi~, Eaq.
Ila L Fe]d, Esq.
Enclosure
LHIBOWtTZ
Comparison of City of Aventura
Ordinance 97-02 (BellSouth F~-mchlse)
and the Proposed Telecommunications Ordinance
Issue ! F, xisting BellSouth Franchise Proposed Tel~om~tmications
Ordinance
I. Nelth~ the existing BellSouth Section 2 of the proposed ordinance
Recurring franchiae, nor cun~t appEcable conlai~ a de~rfifion of recurring local
I Local taw, defines the term "r¢CUmng sendcc which seel~ to lend certainty to
Service local service." As competition the revenue base used to calculate
Revenues spurs the development of new, and franchise fees, and also address future
often mlanticipated, services, a advances in services.
lack of definition, combined with
lack of adequate information (see
Issue 2 below), creates uncertainty
as to the adequacy of h~mchise fee
payments, with no means of
'addressing that uncertainty.
2. Section 4 of the BellSouth Section 6 of the proposed ordinance'
Review of Frauchisc reserves the City's fight reserves tim City's rights to inspect on an
Records and 'to review the Company's billing annual basis all books and records which
Audit and paymet~t records, upon wMeh relate to the calculation of the franchise tee
Rights. theJ~ttyments were beset..." The payments, or any other payments to the
language implies that ifapayment City, or to proper performance of any
was not based on a cemfin record, terms of the franchise. In addition, the
BellSouth wouldnot bo obligated to or~li~nnee also establishes that in the event
xovidc that information for review, the City audits the Company's books and
Therefore, the language in the determines that there is an underpayment
existing Franchise limits of franchise fees to the City in excess of
BcllSouth's obhgation to provide two (2%) percent, th~ Company shall pay
records for iuspection by theCiryto all reasonable costs and expenses of the
ontythose which, in the Company's audit.
discretion, were used to a calculate
the payments due to the City.
3. Section S of the existing BellSouth Section 11 of the proposed ordinance
Transfers. fi-atlchise stales that if the rights of reserves the City's authority to consider
+,he fzanehise are transferred or the transfer ofrlghts under the l~,,tnchise in
assigned by BellSouth to any third the context of addressing any outstanding
party, such third puny shall he noncompliance by the existing f~axchisee,
obligated to comply with all of the and securing the acceptance of the
terms and conditions of the franchise's terms and eoaclitions by the!
tinmchise. The provision does not proposed transferee.
address any unmet obligations by
tl~ transferor (BellSouth) and any
methods to address such existing
issues o f noncompliance.
,~. Section 6 of the BellSouth Section 16 o~' the proposed ordinance
Revocation franchise establishes that the establishes procsdur~s which thc City
md Company's noncompliance "in any must tinder'take ha order to revoke the
Forfeiture. substantial respect~ with material franchise for material violation of its
~rovisions of the franchise shall be terms, and/or Federal, state or local law.
grounds for forfeiture. Only a This Section establishes specific notice
Court can d~termiae that the and hearing requirements ia order to effect
Corapany has failed to comply with the rgvooarion, la addition, the s~tion~
a provision of thc franchise. It is addresses any roliefftom appropriate state
unclear as to the process or agencies which amy be necessary ia order
, procedure which thc City must to overcome a telecommunicafons
follow, if any, to effect the company's legal rightto access to a City's
revocation and subsequent rights-of-way punnmnt to Federal law.
forfeiture of the Company's rights
under the franchise.
~10~ ~tO !~]'i LBI~O~ITZ AE~OCIAT~ IO/OL!! 15:~ P.008/007
- Section 9 of the existi.ug BellSouthSection 8 of the proposed ordiuauce in
Coustructinu fi'anchise sets forth the obligations part, obligates the fi'anchis~e to comply
and of the franchisee to replace and with and abide by all applic'ableprovisious
Maintenance restore the rights-of-way incident to of state ~nd local law, including applicable
its cons~-uctioa of facihties w~thinzooming regulations and permir~ng
the rights-of-way. The last sentenceprocedures. This section father obligates
states that the City 'shall promptlythe franchisee to obtain any and 'all '
i provide all permits, licenses and required permits and pay any and all
~ other authorizations necessary forrequired fees before eom~aeacing any
the purpose of installing, construction on the public right-o£-way.
naain~ining, and operating and
repairing the system and facilities."
Tl~e language seems to
unconditionally commit fl~e City to
provide permits to BellSouth for
construction of its fac~lities. There
~s no corresponding obligation of
BellSouth to follow the permitting
procedures of the City.
6. None. To the extent that ft franchisee fails to
Enforoeraent comply with the terms of a fanchise or the
Remedies. ordinance, certain remedies in the way of
fi~.es would be available to the City u~der
the ordinance. The existiag BellSoulb
franchise only offers revoeatioa as a
remedy for a materlal violatinn of the
terms of the ~ranchise. This fails to
ad&ess the possibility of other violations
which may not rise to the level of uaaterial
mad therefore Rot merit revocation, but still
affect the City's management oflts fights-
of-way.
IIln JlU j;[l LtiblJlil, j"Ijl.I!ltl
7. t'one
Security
Fund.
8. None
Renewal of
Franchise.
\\Wldillit\l999\A 'o'Q"'llril\Mcmos.~4Hft.b1.~irJe..WJld
Page 4
I IJ U 0' j ~ I J 4, f. U IJ I / I) U I
The proposed ordinance establishes a
requirement for a telecommunications
service provider to establish a security
fund, in the form of cash, bond or
corporate guaranty, in order to ensure the
provider's compliance with the terms of
the ordinance and franchise. The security
fund establishes an available source of
funds to address violations of the tenus of
the franchise, including any penalties or
liquidated damages that may be assessed
as a result. This issue may be of
importance to the City, in light of the fact
that competition will result in new
providers increasing demand for access to
the City's rights-of-way, thereby
increasing the risk of noncompliance or
violations of the terms of a franchise.
The proposed ordinance establishes a
procedure by which franchises will be
renewed with the City. It sets forth
specific criteria which will be considered
consistent with applicable law, such as the
status ofa franchisee's cornplianeewith its
current franchise.
CITY OF AVENTURA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Eric M. Soroka, City Manager
Brenda Kelley, Community Development Directg~~
, tJ
September 24, 1999 lr
Vacant Lots in Hospital District
The Meldonians own 14 lots in the hospital district and have requested as to if the City may
be interested in purchasing these lots. I have pulled information from the Miami-Dade
County property appraiser's database and prepared the following information regarding the
assessed value of these and adjacent lots, in addition to information regarding available past
sales history in the area.
SUBJECT PROPERTIES:
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT
NE 214 Terrace BLK 29 Lot 5 $ 5,615 $1.70
28-1234-004-0580 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 30 Lot 1 $ 9,723 $2.95
28-1234-004-0620 (3300 st)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 30 Lot 2 $ 9,723 $2.95
28-1234-004-0630 (3300 st) No sales data available
NE 214 Terrace BLK 30 Lot 3 $ 9,723 $2.95 For any of these folios
28-1234-004-0640 (3300 st)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 30 Lot 4 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-0650 (3300 st)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 30 Lot 5 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-0660 (3300 st)
NE 214 Street BLK 30 Lot 8 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-0690 (3300 st)
NE 214 Street BLK 30 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-0700 (3300 st)
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq ft)
NE 214 Street BLK 30 Lot 10 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-0710 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 37 Lot 1 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-1220 (3300 sf) No sales data available
NE 214 Street BLK 37 Lot 2 $11,230 $3.40 for any of these folios
28-1234-004-1230 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 37 Lot 3 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-1240 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 37 Lot 4 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-1250 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 37 Lot 5 $11,230 $3.40
28-1234-004-1260 (3300 st')
The total assessed value of the subject properties is $147,084. They comprise 46,200
square feet, for an average assessed value of $3.18 per square foot.
COMPARABLE PROPERTIES:
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq ft)
2801 NE 214 Terr BLK 20 Lot 6 $ 5,615 $1.70 03/86 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-0130 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 20 Lot 7 $11,230 $3.40 06/96 $155,000
28-1234-004-0140 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 20 Lot 8 $11,230 $3.40 06/96 $155,000
28-1234-004-0150 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 20 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40 06~96 $155,000
28-1234-004-0160 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 20 Lot 10 $11,230 $3.40 06/96 $155,000
28-1234-004-0170 (3300 sf) (11.74 sf)
2823 NE 214 Terr BLK 21 Lot 6 $ 9,723 $2.95 09/97 $210,000
28-1234-004-0180 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 21 Lot 7 $ 9,723 $2.95 09/97 $210,000
28-1234-004-0190 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 21 Lot 8 $ 9,723 $2.95 09/97 $210,000
28-1234-004-0200 (3300 sf) (21.21 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 21 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40 01/98 $ 32,500
28-1234-004-0210 (3300 sf) ( 9.85 sf)
2
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq fi)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 21 Lot 10 $11,230 $3.40 01/98 $ 32,500
28-1234-004-0210 (3300 sf) ( 9.85 sf)
2831 NE 214 Terr BLK 22 $29,170 $2.95 01/98 $ 32,500
28-1234-004-0230 Lots 6, 7 & 8 (9900 sf) ( 3.28 sf)
2833 NE 214 Terr BLK 22 Lot 9 $12,736 $3.22 08/96 $ 15,000
28-1234-004-0250 (3960 st') ( 3.79 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK22 Lot 10 $ 5,615 $1.70 08/96 $ 5,000
28-1234-004-0260 (3300 sf) ( 1.52 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 23 Lot 6 $ 5,615 $1.70
28-1234-004-0270 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 23 Lot 7 $ 5,615 $1.70
28-1234-004-0280 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 23 $29,170 $2.95 02/98 $ 75,000
28-1234-004-0290 Lots 8, 9 & 10 (9900 sf) ( 7.58 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 28 Lots 1, $42,181 $3.65 12/98 $106,000
28-1234-004-0500 2 & 3 & pt rd (11550 sf)
2821 NE 214 Terr BLK 28 $44,920 $3.40 04/94 $ 28,000
28-1234-004-0510 Lots 4,5,9, 10 (13200 sf) ( 2.12 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 28 Lot 6 $17,872 $3.61 12/98 $106,000
28-1234-004-0520 (4950 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 28 Lot 7 $11,915 $3.61 12/98 $106,000
28-1234-004-0530 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 28 Lot 8 $11,915 $3.61 12/98 $106,000
28-1234-004-0520 (3300 sf) ( 4.59 sf)
2832 NE 214 Terr. BLK29 $22,460 $3.40 07/96 $ 44,000
28-1234-004-0560 Lots 1 & 2 (6600 sf) ( 6.67 sf)
2834 NE 214 Terr BLK 29 $22,460 $3.40
28-1234-004-0570 Lots 3 &4 (6600 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK29 $22,460 $3.40 03/73 $ 5,900
28-1234-004-0590 Lots 6 & 7 (6600 sf) ( 0.89 sf)
2833 NE 214 St BLK 29 $22,460 $3.40
28-1234-004-0600 Lots 8 & 9 (6600 sf)
2861-53 NE 214 BLK 29 Lot 10 $29,170 $2.95 05/79 $ 40,000
28-1234-004-0670 BLK 30 Lt 6&7 (9900 sf) ( 4.04 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 1 $ 5,615 $1.70 02/82 $ 5,500
28-1234-004-0720 (3300 sf) ( 1.66 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 2 $ 5,615 $1.70
28-1234-004-0730 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 3 $ 9,723 $2.95 05/98 $ 65,000
28-1234-004-0740 (3300 sf)
3
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq ft)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 4 $ 9,723 $2.95 05/98 $ 65,000
28-1234-004-0750 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 5 $ 9,723 $2.95 05/98 $ 65,000
28-1234-004-0760 (3300 sf) ( 6.56 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 Lot 6 $ 5,615 $1.70 02/82 $ 5,500
28-1234-004-0770 (3300 sf) ( 1.66 sf)
NE 214 Terrace BLK 31 $22,460 $3.40 05/81 $ 46,000
28-1234-004-0780 Lots 7 & 8 (6600 sf) ( 6.97 sf)
2849 NE 214 St BLK 31 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40 03/95 $ 23,500
28-1234-004-0790 (3300 sf) ( 7.12 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 31 Lot 10 $11,230 $3.40 03/95 $ 23,500
28-1234-004-0800 (3300 sf) ( 7.12 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 32 Lot 6 $11,230 $3.40 03/95 $ 23,500
28-1234-004-0850 (3300 sf) ( 7.12 sO
NE 214 Street BLK 32 Lot 7 $11,230 $3.40 03/95 $ 23,500
28-1234-004-0860 (3300 sf) ( 7.12 sf)
2911-17 NE 214 BLK 32 $29,170 $2.95 02/97 $125,000
28-1234-004-0870 Lots 8, 9 & 10 (9900 sf) ( 12.63 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 32 Lot 1 $7,872 $3.61 03/98 $128,000
28-1234-004-1120 (4950 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 36 Lot 2 $11,915 $3.61 03/98 $128,000
28-1234-004-1130 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 36 Lot 3 $11,915 $3.61 03/98 $128,000
28-1234-004-1140 (3300 sf) ( 12.92 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 36 Lot 4 $11,230 $3.40 04/98 $ 38,000
28-1234-004-1150 (3300 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 36 Lot 5 $11,230 $3.40 04/98 $ 38,000
28-1234-004-1160 (3300 sf) ( 5.75 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 36 Lot 6 $17,872 $3.61 02/97 $ 30,000
28-1234-004~1170 & part of road (4950 sf) ( 6.06 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 36 Lot 7 $11,915 $3.61 02/97 $ 30,000
28-1234-004-1180 (3300 sf) ( 6.06 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 36 Lot 8 $11,915 $3.61 02/97 $ 30,000
28-1234-004-1190 (3300 sf) ( 6.06 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 36 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40 07/81 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1200 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 36 Lot 10 $11,230 $3.40 07/81 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1210 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 37 Lot 6 $11,230 $3.40 02/72 $ 2,000
28-1234-004-1270 (3300 sf) ( 0.60 sf)
4
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq ft)
NE 213 Street BLK 37 Lot 7 $11,230 $3.40 02/72 $ 2,000
28-1234-004-1280 (3300 sf) ( 0.60 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 37 Lot 8 $11,230 $3.40 08/84 $ 7,000
28-1234-004-1290 (3300 sf) ( 2.12 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 37 Lot 9 $11,230 $3.40 08/84 $ 7,000
28-1234-004-1300 (3300 sf) ( 2.12 sf)
2870 NE 214 St BLK 38 $29,170 $2.95 11/77 $ 62,500
28-1234-004-1320 Lots 1, 2 & 3 (9900 sf) ( 6.31 sf)
2880 NE 214 St BLK 38 $22,460 $3.40 04/79 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1350 Lots 4 & 5 (6600 sf) ( 3.33 sf)
2803-05 NE 213 BLK 37 Lot 10 $29,170 $2.95 06/92 $ 84,000
28-1234-004-1360 BLK48, Lots6 (9900sf) (8.48sf)
&7
NE 213 Street BLK 38 Lot 8 $ 9,723 $2.95 12/88 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1380 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 38 Lot 9 $ 9,723 $2.95 12/88 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1390 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 38 Lot 10 $ 9,723 $2.95 12/88 $ 22,000
28-1234-004-1400 (3300 sf) ( 6.66 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 39 Lot 1 $ 5,615 $1.70 10/88 $ 4,000
28-1234-004-1410 (3300 sf) ( 1.21 sO
NE 214 Street BLK 39 $22,460 $3.40 06/84 $ 63,000
28~1234-004-1420 Lots 2, 3 (6600 sf) ( 9.55 sf)
2890 NE 214 St BLK 39 $22,460 $3.40 06/84 $ 52,000
28-1234-004-1430 Lots 4, 5 (6600 sf) ( 7.88 sf)
2885 NE 213 St BLK 39 $29,170 $2.95 03/80 $ 37,500
28-1234-004-1450 Lots 6, 7,8 ( 9900 sf) ( 3.79 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 39 Lot 9 $ 9,723 $2.95 07/73 $ 25,000
28-1234-004-1470 (3300 sf) ( 7.58 sf)
2901 NE 213 St BLK 39 Lot 10 $19,447 $2.95 07/73 $ 25,000
28-1234-004-1480 BLK 40 Lot 6 (6600 sf) ( 3.78 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 40 Lot I $12,189 $3.69 04/94 $ 35,000
28-1234-004-1490 (3300 sf) ( 10.60 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 40 $36,566 $3.69 04/94 $ 35,000
28-1234-004-1500 Lots 2,3,4 (9900 sf) ( 10.60 sf)
NE 214 Street BLK 40 Lot 5 $12,189 $3.69 04/94 $ 35,000
28~1234-004-1530 (3300 sf) ( 10.60 sf)
NE 213 Street BLK 40 $22,460 $3.40 07/73 $ 25,000
28-1234-004-1540 Lots 7,8 (6600 sf) ( 3.79 sf)
5
ADDRESS LEGAL ASSESSED VALUE LAST SALE LAST
(folio #) (land) PER DATE SALE
VALUE SQUARE (if applicable) AMOUNT
FOOT (value per
sq ft)
2919 NE 213 St BLK 40 $22,460 $3.40 05/84 $ 25,000
28-1234-004-1550 Lots 9, 10 (6600 sf) ( 3.79 sf)
The table above shows that the assessed value of surrounding lots ranges from a Iow of
$1.70 to a high of $3.69 per square foot. The last sale value of surrounding lots, for sales
within the past five years ranges from a Iow of $1.52 per square foot to a high of $21.21 per
square foot, with an average of $8.17 per square foot.
I have attached a copy of the Hospital District Study of the City's Comprehensive Plan to
show the approximate location of these lots. As you can see from the map, the lots fall in the
vicinity of a proposed public area. Furthermore, if the City were to proceed with a CRA
District in this location, the acquirement of these lots may be an important step towards
redevelopment of this district. I would recommend that the City proceed with obtaining more
information as to acquiring the lots in the following manner:
1. Find out how much the Meldonian's are asking for these lots. If their request is not
reasonable, then the pursual of additional information is not necessary.
If their request is reasonable then we may want to pursue the possibility of commencing
negotiations and further research, such that an appraisal is obtained prior to making an
offer or counteroffer.
Once a purchase price is agreed upon:
a. a Phase I Environmental report shall be obtained;
b. a survey of the property shall be obtained;
c. an Opinion of Title shall be obtained.
As always, please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have.
/rnemo/soroka 032499 meldonian
6
Hospital District Study
City of Aventura
ZI5TH
t NE. ,
~"° I I'N' I ~J '1'~1, I,olq .I. I,
~l~ffi~l~ffi ~ I~1~ I~E~
m,~ ~/~ll I I FI ~/~i I I~ ~ Isle
967
~ ~,1 ~1 I~ ~1~
"' ~ I~1' I"/"/'
~~4 ~L'I~. ~& r~dq~'[ 11d~ ~1~1-~1~1 [I '~1 ~1~' ~ ~1~,~ ,,~1 ~1~,~, ~,~
--- i~I~T~ ll ~ ~ 'Il