Loading...
02-21-2002 Workshop19200 West Country Clah Drive Aventura. Fl. City Commission Workshop Meeting' February 21, 2002 9:00 A.M. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sa AGENDA NE 188th Street Re-Zoning/Pedestrian Promenade* Founders Park Gazebo Bandstand* Cultural Center Foundation Members Cone of Silence/Bid Protest Procedure * City Informational Meetings with Condos (Mayor Perlow) Billboards Adjournment * Back-up Information Exists Next Meeting: · Professional Fund Raising Services This meeting is open to the public. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, all persons who are disabled and who need special accommodations to participate in this meeting because of that disability should contact the Office of the City Clerk, 305-466-8901, not later than two days prior to such proceeding. Next Meeting: March 21, 2002 CITY OF AVENTURA OFFICE OF THE CiTY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM City Commission Review of N.E. 188th Street Zoning Districts I Implementation of Pedestrian Promenade Workshop Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Commission revise the RMF3A & RMF3B Zoning requirements to provide for an incentive program that will facilitate the construction of a pedestrian promenade along the shoreline. BACKGROUND In light of recent discussions held at the Commission Meeting and the City Attorney's office opinion that without specific incentives the requirements of a pedestrian promenade could be viewed as a "taking", this could place the City in the position of financially compensating the property owners, unless specific incentives are incorporated in the zoning regulations. VVhile this report focuses on the incorporation of incentives for the development of the promenade, staff and I have spent a great deal of time studying the effects of the new zoning requirements along NE. 188r" Street to determine the feasibility of developing the residential property at a level that the staff feels is consistent with the City. Simply stated, we did not want to create new regulations that would make development difficult to the point that only small rental units would be feasible in the area. This report was prepared with input from our planning staff and planning consultant. The City over the next two years will be investing over $20 million in public funds for a school, community center, road and beautification improvements. It is important that the development be consistent with these investments and at the same time occur in a short period of time (1-4 years). The placement of residential development along N.E. 188t~ Street will also expedite the Town Center to be located at Loehmann's Fashion Island. Memo to City Commission Page 2 It should be pointed out that the promenade was a requirement under the former TC 2 zoning district. If we choose not to rezone the area, we would still be required to formulate incentives to facilitate the promenade. Based on the addition of a school and community center, economic studies and input from our planning consultants, it is our opinion the proposed re-zoning to Iow-medium residential is in the best interests of the City and will reduce traffic in the area by almost 75%. Pedestrian Promenade This section should be clarified that the promenade will be dedicated to the City by easement in order to ensure that the area is included for calculations of determining density and open space requirements. Second, the developer's responsibility to build to certain standards as determined by the City should be made clear. This should be done by reference to separate promenade design criteria. The minimum width should be clarified as a minimum of 10' of unobstructed passageway, not a 10' easement that may be reduced to 8' after taking out retaining walls, railings, lighting fixtures, etc. I want to make it clear to the City Commission that the City will assume the responsibilities for security, maintenance and the cost of lighting of the promenade. This will have a financial impact on future budgets. Incentives for Pedestrian Promenade The incentives should clearly identify a measure of additional development not achievable under base zoning, thus offering real value to those developers who will be required to provide the easement and construction of the promenade, Without increased density, which we do not recommend, we need to focus on incentives that would remove impediments that presently preclude developers from achieving maximum density. In addition, the incentives should also assist in creating larger unit sizes. Our studies indicate that the proposed zoning regulations would motivate a developer to build small units with an average size of 950 s.f. if they wished to maximize the permitted density. The following incentives are recommended as a package: Reduce view corridors from 10% to 3%. Reduce driveway separation requirements provided it meets safety and traffic engineering standards. Eliminate FAR requirements. Increase maximum permitted height from four to five stories. Private property underwater can be counted toward open space and density calculations. Memo to City Commission Page 3 6. Developer would not be required to reimburse the City for the cost of sidewalks on NE. 188th Street. 7. The promenade can be counted toward open space and density calculations. Given the desire to retain the 35 du/acre density, the only meaningful incentive will be to permit an increase in building volume, allowing an increase in unit sizes. The question is how much of an incentive is meaningful and reasonably proportioned to the promenade requiremerits without compromising the Iow-density character of the district. The method of allowing increased building volume is to reduce or eliminate FAR restrictions either by allowing structures to rise above four stories, or by allowing building mass to expand by increasing development footprint and reducing open space. Of these two alternatives, raising the height limit is preferable. The most practical measure of increased development intensity is to add an additional floor along with eliminating FAR restrictions. The view corridor reduction is recommended in light of the fact that the promenade would serve a better public purpose than view corridors considering requiring the developer to set aside non-buildable areas. The driveway separation issue is critical to those developments that would expect to build gated communities due to vehicle stacking issues. It has been the City's position that new developments are required to pay for public improvements adjacent to their properties. In the case of NE. 188t~ Street, the developer would be required to pay its pro-rata share of roadway improvements, sidewalks, landscaping and decorative street lighting. The incentive package provides that the developer would be allowed a credit toward the sidewalk improvements if they build the promenade adjacent to their property. Summary In summary, the recommended incentive package should be incorporated in the zoning districts along N.E. 188th Street in order to ensure that the pedestrian promenade is built. In our opinion, the recommended incentives maintain the integrity of the purpose of the zoning districts. Importantly, it does not increase density and maintains open space requirements. EMS/aca CC01052--02 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF AVENTURA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM City Commission ~ Eric M. Soroka, City, y,y~,a,~a~% L/\ February 14,2002~ % '~ Founders Park Gazebo Bandstand Workshop Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Commission cancel the Founders Park Gazebo Bandstand project. The expense of construction cannot be justified for a facility that may only be used six times a year. As an alternative, the new Community Recreation Center could accommodate small concerts and Founders Park ballfields could accommodate large concerts. BACKGROUND In 2000, the City bid the Gazebo Bandstand project for construction. The Iow bid was $305,000. Based on the fact that the bid was $100,000 higher than the amount estimated by our former engineers, the Commission took action to delay construction and combine the project with the Community Recreation Center. As previously reported, James A. Cummings, our Construction Manager, bid the project in January. The GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price) was $360,000. EMS/aca CC01049-02 CITY OF AVENTURA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Commission i M~.~r Eric M. Soroka, C February 15, 2002 Proposed Cone of Silence Ordinance Workshop Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Commission opt out of the Miami-Dade County Cone of Silence requirements and establish the City's own Cone of Silence requirements. The Ordinance continues the theme established by the City Commission to ensure that purchasing transactions are awarded based on merit and seeks to reduce outside influences on the process. We are fortunate that we have not experienced abuses that the County has in years past. However, in order to be proactive, it is important to consider the Ordinance. BACKGROUND Section 2-11.1(t) of Miami-Dade County Code establishes the "Cone of Silence" requirements, as it relates to procurement processes such as Request for Proposal (RFP), Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Invitation to Submit Qualifications (ISQ). Simply stated, the Cone of Silence restricts communications between the bidder or proposer and the City staff and Commission during the period of time that the notice is issued and the recommendation is issued. The purpose of this County Ordinance was to eliminate any undue influence or lobbying while the purchasing process was in effect and before a recommendation was made by the County Manager. County Ordinance allows cities to opt out of Section 2-11.1(t). Although I agree in concept with the Cone of Silence, it is my opinion that the County requirements in some Memo to City Commission Page 2 cases are too cumbersome and in other cases do not go far enough to address the issue. For this reason, the City Attorney and I have drafted a new Ordinance tailored to meet our needs and better address the issues. The proposed Ordinance seeks to accomplish the following: Streamline the process. Allows the City Commission to interact with staff regarding purchasing transactions recommendations that appear on the Commission Agenda. Prohibits the City Commission, City Manager and staff from communicating with a potential vendor during the time the Cone of Silence is in effect. Allows communication between the potential vendor and the City's Purchasing Agent or City employee designated for administering the procurement process, provided the communication is limited to matters of procedure. Provides for reasonable exceptions that ensure that the playing field is level for all bidders. The Cone of Silence is imposed at the time the item is advertised and terminates at the beginning of the City Commission Meeting at which the item will be considered. EMS/aca Attachment CC01050~02 ORDINANCE NO. 2002 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE CITY TO OPT OUT OF AND EXEMPT ITSELF FROM TIlE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 2-11.1(T) OF THE MIAMI-DADE COUNTY CODE CONCERNING CONE OF SILENCE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO PURCHASING TRANSACTIONS; AMENDING THE CITY CODE BY ADOPTING SECTION 2- 260 "CONE OF SILENCE" OF CHAPTER 2 "ADMINISTRATION," PROVIDING CITY'S CONE OF SILENCE REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO COMMUNICATIONS WITH ~ CITY DURING PURCHASING TRANSACTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Miami-Dade County, Florida, has recently adopted an amendment to Section 2-11.1(t) of the Miami-Dade County Code (the "County Code"), so as to remove any question of municipal autonomy in purchasing transactions, and to enable municipalities to opt out of and exempt themselves from the requirements of Section 2-11. l(t) "Cone of Silence" of the County Code; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that any necessary restrictions upon bidder or proposer communications with the City during the competitive bidding or proposal process related to purchasing transactions may be provided by municipal ordinance and by including appropriate provisions within the specifications for the purchasing transaction, rather than being mandated by a County ordinance which is not tailored to meet local concerns and procedures. IT IS HEREBY ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals Adopted. Each of the above recitals is hereby confirmed and adopted. Section 2. Opt Out Invoked. It is hereby provided that the provisions of Section 2- ll.l(t) "Cone of Silence," of the Miami-Dade County Code shall not apply to the City of Aventura. This opt out provision shall prevail over any conflicting City Ordinance. Section 3. Cit3' Code Amended. That the City Code of the City of Aventura is hereby amended by creating Section 2-260 "Cone of Silence" of Chapter 2 "Administration" to read as follows: Section 2-260. Cone of Silence. (a) Definitions. "Cone of Silence", as used herein, means a prohibition on any communication regarding a particular Request for Proposal ("RFP"), Request for Qualification ("RFQ") or bid, between: a potential vendor, service provider, proposer, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant, and: the City Commissioners, City's professional staffincluding, but not limited to, the City Manager and his or her staff, any member of the City's selection or evaluation committee. Co) Restriction; Notice. A Cone of Silence shall be imposed upon each RFP, RFQ and bid aiter the advertisement of said RFP, RFQ or bid. At the time of imposition of the Cone of Silence, the City Manager or his or her designee shall provide for public notice of the Cone of Silence by posting a notice at the City Hall. The City Manager shall issue a written notice thereof to the affected departments, file a copy of such notice with the City Clerk, with a copy thereof to each City Commissioner, and shall include in any public solicitation for goods or services a statement disclosing the requirements of this section. (c) Termination of Cone of Silence. The Cone of Silence shall terminate at the beginning of the City Commission meeting at which the City Manager makes his or her written recommendation to the City Commission. However, if the City Commission refers the Manager's recommendation back to the Manager or staff for further review, the Cone of Silence shall be reimposed until such time as the Manager makes a subsequent written recommendation. (d) Exceptions To Applicability. The provisions of this section shall not apply to: (1) oral communications at pre-bid conferences; (2) oral presentations before selection or evaluation committees; (3) public presentations made to the City Commissioners during any duly noticed public meeting; (4) communications in writing at any time with any City employee, unless specifically prohibited by the applicable RFP, RFQ or bid documents. The bidder or proposer shall file a copy of any written communication with the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall make copies available to any person upon request; (5) communications regarding a particular RFP, RFQ or bid between a potential vendor, service provider, proposer, bidder, lobbyist or consultant and the City's Purchasing Agent or City employee designated responsible for administering the procurement process for such RFP, RFQ or bid, provided the communication is limited strictly to matters of process or procedure already contained in the corresponding solicitation document; (6) communications with the City Attorney and his or her staff; (7) duly noticed site visits to determine the competency of bidders regarding a particular bid during the time period between the opening of bids and the time the City Manager makes his or her written recommendation; (8) any emergency procurement of goods or services pursuant to City Code; (9) responses to the City's request for clarification or additional information; (10) contract negotiations during any duly noticed public meeting; (11) communications to enable City staff to seek and obtain industry comment or perform market research, provided all communications related thereto between a potential vendor, service provider, proposer, bidder, lobbyist, or consultant and any member of the City's professional staff including, but not limited to, the City Manager and his or her staffare in writing or are made at a duly noticed public meeting. (e) Penalties. Violation of this section by a particular bidder or proposer shall render any RFP award, RFQ award or bid award to said bidder or proposer voidable by the City Commission or City Manager. Any person who violates a provision of this section may be prohibited from serving on a City selection or evaluation committee. In addition to any other penalty provided herein, violation of any provision of this section by a City employee may subject said employee to disciplinary action. Section 4. Sevecability. That the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this Ordinance shall stand notwithstanding the invalidity of any part. Section $. Inclusion in the Code. It is the intention of the City Commission, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and made a part of the Code of the City of Aventura; that the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions; and that the word "Ordinance" shall be changed to "Section" or other appropriate word. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon adoption on second reading. Section 7. Notification. That the City Clerk shall provide a copy of this Ordinance to the Miami-Dade County Ethics Commission. The foregoing Ordinance was offered by Commissioner its adoption on first reading. The motion was seconded by Commissioner upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Arthur Berger Commissioner Jay IL Beskin Commissioner Ken Cohen Commissioner Manny Grossman Commissioner Harry Holzberg Vice Mayor Patricia Rogers-Libert Mayor Jeffi-ey M Perlow its , who moved The foregoing Ordinance was offered by Commissioner adoption who moved on second reading. The motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Arthur Berger Commissioner Jay 1L Beskin Commissioner Ken Cohen Commissioner Manny Grossman Commissioner Harry Holzbe~g Vice Mayor Patricia Rogers-Libert Mayor Jeffrey M. Perlow PASSED AND ADOPTED on first reading this day of PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this day of ,2002. ,2002. ATTEST: JEFFREY M. PERLOW, MAYOR TERESA M. SOROKA, CMC CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF AVENTURA OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Commission y ~nag~ Eric M. Soroka, Cit February 15, 2002 Proposed Ordinance Establishing Procedures for Resolving Bid Protests Workshop Agenda Item RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Commission adopt the attached Ordinance, which establishes procedures fo.r resolving bid protests. BACKGROUND The City Commission previously requested the City Administration to investigated the possibility of establishing procedures for bid protests. This was raised at the time the RFP for the Charter School Management Company was awarded. It is the intent of the Ordinance that all procedural and technical issues related to bids, RFPs, RFQs and contract awards be decided by the City Manager and the City Attorney upon written receipt of a protest. All bidders will be notified following the release of the City Manager's written recommendation. At which time a bidder may file a pretest. At the time the City Manager's recommendation is presented at a Meeting, the City Attorney will advise the City Commission of any legal issues relative to any bid protest filed in connection wit the bid in question. EMS/aca CC01051-02 ORDINANCE NO. 2002- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR RESOLVING PROTESTS CONCERNING BIDS (BIDS), REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP'S), REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ'S), REQUEST FOR LETTERS OF INTEREST (RFLI'S), AND PURCHASE ORDERS BASED ON WRITTEN OR ORAL QUOTATIONS, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATION"; BY AMENDING ARTICLE IV ENTITLED "FINANCE" DIVISION 3 ENTITLED "PURCHASING"; BY CREATING SECTION 2-259 ENTITLED "AUTHORITY TO RESOLVE PROTESTED BIDS AND PROPOSED AWARDS"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, from time to time the City procures goods and services through Invitation for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Letters of Interest, and purchase orders based on written or oral quotations, in accordance with the public bidding procedures set forth in Flodda law and the Code of the City of Aventura (the "City Code"); and WHEREAS, such process may lead to protested bids and proposed awards; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City Commission that procedural and technical issues related to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Letters of Interest, and purchase orders based on written or oral quotations, be decided by the City Manager and the City Attorney, and that their determinations with respect to said procedural and technical issues shall be deemed final; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City and all respondents to Invitations for Bids, Requests for Proposals, Requests for Qualifications, Requests for Letters of Interest, and purchase orders based on written or oral quotations, to have a clear and unequivocal procedure for resolving such protests in a timely and expeditious manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, as follows: Section 1. There is hereby created and added to Article IV "Finance" Division 3 "Purchasing" of Chapter 2 "Administration" of the City Code a new Section 2-259 "Authority to Resolve Protested Bids and Proposed Awards", which shall read as follows: Ordinance No. 2002-_ Page 2 Section 2-259. Authority to Resolve Protested Bids and Proposed Awards. (a) Right to Protest. Any actual bidder, or qualified proposer (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "bidder") who has a substantial interest in, and is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or proposed award of, a request for proposals ("RFP"), request for qualifications ("RFQ'), request for letters of interest ("RFLI') or invitation for bid for goods and/or services ("hereinafter, collectively referred to as the bid") may protest to the City Manager or his or her designee. Protests arising from the decisions and votes of any evaluation or selection committee shall be limited to protests based upon alleged deviation(s) from established purchasing procedures set forth in this Code, any written guidelines issued by the City, and the specifications, requirements and/or terms set forth in any bid. This section shall not be applicable if the bid specifications expressly so state. (1) Any protest concerning the bid specification requirements, and/or terms must be made within three business days (for the purposes of this ordinance, "business day" means a day other than Saturday, Sunday or a national holiday), from the time the facts become known and, in any case, at least two business days prior to the opening of the bids. Such protest must be made in writing to the City Manager or his or her designee, and such protest shall state the particular grounds on which it is based and shall include all pertinent documents and evidence. No bid protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the requirements of this section. Failure to timely protest bid specifications, requirements and/or terms is a waiver of the ability to protest the specifications, requirements and/or terms. (2) Any protest after the bid opening, including challenges to actions of any evaluation or selection committee as provided in subsection (a) above, shall be submitted in writing to the City Manager, or his or her designee. The City will allow such bid protest to be submitted anytime until two (2) business days following the release of the City Manager's written recommendation to the City Commission, as same is set forth and released in the City Commission agenda packet, for award of the bid in question. Such protest shall state the particular grounds on which it is based and shall include all pertinent documents and evidence. No bid protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the requirements of this section. All Ordinance No. 2002-__ Page 3 actual bidders shall be notified in writing (which may be transmitted by electronic communication, such as facsimile transmission and/or e-mail), following the release of the City Manager's written recommendation to the City Commission (3) Any bidder who is aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or proposed award of a purchase order based on an oral or written quotation may protest to the City Manager or his or her designee anytime during the procurement process, up to the time of the award of the purchase order, but not after such time. Such protest shall be made in writing and state the particular grounds on which it is based and shall include all pertinent documents and evidence. No bid protest shall be accepted unless it complies with the requirements of this section. (4) The City may require reasonable reimbursement for expenses incurred in processing any protest hereunder, which expenses shall include, but not be limited to, staff time, legal fees and expenses (including expert witness fees), reproduction of documents and other out-of-pocket expenses. (b) Authority to Resolve Protests. The City Manager or his or her designee shall have the authority to settle and resolve a protest concerning the solicitation or award of a bid. (c) Responsiveness. Prior to any decision being rendered under this Ordinance with respect to a bid protest, the City Manager and the City Attorney, or their respective designees, shall certify whether the submission of the bidder to the bid in question is responsive. The parties to the protest shall be bound by the determination of the City Manager and the City Attorney with regard to the issue of responsiveness. Further, the determination of the City Manager and the City Attorney with regard to all procedural and technical matters shall be final. (d) Decision and Appeal Procedures. If the bid protest is net resolved by mutual agreement, the City Manager and the City Attorney, or their respective designees, shall promptly issue a decision in writing. The decision shall specifically state the reasons for the action taken and inform the protestor of his or her right to challenge the decision. Any person aggrieved by any action or decision of the City Manager, the City Attorney, or their respective designees, with regard to any decision rendered under this section may seek judicial review of said decision by filing an original Ordinance No. 2002-__ Page 4 action against City in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, within thirty (30) days of the decision in accordance with the applicable court rules. Any action not brought in good faith shall be subject to sanctions including damages suffered by the City and attorney's fees incurred by the City in defense of such wrongful action. This paragraph shall not waive standing requirements which are otherwise provided by law. (e) Distribution. A copy of each decision by the City Manager and the City Attorney shall be mailed or otherwise furnished promptly to the protestor. (f) Stay of Procurements During Protests. In the event of a timely protest under paragraph (a) of this section, the City shall not proceed further with the solicitation or with the award pursuant to such bid until a decision is issued under paragraph ( ) above, unless a written determination is made by the City Manager, that the award pursuant to such bid must be made without delay in order to protect a substantial interest of the City. (g) Remedy. The institution and filing of a protest under this Code is an administrative remedy that shall be employed prior to the institution and filing of any civil action against the City concerning the subject matter of the protest. (h) Protests Barred. Protests not timely made under this section shall be barred. Any basis or ground for a protest not set forth in the letter of protest required under this section shall be deemed waived. (i) Report. At the time the City Manager's written recommendation for award of a bid is presented at a meeting of the Mayor and City Commission, the City Attorney, or his or her designee, shall present a report to inform the Mayor and City Commission of any legal issues relative to any bid protest filed in connection with the bid in question. Finality. The determination of the City Manager and the City Attorney with regard to all procedural and technical matters shall be final. (k) No waiver. Nothing in this section shall waive City's sovereign immunity pursuant to section 768.28, F.S. Ordinance No. 2002-__ Page 5 Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable and if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Ordinance but they shall remain in effect, it being the legislative intent that this Ordinance shall stand notwithstanding the invalidity of any part. Section 3. Inclueion in the Code. It is the intention of the City Commission, and it is hereby ordained that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of the City of Aventura; that the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intentions; and that the word "Ordinance" shall be changed to "Section" or other appropriate word. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption on second reading. The foregoing motion was seconded by Commissioner to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Arthur Berger Commissioner Jay R. Beskin Commissioner Ken Cohen Commissioner Manny Grossman Commissioner Harry Holzberg Vice Mayor Patricia Rogers-Libert Mayor Jeffrey M. Perlow Ordinance was offered by Commissioner , who moved its adoption on first reading. The , and, upon being put The foregoing Ordinance was offered by Commissioner , who moved its adoption on second reading. The motion was seconded by Commissioner , and, upon being put to a vote, the vote was as follows: Commissioner Arthur Berger Commissioner Jay R. Beskin Ordinance No. 2002-__ Page 6 Commissioner Ken Cohen Commissioner Manny Grossman Commissioner Harry Holzberg Vice Mayor Patricia Rogers-Libert Mayor Jeffrey M. Perlow PASSED on first reading this 5th day of March, 2002. PASSED AND ADOPTED on second reading this 2"d day of April, 2002. ATTEST: JEFFREY M. PERLOW, MAYOR TERESA M. SOROKA, CMC CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY A'I-rORNEY Billboard Proposal 1. Remove billboard #2 2. Remove billboard #6 3. Increase height of billboard #1 COON MAULE ,~ CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR Clear Channel Outdoor South Florida Division 5800 NW 77th Court, Miami, Florida 33166 Telephone: (305) 714-3542 Fax: (305) 714-3480 #1 #1 US HWY 1 EL 40F NE 203 St. CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR Clear Channel Outdoor South Florida Division 5800 NW 77th Court, Miami, Florida 33166 Telephone: (305) 714-3542 Fax: (305) 714-3480 #2 # 2 NE 203 St SL IOOF W/O US HWY 1 Clear Channel Outdoor South Florida Division 5800 NW 77th Court, Miami, Florida 33166 Telephone: (305) 714-3542 Fax: (305) 714-3480 ?.~ CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR #6 # 6 Biscayne BD WL 25F S/O NW 192 St. ~ CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR Clear Channel Outdoor South Florida Division 5800 NW 77th Cour[, Miami, Florida 33166 Telephone: (308) 714-3542 Fax: (305) 714-3480 Aventura Flyover North South Face ~ CLEARCHANNEL OUTDOOR Clear Channel Outdoor South Florida Division 5800 NW 77th Court, Miami, Florida 33166 Telephone: (305) 714-3542 Fax: (305) 714-3480 Aventura Flyover North Face