07-26-2005
City Col11l1liJJsion
Susan Gottlieb, Mayor
A ~e City of
~ventura
.(¡),
-"""";.'
City M~F
Eric M. Soroka, lCMA-CM
Zev Auerbach
Boh Diamond
Billy Joel
Harry Holzberg
Michael Stem
Luz Urbáez Weinberg
GtyClerk
Te<esa M. Soroka, MMC
City Attom<:/,
Weiss Serota Helfman
Pasloriza Cole & Boniske
AGENDA
JULY 26, 2005
following 10 AM LPA Mtg.
Aventora Gov.....- Center
19200 West Coonùy Club Drive
Aventura, Florida 33 180
1. CALL TO ORDEWROLL CALL
2. RESOLUTION - PUBLIC HEARING:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF A VENTURA, FLORIDA,
ADOPTING THE MOTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY TO
TRANSMIT THE DRAFT EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR PRELIMINARY
REVIEW AND COMMENT; REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE REVIEW OF
THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT "A," TO THE
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL (SFRPC)
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF mE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
REGULATION ACT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ADJOURNMENT
3.
This meeting is open 10 the poblic, In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, allpet>Ol1S who are disabled
and who need special accommodations to participate in this meetiog becaose of that disability should contact the Office of the City
Clerk, 305-466-8901, not 1- than two days prior to such proceeding. One or more membefl¡ of the City of Aventora Advisory
Boards may be in attendance, Anyooe wishiog to ""peal any decision made by the Aventora City Cormnission with respect to any
matter considered at such meeting or hearing wiD need a rerord of the proceedings and, for such pmpose, may need to ensure that a
verbatim rerord of the proceedings is made, which rerord inclodes the lestimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Agenda items may be viewed at the Office of the CityCletk, City of Aventora Government Center, 19200 W, Counùy Club
Drive, Aventura, Florida, 33180, Anyone wishing to obtain a copy of any agenda item should coutact the City Cletk at 305-4ó6-
8901.
CITY OF AVENTURA
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
DATE:
City Commission { if
E"' M, So'oka. IC~M,City Maoo " '
July 11, 2005
City of Aventura Draft Evaluation and Appraisal
Report of the City's Comprehensive Plan
TO:
SUBJECT:
July 26, 2005 Local Planning Agency Meeting Agenda Item No. L
July 26, 2005 City Commission Meeting Agenda Item No. ~
BACKGROUND
The State of Florida requires that each municipality undertake an evaluation and
appraisal of its Comprehensive Plan once every seven years. The City's
Comprehensive Plan was adopted in December of 1998; therefore, our
Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) is due to the State on December 1, 2005.
The EAR is an evaluation of the goals, policies and objectives of the master plan,
an appraisal of how well those goals, policies and objectives have been
implemented to date and an opportunity to ensure that any updates necessary to
guide future development of the City are made to the plan.
The draft EAR is attached. It has been prepared based on the six major issues
identified at the public workshops in December of 2004 and April of 2005 and
accepted by the Florida Department of Community Affairs in February of 2005.
Those issues are:
. Development and Redevelopment
. Housing
. Emergency Management
. Transportation
. Intergovernmental Coordination
. Quality of Life
A great deal of effort from the City's Planning Consultants, Planning Director and
my office has been spent to ensure that the issues raised by the City
Commission are addressed in the EAR.
OVERVIEW
The EAR is organized into six chapters and three appendices. Chapter I is an
introduction to the EAR and an overview of our community.
Chapter II has an overview followed by separate discussion of the six major
issues, This is the chapter that makes recommendations for amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan for future development and redevelopment of the City. The
highlights of these proposed amendments are:
Future Land Use Element
. Add a new objective and policies to this element to state that by 2007
the City shall review and amend its Land Development Regulations
(LDRs) in order to provide a cohesive blueprint for development and
redevelopment. The LDRs will address strategies to accommodate
growth while maintaining neighborhood integrity, ensure appropriate
height and site development requirements and design guidelines,
ensure appropriate transitions and linkages between different
neighborhood uses, encourage more walkable neighborhoods, buffer
neighborhoods and existing development from the encroachment of
incompatible uses, limit the intensity of future development and
redevelopment in a manner that is consistent with current development
patterns and that minimizes further negative impacts to the City's
infrastructure, traffic congestion, hurricane evacuation clearance times
and quality of life and prevent redevelopment that would significantly
increase its existing intensity or density unless redevelopment would
implement specific development and redevelopment goals that are or
might be established for a particular area
. Add text to the Medium High Density Residential and Business and
Office land use categories to state that the height of buildings and
attainment of maximum densities and intensities are contingent upon
the ability of the developer to ensure appropriate transitions and
buffers with the surrounding neighborhood and alleviate impacts that
adversely impact level of service standards and quality of life
. Add text to the Town Center land use category to clarify that such
center is not a regional activity center, but rather is intended to
primarily serve the City's existing and future residents and businesses
. Add a Water land use category which clarifies that the use of areas
designated "water" on the Future Land Use Map are not the site of
potential development consistent with Chapter 24 of the Miami-Dade
County Code and shall be limited to recreational and commercial
boating facilities, open space and urban relief, recreation, waterways,
wetlands, flood control, stormwater drainage and storage and natural
resource protection.
Redevelopment Element
. Add a new "Redevelopment" Element that consolidates the existing
"Urban Design" and "Economic Development" Elements with expanded
policies
. Add a policy that by 2007, the City shall refine development/design
guidelines for the Town Center that provides for its redevelopment as a
design unified downtown serving primarily City residents
. Add a policy that by 2007, the City shall review and amend its LDRs to
reduce potential development/redevelopment intensities on the
Biscayne Boulevard corridor, including strategies to improve the
corridor through cohesive design and development and redevelopment
patterns
Emergency Management
. Add a new policy that by 2007, the City will coordinate with appropriate
agencies to ensure that updated data and methodologies are being
utilized in hurricane evacuation clearance times formulas and
encourage the use of consistent evacuation clearance time standards
by northeast Miami-Dade County municipalities
Transportation Element
. Add a new objective to the Transportation Element stating that by
2007, the City will enact LDR amendments to ensure that new
development and redevelopment does not further degrade
transportation level of service standards in the City and enhance
mobility options for existing and future residents
. Recommends that the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area
(TCEA) be maintained, but add a policy stating that by 2006, the City
will annually evaluate the impact of its TCEA as required by state
statute
. Add a new policy stating that the City will develop a method by which
new development can participate in funding transportation
enhancements, particularly the expansion, operation and maintenance
of the City's transit system
Chapter III is an Objective Achievement Analysis, which identifies the City's
successes and measures progress in implementing the Comprehensive Plan
objectives since adopting the Plan in 1998. The analysis shows that the City has
done an excellent job in implementing, continuing to implement or working with
agencies having jurisdiction to implement all policies in the 1998 plan.
Chapter IV is a Communitywide Assessment comparing conditions in the City
between the date of the adoption of the plan in 1998 and this evaluation and
appraisal. It addresses population growth, vacant land, location of development,
level of service standards, co-ordination of residential development and public
school planning, relevant changes in growth management laws and consistency
of the Comprehensive Plan with those laws.
Chapter V is a Summary of Recommendations for amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan, organized according to the name of the Element in the
Comprehensive Plan. These are the same amendments listed in Chapter II,
where they are organized under major issue headings.
Chapter VI is a Public Participation Summary outlining the public workshops,
interagency scoping meeting and acknowledgement by the State of Florida
Department of Community Affairs of our scope of work to include the six major
issues of development and redevelopment, housing, emergency management,
transportation, quality of life and intergovernmental coordination.
There are four appendices to the report, Appendix A is the Letter of
Understanding and Scope of Work from DCA dated February 2, 2005. Appendix
B is the City's Capital Improvements Program. Appendix C is a table evidencing
compliance with Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes. Appendix D is a table
evidencing compliance with Rule 9J-5 of the Florida Administrative Code,
ACTION REQUIRED
The Local Planning Agency may make a motion recommending to the City
Commission that the draft EAR be transmitted for preliminary review, The
reviewing agency will provide its comments within thirty days. These comments
may be incorporated into the EAR at the discretion of the City Commission.
Once the EAR is in final form, a public hearing will be held to formally adopt the
EAR and transmit it for final review. The Florida Department of Community
Affairs (DCA) is the lead review agency for Evaluation and Appraisal Reports;
however, it has passed legislation delegating that review authority by option of
the municipality to Regional Planning Councils. The City's Planning Consultants
have recommended that the City Commission request that DCA delegate the
review of the City's EAR to the South Florida Regional Planning Council, since
the Council is our local agency and is familiar with the specific issues facing the
region.
NEXT STEP
Once the EAR is adopted in final form, staff and I will expedite revisions to the
Land Development Regulations to incorporate the recommendations of the EAR.
I want to take this opportunity to recognize the efforts of the Planning
Consultants, Planning Director and Staff.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
c.c.: David Wolpin. Esq., City Attorney
Joanne Carr, AICP, Planning Director
Bell David Planning Group, Consultants
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- -
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA,
ADOPTING THE MOTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING
AGENCY TO TRANSMIT THE DRAFT EVALUATION AND
APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND COMMENT;
REQUESTING THAT THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DELEGATE REVIEW OF THE
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR) OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT "A,"
TO THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING
COUNCIL (SFRPC) PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMPREHENSIVE
PLANNING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATION
ACT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Aventura desires to transmit the draft Evaluation and
Appraisal Report ("EAR") for preliminary review and comment, prior to adopting the
Report in final form; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission has been designated as the Local Planning
Agency for the City pursuant to Section 163.3174, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, the local Planning Agency has held a public hearing to review and
receive comments on the draft EAR and has recommended transmittal to the City
Commission; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 98-27, the City Commission adopted its
Comprehensive Plan according to the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida
Statutes, known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and land
Development Regulation Act, and
WHEREAS, Florida Statutes §163.3191(8) allows the Florida Department of
Community Affairs ("Department") to delegate its "authority" as the state land planning
agency for sufficiency review of EARs to the appropriate regional planning council,
while retaining oversight of the process; and
WHEREAS, the Department entered into such an agreement with the South
Florida Regional Planning Council (SFRPC) to review EARs in Miami-Dade County for
sufficiency in accordance with the prescribed criteria in Florida Statutes §163.3191 and
Florida Administrative Code R. 9J-5.005, where the local governing body, by vote of a
majority of its membership, requests delegation in writing; and
Resolution No. 2005- -
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City of Aventura elects to have its Evaluation and Appraisal
Report reviewed for sufficiency by the South Florida Regional Planning Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF AVENTURA, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1.
That each of the above stated recitals is hereby adopted and
confirmed.
Section 2.
The City of Aventura hereby requests that the Florida Department
of Community Affairs delegate the sufficiency review of its Evaluation and Appraisal
Report of the City's Comprehensive Plan to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council pursuant to and in accordance with Section 163.3191, Florida Statutes.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon
adoption.
The foregoing Resolution was offered by
adoption. The motion was seconded by
vote, the vote was as follows:
Commissioner Bob Diamond
Commissioner Harry Holzberg
Commissioner Billy Joel
Commissioner Michael Stern
Commissioner Luz Urbaez Weinberg
Vice Mayor lev Auerbach
Mayor Susan Gottlieb
, who moved its
, and upon being put to a
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of July, 2005.
SUSAN GOTTLIEB, MAYOR
Resolution No. 2005- -
Page 3
ATTEST:
TERESA M. SOROKA, MMC
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:
CITY ATTORNEY
This Resolution was filed in the Office of the City Clerk this - day of
CITY CLERK
,2005.
!
CITY OF A VENTURA
2005 Comprehensive Plan
Evaluation and Appraisal Report
July 2005 Draft
Prepared for the City by: Bell David Planning Group
The Corradino Group, Subconsultant
1111
I.'.. . .., ~.'41.~ 1::\"",' """'.. %;;;..H~~
. Seøt# 8' SðI/J
'. " " '. ~,
~, .. I
".~ u ...'.
ÚH11I11J;S/QOW Com_,
II/fyJod _0-
5"euN Sed J
Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM
City Manager
Teresa M. Soroka, MMC
City Clerk
Joanne Carr, AICP
.Planning Director
Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza Guedes Cole & Boniske
City Attorney
I
Com-,
M'd1od Slrm
s-t2
CITY OF AVENTURA 2005 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY OVERVIEW
Figure 1.1. City of A ventura Location Map
CHAPTER II. MAJOR ISSUES
II. A. Development and Redevelopment
I. Issue Description and Analysis
2. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
3. Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Figure II.A.I. City of Aventura Future Land Use Plan Map
Figure II.A.2. City of A ventura Zoning Map
Figure II.A.3. City of Aventura Vacant Land Map
Figure II.AA. City of Aventura Town Center District
Figure II.A.5. City of Aventura Hospital District
II.B.
Housing
I. Issue Description and Analysis
2. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
3. Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
II. C. Emergency Management
1. Issue Description and Analysis
2. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
3. Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Figure II.C.I. City of A ventura Hurricane Evacuation Zones
Figure II.C.2, City of A ventura Hurricane Evacuation Routes
II. D. Transportation
I. Issue Description and Analysis
2. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
3. Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Figure II.D.I. City of A ventura Roadway Levels of Service (2030)
Figure II.D.2. MDT A Bus Routes (2005)
Figure II.D.3. City of Aventura Shuttlebus Routes
II. E. Quality of Life
1. Issue Description and Analysis
2. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
3. Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Figure II.E.I. City of Aventura Public Parks
Figure II.E.2. City of Aventura Public Waterfront Access Sites
Page
I - 3
3
4 - 73
6 - 27
6 - 20
21
22 - 27
10
12
15
18
19
28 - 35
28 - 32
33
34 - 35
36 - 52
36 - 48
49
50-52
39
40
53 - 63
53 - 60
61
62 - 63
55
56
57
64 - 73
64 - 71
72
73
67
68
CHAPTER III.
OBJECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT ANAL YSlS
lILA. Future Land Use Element
III.B. Transportation Element
III.c. Parks and Recreation Element
III.D. Housing Element
III.E. Infrastructure Element
III.F. Capital Jmprovements Element
111.0. Intergovernmental Coordination Element
IILH. Conservation and Coastal Management Element
111.1. Economic Development Element
III.J. Urban Design Element
CHAPTER IV. COMMUNITYWIDE ASSESSMENT
IILA. Population Changes, Vacant Land, Changes in Land Area,
and Location of Development in Relation to
Location of Development Anticipated in Comprehensive Plan
IILB. Levels of Service Analysis and Financial Feasibility
III.C. Coordination of Land Use and Public School Planning
III.D. Consistency with Growth Management Laws
I. State Comprehensive Plan
2. Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
3. Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code
4. Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida
CHAPTER V. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTER VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY
LIST OF APPENDICES
Page
74 - 192
74 - 93
94 - 103
104 - 107
108 - 116
117 - 132
133 - 142
143 - 151
152 - 186
187 - 189
190 - 192
193 - 207
193 - 194
195-201
202 - 204
205 - 207
207
205 - 207
207
207
208 - 223
224
Appendix A,
Appendix B.
Appendix C.
Appendix D.
Letter of Understanding and Scope of Work
Capital Improvements Program
Consistency with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
Consistency with Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code
ii
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
I.
INTRODUCTION AND COMMUNITY OVERVIEW
The City of Aventura's Comprehensive Plan (Plan) is its blueprint for existing and future
development. The Plan's goals, objectives and policies reflect the City's vision for its
future, and for how it will meet the needs of existing and future residents, visitors and
businesses.
The Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) is a State-mandated update of the Plan. In
order to be effective, the Plan must be a living document, one with the flexibility to adapt
to changing conditions and needs. Although there are other opportunities to periodically
revise the Plan, these revisions often occur as the result of outside development
applications. In the daily hustle, it is unlikely that the City has an opportunity to step back
and take a holistic look at how well the Plan is working, and how it might be refined to
address community-specific issues and challenges. The EAR provides this opportunity.
The City of A ventura, the City of Excellence, was incorporated in November 1995, making
it one of Miami-Dade County's newest municipalities. Nonetheless, the City traces it roots
back more than thirty-five years, when developer Don Soffer and Tumberry Associates
established Turnberry Isles, a 785-acre master planned community. Turnberry Isles served
as the catalyst for the development of other high quality residential communities in the
area, as well as a strong commercial and office base, The City now boasts a diversified
mix of single and multi-family residential, commercial, office, industrial and recreational
uses, as well as Aventura Mall, a regional activity center. Its diversified land use base,
high quality of life, and strategic location on the intracoastal waterway between Miami and
Ft. Lauderdale have made Aventura one of the region's most desirable locations for
residents and businesses. As a result, a recent study by the Wall Street Journal indicates
that the highest real estate appreciation in 2004 in the southeastern United States occurred
in zip code 33180, which includes the City of A ventura. Specifically, the median home
sales price in the City in 2004 was $445,500, an increase of 23.6 percent from 2003 and
lI2.5percenttrom 1999.1
With a 2000 population of 25,267, Aventura is the eighth most populous municipality in
Miami-Dade County. Although it was not incorporated until 1995, between 1990 and
2000, the City's population increased trom 15,375 to 25,267, a 67 percent increase. The
cities of Hialeah Gardens and Medley are the only municipalities in Miami-Dade County
that grew at a faster rate during that period. By 2010, the City's population is anticipated to
increase to 32,925, an increase of 30 percent since 2000. Based on projections prepared by
the University of Florida, by 2015, it is projected that its population will increase to 37,307
(48% above the 2000 Census), and by 2025, it is projected that it will increase to 46,329
(83% above the 2000 Census)2. It should be noted, however, that these estimates are based
on historic and current population figures and growth trends, and do not reflect local
conditions. The City is rapidly approaching build-out, and its future development potential
and population growth is limited by the scarcity of vacant and developable land. For these
I Miami New Times, May 12 - 18, 2005, Volume 20, Number 6
2 University of Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, Affordable Housing Needs Assessment,
2003
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
reasons, the City estimates that its population will cap out at around 32,925, the year 2010
population estimate.
The City of Aventura has a number of other demographic characteristics that make it
unique. In 2000, 35.2 percent of its population was 65 or older, the second highest
percentage in Miami-Dade County. Despite this fact, recent trends in the City reflect an
increasing number of younger households and families. In 2000, the median family
income in the City was $41,092, the seventh highest among the County's 32
municipalities.3
The City of Aventura has a land area of approximately 3.2 square miles bounded by:
Broward County and the City of Hallandale Beach to the north; Golden Beach and Sunny
Isles across Dumfounding Bay and the Intracoastal Waterway to the east; North Miami
Beach to the south, and; unincorporated Miami-Dade County to the west (Figure 1.1.).
There have been no changes in the City's land area since it was incorporated in 1995.
3 Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, Miami-Dade County Facts, Revised 3/2004
6 Chapter 31, Article IV, "Land Development Regulations", City of Aventura Code of Ordinances
2
DRAFT City of Aventrua 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure 1.1 City of Aventura Location Map
Atlantic Ocean
N
W+E
S
Legend
- Street
0 City of Aventura
. Miami-Dade County
0 Broward County
3
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
II. MAJOR ISSUES
In 1998, the State of Florida revised the statutory requirements for the EAR to allow local
governments to base their analysis on the key local issues that they are facing. In order to
comply with these requirements, and in recognition of the complicated and diverse range of
planning issues that the City of Aventura is currently facing, the City initiated its EAR
process with a public workshop on December 16, 2004, and conducted an interagency
scoping meeting with members of State, regional and County agencies and representatives
of adjacent municipalities on December 20, 2004. A Local Planning Agency Workshop
was conducted on April 25, 2005. This process is also detailed in the Public Participation
Summary section of this report.
Based on input received via this process, the City of Aventura identified six major issues
for inclusion in the EAR. On January 14,2005 the City provided the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) with a request for a Letter of Understanding regarding these
issues, and the City's proposed Scope of Work (Appendix A). On February 2, 2005, DCA
provided the City with a Letter of Understanding agreeing to the proposed issues and
Scope. The six major issues are as follows:
Issue I.
Development and Redevelopment
The City of Aventura is substantially developed. Nonetheless, development remains a
major issue due to regional growth pressures, initiatives to redirect development to
established urban areas, and the need to develop and/or reexamine plans for specific areas
(i.e. Town Center, the Hospital District).
Issue 2.
Housing
Increased property values and costs are making housing in the City prohibitive to many
households. The availability of housing that is affordable and appropriate for existing and
future households of all income levels is therefore a major issue. Specific concerns include
,the availability of housing to accommodate employees of existing and future businesses,
the diminishing rental housing stock that is resulting from condominium conversions, and
barriers to homeownership.
Issue 3.
Emergency Management
Aventura is a coastal community, and emergency management and hurricane preparedness
are on-going concerns. Specific issues include the impacts of development and
redevelopment on emergency management efforts, the ability of the transportation system
to handle evacuation needs, and coordination with other jurisdictions. Terrorism and
homeland security is a major important concern, particularly with regards to regional
activity centers such as the Aventura Mall.
4
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Issue 4.
Transportation
As a densely developed urban center, the City experiences significant traffic congestion.
The City's existing and future residents need better mobility options through a variety of
transportation modes (mass transit, automobile, water taxis, boats, bicycles, pedestrian
facilities). Transportation problems (congestion, traffic noise, signalization and signage
issues, connectivity and negative impacts on neighborhoods) need to be addressed.
Issue 5.
Quality of Life
Due to on-going development pressures and competing needs, the City is challenged to
maintain and improve the high quality of life of existing and future residents, businesses,
and visitors through the provision of services such as parks, public safety, public facilities,
schools and pedestrian facilities.
Issue 6.
Intergovernmental Coordination
In the afore-mentioned issue scoping phase, intergovernmental coordination was identified
as a key issue to be addressed in the EAR. Specific concerns regarding intergovernmental
coordination pertained to the impacts of development in adjacent jurisdictions, and
coordination with other governmental agencies in the provision of services and facilities
that impact the City's quality of life (i.e. public schools). In developing this report, it
became evident that these issues are fully and appropriately addressed in the discussion and
analysis of Issue I, "Development and Redevelopment", and Issue 5, "Quality of Life".
Therefore, intergovernmental coordination is not addressed as a separate issue in this
Report.
5
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
ILA.
Development and Redevelopment
1.
Issue Description and Analysis
The City of Aventura faces a number of challenges relating to development and
redevelopment. The City was approximately 95 percent developed upon its incorporation
in 1995, and a number of projects previously approved in the County but not yet developed
have vested rights. There have been growing concerns about the intensity of development
and overbuilding in the City, and the impacts of this development on quality of life. In
particular, the City faces heavy traffic congestion, which is raising concerns about
emergency management and the public health, safety and welfare. In addition,
compatibility of new development and redevelopment with existing development, building
heights, and maintaining the quality of the built environment were all cited as concerns by
City officials and residents during the EAR-scoping process, and in other City public
participation forums. In response to these concerns, the City has enacted a temporary
moratorium on development until the EAR is completed. Key issues cited in the proposed
moratorium ordinance were traffic concurrency, the Town Center land use designation,
redevelopment guidelines, building heights, and emergency management. Projects which
have vested rights and/or site plan approvals, however, would be exempted from this
moratorium.
The Comprehensive Plan and land development regulations must include provisions to
adequately preserve and enhance the City's quality of life and to protect its existing
development and neighborhoods, while remaining cognizant of economic development
needs and property rights. The City's land development regulations include detailed
requirements to regulate development in the City, while the Comprehensive Plan contains
more general standards in the interpretive text for its Future Land Use categories. The
intent of these standards is to ensure that new development and redevelopment is consistent
with existing development in the City, and does not unduly diminish quality of life. While
a detailed review and rewrite of the land development regulations is not within the purview
of the EAR, strategies to ensure protection of existing development from adverse impacts
'caused by new development and redevelopment may be considered and adopted into the
Comprehensive Plan.
6
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
a.
Existing Development
The City of Aventura is substantially built-out. Table ILA.I. details the City's existing
land uses in 2005. As can be seen, in 2005 there were 523.89 acres of residential uses,
319.97 acres of commercial uses, 2.04 acres of industrial uses, 8.81 acres of community
facilities, 257.07 acres of recreational lands, 284.87 acres in utilities and rights-of-ways,
104.5 acres of vacant land, and 531,61 acres of water in the City, The most significant
change in existing land use in the City since 1995 is the transition of approximately 41.53
of industrial land to residential uses. This change is largely attributable to the ongoing
conversion ofNE 188 Street between NE 29 Avenue and the Intracoastal Waterway from
marine construction and repair operations to residential uses.
Table II.A.I. Existing Land Uses in the City of Aventura
Land Use Acres % of Land Area
Single Familv Residential 35.04 2%
Multi-Family Medium 85.26 4%
Density Residential
Multi-Family High Density 403.59 20%
Residential
Commercial 319.97 16%
Industrial 2.04 .1%
Community Facilities 8.81 .4%
Recreation and Open Space 257.07 12%
Utilities and Rights-of-Way 284.81 14%
Vacant 104.5 5%
Water 531.61 26%
Total 2,032.70 100%
7
DRAFT
b.
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Future Land Use
The City's Future Land Use Plan Map (Figure ILA.I) is intended to implement the
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Goal of providing "the best possible distribution of land
use and services to meet the physical, social, cultural and economic needs of the present
and future populations of the City". The Future Land Use Plan Map reflects the City's
plans for how it should develop and redevelop in the planning period. The Comprehensive
Plan has adopted the following Future Land Use categories:
.
Low Density Residential, which allows a residential density of up to six dwelling
units per gross acre;
Low-Medium Density Residential, which allows a residential density of between
six and 13 units per gross acre;
Medium Density Residential, which allows a residential density of ] 3 to 25 units
per gross acre;
Medium-High Density Residential, which allows a residential density of between
25 and 60 units per gross acre;
Industrial and Office, which provides for marine industries, marine manufacturing
operations, marine warehouses, marine showrooms, mini-warehouses, office
buildings, office buildings, hospitals and medical buildings, and similar uses with a
maximum floor area ratio (total building square footage (excluding parking
structures) divided by the net area of the parcel) of 2.0;
Business and Office, intended to accommodate the full range of sales and service
activities, including retail, wholesale, personal and professional services,
commercial and professional offices, hotels, motels, hospitals, medical buildings,
nursing homes, entertainment and cultural facilities, amusements and commercial
recreation establishments with a maximum floor area ratio of2.0, and;
Town Center, defined as future hubs of activity intended to be moderate to high-
intensity design unified areas containing a mixture of uses integrated horizontally
and vertically, and developed in accordance with adopted thematic plans. Within
Town Centers, a maximum floor area ratio of 2.0 and a maximum residential
density of 25 dwelling units per gross acre shall be allowed.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Table 11.A.2. identifies acreage in the City by Future Land Use Category.
a e .. creage JY. uture an se ategory
Future Land Use Category Acres % of Land Area
Low Density Residential 0 0%
Low-Medium Density 0 0%
Residential
Medium Density Residential 143.5 7%
Medium-High Density 572.8 28%
Residential
Parks and Recreation 283.1 14%
Industrial and Office 0 0%
Business and Office 422.7 21%
T bl II A 2 A
b F
dU
L
c
8
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table II.A.2. Acreage by Future Land Use Cate orv continued
Future Land Use Cate!!Orv Acres % of Land Area
Town Center 79.0 4%
Water 531.6 26%
Total 2,032.7 100%
As can be seen on Tables ILAI and ILA.2, a significant portion (531.61 acres, 26 percent)
of the City of Aventura is designated as Water on the Future Land Use Map. City staff has
previously detennined that the Water land use designation is a passive use and not the site
of potential development, consistent with Section 24-48.24 of Chapter 24, titled
"Environmental Protection..." of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. In order to
clarify and confinn City staffs previous and consistent detennination, interpretative text
addressing the water designation on the Future Land Use Map needs to be incorporated into
the Comprehensive Plan.
9
DRAFT City of Aventrua Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure ILA.1 City of Aventura Future Land Use Plan Map
CF
@)
,:-.., ~ 1
' ~ p:
-t,
BROW". COUNTY
MIAMI OAO' COUNTY
"DDm"""l """,""NT
LANO USE CATEGORIES
DE-""',
0 ~.:'
D~"'."
0 ..-."" OM"',
0 ¡:~.,
rn¡¡ :=:"-::
~ --.
rEI::='
""0.
LAND USE ~^'L~o",r~,
CJ ~:::.:.,~:-..,
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ .""""""'."'"
æm ~::";~~ .,.~".,
~."...,..~.".'"
Din"'",..,"."
- T~,'..,.
œ ....
rn i:::',;;;"'-"""
@ ~'."'
Eo'"...,
P...
Mop 1-7
Future land Use Map
With Adjacent land Uses &
Parks & Open Space
City of Aventura Comprehensive Plan
-"-""
"1:"æ", - SWi' '" c~"
~
Ivey, Hoccis & WolIs, Ino
- 1998
10
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
c.
Zoning
In order to further analyze the City's existing development characteristics, it is also
necessary to examine current zoning. The City of Aventura's zoning map is shown on
Figure II,A.2. A description of the zoning categories, including the maximum units per
acre, Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) and height is provided on Table II.A.3.
Table II.A.3. Zoninl! Districts in the City of Aventura
Category Units/Acre or Maximum Height
FAR
RSI (Residential Single 13 units/net acre 2 stories, 30 feet
Familv)
RS2 (Residential Single 25 units/net acre 3 stories, 55 feet
Family)
RMF3 (Residential Multi- 25 units/gross acre 4 stories. 45 feet
family/Medium Density)
RMF3A (Residential Multi- 45 units/gross acre 7 stories, 80 feet
family/Medium Density)
RMF3B (Residential Multi- 35 units/gross acre 4 stories, 45 feet
family/Medium Density)
RMF4 (Residential Multi- 60 units/gross acre 40 stories, 400 feet
family/High Density)
BI (Neighborhood FAR.40 at one story, .11 per 2 stories, 35 feet
Business) additional story
B2 (Community Business) FAR.40 at one story, .11 per 20 stories, 341 feet
additional storv
B3 (Heavy Business) FAR.40 at one story, ,II per 20 stories, 341 feet
additional story, Max. 2.0
TC-I (Town Center, Mixed Mixed use, up to 25 units 4 stories, 50 feet
Use) per acre, FAR .20, Max. 2.0
TC-2 (Town Center, Mixed use, up to 25 units 4 stories, 50 feet
Marine) per acre, FAR .20, Max, 2.0
OP (Office Park) FAR.40 at one story, .11 per 10 stories, 176 feet
additional story, Max. 2.0
MO (Medical Office) FAR.40 at one story, .11 per 10 stories, 176 feet
additional story, Max. 2.0
MI (Light Industrial) Confonn to all site 3 stories, 45 feet
requirements
CF (Community Facilities) Confonn to all site 10 stories or 120 feet,
requirements whichever is less
ROS (Recreation Open nla 5 stories, 60 feet
Space)
CNS (Conservation) nla nla
II
DRAFT City of Aventura Evaluation and Appraisal Report -July 2005 Draft
Figure II.A2 City of Aventura Zoning Map
RS!
RS2
.,.,3
-
-"
-
~
-
,-
-
-
-
.",
MI
-
I!III
me
!IIt*,f;;
AVENTURAZONING MAP
RESlOCNTlAL SINGLE rAMILY DlSTRICl
RESIII£NTlAL SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT
MULTI-FAM'" NEDI"" II£NSITY RESIDENTIAL
MULTI-FAMILY MED"" OCNSITY RESlII£NTlAL
MUL TI..FAM'" MEDIl.. II£NSH' RESIDENTIAL
MUL TI-rAM'" HIGH II£NSITY RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHIlæHDO BUSINESS DISTRICT
COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
HEAV' 'USINESS DlsrRICT
m~N CENTER DISTRICT
m~N CEN"R M.RI>£ D]SrRieT
ornCE PAlO< DISTRICT
MEDlC.L !HICE DISTRICT
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
CD""'ITY FACILITIES DISTRICT f/¡
RECREATI<><IFENSPACE !f.}
CDNSERVATlIJN DISTRICT "I!J
UTILITIES DISTRICT
Mo".,""""""
~
'.100
"""
""'"
,om
""'"
'O".,
"".,00 No
"""""""
""",
""'."
""""
""",
"""."....., ""'"
......, '" ""." "
"",,<,
"'""
"""'"
"""
]2
DRAFT
d.
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Vacant Land and Vested Rights
Figure ILA.4. and Table ILA.4. identify the location and status of the 104.5 acres of vacant
land in the City. Because the remainder of the City is already developed, it is anticipated
that most of the future development and redevelopment in the City will occur on these
parcels.
Table n.AA. Vacant Land in the City of Aventura
Status Acres % of Vacant Land
Site Plan Approval and 8.2 8%
Vested Rights
Vested Rights 11.3 11%
Site Plan Approval and 7.6 7%
Development Agreements
Site Plan Approval 18.1 17%
Application on File 2.3 2%
No Application on File 57 55%
Total 104.5 100%
.
As noted earlier, the City has enacted a development moratorium until the EAR is
completed in order to ensure that mechanisms are in place to protect quality of life
and mitigate negative impacts that might be associated with such development and
redevelopment. The proposed moratorium is limited to the area east of Biscayne
Boulevard, and excludes parcels that have obtained vested rights detenninations,
development agreements, and/or site plan approvals. These exceptions are in
recognition of the property rights of owners and developers who have invested a
significant amount of time and resources in order to obtain development approvals,
and are necessary in order to ensure that the proposed moratorium ordinance is
defensible. Many of the parcels that have obtained vested rights did so based upon
development approvals that were granted prior to the fonnation of the City on 1995,
and were granted vested rights pursuant to Section 31-3(b) of the City's Code of
Ordinances.? As demonstrated on Table ILA.4., 59.3 (43%) of the vacant acres in
the City would not be impacted by the proposed moratorium.
Approximately 1,571 residential units, 344,000 s.f. of office space and a 1.4 acre retail
complex are currently in the pipeline and will likely be built within the planning period.
According to the 2000 Census, the average household size in the City of Aventura is 1.79
persons per household9. It is therefore estimated that the City's population might increase
by 2,812 new residents (II %) as a result of these projects. It is important to note, however,
that many of these units are expected to be purchased by investors, seasonal residents or
7 David M. Wolpin, Esq., Memorandum to Aventura Mayor and Commissioners Regarding Potential
Moratorium, April 8, 2005
9 U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000, Profile of General Demographic Characteristics, 2000, Miami-Dade
County by Municipality, Census Designated Place and Congressional District
13
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
residents who already live in the City, which would lower the overall impact on the City's
population.
Several development applications in process in the City would be impacted by the proposed
moratorium. If these projects move forward to completion, it is estimated that the City's
population might increase by an additional 838 households. Again, many of these units, if
built, might be purchased by investors, seasonal residents or residents who already live in
the City, which would lower the overall impact on the City's population.
As can be seen on Figure 11.A.4., 57 acres in the City are vacant, but do not have
applications on file. In order to determine the potential development on these parcels, this
map was compared with the City's Future Land Use Plan Map (Figure II.A.I) and Zoning
Map. This review indicates that all vacant parcels for which no applications have been
received are designated Business and Office on the Future Land Use Plan Map, and are
zoned either B-2 (Community Business District), MO (Medical Office District), or OP
(Office Park). Unless the designation of these parcels is changed, their development
should not impact the City's residential population; however, it is estimated that their
maximum build out under the existing Future Land Use designation could result in
3,972,672 s.f. of non-residential space. Again, it should be noted that these estimates are
based solely on the Future Land Use Plan Map, the acreage contained in each land use
category, and the maximum intensity allowed per Future Land Use category in the adopted
Comprehensive Plan, reduced by 20 percent to account for the difference between gross
and net acres. Parcel size, existing development, site-specific development constraints, and
other development requirements such as parking, open space, setbacks, and rights-of-way
would significantly reduce the ultimate maximum development and redevelopment
capacity. Moreover, many parcels are zoned at less than the maximum intensity that their
Future Land Use designation allows, and would have to be rezoned to achieve their
maximum development or redevelopment potential.
14
DRAFT City of A ventura Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure ILA.3 City of Aventura Vacant Land Map
THE CITY OF AVENTURA
.",.~~".. w~_.,-
~~,~.~~ u
15
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
e.
Redevelopment Needs/Initiatives
There are several areas of the City of A ventura that demonstrate unique development and
redevelopment needs, and/or that have been the focus of specific area planning efforts. In
200 I, consultants for the City evaluated the potential for the creation of a new Town Center
in the City. The subject area for this Study is bounded by: NE 191 Street and the William
Lehman Causeway to the north; Biscayne Boulevard to the west; NE 187 Street, NE 185
Street, and a finger canal to the south, and; County Club Drive and Dumfounding Bay to
the east. Existing development in this area includes: the Loehmann's Plaza shopping mall;
the fonner concentration of boat construction and repair operations along NE 188 Street
that is transitioning into residential uses, and; other commercial and office uses (Figure
ILA.3.). The Town Center Study evaluated several alternative development and
redevelopment proposals for the area with the goal of recommending a plan that includes:
an appropriate mix of residential, retail, office and commercial uses in close proximity; a
well-developed system for multi-modal transportation access and circulation (pedestrian,
bicycle, automobile and transit); civic buildings and spaces, and; a cohesive design. 10 The
City has designated a significant portion of the Study Area "Town Center" on the Future
Land Use Plan Map, and has created the TC-I and TC-2 zoning districts to implement this
land use,
The Comprehensive Plan's interpretive text for Town Centers states that they are "intended
to be moderate- to high-intensity design-unified areas which will contain a mixture of
different urban functions integrated both horizontally and vertically. Town Centers shall be
characterized by physical cohesiveness, direct accessibility by mass transit service, and a
high quality urban design. The development of each Town Center will be managed
through the creation of a thematic plan, which shall outline its major characteristics and
specify the design and regulatory tools necessary to achieve those characteristics." I I
Although the City of Aventura has made significant progress in implementing its Town
Center designation through the designation of the Study Area "Town Center" on the Future
Land Use Plan Map, creation and implementation of the Town Center zoning districts,
establishment of the internal shuttle bus transit system, and other initiatives, the area's
redevelopment into a true town center is in the preliminary stages, and the ultimate fonn it
will take remains subject to debate. For example, questions remain about whether the
Town Center should serve as a regional activity center, or should cater primarily to
residents of the City through a concentration of neighborhood-oriented retail or services.
Due to the location of several already established regional activity centers within (Aventura
Mall) or proximate (Gulfstream Park) to the City of Aventura, the Town Center's
development as a downtown that primarily serves City residents might be more
appropriate.
The Hospital District comprises the area around Aventura Hospital and bounded by the
FEC Corridor to the west, Biscayne Boulevard to the east, and the Broward County
line/City Limits to the north (Figure ILA.4). The area currently consists of A ventura
10 Aventura Town Center Study Draft Plan, Wallace Roberts & Todd LLC, January 22, 2001
II City of Aventura Adopted Comprehensive Plan
16
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Hospital and medical office developments of differing sizes and intensities, fragmented
single family development that demonstrates some blighted conditions both north and south
of the Hospital, and commercial out parcels with Biscayne Boulevard frontage. On April
21,2003, consultants for the City submitted a conceptual urban development framework
for the District. The report submitted by the consultant identifies a number of
underutilized parcels in the district, and identifies potential improvements, including:
streetscape improvements; potential new streets, street expansions, and street closures, and;
redevelopment opportunities. The report recommends that design guidelines be
considered for the Hospital District in order to enhance the area's function as a cohesive
district of medical offices and other compatible uses.12
The City has made progress in the implementation of the Hospital District through
designation of the entire area Business and Office on the Future Land Use Plan Map, the
development of both site development and urban design standards for the southem portion
of the District and zoning the area MO (Medical Office). As noted in the April 21, 2003
Conceptual Urban Development Framework - Aventura Medical Office District, however,
several factors have impeded the redevelopment of the area, particularly in the single
family areas. The Medical Office zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 1.5 acres,
and the fragmented parcel and ownership characteristics of the single family area has made
assembling the land necessary to implement the designation difficult. Changes to the
development and lot size requirements in the MO District specific to the subject area, and
the provision of other incentives to foster the area's redevelopment, may be required in
order to implement the redevelopment goals.
Biscayne Boulevard is the City of Aventura's main north-south thoroughfare. The
Biscayne Boulevard corridor in the City is characterized by intensive commercial and
office development that largely predates the City's incorporation, including regional
activity centers such as the Aventura Mall. Loehmann's Plaza fronts Biscayne Boulevard
as well. Despite the overall intensity of development in the City, certain shopping centers
along Biscayne Boulevard are underutilized. Opportunities to further the achievement of
cohesive design and development patterns and economic development goals may exist
through the redevelopment of these centers.
A review of Figures ILA.\. and ILA.2. indicates that the City's Biscayne Boulevard
frontage is designated Town Center or Business and Office on the Future Land Use Plan
Map, and zoned B-2, B-3, RMF-3, OP, or MO. Many of the afore-mentioned shopping
centers have B-2 zoning, which would allow their redevelopment at a higher intensity than
currently exists. Such redevelopment, however, might not be appropriate for all areas of
the corridor, which experiences significant traffic congestion and is primarily characterized
by lower-rise commercial establishments. Moreover, the Boulevard serves as a primary
gateway into the City, and links the Town Center, Aventura Mall, and the Hospital District.
12 Conceptual Urban Development Framework, Aventura Medical Office District, Wallace Roberts & Todd
LLC, April 21, 2003
17
185ST
Legend
- Town Center District
0 City of Aventura
- Water
- Street
- Miami-Dade County
18
1BBST
N
W+E
S
DRAFT City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report- July 2005 Draft
Figure II.A.S City of Aventura Hospital District
NE 214 ST.
w
~
'"
'"
w
z
¡..:
u
co
N
W
Z
¡..:
u
C1,¡
w
z
NE 210 ST.
w~
s
NE 209 ST.
Legend
r:J Hospital
- Street
- Railroad
- Hospital District Boundary
D City of Aventura
- Miami-Dade County
CJ Broward County
19
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
f.
Development and Redevelopment in Adjacent Areas
As noted in Chapter!, the city of Aventura is bounded by: Broward County and the City of
Hallandale Beach to the north; Golden Beach and Sunny Isles across Dumfounding Bay
and the Intracoastal Waterway to the east; North Miami Beach to the south, and;
unincorporated Miami-Dade County to the west (Figure J. I.). Development and
redevelopment that is occurring in adjacent areas invariably impacts the quality of life in
Aventura, and vice versa. Impacts of development in adjacent cities on traffic congestion
and hurricane times evacuation are particular areas of concern, and are addressed in
Chapters II,C. and IJ.D.
Gulfstream Park is an existing 250-acre racetrack located in the City of Hallandale Beach
in Broward County, abutting the City of Aventura's northern boundary. Gulfstream Park is
currently the subject of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) application for the
proposed development of a large-scale, mixed-use project on 85,7 acres currently used for
parking. The racetrack facility would be retained. The proposed flexible development
program for this site includes 1.2 million s.f. of retail, 1,500 residential units, a 5,500 seat
movie theater, and 300,000 s.f. of office space. I] This Application for Development
Approval for the DRI is still in process. The City of Aventura has been diligent in
providing comments and input in the DRI process due to the potential impacts of this
proposed development.
The City of Sunny Isles Beach, located across the Intracoastal Waterway and Dumfounding
Bay to the east of the City, has experienced significant redevelopment in the past few years,
with low-rise beachffont motels being replaced by high-rise condominium and hotel
projects. This redevelopment has rapidly changed the complexion of Sunny Isles Beach,
and had implications for northeast Miami-Dade County as a whole, particularly in teffils of
traffic and hurricane evacuation. William Lehman Causeway, one of the two the main
linkages between Sunny Isles Beach and the mainland, traverses the City of Aventura.
Efforts to continue to ensure coordinated planning with the City of Sunny Isles Beach,
,particularly in teffils of transportation and emergency management, are key to future
development and redevelopment of both cities.
The Ojus area of unincorporated Miami-Dade County is located west of the City of
A ventura. The area is currently characterized by low density residential neighborhoods
and commercial strip development along West Dixie Highway and Miami Gardens Drive.
The Ojus area demonstrates some redevelopment needs, particularly in the commercial
areas, and was the subject of a 2001 charrette conducted by the Miami-Dade Department of
Planning and Zoning. Charrette recommendations included multi-modal transportation
improvements, the development of urban design standards, increased code enforcement,
environmental restoration/protection, historic preservation, land use and zoning strategies,
and the provision of incentives for redevelopment.14
13 Village of Gulfstream Park Development of Regional Impact. Application for Development Approval, April
28,2004
14 A Vision lor the Dius Area, Dius Charrette Report, Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and
Zoning, May 2001
20
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
Section 163.3191(2)(e), F.S., requires that the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the identified major issues be addressed in the EAR. The
previous section of this report described specific impacts of the development and
redevelopment issue in detail.
In summary, major positive social impacts of development and redevelopment include: the
creation of stronger neighborhoods, which in turn strengthens the sense of community and
social fabric; opportunities to enhance the quality of life for existing and future residents
and visitors by providing increased opportunities for social interaction, reducing
automobile dependence, and providing better public space, and; the provision of additional
economic opportunities. Potential negative impacts include: reduced service levels and
congestion that might result from increasing density without expanding service capacity;
the encroachment of incompatible uses on existing communities that are essential to
healthy development, and; increased school overcrowding.
From an economic standpoint, the development and redevelopment issue has a number of
implications. Development and redevelopment increases the tax base, and therefore
increases the City's ability to provide services to existing and future residents. Moreover,
development and redevelopment attracts new residents and businesses to neighborhoods,
creating new jobs for existing residents. Nonetheless, increased development and
redevelopment requires the provision of additional and expanded public services and
infrastructure, with added public costs. Impact fees, concurrency requirements, and other
mechanisms should be in place to ensure that development assumes its fair share of these
costs.
From an environmental standpoint, redevelopment and infill development result in more
sustainable development patterns than suburban sprawl, and play an important role in
,protecting the region's many environmental resources, including the Everglades and other
environmentally sensitive lands. Within the City, however, development and
redevelopment can diminish the level of open space, disrupt vistas and view corridors, and
have negative impacts on natural resources, including natural and man-made water bodies.
It is important to ensure that adequate open spaces are maintained and public spaces
provided in conjunction with development and redevelopment in the City, and that
potential negative impacts of such development and redevelopment are mitigated through
the use of best management practices and other strategies.
21
DRAFT
3.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Section 163.3191 (2)(g), F,S" requires that the EAR evaluate the plan objectives within
each element as they relate to the major issues and identify, where appropriate, unforeseen
or unanticipated changes in circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities
with respect to the major issues, Because of its broad nature, Issue LA" "Development
and Redevelopment", impacts the Comprehensive Plan in its entirety. Specific
recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Plan to address the issue of development
and redevelopment are as follows.
a.
Future Land Use Element
The following objectives and policies in the Future Land Use Element should be amended
as noted or added to address this issue:
Recommendation II.A.I. A number of the major issues facing the City, including
building heights, concerns over the intensity of development, and ensuring compatibility
between existing neighborhoods and new development and redevelopment, must be
addressed through the City's land development regulations, It is therefore recommended
that a new Objective and policies be added to the Future Land Use Element to state that by
2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to provide
a cohesive blueprint for development and redevelopment in the City. The revised land
development regulations shall address strategies to:
. accommodate growth while maintaining neighborhood integrity;
. ensure appropriate height and site development requirements and design guidelines;
. ensure appropriate transitions and linkages between different neighborhoods and
uses;
encourage more walkable neighborhoods;
buffer neighborhoods and existing development from the encroachment of
incompatible uses;
limit the intensity of future development and redevelopment in a manner that is
consistent with current development patterns, and that minimizes further negative
impacts to the City's infrastructure, traffic congestion, hurricane evacuation
clearance times, and quality oflife, and;
prevent redevelopment of a parcel in a manner that would significantly increase its
existing intensity or density, unless redevelopment of said parcel will implement
specific development and redevelopment goals that are or that might be established
for particular areas.
.
.
.
.
Recommendation II.A.2. Policy 1.1 defines the City's residential land categories. It is
recommended that Policy 1.1 be amended to the following:
. under the Medium Density land use category delete "authorizes apartment
buildings ranging" and replace with "allows a range in density". Also, add the
following to the end of the second sentence ", but may also include single family
detached, duplexes, triplexes and quadruplexes"
22
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
.
under the Medium-High Density category delete "authorizes apartment buildings
ranging from" and replace with "allows a range in density". Add the following new
sentences: "The type of housing structure typically permitted in this category
includes low, medium and high-rise apartments, but may also include single family
detached, duplexes, triplexes, quadruplexes and townhouses. Additionally, the
height of buildings and attainment of densities approaching the maximum shall
also be contingent on the ability of the developer to ensure appropriate transitions
and buffers with the surrounding neighborhood, and to alleviate impacts that will
adversely impact service levels and quality oflife."
Recommendation ILA.3. Policy 1.2 defines the City's non-residential land use
categories. It is recommended that Policy 1.2 be amended to:
.
Add text to the Business and Office Category to state that the maximum intensity
allowable on a given site shall also be contingent on the ability of the developer to
ensure appropriate transitions and buffers with the surrounding neighborhood, and
to alleviate impacts that will adversely impact service levels of service and quality
oflife;
.
Add text to the Town Center Category to clarify that such centefs are not intended
to be Regional Activity Centers, but are instead intended to primarily serve the
City's existing and future residents and businesses, and;
.
Add a Water Category which clarifies that areas designated Water provide
numerous benefits to the City of Aventura and are an important component of the
City's multi-modal transportation network, stormwater drainage infrastructure, and
natural and built environments, It should specify that the use of these areas shall be
limited to recreational and commercial boating facilities (including water taxis and
ferries), the provision of open space and urban relief, recreation, waterways,
wetlands, flood control, stormwater drainage and storage, and natural resource
protection and enhancement, and comply with the requirements of Chapter 24,
"Environmental Protection...", of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. It
should further state that development in or above such areas in a manner that will
diminish these functions shall be prohibited, and that development and
redevelopment adjacent to these areas shall include provisions to enhance these
functions where appropriate.
Recommendation II.A.4. Policy 2.1 states that in planning and designing development
and redevelopment, the City shall enforce the guidelines contained in the Comprehensive
Plan's Urban Design Element. It is recommended that this Policy be revised to replace the
reference to "Urban Design Element" with "redevelopment plans, the Redevelopment
Element, and land development regulations",
Recommendation II.A.S. Policy 2.4 addresses the designation of sites and use of
landscaping materials in public projects, an important consideration in development and
23
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
redevelopment. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to call for the use of native
landscaping materials where feasible and appropriate in public projects.
Recommendation II.A.6. Objective 3 states that decisions regarding the location,
extent, and intensity of future land use in Aventura will be based on environmental
conditions and the financial feasibility of providing services at levels that meet or exceed
adopted levels of service by 2005. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to
update the date to 2015, and to expand the text to also state that decisions regarding the
location, extent and future land use in Aventura will be based on compatibility with and the
minimization of adverse impacts on existing neighborhoods.
Recommendation II.A.7. Objective 5 states that by 2005 Aventura shall reduce the
number of existing uses that are inconsistent with the uses designated in the Future Land
Use Plan Map. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to update the date to 2015,
and to state that the City shall continue to reduce the number of land uses inconsistent with
the uses designated on the LUP Map.
Recommendation II.A.S. Policy 5.1 identifies a number of factors that the City will
consider in evaluating compatibility among proximate land uses. It is recommended that
this Policy be amended to include the existing character and function of the sulTounding
neighborhood, consistency with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and
specific neighborhood development and redevelopment plans in the list of factors to be
considered in compatibility evaluations.
Recommendation II.A.9. Policy 5.2 states that residential neighborhoods shall be
protected from the intrusion of uses that will disrupt the neighborhood. It is recommended
that this Policy be amended to remove the word residential, as all neighborhoods should be
provided with this protection, regardless offunction.
Recommendation II.A.I0. Objective 6 states that upon adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan, all public and private activities regarding the use, development and redevelopment of
land shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives, and policies. It is
recommended that this Policy be amended to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan
has been adopted.
Recommendation II.A.H. Policy 8.1 calls for the City to establish opportunities to
amend the Comprehensive Plan. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to reflect
the City's established procedures for Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Recommendation II.A.12. Policy 9.1 states that the City shall maintain and enhance
regulations governing the use and development of land. It is recommended that this Policy
be amended to include protecting and minimizing negative impacts to the character and
function of the sulTounding neighborhoods to the list of items that are regulated by the land
development regulations.
24
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Recommendation II.A.l3. Policy 9.3 states that the City shall enact land development
regulations within one year of adopting its Comprehensive Plan. It is recommended that
this Policy be updated to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan and land
development regulations have been adopted, but may be amended from time to time.
Recommendation II.A.I4. Objective II states that upon adoption of the Plan, the
location, design and management of development and redevelopment shall ensure the
protection of natural resources and systems. It is recommended that this Objective be
amended to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted.
b.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Recommendation II.A.IS. Objectives I and 3 of the Intergovernmental Coordination
Element, and policies thereunder, address joint land use planning with other jurisdictions.
It is recommended that new policies be added under Objective I and Objective 3 to call for
increased coordination with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure compatible development and
redevelopment, and address the unique challenges and opportunities that face northeast
Miami-Dade and southeast Broward counties
c.
Conservation & Coastal Management Element
The following objectives and policies in the Conservation & Coastal Management Element
should be amended as noted to address this issue.
Recommendation II.A.I6. Objective 12 of the Conservation & Coastal Management
Element, and policies 12.1 through 12.7, address protection of the City's shorelines and
water dependent uses. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under Objective 12 to
state that the use of areas designated Water on the Future Land Use Plan Map shall be
limited to recreational and commercial boating facilities (including water taxis and ferries),
the provision of open space and urban relief, recreation, waterways, wetlands, flood
,control, stOll11Water drainage and storage, and natural resource protection and enhancement,
and comply with the requirements of Chapter 24, "Environmental Protection...", of the
Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. It should further state that development in or
above such areas in a manner that will diminish these functions shall be prohibited.
d.
Redevelopment Element
The City of Aventura's Comprehensive Plan currently contains two optional elements: the
Economic Development Element and the Urban Design Element. The Economic
Development Element addresses strategies for improving and streamlining the development
approval process to further economic development goals, development of a unified
approach for marketing the City to businesses, and the establishment of Community
Redevelopment Area that includes Thunder Alley, the Hospital District, and the Biscayne
Boulevard corridor. The Urban Design Element contains the original concept plans for the
25
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Town Center and Hospital District,15 and calls for the City to enact land development
regulations to implement these conceptual plans.
Recommendation II.A.I7. Due to the number of development and redevelopment issues
that the City is facing, and the fact that the concept plans for the Town Center and Hospital
District have changed, it is recommended that the Economic Development and Urban
Design elements be consolidated and expanded into a new Redevelopment Element that
addresses the following issues and initiatives:
By 2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to
provide a cohesive blueprint for development and redevelopment in the City. The revised
land development regulations shall address strategies to:
. accommodate growth while maintaining neighborhood integrity;
. ensure appropriate height and site development requirements and design guidelines;
. ensure appropriate transitions and linkages between different neighborhoods and
uses;
. encourage more walkable neighborhoods;
. buffer neighborhoods and existing development from the encroachment of
incompatible uses;
. limit the intensity of future development and redevelopment in a manner that is
consistent with current development pattems, and that minimizes further negative
impacts to the City's infrastructure, traffic congestion, hurricane evacuation
clearance times, and quality oflife, and;
. prevent redevelopment of a parcel in a manner that would significantly increase its
existing intensity or density, unless redevelopment of said parcel will implement
specific development and redevelopment goals that are or that might be established
for particular areas.
The City shall coordinate with the private sector and other agencies as appropriate, to
implement strategies to market the City of Aventura as a location for new businesses,
promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses, ensure an adequate supply
of non-residential land uses to address economic development goals, provide services
and employment opportunities to existing and future residents, and coordinate
economic development, development, and redevelopment goals;
By 2007, the City shall refine development/design guidelines through the land
development regulations for the Town Center that provides for its redevelopment as a
design-unified downtown that primarily serves City residents. The Town Center shall
be characterized by a mixture of different urban functions integrated horizontally and
vertically, multi-modal transportation access and circulation, and high quality urban
design;
15 City of Aventura Adopted Comprehensive Plan, Urban Design Element, Figure 1 and Figure 2, p. 74 and
76
26
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
By 2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to
reduce potential development/redevelopment intensities on the Biscayne Boulevard
corridor. The City should also evaluate strategies to improve the Biscayne Boulevard
corridor through cohesive design and development patterns, the appropriate
redevelopment ofunderutilized parcels.
27
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
II. B. HOUSlNG
1.
Issue Description and Analysis
As noted in Chapter I., in 2004 the highest real estate appreciation in the southeastern
United States occurred in zip code 33180, which includes the City of Aventura.
Specifically, the median home sales price in the City in 2004 was $445,500, an increase of
23.6 percent from 2003 and 112.5 percent from 1999.16 While these increases are
reflective of the City's high quality of life and have positive implications for the City's tax
base and fiscal health, they are also making housing in the City prohibitive to many
households, including middle income households. The availability of housing that is
affordable and appropriate for existing and future households of all income levels is
therefore a major issue. Specific concerns include the availability of housing to
accommodate employees of existing and future businesses, the diminishing rental housing
stock that is resulting from condominium conversions, and barriers to homeownership.
"Housing cost burden", defined as the percent of a household's income that is used to pay
for housing costs, is frequently used as a measure for determining whether or not housing is
affordable. According to federal housing program guidelines and the University of
Florida's Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing (Shimberg Center), housing costs
should not exceed 30 percent of a household's income in order to be considered
affordablel7. For example, a family of four with a combined household income of $57,840
should pay no more than $17,352 in annual combined housing costs.
Federal guidelines define a very low income household as a household whose income is at
or below 50 percent of the median household income for the area, a low income household
as a household whose income is between 50 and 80 percent of the median for the area, and
a moderate income household as a household whose income is between 80 and 120 percent
of the median for the areal8. The median income varies in accordance with household size.
Table 11.8.1 identifies median household incomes by household size for Miami-Dade
County.
16 Miami New Times, May 12 - 18,2005, Volume 20, Number 6
17 The State of Fiorida 's Housing, 2000, Page 33, University ofFlorida Shimberg Center for Affordable
Housing, William O'Dell and Mark T. Smith,
18 Affordable Housing Guidelines, Miami-Dade Housing Agency, Apri12!, 2003
28
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table II.B.!. Median Household Income by Household Size, Miami-Dade County!"
Household Size 50 % of Median 80 % of Median Median 120 % of
(Very Low) (Low) Median
(Moderate)
1 $16,850 $27,000 $33,700 $40,440
2 $19,300 $30,850 $38,600 $46,320
3 $21,700 $34,700 $43,400 $52,080
4 $24,100 $38,550 $48,200 $57,840
5 $26,050 $41,650 $52,100 $62,520
6 $27,950 $44,750 $55,900 $67,080
7 $29,900 $47,800 $59,800 $71,760
8 $31,800 $50,900 $63,600 $76,320
The University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, under contract with
the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, prepares an Affordable Housing
Needs Assessment (AHNA) for each municipality in the State in order to assist in the
development and evaluation of comprehensive plan housing elements. The AHNA
provides information about household size, income (as measured against the median),
ownership status, and other indicators. Table II.B.2 below summarizes the AHNA
infonnation for the City of Aventura for the years 2002, 2005, 2015, and 2025. Analysis of
this data provides an indication of the current and projected demand for housing. It
should be noted, however, that these estimates are based on historic and current population
figures and growth trends, and do not reflect local conditions. The City is rapidly
approaching build-out, and its future development potential and population growth is
limited by the scarcity of vacant and developable land. For these reasons, the City
estimates that its population will cap out at around 32,925, the year 2010 population
estimate.
19 Affordable Housing Guidelines, Miami-Dade Housing Agency, April 21, 2003, Page 17
29
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 11.8.2. Affordable Housing Demand Data20
Year 2005 Year 2015 Year 2025
Total Number of Households 15,317 18,861 22,952
Renter Households/% of Total 4,566/30% 6,109/32% 7,704/34%
Owner Households/% of Total 10,751/70% 12,752/68% 15,248/66%
Very Low Income Renter Households/% of Total 1728/37% 2,177136% 2,680/35%
Low lncome Renter Households/% of Total 850/19% 1,153/19% 1,452/20%
Moderate Income Renter Households/% of Total 853/19% 1,192/20% 1,523/20%
Total Low and Moderate Income Renter 3,431/75% 4,522/74% 2,054/73%
Households/% of Total
Very Low Income Owner Households/% of Total 2,211/21% 2,264/18% 2,838/19%
Low Income Owner Households/% of Total 1,531/14% 1,709/13% 1,723/11%
Moderate Income Owner Households/% of Total 1,825/17% 2,157/17% 2,589117%
Total Low and Moderate Income Owner 5,567/52% 6,130/48% 7,150/47%
Households/% of Total
As can be seen on Table IIB.2., in 2005 there were a total of 15,317 households in
Aventura. A total of 4,566 (30%) of these households rented their homes, while 10,751
(70%) owned their homes. Among the households who rented their homes, 1,728 (37%)
were very low income, 850 (19%) were low income, and 853 (19%) were moderate
income. In total, 3,431 (75%) of the City's renter households were low and moderate
income in 2005. Among the households who owned their homes, 2,211 (2 I %) were very
low income, 1,531 (14%) were low income, and 1,825 (17%) were moderate income. In
total, 5,567 (52%) of the City's homeowner households were low and moderate income in
2005.
The Shimberg Center also projects the Affordable Housing Needs Assessment data for
2015 and 2025. As can be seen on Table II.B.2., in 2015 it is projected that there will be a
total of 18,861 households in Aventura. A total of 6,109 (32%) are projected to rent their
homes, while 12,752 (68%) are projected to own their homes. Among the households
projected to rent their homes, it is estimated that 2,177 (36%) will be very low income,
],153 (19%) will be low income, and 1,192 (20%) will be moderate income. In total, it is
projected that 4,522 (74%) of the City's renter households will be low and moderate
income in 2015. Among the households projected to own their homes, it is estimated that
2,264 (18%) will be very low income, 1,709 (13%) will be low income, and 2,157 (17%)
20 Affordab/e Housing Needs Assessment, Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, 2005
30
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
will be moderate income. In total, it is projected that 6,130 (48%) of the City's homeowner
households will be low and moderate income in 2015
In 2025, the Shimberg Center projects that there will be a total of 22,952 households in
Aventura. A total of 7,704 (34%) are projected to rent their homes, while 15,248 (66%) are
projected to own their homes. Among the households projected to rent their homes, it is
estimated that 2,680 (35%) will be very low income, 1,452 (20%) will be low income, and
1,523 (20%) will be moderate income. In total, it is projected that 2,054 (73%) of the
City's renter households will be low and moderate income in 2025. Among the households
projected to own their homes, it is estimated that 2,838 (19%) will be very low income,
1,723 (II %) will be low income, and 2,589 (17%) will be moderate income. In total, it is
projected that 7,150 (47%) of the City's homeowner households will be low and moderate
income in 2005.
Based on the Shimberg Center's projected population figures and tenure characteristics, in
order to fully address housing demand in 2015 the City's housing inventory should include:
2,177 rental units and 2,264 ownership units affordable to very low income households;
1,153 rental units and 1,709 ownership units affordable to low income households; 1,192
rental units and 2,157 ownership units affordable to moderate income households; and
1,587 rental units and 6,622 ownership units affordable to households who are of middle or
upper income levels. In order to fully address housing demand in 2025, the City's housing
inventory should include: 2,680 rental units and 2,838 ownership units affordable to very
low income households; 1,452 rental units and 1,723 ownership units affordable to low
income households; 1,523 rental units and 2,589 ownership units affordable to moderate
income households; and 2,049 rental units and 8,098 ownership units affordable to
households who are of middle or upper income levels.
As noted earlier, however, the Shimberg Center's estimates are based on historic and
current population figures and growth trends, and do not reflect local conditions. The City
is rapidly approaching build-out, and its future development potential and population
growth is limited by the scarcity of vacant and developable land. For these reasons, the
City estimates that its population will cap out at around 32,925, the year 2010 population
estimate. The City's demand for housing units in 2015 and 2025 is therefore estimated to
be much less than that which is projected by the Shimberg Center
The condition of the existing housing stock is another component of the goal of providing
decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing to the City's existing and future residents.
The Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing defines substandard units as those that have
one or more of the following characteristics: no heating fuel; incomplete kitchen and/or
plumbing, and/or overcrowded units. In addition, substandard units may have code
violations and/or structural issues. Addressing these conditions is an important component
of housing programs, According to the Shimberg Center, in 2000, 530 units (3.8 %) used
no heating fuel; 585 units (4%) lacked complete kitchen facilities, and 83 units (.4%)
lacked complete plumbing facilities. An overcrowded unit is one in which there is more
than one person per room. In 2000, 66 (.3%) of the City's household resided in
overcrowded units. These figures do not necessarily reflect units with one or more code
violations and/or substandard conditions. A May 19,2005 windshield survey of the City's
31
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
neighborhoods indicates that a concentration of units needing repair exists in the single
family residential neighborhoods located west of Biscayne Boulevard in the Hospital
District. As noted in Chapter II.A., these areas are targeted for redevelopment with
medical offices.
32
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
Section l63.3l91(2)(e), F.S" requires that the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the identified major issues be addressed in the EAR. The social,
economic and environmental impacts oflssue [I.B., "Housing", are addressed as follows.
The provision of housing that is decent, safe, sanitary and affordable to all households has
numerous social, economic, and environmental benefits. The scarcity of housing
contributes to many social problems, including poverty, homelessness, displacement, and
foreclosures. Moreover, substandard and dilapidated housing negatively impacts the
quality oflife of occupants and neighborhoods. Affordable housing reduces such problems
with the added social benefit of increased economic diversity.
From an economic standpoint, the availability of quality housing increases household
disposable income, which positively impacts local businesses and furthers job creation and
other economic development goals. Moreover, the availability of housing makes an area
more attractive for workers and employers, and can be a key factor in attracting new
business to the area. From an environmental standpoint, slum and blight conditions and a
scarcity of affordable housing negatively impacts public health and safety, and degrades the
quality and aesthetic beauty of the built and natural environment.
33
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3.
Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Section 163.3191 (2)(g), F,S., requires that the EAR evaluate the plan objectives within
each element as they relate to the major issues and identify, where appropriate, unforeseen
or unanticipated changes in circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities
with respect to the major issues. Issue LB., "Housing", impacts:
.
Objectives I, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 of the Future Land Use Element, and policies
thereunder, as they address residential land uSe categories, the protection of
residential neighborhoods, strategies to address existing and future residential
demand, and/or strategies to accommodate existing and future residents;
The Housing Element in its entirety;
Objective I of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and policies 1.7 and
1.8 thereunder, as they address coordination with other local governments to
identify opportunities for affordable housing, and the need to coordinate funding
cycles for affordable housing programs.
.
.
Specific recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Plan to address the issue of
development and redevelopment are as follows.
a.
Housing Element
Recommendation 11.8.1. Objective I and its policies address strategies to create and
preserve affordable housing for all existing and future City residents. It is recommended
that a new Policy be added under Objective I to state that the City shall support public and
private sector efforts to provide an adequate supply of housing units that are affordable to
households of all incomes in proportions that are reflective of the housing demand and
needs. It should further state that developers are encouraged to provide a variety of
housing types, including housing affordable to City residents of all income levels, in
residential projects and communities.
Recommendation II.B.2. Objective 3 addresses the availability of sites for affordable
housing, and states that due to the scarcity of land and high land values, affordable housing
units will be distributed. It is recommended that this Objective be amended to state that
"due to high and increasing property values and the scarcity of developable land, the City
will coordinate with the private sector in order to encourage the provision of a variety of
housing types, including housing affordable to City residents of all income levels, in
residential and Town Center communities throughout the City".
Recommendation 11.8.3. Policy 3.1 states that the land development regulations will
include appropriate criteria to allow diverse housing types. It is recommended that this
Policy be amended to add "including housing affordable to City residents of all income
levels" after "type".
34
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
b.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Recommendation 11.8.4. Objective I addresses coordination with other local
governments to identify opportunities for affordable housing. It is recommended that a
new Policy stating that the City shall incorporate the recommendations of the joint Florida
Department of Community Affairs/South Florida Regional Planning Council "Regional
Affordable Housing Strategy" in its Comprehensive Plan, as appropriate, after the final
recommendations are issued.
35
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
II.c.
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
1.
Issue Description and Analysis
a.
Existing Conditions
As a substantially developed coastal community, emergency management and hurricane
preparedness are on-going concerns in the City of Aventura. Figure II.C.!. identifies the
2003 hurricane evacuation zones in Miami-Dade County.22 Zone A, the Coastal High
Hazard Area, encompasses the County's Atlantic beaches and barrier islands, including the
cities of Miami Beach, Surfside, Sunny Isles Beach, and Golden Beach. The coastal high
hazard area must be evacuated in the event of any hurricane, regardless of stonn category.
The portions of A ventura that are east of US-I (Biscayne Boulevard) are located in the
Hurricane Vulnerability Zone (Zone B), which must be evacuated in the event of hurricane
of Category 2 strength or higher. This area does not require evacuation in the event of a
Category I stonn, although evacuation is always recommended when a hurricane threatens
South Florida.
As noted earlier, the City of Aventura's location in the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone
requires residents to evacuate in the event of a category 2 or stronger stonn, although
evacuation is encouraged during any major stonn event. The ability of the City's roadway
system to allow evacuation in a safe and timely manner is integral to the function of the
emergency management system, and the health and safety of City residents. As the City
and its neighboring jurisdictions continue to develop and redevelop, increased pennanent,
seasonal, and temporary populations must be evacuated. As is further described in Chapter
ILD., the City already faces significant traffic congestion, which inhibits the ability of
residents and visitors to evacuate safely and efficiently. Moreover, it must be noted that
many residents of the Coastal High Hazard Area, and other surrounding jurisdictions, may
evacuate through the City of Aventura, which potentially increases evacuation times for
City residents. For example, the William Lehman Causeway, which traverses the City of
A ventura, is a major evacuation route for the City of Sunny Isles Beach, which is currently
undergoing significant development and redevelopment. For these reasons, emergency
management was cited as a key concern in the recently proposed moratorium ordinance.
There are three major evacuation routes out of the City of Aventura: Biscayne Blvd, aka
US I (North); Ives Dairy Road - N 203,d St. (West), and; Miami Gardens Drive - N 185th
St. (West). These evacuation routes are shown on Figure ILC.2. In addition, the City has
established traffic control points in order to facilitate evacuation. Established traffic
control points include: Biscayne Blvd. and 207 St.; Biscayne Blvd. and Aventura Blvd.;
Biscayne Blvd. and 191" St; Biscayne Blvd. and 183'd St.; 29th Ave and I90th St.; 34th Ave
and Country Club Drive; Biscayne Blvd. and 203rd St; Biscayne Blvd. and Lehman
Causeway; Biscayne Blvd. and 187th St.; Dixie Highway and 21Sth St; 29th Place and
Aventura Blvd.; and 34th Ave and 207th St.
22 Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report, Miami-
Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning, 2003
36
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Clearance time is the time required to clear the roadway of all vehicles evacuating in
response to a hurricane situation. Clearance time begins when the first evacuating vehicle
enters the road network. Clearance time includes the time required by evacuees to entef the
road network (referred to as mobilization time) and the time spent by evacuees to enter the
road network due to traffic congestion (referred to as queuing delay time). Clearance time
does not relate to the time anyone vehicle spends traveling on the road network and does
not include time needed for local officials to assemble and make a decision to evacuate.
Evacuation time is the combination of the clearance time and the pre-landfall hazards time.
In most cases, if not all, evacuations are called to a stop as soon as tropical storm force
winds (one of the many pre-landfall hazards) begin to make landfall. This decision is made
to not only protect the safety of those trying to evacuate but also because many of the
evacuation routes begin to close due to bridge closures or roadway flooding. Therefore,
clearance time is the amount of time necessary from the issuance of the evacuation order
until the last person gets to a place of safety. Evacuation time is the total time from when
the evacuation order is issued until the eye of the tropical system makes landfall. Table
III.C.!. below gives approximated clearance times for the City of Aventura based on the
most recently available data from the South Florida Regional Planning Council.
Table 1II.c.1. Populations and Clearance Times (based on 1998 Proiections
City Population Evacuation Evacuation Evacuation Citywide
Zones Routes Route Times Clearance
Time
Aventura 26,882 I Biscayne Blvd Jul Nov 10.67 hrs
8.49 10.67
Lehman Cswy Jul Nov
1.03 1.32
Sunny lsles 15,327 1&2 Lehman Cswy Jul Nov 4.79 hrs
1.03 1.32
Sunny Isles Jul Nov
Cswy 3.79 4.79
Golden Beach 924 I Lehman Cswy Jul Nov 1.32 hrs
1.03 1.32
North Miami 40,345 2 NMiami Jul Nov 8.85 hrs
Beach Beach Blvd 7.06 8.85
Hallandale 35,369 8&9 Hollywood Jul Nov 9.17hrs
Beach Blvd 7.14 9.17
Hallandale Jul Nov
Beach Blvd 4.66 5.97
Miami-Dade 2,363,600 N/A N/A Jul Nov 20.1 hrs
Countv 15.8 20.1
Broward 1,754,893 N/A N/A Jul Nov 8.82 hrs
Countv 6.88 8.82
Sonrce: Sonth Florida Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study - April 1996
37
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
If the comprehensive plan amendments approved by the City since 1998 are taken into
account the City's evacuation time, according to the South Florida Regional Planning
Council's model, is currently at 11.54 hours.
Policy 12.2 of the Comprehensive Plan's Future Land Use Element and Objective 9 of the
Coastal Management Element require that the City maintain hurricane evacuation clearance
times of 12 hours or less. As noted on Table III.C.1. above, the City is currently meeting
the 12 hour clearance time for all storms. The November calculations are higher due to the
number of seasonal residents living in these areas. As development and redevelopment
continues in the City and surrounding areas, clearance times will lengthen without
increased roadway capacity to address evacuation needs. The impacts of proposed
development and redevelopment on the City's hurricane evacuation clearance times are
monitored by the City in conjunction with the South Florida Regional Planning Council on
an on-going basis.
As noted in Chapter I1.A.I., development and redevelopment that is occurring in adjacent
areas invariably impacts the quality of life in Aventura, and vice versa. Impacts of
development in adjacent cities on hurricane evacuation times is a particular concern. A
complicating factor is that the hurricane evacuation clearance standards for many
surrounding jurisdictions, including those in the Coastal High Hazard Area, is up to 24
hours, which is inconsistent with Aventura's adopted 12 hour standard. This differential
provides these cities with greater development and redevelopment capacities than the City
of Aventura, and inhibits the City's ability to achieve its clearance standards due to
increased congestion on evacuation routes. Because hurricane evacuation and emergency
management planning is, by necessity, conducted on a regional basis, it is evident that the
City must utilize intergovernmental coordination and regional planning forums to address
these concerns, and to reevaluate the hurricane evacuation formulas.
38
DRAFT City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005
Figure II.C.I. C' urricane Evacuatio
Hurricane Evacuation Zones
-
-
Zone A
Zone B
~ City of Aventura
c=J Miami-Dade County
c=J
Broward County
DRAFT City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Rep
Figure II.C.2. City of Aventura Hurricane E
!-I,;rr cane Evc1tuatlon Ro..:e
-
Directional How
SIreN
City of Aventura
~11¡.¡ml-i)¡¡cJe County
Brow¡¡rd County
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
b.
Miami-Dade County Emergency Management System
The Miami-Dade County Emergency Management System (CEMS) is implemented by a
coordinated network that includes: County government agencies; municipalities; State and
federal agencies located in the County; private not-for-profit agencies that have
membership in Miami-Dade County Volunteer Organizations Active in Disasters (VOAD),
and; business organizations which provide essential services in response/recovery
operations. This system is designed to ensure that adequate resources are provided to
jurisdictions whenever their own resources are inadequate to cope with a given situation.
When a "Local State of Emergency" is declared by Miami-Dade County, a network of the
Miami-Dade County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and seven Divisional EOCs is
activated to ensure that all municipalities are represented in the network. If a small area of
the county or its municipalities is affected, the Miami-Dade County EOC would be
activated to provide the required assistance to the community. This system will be applied
in day-to-day activities, such as training and exercises, as well as emergency operations and
planning. Other responsibilities of the County include:
. Coordinating intra-county mutual aid;
. Maintaining a liaison with local jurisdictions within the County and with
neighboring counties;
. Identifying multi-purpose staging areas throughout the county to provide rally
points for incoming mutual aid and humanitarian depots for support of recovery
operations;
. Forwarding local mutual aid requests that cannot be satisfied from within the
County to the State EOC;
. Dispatching reports to the State EOC as the emergency situation develops and as
changes in the emergency dictate;
. Receiving and employing resources provided by other counties, State, federal, and
private agencies, and;
. Carrying out emergency regulations issued by proper authorities.
The Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management, located at 9300 NW 41st Street in the
City of Doral, has decentralized direct communication will all municipalities in Miami-
Dade County in an effort to maintain a manageable span of control in the County
emergency operations center. There are seven "Divisional EOCs" located in the cities of:
Coral Gables; Hialeah; Homestead; Miami; Miami Beach; North Miami, and; North Miami
Beach.
The City of Aventura communicates with the Divisional Emergency Operations Center
located at North Miami Beach Police Department, 16901 NE 19th Ave, North Miami
Beach. The Aventura Police Department will assign the appropriate personnel to represent
the City at the Divisional EOc. Based within the Divisional EOCs will be representatives
ITom the other municipalities of Miami-Dade County. The Divisional EOCs serve as a
communication conduit to and from the Miami-Dade County EOC for all the municipalities
based within the Divisional EOC. Each Divisional EOC sends at least one representative to
the Miami-Dade County EOC to facilitate communication. The Divisional EOC
representatives sent to the Miami-Dade County EOC have a clear understanding of the
41
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Emergency Response Plans of the municipalities they represent and Miami-Dade County.
The Divisional EaC representative is an official capable of making key decisions. Some
responsibilities of the Divisional EaC include:
. Monitoring and coordinating the response and recovery activities of the various
assigned municipalities through Divisional EaC chain-of-command;
. Providing or coordinating requested support four Divisional EaC staff
municipalities;
. Working closely with other remember to share information, professional and
technical skills, personnel and equipment, and;
. Anticipating upcoming needs and potential problems.
42
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
c.
Emergency Management within the City of Aventura
The City of Aventura, in order to maintain control over the emergency situation within the
boundaries of the City, will maintain emergency operations for a Category 1-3 hurricane in
either the A ventura Government Center at 19200 West Country Club Drive, third floor
EOC Room (No.320) Of the North Miami Beach Emergency Operation Center at 16901 NE
19th Avenue in North Miami Beach. The location of the Aventura Emergency Operations
Center will be deteTITIined by the City Manager, based on various factors relative to any
given emergency. The Aventura Govemment Center EOC shall be in operation for all
essential employees during a hurricane category less than 3. For hurricane category 4/5 the
EOC will be deteTITIined by the City Manager.
The City of Aventura emergency response will be implemented and managed by the City
Manager, who will act as the Director of Emergency Management for the City. Under City
Ordinance #2000-10, the City Manager has the sole authority to declare a State of
Emergency for the City, and to place the City's Emergency Plan into action.
Responsibilities of the City of Aventura during an emergency include:
. Implementing, monitoring and coordinating mitigation, preparation, response and
recovery activities within the City boundaries consistent with State and County
activities;
. Issuing emergency regulations to protect life, property, public order and welfare:
. Recommending funding for emergency operations to the City Commission;
. Equipping and operating Emergency Operations Center to control emergency
conditions;
. InfoTITIing City officials, residents, business owners and employees of executive
decisions, actions, instructions and progress;
. Coordinate the return of essential services to noTITIal as quickly and effectively as
possible after a disaster, and;
. Applying for public assistance and disaster relief funding.
i.
City of Aventura Notification Procedures
In the event of a hurricane or tropical stOTITI event, the City of A ventura will implement the
following notification policies and procedures:
.
Notifications trom the Miami-Dade County EOC to the Divisional EOCs will have
a priority status and should be made prior to notifications to other entities;
Each Divisional EOC will be responsible for maintaining a facsimile line that can
be reached and will be staffed 24 hours a day and seven days a week;
Miami-Dade County EOC will develop a FAX cover sheet that stipulates that the
infoTITIation being distributed must be relayed to the stated recipient as soon as
possible;
Miami-Dade County will distribute infoTITIation obtained from the National
Weather Service and/or the National Hurricane Center to the Divisional EOC's as
.
.
.
43
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
.
soon as possible. This will be used to supplement any other source that the
Divisional EOCs may have for weather-related infonnation
Each Divisional EaC will establish a facsimile distribution network to
municipalities, The Divisional EaCs will distribute disaster threat or disaster-
related infonnation to the municipalities
The Aventura Police Department Special Services Commander or designee will act
as the City liaison to the Divisional Eac. The Special Services Commander will
relay all weather and emergency management infonnation to the City Manager,
who will act as Director of Emergency Management for the City. The City Manager
will distribute all information regarding the City's emergency procedures and status
to the City Commission, Department directors and residents. Department directors
will relay information to department employees.
.
ii.
City of Aventura Activation Procedures
In the event of a potential or imminent hurricane or tropical storm event, the City of
Aventura will implement the following notification policies and procedures:
Levell: Typically a "monitoring" phase. Notification will be made to the Divisional Eacs
about the position of any approaching tropical weather system. Each Divisional EaC
should take prudent care to monitor the progress of any system
Level 2: A limited Divisional EaC Activation. The Divisional EaCs should be staffed by
Emergency Management personnel. Contact made with Miami-Dade County Eac. Level 2
activation should be initiated when a Hurricane/Tropical Stonn Watch is issued for Miami-
Dade County.
Level 3: A full-scale activation of the Divisional EaC with 24 hours a day staffing, by
primary emergency response departments. Representatives from the satellite Eacs should
be sent to the Divisional EaCs. Divisional EaC representatives sent to Miami-Dade
County EaC. This must be accomplished within 4 hours of activation. Level 3 activation
should be initiated when a Hurricane/Tropical Stonn Warning is issued for Miami-Dade
County and should be maintained during landfall of severe weather stonn (hurricane) or
catastrophic event.
Level 4: (Recovery Phase) Full Activation of all Divisional Eacs with 24 hours a day
staffing of the Eac. Satellite Eac representative in place at Divisional EaC and
Divisional representatives at Miami-Dade County EaC. Level 4 is initiated after the impact
of a catastrophic event (or hurricane). This level is maintained throughout the recovery
phase until the disaster is downgraded back to a Level I or 2.
iii.
Communication Procedures
When a hurricane or tropical stann presents a significant threat to the South Florida area,
the Special Services Commander shall open communications with the Divisional EaC. The
Special Services Commander shall report all communications and weather updates to the
44
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
City Manager. The City Manager shall act as the Director of Emergency Management, and
shall have the authority to implement, report on and manage all actions undertaken by the
City in the event of an emergency. The City Manager shall have the sole authority to
declare a State of Emergency and place the Emergency Procedures Plan into action, as per
City Ordinance #2000-10.
The City Manager at his/her discretion shall call a meeting with all command post
employees when notification is received that the Divisional EOC is becoming operational.
The City Manager shall also call any meetings with Department Directors to review
emergency procedures and discuss responsibilities and strategies. All communications
regarding the emergency procedures and weather updates shall come from the Special
Services Commander through the City Manager, or his designee, in accordance with the
organizational chart shown on Figure III.C.3. The Police Department will designate an
employee to respond to a post at the Divisional EOC when called upon. The City Manager,
at his or her discretion, shall authorize that the City Emergency Plan be placed into action.
Once the City Manager authorizes that the City Emergency Plan be placed in action, all
Department Directors shall begin preparing the departments according to emergency
procedures.
45
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure III.C.3. City of Aventura
Communications Flow Chart
Police
Department
Employees
Finance &
Support
Services
Department
Employees
Community
Services
Department
Employees
Community
Development
Department
Employees
City Clerk
Department
Employees
46
DRAFT
iv.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
City of Aventura Pre-Emergency Procedures
In order to ensure preparedness for stonn events, the City of A ventura implements the
following pre-emergency procedures on an on-going basis:
.
Once per year prior to hurricane season, the Department Emergency Procedures
Manual will be updated and distributed to Department employees;
The Office of the City Manager will publish hurricane preparedness tips in the July
issue of the Aventura Update, a newsletter distributed Citywide, to educate
residents and businesses about the City's hurricane procedures;
The Office of the City Manager, in conjunction with the Police Department, may
hold public meetings prior to hurricane season to infonn residents of hurricane
preparedness tips. The Police Department will have hurricane preparedness
materials available to disttibute upon request, and will also respond to requests to
speak to groups regarding hurricane preparedness;
The City Manger will be notified by the Commander of Special Services of any
threat of hazardous weather or imminent executive orders from Miami-Dade
County. Once notified, the City Manager will hold a meeting with Department
Directors and authorize that the Emergency Management Plan be placed in action;
After the plan is in action, and prior to the Evacuation Order trom the County, the
Office of the City Manager will fax an "Early Warning" to all condominiums,
homeowners associations, property managers, and business associations, informing
residents of the storm system and encouraging them to stay tuned to the local
weather forecast;
After the County has issued an Evacuation Order for the City, the Office of the City
Manger will fax an Evacuation Notice to all condominiums, homeowners
associations, property managers and business associations. The Evacuation Notice
will include information about the City's Emergency Shuttle Bus Service. The
Office of the City Manger will send a copy of all released infonnation to the
Miami-Dade Office of Emergency Management to apprise them of the city's status
and ensure the consistency of infonnation provided to the public;
The City Manager will relay all emergency information to the City Commission;
The City Manger will provide a list of "essential" employees to the Finance &
Support Services Director prior to hurricane season. The essential employees of the
Office of the City Manager are the City Manager and the Assistant to the City
Manager;
All staff within the Office of the City Manager will prepare the department by:
0 Backing up all computer files on the f:/drive
0 Unplugging all electrical equipment
0 Removing loose items trom high areas
0 Securing files away trom windows
0 Moving all computer and telephone equipment away from windows
0 Closing all doors prior to leaving the department;
The Finance & Support Services Director will supply a list of all City employees,
their phone numbers and status (essential or non-essential) to the City Manager;
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
47
DRAFT
v.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
.
Once an Evacuation Order has been given by Miami-Dade County, the Office of the
City Manager will fax an emergency announcement to the designated media
hurricane fax numbers to alert residents of Evacuation Order. A copy of the
announcement will also be sent to the Miami-Dade Office of Emergency
Management EOC;
The Office of the City Manager will place a recorded on (305) 466-8900, informing
callers of the Evacuation Order, leaving police dispatch phone number for both
residents and employees to call for more information, and;
All "essential" employees of the Office of the City Manager shall report to the
designated areas, and wait until the storm passes and it is safe to re-enter the City.
The designated area may be the Aventura Police Station, the North Miami Beach
EOC, or another location as determined by the City Manager, based on various
factors relating to any given storm.
.
.
City of Aventura Post-Emergency Procedures
In the event of an emergency storm event, the City of Aventura implements the following
post-emergency procedures:
.
The Divisional EOC will announce when it is safe to re-enter the City. Upon
notification of safe re-entry, all "essential" employees of the Office of the City
Manager will report to the temporary command post, to be determined by the City
Manager, within the City;
The Office of the City Manager will continue to fax reports to designated media
regarding re-entry for residents;
The City Manager will contact all Department Directors to request assistance;
The City Manager shall contact all Department employees to request assistance. All
non-essential employees shall monitor news stations and/or call the Police dispatch
for information on when to return to work;
The City Manager will announce the decision to return to work for all non-essential
employees. The Finance & Support Services Department shall contact all non-
essential employees to inform them ofthe decision;
The City Manager shall organize special Commission meetings and maintain any
special ordinances/resolution the City Commission may enact during an emergency;
The Office of the City Manager will assist in obtaining relief from federal, state and
local agencies, and;
The Office of the City Manager will coordinate the completion and submission of
damage assessment forms to the Finance & Support Services Director for FEMA
reimbursement.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
48
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Social, Economic and Environmental lmpacts
Section 163.3191(2)(e), F.S., requires that the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the identified major issues be addressed in the EAR. The social,
economic and environmental impacts of emergency management are summarized below.
Maintaining an emergency management system is essential to guaranteeing the health,
safety and welfare of the City's existing and future residents and visitors, particularly in
hurricane-vulnerable areas such as South Florida. The failure to adequately prepare for a
major stonn event can result in the loss of life and destruction of property, and disrupt the
nonnal course of daily activities for long periods of time, with great social and economic
costs. For example, aftereffects of Hurricane Andrew are still evident in South Miami-
Dade County. The City must have post-disaster recovery programs to expedite the
nonnalization of City functions, and assist residents and businesses in their recovery, both
financially and emotionally.
From an environmental standpoint, natural resources are often damaged or destroyed in
hurricane and stonn events, and their restoration is an important component of post-disaster
recovery efforts. Moreover, the loss of natural habitat due to development and human
alteration can increase vulnerability to stonn events. For example, coastal mangroves and
wetlands provide a natural function in reducing stonn surges, and pervious surfaces
increase drainage capacity and reduce flooding. The natural system must therefore be
considered as a component in emergency management and post-disaster recover programs.
49
DRAFT
3.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Section 163.3191 (2)(g), F,S., requires that the EAR evaluate the plan objectives within
each element as they relate to the major issues and identify, where appropriate, unforeseen
or unanticipated changes in circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities
with respect to the major issues. Issue I.C., "Emergency Management", impacts:
.
Objectives 3,8, and 12 of the Future Land Use Element, and policies thereunder, as
they address strategies to ensure the availability of services and infrastructure to
accommodate new development and redevelopment, procedures to amend the
Comprehensive Plan, and maintaining hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12
hours or less;
Objective I of the Transportation Element, and policies thereunder, as they
addresses the maintenance of a safe, convenient, and energy efficient multi-modal
transportation system, and roadway and transit level of service standards; Element
in its entirety;
IntTastructure Goal 2, Objective I of the Infrastructure Element, and policies
thereunder, as they address stormwater drainage level of service standards, and
flood protection;
Aquifer Recharge Goal, Objective I of the Infrastructure Element, and policies
thereunder, as they address aquifer recharge areas and protection of the City's
natural drainage features;
Policy 1.5 of the Capital Improvements Element, as it calls for the establishment of
a multi-purpose public facility in the north portion of the City to be used as a park
that can also be used as a staging area in the event of a natural disaster;
Objectives 2 and 3 of the Capital Improvements Element, and policies thereunder,
as they address strategies to ensure the availability of services and infrastructure to
accommodate new development and redevelopment;
Objectives I and 3 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and policies
thereunder, address joint land use planning with other jurisdictions.
Objective 4 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element, and policies
thereunder, as they address coordination with other jurisdictions on emergency
management and the provision of timely and adequate shelter;
Coastal Management Goal Objectives 2 and 5 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element, and policies thereunder, as they address the stormwater
drainage and coastal wildlife habitat;
Objectives 9, 10 and II of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, and
policies thereunder, as they address maintaining hurricane evacuation clearance
times of 12 hours or less, emergency management, and post-disaster recovery
strategies, and;
Conservation Goal Objective 6 and policies thereunder because they address flood
protection and storm water drainage.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Specific recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Plan to address the issue of
development and redevelopment are as follows.
50
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evalualion and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
a.
Future Land Use Element
Recommeudation II.C.I. Objective 3 states that decisions regarding the location,
extent and intensity of future land uses in the City will be based on environmental
conditions and level of service standards. It is recommended that that this Objective be
amended to add "and the ability to maintain the hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12
hours or less" after "conditions".
Recommendation II.c.2. Policy 3.1 states that development orders authorizing new or
significantly expanded land uses shall be contingent upon the provision of services at or
above adopted level of service standards specified in the Capital Improvement Element. It
is recommended that this Policy be amended to add "and the ability to maintain the
hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12 hours or less" after "Element".
Recommendation II.c.3. Policy 8.2 specifies the criteria by which applications to
amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be evaluated. It is recommended that "impacts on the
City's ability to maintain the hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12 hours or less" be
added to the list of criteria.
Recommendation II.c.4. Objective 12 states that the City shall coordinate its coastal
planning area population densities with the South Florida Regional Planning Council and
Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management. It is recommended that this
Objective be amended to state that the City shall coordinate its coastal planning area
population densities with the South Florida Regional Planning Council, Miami-Dade
County Office of Emergency Management, and adjacent jurisdictions.
Recommendation II.C.S. Policy 12.1 states that all proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments that increase population density shall be analyzed for impacts on hurricane
evacuation routes and times included in the 1996 South Florida Regional Hurricane
Evacuation Study. It is recommended that this Policy be revised to state that the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments that increase population density shall be analyzed for
'impacts on hurricane evacuation routes and times based on the best and most recent
available South Florida Regional Planning Council data regarding hurricane evacuation
clearance times in the City.
Recommendation II.C.6. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Objective 12 stating that by 2007, the City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to
ensure that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in hurricane evacuation
clearance time fommlas, and encourage the use of consistent evacuation clearance time
standards by northeast Miami-Dade County municipalities.
b.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Recommendation II.c.7. Objective 4 states that the City will ensure adequate and
timely shelter within the region for residents of evacuation areas. It is recommended that
this Objective be revised to state that the City will coordinate with the appropriate agencies
51
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
to implement strategies to maintain huITicane evacuation clearance times to l2 hours of
less, ensure that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in huITicane evacuation
clearance time fonnulas, and ensure adequate and timely evacuation routes and shelter
within the region for residents of evacuation areas.
Recommendation II.C.S. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Objective 4 stating that the City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to ensure
that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in hurricane evacuation clearance
time fonnulas, and encourage the use of consistent evacuation clearance time standards by
northeast Miami-Dade County municipalities.
d.
Conservation and Coastal Management Element
Recommendation II.c.9. Objective 10 and policies 10.1 through 10.20 address the
City's post-disaster redevelopment plan. It is recommended that Objective 10 be amended
to state that the City shall implement pre- and post-emergency procedures in accordance
with its adopted Emergency Procedures Manual, as it is amended from time to time. The
policies thereunder should be replaced by policies that reflect the cuITently adopted plan
and procedures, as outlined in this Chapter.
52
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
II.D.
TRANSPORTATION
1.
Issue Description and Analysis
a.
City of Aventura Transportation System
The City of Aventura is located within Miami-Dade County's Urban Infill Area (UIA),
which is designated as a Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area, and is exempt from
transportation concurrency requirements. The City has therefore not had to delay or
prohibit development or redevelopment due to transportation concurrency issues between
1995 and 2005.
The City's adopted Level of Service standards for transportation are: a minimum peak
period LOS of E on State and City roads where no public mass transit exists; where mass
transit having headways of 20 minutes or less is provided, roadways shall operate at no
greater than 120 percent of their capacity, and; where extraordinary transit service such as
commuter rail or express bus service exists, parallel roadways within Yz mile shall operate
at no greater than 150 percent of their capacity. An express bus service is provided in the
City between Aventura Mall and Golden Glades, and along Biscayne Boulevard. The
Level of Service standards for roadways are based on the following definitions:
. LOS A - free flow traffic operations at average travel speeds;
. LOS B - stable flow with other users in traffic stream;
. LOS C - uncongested with other users causing significant interactions;
LOS D - congested stable flow with major delays;
. LOS E - very congested with traffic at or near capacity, and;
. LOS F - extremely congested with breakdown flows.
In order to determine the current levels of service on roadways in A ventura, level of service
information was taken fi'om the Miami Dade County MPO 2030 Long Rang Transportation
Plan, which is the official transportation planning document for Miami-Dade County. It
specifies all transportation projects to be planned, designed or constructed within this time
horizon. It utilizes a complex modeling structure which integrates the most recent Census
data and traffic information. It then distributes and projects trips, volumes and levels of
service in the future. A new LRTP is developed every five years. This becomes the basis
for determining and prioritizing transportation needs. To be eligible for federal dollars,
projects must first be part of this plan.
Information indicates that at the time of the counts: Ives Dairy Road was operating at LOS
F, William Lehman Causeway was operating at LOS B, Biscayne Boulevard was operating
at LOS F, and Country Club Drive, Aventura Boulevard, Waterways Boulevard, and NE
34th Avenue, were all operating at LOS B or better. Overall, this examination determined
that there is capacity remaining on the roadway network (nearly an extra travel lane's
worth, or 2,000 trips). Nonetheless, based on the most recent available data, the City is not
meeting its roadway Level of Service standards on Biscayne Boulevard or Ives Dairy Road.
53
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure II,D, I shows the projected levels of service on the city's roadways during the
planning period, As can be seen, it is projected that by 2030: William Lehman Causeway
will be operating at LOS B; Aventura Boulevard will be at LOS D, and; Country Club
Drive will be mainly at LOS E, with the links approaching the William Lehman Causeway
at LOS F, NE 34th Avenue will be at LOS F and Waterways Boulevard will be at LOS E.
Ives Dairy Road and Biscayne Boulevard will continue to operate at LOS F, Therefore, it
is projected that the City will not be meeting its roadway Level of Service standards for
portions of Country Club Drive, Ives Dairy Road, or Biscayne Boulevard in 2030.
The City's existing transportation system is comprised of more than roadways, Mass
transit service in the City is provided by the Miami-Dade Transit Authority through express
and regular bus service (Figure ILD.2)23, and by the City of Aventura through its internal
shuttle bus service (Figure ILD.3), The City of Aventura's shuttlebus service boasts an
average monthly ridership of 9,000, and has had a total ridership of 457,138 since its
inception in 199924.
Bicycles and pedestrian paths/sidewalks are another important component of the City's
transportation system. The City provides sidewalks along most major roadways, and
major bicycle and pedestrian paths along Country Club Drive around the TurnbeITY Golf
Course and along NE 187 Street. In addition, there are many waterways in the City that
provide opportunities for recreational boating. Although there is no water taxi service in
the City at present, it might be explored as a future option for trips within the City, and
between the City and other waterfront locales,
23 Miami-Dade Transit Authority, 2005
24 City of Aventura Shuttlebus Ridership Summary, January 1999 to Present, City of Aventura Community
Services Department, 2005
54
DRAFT City of Aventura 200S Evaluation and Appraisal Report- July
Figure 11.0.1. City of Aventura Roadway Levels
I Legend '..'l
I Peak Hour Level-of-Service
¡ .. LOS A I
LOS B
LOS C
LOS D
LOS E
LOS F
-
-
-
Coo.
e]
Railroad
Street
Miami-Dade County
Broward County
City of Aventura
---
DRAFT City of Aventura Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005
I
Miami-Dade Transit: Metrobus Routes & Metrorail Alignment
~----------------
~ ; ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡. ~'J
I M_-~.:. _..._......n......_",,:::¡;,-=t7¡~----- ---=::-;=---------;;;=:71;Zt
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I --. -- ---
I :Mt-~- 1"- ~.'\
L'::'..:..___-
Figure II.D,2. MOTA Bus Routes (2005)
!!Iìlil
--
---_... ... ..,.."",m
""""."""""-.....-......."""'0"'
m____....--....-
---...,
~_........_. .n.--_""',""'"
m__-_...-..-...-""""""
-_........... .. .. ....--~/-
='::';';"¡~.:~~=:;:
MIAM.!!!!'
mlliiiiiI'
56
DRAFT City of A ventura Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Figure n.D.3 City of Aventura Shuttlebus Routes
.~"^~ CVUNn
57
.---BlueRoUle
. ---Green Route
. --- Red Route
- . - Yellow Route
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
b.
Transportation Challenges and Opportnnities
A number of issues combine in A ventura to make planning for transportation a challenge.
These include the City's geographic location, in the northeast quadrant of the county, near
the barrier islands and ocean. This location specifically, and the region as a whole, is one
of the most desirable locations in the nation. Intensification of land uses and limited
capacity present issues to the transportation network. it is clear that the City's existing and
future residents need better and more diverse mobility options.
As noted earlier, A ventura is in a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area, (TCEA).
As practiced to this date, there are essentially no checks and balances on development in
regards to transportation under this system. In May 2005, the State of Florida amended
Section 163.3180, F.S. to require that local governments include provisions in their
Comprehensive Plan to support and fund mobility within Transportation Concurrency
Exception Areas, and demonstrate how mobility will be provided in these areas. The new
legislation further requires that by July 2006, local governments evaluate the impact of the
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area on the Strategic IntemlOdal Transportation
System and adopted level of service standards of roadways funded in accordance with
Section 339.2819, F.S. Proof that cities participating in this type of system are enhancing
alternative modes of transportation, fostering mobility and ensuring connectivity will be
required. It is anticipated that this legislation will significantly change the impact of the
TCEAs, as proposed development in these areas will be subject to a more stringent review
of its impacts on the transportation system and levels of service.
Transportation and mobility in Aventura may be best served initially by the recommended
amendments to the City's land development regulations. It is recommended that at the
same time, Transportation Concurrency Exception Areas should be maintained under the
2005 legislation, until such time that the City feels this level of care is inadequate. If this
occurs, the City should explore the implementation of more impactful transportation
management tools. In addition it is recommended that the City mitigate impacts to the
transportation system by developing an impact fee charged to developers, which would
fund alternative modes of transportation.
It has been noted that there are few if any opportunities to expand the physical capacity of
the roadway network in Aventura. Capacity and mobility improvements will therefore
occur through alternative means. In order to more closely assure that mobility is
maintained in the City as development occurs, the City should examine the implementation
of impact fees to fund the operations and maintenance of the Aventura Circulator.
58
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
c.
Transportation Funding
Funding for transportation projects comes from federal, State and local sources. Most
major projects are funded from federal funds distributed by the MPO. The MPO also
issues several municipal grants each year. The primary source of transportation funding for
cities in Miami Dade County is from the People's Transportation Plan, the halfpenny sales
tax passed in 2002. Twenty percent of total tax dollars are distributed to the municipalities.
A ventura receives approximately $800,000 per year, of which 20% or $160,000 is to be
spent on transit activities. The following is a description of the transportation funding
process.
i.
Federal
The federal government collects 24.4 cents per gallon on diesel and 18.4 cents per gallon
on gasoline to fund federal transportation projects. Of the amount collected, 2.86 cents
goes to transit, one cent goes to cleaning up leaking tanks, and the remainder goes to roads
and bridges.
Federal transportation funds are currently authorized under the TEA-21 legislation. The
program actually expired in 2003, but is operating under a continuing resolution due to the
inability of Congress to pass a new transportation authorization bill. Many of the Federal
programs are available only to State transportation departments, which are in turn passed
on to County's and local governments. TEA-21 funds are distributed between transit,
highway, and safety projects.
ii.
State
The State of Florida collects 10.1 cents per gallon on fuel (diesel and gasoline), that the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) retains. Fifteen percent (15%) of that
money goes to transit and the remainder goes to any legitimate State transportation need.
The State also collects 4.6 cents on gasoline and 5.6 cents on diesel under the SCETS
(State Comprehensive Enhanced Transportation System) tax, which must be spent in the
district that it is collected.
iii.
Local
The State also collects fuel tax money that is distributed directly back to counties and local
governments. Two (2) cents are collected as the Constitutional Fuel Tax which can go only
to the acquisition, construction, and maintenance of roads. The County fuel tax collects an
additional one (I) cent that can be spent for any legitimate County transportation purpose,
and municipalities collect another one (I) cent that can be spent on any legitimate
municipal transportation purpose. Counties can elect to collect one more cent through what
is referred to as the ninth-cent fuel tax, and between five (5) cents and II cents under the
Local Option Gas Tax. The ninth cent and the local option gas tax go back to the local
jurisdiction to meet local transportation needs.
59
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
An additional source of local transportation funds comes from the Charter County
Transportation System Surtax which allows transit counties to collect between .5% and 1 %
sales tax on gasoline to be spent on transit programs. These funds must provide for the
distribution of some funds back to the municipalities. Miami-Dade County collects .5
cent sales tax on gasoline.
The only local transportation money that is not collected from gasoline taxes resulted from
Miami-Dade County's November 2002 passage of a halfpenny sales tax on merchandise to
develop the People's Transportation Plan. The legislation requifes that 20% of the sales tax
money be distributed to the municipalities for their use for transportation related
expenditures. This money is redistributed to the municipalities based upon an annual
population estimate. Twenty percent of the surtax proceeds are distributed to those cities
existing as of November 5, 2002. Surtax proceeds are distributed among existing cities on
a pro rata basis based on the ratio of a city's population to the total of all City populations,
as adjusted annually. Newly incorporated cities have the right to negotiate with the County
for a pro rata share of the surtax. Cities must apply 20% of their funds to transit uses such
as circulators, bus shelters, and bus pull outs. In 2003, the County collected $175 million
dollars, of which $35 million was distributed to the cities for transportation. The ordinance
that enacted the Y, cent sales tax identified a number of transportation and transit projects to
be funded through the tax, including the Northeast Corridor, a 13.6-mile MetroRail corridor
that will extend from downtown Miami to NE 215 Street, generally along the Biscayne
Blvd./US I Corridor and Florida East Coast railroad right-of-way.
It should be noted that current revenues that the City receives for transportation fund only
capital improvements, and do not fund operation and maintenance. It is therefore
recommended that the City enact impact fees and other mechanisms in order to provide for
such funding, improve transportation levels of service, and expand the mobility options of
existing and future residents.
60
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
Section 163.3191(2)(e), F.S., requires that the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the identified major issues be addressed in the EAR. The social,
economic and environmental impacts of Issue 1.0., "Transportation". are addressed as
follows.
Although the City of Aventura has a multimodal transportation system, its existing
transportation system is primarily oriented to the automobile. There are a number of
persons and households, however, who do not have regular access to an automobile, and
who therefore have difficulty accessing employment, recreation and other services
(transportation disadvantaged). Unfortunately, the transportation disadvantaged also tend
to be members of special needs groups (i.e. the elderly, the disabled) with the greatest need
for services. The resulting cycle exacerbates the very factors that contributed to their
disadvantages in the first place. The provision of an increased range of mobility
alternatives will therefore increase the access of transportation disadvantaged persons and
households to employment and services, with associated positive economic and social
benefits.
The provision of an improved multi-modal transportation system will have a number of
other positive economic benefits. Employers benefit by the improved access of existing
and potential employees to the workplace, and businesses benefit trom being more
accessible to their customer base. Moreover, a good transportation system can be a key
factor in attracting new employers and businesses to the area.
Automobiles have a number of negative environmental impacts, including traffic
congestion, air pollution, and energy consumption. The provision of alternatives to the
automobile for local and regional trips lessens these negative environmental impacts.
Moreover, mobility alternatives are perhaps the most important factors in reducing urban
sprawl, and fostering more efficient land use patterns and reduced land consumption.
61
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3.
Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Section 163.3191 (2)(g), F.S., requires that the EAR evaluate the plan objectives within
each element as they relate to the major issues and identify, where appropriate, unforeseen
or unanticipated changes in circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities
with respect to the major issues. Issue 1.0., "Transportation", impacts:
. Objectives 3 and 8 of the Future Land Use Element, and policies thereunder, as they
address strategies to ensure the availability of services and infrastructure to
accommodate new development and redevelopment and procedures to amend the
Comprehensive Plan;
. The Transportation Element in its entirety;
. Objectives 2 and 3 of the Capital Improvements Element, and policies thereunder,
as they address strategies to ensure the availability of services and infrastructure to
accommodate new development and redevelopment, and;
. Policy 1.6 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is impacted because it
calls for the establishment of a coordinated regional transit system for the
transportation disadvantaged.
Specific recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Plan to address the issue of
transportation are as follows:
a.
Transportation Element
Recommendation II.D.1. Add a new Objective to the Transportation Element stating
that by 2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to
provide a cohesive blueprint for development and redevelopment in the City, ensure that
new development and redevelopment does not further degrade transportation levels of
service within the City, and enhance mobility options for existing and future residents.
Recommendation II.D.2. Add a new Policy under Objective I stating that beginning in
2006, the City shall annually evaluate the impact of its Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area on Strategic Intermodal System facilities and the adopted level of service
standards of transportation facilities that are funded in accordance with Section 339.2812,
F.S. If it is determined that the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area is no longer
adequate, the City shall explore the implementation of more impactful transportation
management tools.
Recommendation II.D.3. Add a new Policy under Objective I of the Transportation
Element stating that the City will continue to identify projects to support and fund mobility,
enhance alternative modes of transportation, and ensure connectivity in its Capital
Improvements Program in accordance with Section 163.3180, F.S.
Recommendation II.D.4. Add a new Policy under Objective I stating that beginning in
2006, the City shall evaluate the impacts of proposed development and redevelopment on
its transportation system, Strategic Intennodal System facilities, and the adopted level of
62
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
service standards of transportation facilities that are funded in accordance with Section
339.28l2, F.S., and identify strategies to alleviate or mitigate such impacts.
Recommendation 11.0.5. Add a new Policy under Objective I stating that by 2007 the
City will develop impacts fees and other methods by which developers can mitigate
impacts to the transportation system by contributing funds for altemative modes of
transportation, particularly the expansion, operation and maintenance of the Circulator
System.
63
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
ILE.
QUALITY OF LIFE
1.
Issue Description and Analysis
The City of Aventura is well-known for the excellent quality of life that it provides to its
residents and visitors. The City's high quality of development, world-class shopping and
entertainment venues, waterfront location, and public and private recreational offerings
have made it one of the most desirable locales in South Florida for residents and
businesses. Due to on-going development pressures and competing needs, however, the
City is challenged to maintain and improve the high quality of life it offers to current and
future residents, businesses, and visitors. Steps must be taken to continue to maintain and
improve its quality oflife in the face of these pressures.
Maintaining and improving levels of services for key facilities and services is integral to
maintaining the City's quality of life. Some of these services, such as recreation and open
space and public safety, are within the purview of the City and its administration. Other
services such as public schools, libraries, and fire-rescue are provided in the City by other
agencies such as Miami-Dade County and Miami-Dade County Public Schools. The City
must increase coordination efforts with these entities in order to ensure that its quality of
life is maintained and enhanced.
64
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
a.
Recreation and Open Space
The City of Aventura's adopted Level of Service standard for recreation and open space is
2.75 acres of net usable park land per 1,000 residents. Based on its 2000 population of
25,267, the City must therefore provide 69.48 acres of recreation open space in order to
meet its Level of Service standard. The City estimates that its 2005 population is 28,200
residents, requiring 77.55 acres of recreation and open space.
As noted on Table II.A.2., the City has 257.07 acres of recreation open space identified on
its Future Land Use Plap Map, including public and private open space. In order to
detennine the amount of recreation and open space that is available for use by residents for
concurrency purposes, the City counts public parks at 100 percent, private recreation
facilities at 50 percent, and marinas and golf course at 25 percent. Based on this fonnula,
the City's existing recreation and open space acreage is 114. The City is therefore
exceeding its recreation and open space Level of Service standard by 38.4 acres. Table
1lI.E.1. below identified the City's public and private recreation and open space by type
and acreage.
Table II.E.!.
Recreation and Open Space Inventory
LYPe Name Acrea!!e Aoolicable Acrea!!e
Community/Public Country Club Drive 5 5
Exercise/Walking
Path
Community/Public Arthur 1. Snyder 3.5 3.5
Memorial Park
Neighborhood/Public Veterans Park 2 2
Neighborhood/Public Waterways Park 7 7
Neighborhood/Public A ventura Founders II II
Park
Total Public 29 29
.Recreation/Private 63.61 31.81
Marina/Private 9.40 2.35
Golf Courses 203.17 50.79
Total Private 276.18 84.95
Total 305.18 113.95
As can be seen on Table ¡I.E. I. above, the City currently has 29 acres of recreation and
open space in six public parks. These parks are shown on Figure ¡I.E. I. Current park
projects include development and expansion of Waterways Park, improvements to
Founders Park, and Country Club tennis court improvements. The City has eannarked
$4,835,006 for these projects in FY 2005/06 and FY 2006/07.29
29 City of Aventura Capital Improvements Program 2005 - 2010
65
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
In order to ensure that new development and redevelopment pays its fair share for
recreation and open space, the City collects a Parks Impact Fee as per Article IV., Division
5 of its Code of Ordinances, Under these requirements, residential developers must pay
$1,352.00 per new detached single family unit, $1,352,00 per new attached single family
unit, and $690.00 per new multi-family unit. These impact fees are eannarked for capital
improvements and expansions to the City's park system through the Park Development
Fund. In FY 2005/06 the City budgeted $1,000,000 in park impact fees for park
development and improvement projects. In addition, the City negotiates with private
developers to provide recreation and open space in the City. For example, the City
acquired a 2 aCfe parcel from the developer of the Peninsula Condominium project for
recreation and open space. This parcel is now known as Veterans' Park and consists of a
children's playground and dog park.
Maintaining public access to the City's waterfront is another important component of
meeting the recreational needs of existing and future residents. The City owns waterfront
acreage in Founders Park, Waterways Park, the NE 188 Street shoreline, and on the
northern perimeter of Little Maule Lake. These sites are shown on Figure II.E.2.
Beautification programs are another important component of maintaining and improving
quality of life in the City. In December 1996 the City Commission initiated the Citywide
Beautification Program in order to landscape medians, rights-of-way and public spaces
throughout the City. This program has been key to maintaining and improving the City's
built environment. A total of $577,000 is eannarked for City beautification programs in
FY 2005/06 and FY 2006/073°.
30 City 4 Aventura Capital Improvements Program 2005 - 201 ()
66
DRAFT City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report- July 2005
Figure II.E.1. City of Aventura Public
Waterways Park
,.
Public Park
Major Road
City of Aventura
Miami-Dade County
Broward County
DRAFT City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005
Figure II.E.2. Public Wateñront
- Railroad
D City of Aventura
. Miami-Dade County
D Broward County
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
b.
Public Schools
The City of Aventura, like jurisdictions throughout Florida, is faced with a number of
challenges regarding public schools. The City's population has increased as a result of
continued development and redevelopment, and this growth has increased demand for new
or expanded school facilities. A number of the County's school facilities are overcrowded,
and new schools cannot be provided quickly enough to meet the demand for new student
stations. Moreover, the City has few remaining vacant and developable parcels, which
limits the availability of land for new school construction.
The City of Aventura is currently served by two elementary schools, one middle school,
and one senior high school. Table 1I.E.2. identifies these schools, and shows their 2004
enrollment, Class Size Reduction Capacity, and current utilization rates. Utilization rates
are calculated by Miami-Dade County Public Schools by dividing enrollment by class size
reduction capacity. If the utilization rate of a school exceeds 100 percent, it is considered
to be overcrowded. As can be seen on Table 1I1.E.2., the four public schools serving the
City are overcrowded.
Table 1I.E.2. City of Aventura 2004 Student Enrollment and School Conditions31
School Name 2004 Enrollment Class Size Utilization Rate
Reduction CaDacitv
Virginia Boone/ 941 760 124%
Highland Oaks
Elem.
Oius Elem. 885 465 190%
Highland Oaks 2,557 1,197 214%
Middle
Dr. Michael M. 3,759 2,313 163%
Krop Senior High
, A ventura City of 600 n/a n/a
Excellence Charter
School
In 1996, the State of Florida enacted legislation that provided for the creation of charter
schools, non-profit corporations that are typically operated by a group of parents, teachers,
an organization, a municipality, universities, and/or a combination of more than one group.
There are many reasons to establish a charter school but as outlined in the Board Rule the
major reasons are: to improve student learning, to increase learning opportunities for all
students with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for academically low
achieving students; to encourage use of innovative learning methods; to increase choices of
learning opportunities for students; to establish a new fonn of accountability for schools; to
require the measurement of learning outcomes and create innovative measurement tools; to
31 Miami-Dade Public Schools, 2005
69
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
make the school the unit for improvement; and to create new professional opportunities for
teachers.32
A charter school is bound by the requirements of Sections 228.056, 230.22 and .23, Florida
Statutes and Miami-Dade County School Board Rule 6Gx13.6A.1.47 and must be reviewed
and approved by the School Board. They are also fully recognized public schools.
On August 25, 2003, the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School opened as the first
municipally sponsored charter school in Miami-Dade County. Located at 3333 NE 188
Street, the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School serves up to 600 students between
kindergarten and fifth grade. In its short history the school has become an important
component of the community, and a source of great civic pride. Its success is evidenced by
a return rate of over 99 percent and A rating. The school operates as a City Department,
and its Principal reports to the City Manager. The school demonstrates the City's
commitment to ensuring the quality of life of existing and future residents. The City is
currently expanding the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School to serve 6th grade
students by 2005, 7'h grade students by 2006, and 8th grade students by 2007 increasing the
student capacity to 900.
In May 2005, the State of Florida amended its growth management statutes to require that
local governments establish and enforce concurrency requirements for public schools and
adopt public school facilities elements into their comprehensive plans. According to the
new requirements, the public school facilities element and concurrency requirements must
be adopted by no later than December I, 2008 on a phased schedule to be established by
the Florida Department of Community Affairs. As demonstrated on Table II.E.2. above,
the public schools serving the City of Aventura are all overcrowded, with the exception of
the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School. The new school concurrency
requirements may therefore have implications for future development and redevelopment
in the City. The City will monitor the interpretation and implementation of the new
requirements, and coordinate with the State, Miami-Dade County Public Schools, regional
and County agencies, and other jurisdictions to address the new requirements and adopt the
Public School Facilities Element into its Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the
established schedule. As of the date of this report, however, it is uncleaf how the new
requirements will be applied and implemented.
32 The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida Board Rules
70
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
c.
Public Safety
Ensuring the health and safety of residents and visitors is another important component in
maintaining and improving quality of life. Between 1997 and 2005 the number of sworn
police officers in the City of Aventura increased from 49 to 76. The City's crime rate has
decreased rapidly during that period, as is demonstrated on Table II.E.3. below.
Table II.E.3. City of Aventura Crime Rate, 1998 - 2005
Year Total Crimes PoDulation Crime Rate % Cban!!e
1998 3,339 20,349 16,408.7 0
1999 3,058 22,800 13,412.3 -18.3%
2000 3,157 25,267 12,494.6 -6.8%
2001 2,672 25,903 10,315.4 -17.4%
2002 2,335 26,142 8,832 -13.4%
2003 2,260 27,241 8,296.3 -7.1%
2004 1,850 28,202 6,559.8 -20,9%
Source: City of Aventura 2004 Annual Report
In order to maintain and improve the quality of its police services, and ensure that new
development pays its fair share for increased police services that will be necessitated by
such development, the City collects a Police Fee as per Article IV., Division 5 of its Code
of Ordinances. Under these requirements, developers must pay $96.47 per residential unit
and $.140 per square foot of non-residential development. Between FY 05 and FY 10, it is
projected that the police impact fee will generate revenues of $53 I ,000. These funds are
earmarked for capital outlay items such as new equipment necessitated by increased
demand.
Fire rescue service in the City of Aventura is provided by the Miami-Dade County Fire
Rescue Department. The City coordinates with the County in order to maintain and
improve the quality of fire rescues service that it provides to the City and its residents. The
.average fire rescue response time in Miami-Dade County is currently estimated to be
between eight and nine minutes. The average response time in the City is six to eight
minutes.JJ
33 City of Aventura, Emergency Services Re.'ponse, City Commission Workshop Agenda, April 21, 2005
71
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts
Section l63.3l9l(2)(e), F.S" requires that the potential social, economic, and
environmental impacts of the identified major issues be addressed in the EAR. The social,
economic and environmental impacts of Issue IE., "Quality of Life", are addressed as
follows.
The provision of recreation open space has numerous positive social benefits for the
community. By providing a venue for physical activities, parks can result in a healthier
population, with positive public health implications, Moreover, parks provide an outlet for
positive social interaction and activity, which can ease the boredom and isolation that leads
to crime and other social problems. Parks are particularly important as a social and
recreational outlet for youths and special needs populations.
The effective provision of such services as schools, police, and fire-rescue has great
impacts on the public health, safety, and welfare, and to the social fabric of the community.
The City has demonstrated its commitment to improving the delivery of these services
through the charter school, increased police force, and other initiatives. Moreover, the City
will continue to work cooperatively with agencies having jurisdiction within the City, or
sharing common interests with the City, to improve the delivery of services such as public
schools and fire-rescue.
From an economic standpoint, a well-developed and maintained park system, quality public
schools, and strong public safety programs are important tools in attracting new businesses
and residents to the City. Parks and public safety programs are key to crime reduction and
improved public health, lessening the negative economic impacts of crime and rising health
care costs. Quality schools are key to the economy by providing existing and future
residents with the tools necessary for economic self-sufficiency and advancement, and
employers with an educated and skilled workforce. Although there is a public cost to
providing these services, these costs are mitigated by these factors.
Parks also have numerous positive environmental impacts. The City is experiencing rapid
growth, and is substantially built out. Parks provide urban relief in a built environment.
Moreover, open space plays a key role in the ecosystem through providing such functions
as aquifer recharge, wildlife habitat, and air quality. It is therefore imperative to maintain
open space as a viable land use in the City.
72
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3.
Comprehensive Plan Impacts and Recommendations
Section 163.3191 (2)(g), F.S., requires that the EAR evaluate the plan objectives within
each element as they relate to the major issues and identify, where appropriate, unforeseen
or unanticipated changes in circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities
with respect to the major issues. Issue I.E., "Quality of Life", impacts:
.
The Future Land Use Element in its entirety;
The Parks and Recreation Element in its entirety;
The Capital Improvements Element in its entirety;
The Intergovernmental Coordination Element in its entirety;
Coastal Management Goal, Objective 4, Policy 4.3 of the Conservation & Coastal
Management Element as it addresses protection of natural reservations identified in
the Parks and Recreation Element, and;
Coastal Management Goal, Objectives 6 and 12 of the Conservation & Coastal
Management Element, and policies thereunder, as they address the preservation and
enhancement of waterfront sites for water-dependent uses.
.
.
.
.
Specific recommendations to amend the Comprehensive Plan to address the issue of
transportation are as follows:
a.
Parks and Recreation Element
Recommendation II.E.I. Objective 2 states that the City will coordinate the provision
of public and private resources to meet recreation demands within one year of Plan
adoption. It is recommended that this Objective be amended to state that the City will
continue to coordinate the provision of public and private resources to meet recreation
demands, and that the reference to "within one year of Plan adoption" be deleted.
Recommendation II.E.2. Policy 2.1 states that there were no recreation system
.deficiencies at the date of the Comprehensive Plan's adoption. It is recommended that this
Policy be amended to state that the City will continue to ensure that it meets and exceeds its
established Level of Service Standard for Recreation and Open Space through the
Concurrency Management System, the collection of Park Impacts Fees, and other
strategies.
Recommendation II.E.3. Policy 3.1 states that the City will develop land development
regulations to include appropriate definitions of open space needs and standards. It is
recommended that this Policy be amended to state that the City will continue to ensure that
open space requirements for new development and redevelopment are met through the
implementation and enforcement of its land development regulations.
73
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
CHAPTER III.
OBJECTIVE ACHIEVEMENT ANALYSIS
An important objective of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) is the identification
of successes and shortcomings in implementing the Comprehensive Plan objectives
(Sections 163.3191(2) (g) and (h), F.S. since the Plan's adoption in 1998. The following
Chapter measures the City's progress in implementing its adopted Comprehensive Plan
goals, objectives and policies.
III.A. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
1.
Objective FLU-I
Objective I of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "The following land use
densities, intensities and approaches shall be incorporated in the Land Development
Regulations."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Incorporation of the stated land use
designations into the Land Development Regulations."
Land Use designations as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan are more general and Land
Development Regulations (Zoning) are more specific. Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and
Rule 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code require consistency between a city's land use
designations and land development regulations. Therefore, through zoning the land use
designations are incorporated. A review of Chapter 31, Land Development Regulations, of
the City of Aventura's Code of Ordinances confinns that the City has incorporated its
Future Land Use designations into its land development regulations.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-l.1 through FLU-1.3) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table 1ll.A.I below:
Table III.A.I Future Laud Use Element Ob'ective FLU-I Achievement Status
Polic 1m lemented? Relevant
PolicyFLU-l.l Yes Yes
The Future Land Use map
shall identify all residential
land as one of the following
Residential Land Use
Categories: Low Density,
Low-Medium Density,
Medium Density and
Medium-Hi h Densit .
74
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.! Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-I Achievement Status cont.
Poli!;Y
Policy FLU-l.2
The Future Land Use map
shall identify all
nonresidential land as one
of the following
nonresidential land use
categories: Industrial and
Office, Business and Office,
Town Center and Parks and
Recreation.
Policy FLU-1.3
Communities facilities
(including schools) and
places of worship shall be
allowed on property with a
residential or business and
office land use designation
through the conditional use
procedures found in the
City's land development
regulations, and shall also
be encouraged within Town
Centers when such
placement results in the co-
location of schools with
other educational and
cultural resources such as
libraries, museum,
conservatories, and
auditoriums.
2.
Objective FLU-2
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, for example, the Yes
Aventura Charter School
and Community Center
have been co-located.
Please see Article VII. Use
Regulations in Chapter 3 1
Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "The Future Land Use Plan shall
emphasize concentration and intensification of development around centers of activity,
development of well designed communities containing a variety of uses, housing types and
public services, renewal and rehabilitation of blighted areas. [9J-5.006 (3)(b)(2)]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Residential and non-residential land
use densities within the City by LUP map category."
75
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Residential and non-residential land use densities and intensities are described on the LUP
map by category and further described in the Comprehensive Plan text. See Chapter II.A.
of this report for a description of the City's residential and non-residential land uses by
category.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-2.l through FLU-2.6) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.A.2 below:
Table III.A.2 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-2 Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-2.l Yes, through the Urban Yes
In planning and designing Design Element and Article
all new development and XI. Development Standards
redevelopment, the City of General Applicability in
shall vigorously promote Chapter 31 of the City's
implementation of the Code of Ordinances
guidelines contained in the
"Urban Design Element."
Policy FLU-2.2 Yes, ongoing Yes
To promote housing
diversity and to avoid
creation of monotonous
developments, A ventura
shall vigorously promote a
variety of housing types in
residential communities and
Town Centers through its
,planning, zoning,
subdivision, site planning
and other regulatory
activities.
76
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.2 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-2 Achievement Status cont.
Policy
Policy FLU-2.3
Business developments
shall preferably be placed in
clusters or nodes in the
vicinity of collector or
greater roadway
intersections and not in
continuous strips Of, with
the exception of small
neighborhood nodes, In
isolated spots. Business
developments shall be
designed to anchor
adjoining smaller
businesses or the adjacent
business district. Non-
residential zoning will not
necessarily be warranted on
a given property merely due
to adjacent roadway
construction or expansion,
or by its location at the
intersection of two
roadways.
Policy FLU-2.4
The City shall promote
good urban design, water
and energy conservation
and wildlife habitat when
designing sites and
selecting landscape material
for all public projects.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
77
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.2 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-2 Achievement Status cont.
Policy ImDlemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-2.5 Yes, but other agencies Yes,
Public facility and service have jurisdictional authority
provided shall give priority for the provision of certain
to eliminating any public facilities, for
infrastructure deficiencies example, water and sewer
to facilitate rehabilitation or (Miami-Dade Water and
renewal of areas. Sewer Department) and
roadways (Miami-Dade
Public Works and FOOT)
Policy FLU-2.6 Yes Yes
In fonnulating or amending
development regulations,
A ventura shall avoid
creating disincentives to
redevelopment.
3.
Objective FLU-3
Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Decisions regarding the
location, extent and intensity of future land use in Aventura will be based upon suitable
environmental conditions and the financial feasibility of providing, by the year 2005,
services at levels of service (LOS) that meet or exceed the minimum standards adopted in
the Capital Improvements Element. [9J-5.006(3)(b)I]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of development actions that
exceeded adopted level of service standards."
No applications for development have been approved which exceed the adopted level of
service standards set by the City in the Capital Improvements Element and in Chapter 31
Land Development Regulations, Article XI Development Standards of General
Applicability. As part of the review concerning future land use changes environmental
conditions and the feasibility of providing services is always reviewed. As this is ongoing
reference to the year 2005 should be deleted.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-3.1 through FLU-3.4) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.A.3 below:
78
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.3 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-3 Achievement Status
Policy Implemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-3.1 Yes, ongoing through the Yes, with changes,
All development orders CIE and Article XI references to "significant"
authorizing new, or should be deleted
significant expansion of
existing land uses, shall be
contingent upon the
provision of services at or
above the Level of Service
(LOS) standards specified
in the Capital
Improvements Element
(CIE) at the same time as
the land uses are authorized.
r9J-5.006(c)31
Policy FLU-3.2
A ventura shall maintain and
enhance, as necessary,
impact fee and comparable
programs and procedures to
require all development,
regardless of size, to
contribute its proportionate
share of capital facilities, or
funds or land thereof,
necessary to accommodate
impact of the proposed
development or increment
of redevelopment over and
above preexisting
development on a site.
A ventura shall periodically
review and update fee
schedules to ensure that all
public marginal costs are
appropriately recognized,
and that fee structures
reflect pertinent geographic
variability in facility usage.
Yes, police and parks Yes
impact fees and specific
purpose exactions, for
example, roadways and
roadway improvements.
79
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.3 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-3 Achievement Status cant.
PoliIT
Policy FLU-3.3
Municipal agencies shall
continue and, where
possible, improve their
efforts to coordinate
projects to construct or
repair infrastructure such as
roadways and utilities in
order to minimize the
disruption and
inconvenience caused by
such construction activities.
Policy FLU-3.4
The Community
Development Department
shall coordinate and
centralize the compilation
of monitoring information
necessary to make
determinations regarding
existing and projected
Levels of Services and to
prepare Evaluation and
Appraisal Reports for
submittal to the State land
planning agency, as
required by Chapter 163,
F.S. and Rule 9J-5, FAC.
4.
Objective FLU-4
Imnlemented?
Yes, intra- and inter- Yes
municipal/governmental
coordination lines of
communication are in place
and implemented through
the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element
Relevant
Yes, ongoing, the City Yes
through its development
review process monitors all
information regarding LOS
and through a consultant
will prepare the EAR
Objective 4 ofthe Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Upon the adoption of the Plan,
the location, design and management practices of development and redevelopment shall
ensure the protection of natural resources and systems by recognizing, and sensitively
responding to these constraints including historical resources. [9J-5.006(3)(b)4]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Acres of environmentally sensitive
lands preserved within the City."
Through the requirements of the Land Use and Conservation and Coastal Management
Elements the City must evaluate and determine the acreage for various land uses within the
80
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
City including environmentally sensitive lands that are preserved. At this time, it is
calculated that there are approximately 35 acres of environmentally sensitive lands within
the City.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (FLU-4.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IILAA below:
Table III.A.4 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-4 Achievement Status
Poliçy Implemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-4.1 Yes, through the Yes
Development orders in Comprehensive Plan
A ventura shall be consistent Elements and other
with the goals, objectives regulatory agencies and
and policies contained in their regulations
the Conservation and
Coastal Management
Elements of this Plan, and
with all applicable
environmental regulations,
as well as all other
Elements of the Plan.
5.
Objective FLU-5
Objective 5 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Aventura shall, by the year
2005, reduce the number of land uses inconsistent with the uses designated on the LUP
map or with the character of the suITounding community. [9J-5.006(3)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Acreage of inconsistent or
incompatible properties by LUP map category."
CuITently, there are approximately 17 acres of inconsistent or incompatible properties by
LUP map category. Generally, the area known as the Hospital District has existing land
uses which are inconsistent with the uses designated on the Adopted Future Land Use Map.
The City is striving to reduce the amount of acreage that is inconsistent through the
redevelopment ofthis area. Inconsistent marine industrial uses along NE 188 Street have
transitioned into residential uses since the date of adoption, as per the Future Land Use
Plan Map. Implementation of the Town Center designation is ongoing; however, the uses
existing in this area are not inconsistent with the uses allowed in the Town Center
designation. Please see Chapter ILA. for further discussion about these areas. As this is
ongoing reference to the year 2005 should be deleted.
81
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-S, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-S.I through FLU-SA) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IILA.S below:
Table III.A.S Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-S Achievement Status
Policy
Policy FLU-5.l
When evaluating
compatibility among
proximate land uses, the
City shall consider such
factors as: noise, lighting,
shadows, glare, vibration,
odor, runoff, access, traffic,
parking, heights, bulk, scale
of architectural elements,
landscaping, hours of
operation, buffering, and
safety, as applicable.
Policy FLU-S.2
Through implementation of
the land development
regulations, residential
neighborhoods shall be
protected from intrusion by
uses that would disrupt or
degrade the health, safety,
tranquility, character, and
overall welfare of the
neighborhood. [9J-
S.OO6(3)(c)21
Policy FLU-S.3
Supportive but potentially
incompatible uses shall be
pell11itted on site within
functional neighborhoods,
communities or districts
only where proper site
design can and will be used
to integrate the compatible
and complementary
elements and buffer any
potentially incompatible
elements.
Imnlemented?
Yes, through Chapter 31 in Yes
its entirely
Relevant
Yes, through Chapter 31 in Yes
its entirely
Yes, through Chapter 31 in Yes
its entirety
82
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.S Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-S Achievement Status cont.
Polic;y Imolemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-SA Yes, through the Capital Yes
Through its planning, Improvements Element,
regulatory, capital Chapter 31 in its entirely
improvements and and more specifically
intergovernmental Article VII. Use
coordination activities, Regulations
A ventura shall ensure that
suitable land is provided for
placement of utility
facilities necessary to
support proposed
development. Necessary
utility facilities may be
located in all land use
categories.
[9J-S.OO6(3)(b)9]
6.
Objective FLU-6
Objective 6 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Upon the adoption of the
Aventura Plan, all subsequent public and private activities regarding the use, development
and redevelopment of land and the provision of urban services and infrastructure shall be
consistent with the goal, objectives and policies of this Element, with recognized
Population Estimates and Projections, and with future uses designated on the adopted
Future Land Use Plan (FLUP) map, and as balanced with the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of all Elements of the Comprehensive Plan."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of development actions that
are inconsistent with the Goals, Objectives and Polices of the adopted Aventura
Comprehensive Plan."
No applications for development have been approved which are inconsistent with the
Goals, Objectives and Policies of the adopted Aventura Comprehensive Plan. Two
applications have been denied by the City due to inconsistencies with the Plan's goals,
objectives and policies.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-6, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (FLU-6.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table JlI.A,6 below:
83
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.6 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-6 Achievement Status
Poliçy Implemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-6.! Yes, through consistency Yes
All development orders requirements between the
authorizing a new land use Comprehensive Plan and
or development, or Land Development
redevelopment, or Regulations per Chapter
significant expansion of an 163 and Rule 9J-5.
existing use shall be
contingent upon an
affirmative finding that the
development or use
conforms to, and IS
consistent with the goals,
objectives and policies of
the Plan including the Land
Use Plan Map.
7.
Objective FLU-7
Objective 7 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "The City of Aventura shall
protect, preserve, ensure the proper management, and promote public awareness of
historical, architectural and archaeologically significant sites."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Acres of identified historical,
architectural and archaeologically significant sites preserved by LUP map category."
The City has no historically, architecturally or archaeologically significant sites designated
on the LUP by category.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU- 7, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (FLU-?I) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.A.7 below:
84
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.7 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-7 Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyFLU-7.1 No, the City has no No, not currently, but
The City shall undertake designated sites but has objective and policy should
efforts to locate sites with available any assistance be retained.
confinned historic, necessary from the Miami-
architectural and Dade County Office of
archaeological significance Historic Preservation to
and shall take timely and locate sites. Chapter 31,
appropriate measures to Article VI. Archaeological
preserve identified sites. and Historical Landmarks
outlines standards and
procedures for designation.
8.
Objective FLU-8
Objective 8 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "The City of Aventura
Community Development Depmiment shall maintain a process for periodic amendment to
the Land Use Plan map, consistent with the adopted Goals, Objectives and Policies of this
Plan."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of opportunities to amend the
Aventura Comprehensive Plan."
The City allows the statutory maximum for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, which
is currently two per year pursuant to Section 163.3187, F.S.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-8, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-8.1 through FLU-8.3) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.A.8 below:
85
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.8 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-8 Achievement Status
Poli~
Policy FLU-8.!
The City Commission, upon
recommendation of the City
Manager, shall establish
opportunities for the
consideration of
amendments to the
Aventura Comprehensive
Plan. The City Commission
shall not establish more
than the State imposed
maximum number of
opportunities, currently two
opportunities per year.
Small scale amendments or
emergency amendments
shall be exempt from this
limitation, as provided for
in State law.
Policy FLU-8.2
Applications to amend the
City's Future Land Use Plan
map shall be evaluated to
consider consistency with
the Goals, Objectives and
Policies of all Elements,
other timely issues, and in
particular the extent to
which the proposal, if
approved, would:
I. Satisfy a deficiency in the
Plan map to accommodate
projected population or
economic growth of the
City;
2. Enhance or impede
provision of services at
adopted LOS Standards;
3. Be compatible with
abutting and nearby land
uses and protect the
character of established
neighborhoods; and
Imolemented?
Yes, through Chapter 3 I , Yes
Article IV. Comprehensive
Plan amendment
procedures and Section
163.3187, F.S.
Relevant
Yes
Yes
86
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
4. Enhance or degrade
environmental or historical
resources, features or
systems of significance.
Policy FLU-8.3
The City shall strive to
accommodate residential
development in suitable
locations and densities
which reflect such factors as
recent trends in location and
design of residential units;
projected availability of
service and infrastructure
capacity; proximity and
accessibility to
employment, commercial
and cultural centers;
character of existing
adjacent or surrounding
neighborhoods; avoidance
of natural resource
degradation; maintenance of
quality of life and creation
of amenities.
Yes
Yes
9.
Objective FLU-9
Objective 9 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "A ventura shall continue to
maintain, update and enhance the municipal code, administrative regulations and
procedures, to ensure that future land use and development is consistent with the Plan, and
to promote better planned development and communities with well designed buildings. [9J-
5,OO6(3)(b) 10]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of City sponsored
amendments to the Land Development Code."
The City has continued to update and enhance the land development regulations since
approval of Chapter 31 Land Development Regulations on July 13, 1999. The land
development regulations have been amended 12 times since 1999.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-9, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-9.1 through FLU-9.3) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.A.9 below:
87
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.9 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-9 Achievement Status
Policy
PolicyFLU-9.1
A ventura shall continue to
maintain, and enhance as
necessary, regulations
consistent with the Plan
which govern the use and
development of land and
which, as a minimum,
regulate:[9J-5.006(3)(c)l]
I. Land use consistent with
the Land Use Element and
Level of Service Standards;
2. Subdivision of land;
3.Areas subject to seasonal
or periodic flooding;
4. Stormwater management;
5. Protection of
environmentally sensitive
lands;
6. Signage; and
7. On-site traffic flow and
parking to ensure safety and
convemence and that no
avoidable off-site traffic
flow impediments are
caused by development.
Policy FLU-9.2
A ventura shall continue to
investigate, maintain and
enhance methods, standards
and regulatory approaches
that facilitate sound,
compatible mixing of uses
in projects and
communities. [9J-
5.006(3)(b)3]
Imnlemented?
Yes, the City continues to Yes
amend its Code of
Ordinances as necessary to
be in compliance with 9J-
5.006 and other regulation
fi'om agencies such as
Miami-Dade County and
the State of Florida.
Yes, through Chapter 3 I in
its entirety and the Urban
Design Element and other
Best Planning and
Management Practices will
promote the mixing of uses
in projects and communities
88
Relevant
Yes, mixed use
development promotes a
multitude of efficiencies
DRAFT
City ofAventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.A.9 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-9 Achievement Status cont.
Policv
Policy FLU-9.3
The City within one (1)
year of adoption of this Plan
shall enact land
development
regulations that include
prOVISIOns for: [9J-
5.006(3)(c)4]
I. Open space in the fmTI1
of squares, plazas, or green
areas in residential and
commercial zoning
categories;
2. Diversity of uses in or
adjacent to residential
districts, including
neighborhood designs that
have a mixture of retail,
residential, office,
institutional and service
business uses in close
proximity;
3. Diversity of housing and
construction types;
4. Parking requirements for
all zoning districts to allow
. and retain on-street parking
where appropriate.
5. A hierarchy of street
types and designs, ranging
trom pedestrian and bike
paths to boulevards that
serve both neighborhood
and area-wide vehicular and
pedestrian trips.
to.
Objective FLU-tO
Imnlemented?
Yes. in 1999, Chapter 31
Land Development
Regulations were adopted
which provides for open
spaces, diversity of uses and
housing types and walkable
streets and which are all
consistent with Rule 9J-
5.005 and the Urban Design
Element
Relevant
No, plan has been adopted
Objective 10 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Energy efficient development
shall be accomplished through land use patterns, site planning, landscaping, building
design and development of multi-modal transportation systems."
89
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "No feasible measure exists. Surrogate
measure: Residential and non-residential land use densities within the City by LUP map
category. "
Although no feasible measure exists, the City encourages thoughtful development patterns
such as the Town Center Zoning District to meet this objective, Residential and non-
residential land use densities and intensities are described on the LUP map by category and
further described in the Comprehensive Plan text. See Chapter II.A. of this report for a
description of the City's residential and non-residential land uses by category.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-IO, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (FLU-I 0.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.A.I 0 below:
T bl IIIAIOF
L
dU
EI
Ob'
FLU lOA h'
s
a e uture an se ement lIectJve - c levement tatus
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyFLU-IO.1 Yes Yes
A ventura shall facilitate
redevelopment of
substandard or
underdeveloped areas, high
intensity activity centers,
mass transit supportive
development and mixed use
projects to promote energy
conservation.
II.
Objective FLU-ll
Objective II of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "Upon the adoption of the Plan,
the location, design and management practices of development and redevelopment shall
ensure the protection of natural resources and systems by recognizing, and sensitively
responding to constraints posed by soil conditions, topography, water table level,
vegetation type, wildlife habitat, and hurricane and other flood hazards."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Acres of environmentally sensitive
land by LUP map category; acres of developed land not serviced by sanitary sewer system
by LUP map category; acre-days ofland flooded by LUP map category."
This Objective should be updated and/or revisited because the Comprehensive Plan was
adopted. There are approximately 30 acres of environmentally sensitive land that is
designated Parks and Recreation on the Future Land Use Map and another 5 acres
designated Medium-High Density Residential. There are less than IS acres not serviced by
90
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
the sanitary sewer collection system in the Business and Office LUP category and located
mainly in the Hospital District. The acre-days of land flooded is not available but is
believed to be de minimus due to the sandy soil conditions and adequate stonnwater
drainage.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-II, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-I 1.1 and FLU-I 1.2) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table !I1.A.!1 below:
T bl III A 11 F
L
dU
EI
Db'
FLU 11 A h'
s
a e uture an se ement ).JectIve - c levement tatus
Policv Imolemented? Relevant
PolicyFLU-ll.1 Yes, an development orders Yes
Development orders In must be consistent with an
A ventura shan be consistent Elements of the
with the goals, objectives Comprehensive Plan
and policies contained in
the Conservation and
Coastal Management
Elements of this Plan, and
with an applicable
environmental regulations,
as well as an other elements
of the Plan.
Policy FLU-I 1.2 Yes Yes
An significant natural
resources and systems shan
be protected from
incompatible land use
including inland wetlands
,and forested portions of
Environmentany Sensitive
Sites as identified in the
Conservation Element, as
may be amended from time
to time.
91
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
12.
Objective FLU-12
Objective 12 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "The City of Aventura shall
coordinate its coastal planning area population densities with the South Florida Regional
Planning Council and the Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
However, there is a high degree of coordination between the City and the South Florida
Regional Planning Council, although additional coordination is needed. The City is
meeting its 12 hour standard as established in the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Chapter
H.c. for additional information about this issue.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-12, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (FLU-12.l and FLU-12.2) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table H1.A.12 below:
Table III.A.I2 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-I2 Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy FLU-12.1 Yes Yes
All proposed
Comprehensive Plan
amendments that increase
density (population) shall
be required to submit, at the
time of application, an
analysis of the impacts of
the proposed amendment
upon the evacuation foutes
and evacuation times as
included within the South
Florida Regional Hurricane
Evacuation Study, April,
1996, or as may be
amended from time to time.
Policy FLU-12.2 Yes Yes
The City shall not approve
any Comprehensive Plan
amendment that increases
density (population) and
results in evacuation times
exceeding 12 hours.
92
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
13.
Objective FLU-13
Objective 13 of the Future Land Use Element is as follows: "To address the current school
siting needs and to coordinate with other governmental entities to discuss projected student
membership and site size deficiencies."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
The City, however, entered into an Interlocal Agreement between Miami-Dade County
Public Schools along with the majority of municipalities in Miami-Dade County in 2003.
The City has also created a City run Charter School. Currently, there is an elementary
school open to the residents of A ventura with a middle school under construction. Please
see Chapters ILE. for further discussion about this issue.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective FLU-I3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (FLU-B.I) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table lILA.13 below:
Table III.A.13 Future Land Use Element Objective FLU-13 Achievement Status
Poli9' Implemented? Relevant
PolicyFLU-I3.1 Yes, agreement became Yes, but delete reference to
By December 31 1999 the effective in 2003 December 31, 1999
City shan coordinate with
Miami-Dade County Public
School Board, Miami-Dade
County, other
municipalities of Northeast
Miami-Dade County and
the South Florida Regional
. Planning Council in order to
develop alternative
solutions to the projected
public school siting needs
included in the data and
analysis, These alternative
solutions should include
utilization of existing
vacant sites, vacant office
space, and addition of 2nd
stories to existing schools,
as wen as other alternative
solutions.
93
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.B. Transportation Element
1.
Objective T-I
Objective I of the Transportation Element is as follows: "Provide the framework for a safe,
convenient, and energy efficient multi-modal transportation system through
implementation of the programs outlined in this element, and the concurrency and access
management systems contained in the City's land development regulations. [9J-
5.019(4)(b)I]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Maintenance of adopted Level of
Service Standards."
Although the City is a Transportation Concurrency Exception Area all development is
"tracked" for impacts to the level of service standards. As noted in Chapter IJ.D., the City
is currently meeting its Level of Service standards for roadways, although the count data is
several years old and needs to be updated. Moreover, it is projected that many roadways
will operate below the adopted Levels of Service by 2025. Please see Chapter II.D. for
further discussion about these issues.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective T-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (T-I.I through T-1.6) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.B.I below:
Table IlI.B.I Transportation Element Objective T-I Achievement Status
PoliIT Imolemented? Relevant
PolicyT-l.l Yes, ongoing with changes, Yes, with changes
As per 9J-5.005(8)(j), the the City is part of the
City of A ventura adopts the Transportation Concurrency
level of service standard as Exception Area as
described III the Miami- described in Policy T -1.3.
Dade County
Comprehensive Delete reference to Miami-
Development Plan, Traffic Dade County
Circulation Subelement Comprehensive
1997, Objective I Policy Development Plan, Traffic
IB, as it relates to Urban Circulation Subelement
Infill Areas (UIA) [9J- 1997, Objective I Policy I B
5.019(4)(c)l], and more and substitute Objective
particularly described as TC-I Policy TC-IB
follows:
The minimum acceptable Please see Chapter II of this
94
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
peak-period LOS for all
State roads and on all City
roads shall be the following:
(a) Where no public mass
transit service exists,
roadways shall operate at or
above LOS E;
(b) Where mass transit
service having headways of
20 minutes or less is
provided within Y, mile
distance, roadways shall
operate at no greater than
120 percent of their
capacity;
(c) Where extraordinary
transit service such as
commuter rail or express
bus service exists parallel
roadways within Y, mile
shall operate at no greater
than 150 percent of their
capacity.
Policy T-1.2
The City of Aventura
accepts Miami-Dade
County's mass transit level
of service as stated in their
1997 CDMP Capital
Improvements Element and
the Mass Transit
Subelement of the Traffic
Circulation Element which
follow:
1) The average combined
population and employment
density along the corridor
between the existing transit
network and the area of
expansion exceeds 4,000
per square mile, and the
corridor is 0.5 miles on
either side of any necessary
new routes or route
extensions to the area of
expansion;
report, the October 2004
Cycle Applications to
Amend the Miami-Dade
County Comprehensive
Plan and the Capital
Improvements Element for
more details about the
City's concurrency
management program.
Yes, delete reference to Yes
Miami-Dade County
Comprehensive
Development Plan, Traffic
Circulation Subelement
1997, Objective I Policy I B
and substitute Objective
MT-I PolicyMT-IA.
Please see Chapter II of this
report, the October 2004
Cycle Applications to
Amend the Miami-Dade
County Comprehensive
Plan and the Capital
Improvements Element for
more details about the
City's concurrency
management program.
95
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2) It is estimated that there
is sufficient demand to
warrant service;
3) The service is
economically feasible; and
4) The expansion of transit
service into new areas is not
provided at a detriment to
existing or planned services
in higher density areas with
greater need.
PolicyT-1.3
In confonnity with the
established Miami-Dade
County Transportation
Exception Area, that area
located within the
boundaries of the City of
Aventura is designated as a
Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area as specified
in Section 9J-5(6), Florida
Statutes. The geographic
location and extent of the
City's Transportation
Concurrency Exception
Area shall be maintained on
the "Future Function
Classification and Number
of Lanes" map. Policy T -1.4
Policy T -1.4
The City shall require an
access management review
by the Florida Department
of Transportation for all
new developments located
along State highways, and
shall not approve any
development order
requmng access to State
highway unless such access
IS pennitted by the
Department of
Transportation.
Yes
Yes
Yes, FDOT District 6 Yes
reviews any new access
points along state highways
such as Biscayne Boulevard
96
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.B.l Transportation Element Objective T-l Achievement Status cont.
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy T - 1.5 Yes, through the Capital Yes
The City will develop Improvement Program the
transportatIOn management City is improving and/or
strategies, such as but not creating a more pedestrian
limited to, traffic calming friendly environment and
techniques and traditional also providing transit within
neighborhood design the City to better integrate
concepts, to improve with the Countywide multi-
efficiency, and enhance the modal transportation
safety of the pedestrian, system.
bicycles, and transit riders
within the context of an
integrated multi-modal
transportation system, [91-
5.019(4)(c)71
PolicyT-I.6 Yes, since the start of the Yes
Annual transit trips per intra-city transit service in
capita will be utilized to 1999 ridership has
detenuine the achievement increased with total
of the mobility goals of the ridership approaching
City. [9J-5.019(4)(c)10] 500,000 riders and an
average of9,000 per month
2.
Objective T-2
Objective 2 of the Transportation Element is as follows: "As part of the internal
,consistency requirement of the Comprehensive Plan elements, the transportation system
outlined in this element will be coordinated with the Future Land Use Map or map series to
ensure that the transportation modes are consistent with the land uses in the area by the
Plan's adoption. [9J-5.019(4)(b)2]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of capital improvements that
encourage and support a multi-modal transportation system."
The latest Capital Improvements Program (2004-2009) calls for over $4.3 million in
sidewalk, drainage, roadway, signage and traffic video monitoring improvements.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective T-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (T -2. I through T -2.6) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.B.2 below:
97
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evalua6on and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table llI.B.2 Transportation Element Objective T-2 Achievement Status
Polkv
PolicyT-2.1
Parking strategies will be
developed that encourage a
multi-modal transportation
system including scaled
pedestrian and bicycle
facilities, public transit,
paratransit, and other modes
of transportation. [9J-
5.0l9(4)(c)31
Policy T-2.2
Through implementation of
the Future Land Use Plan
and Land Development
Regulations, the use of
bicycles and pedestrian
activities will be promoted
and encouraged with
particular emphasis given to
the Town Center. [9J-
5.0l9(4)(c)51
Policy T-2.3
Through the
implementation of the
multi-modal transportation
strategies, demand
,management programs will
be established to modify
peak hour travel demands,
and reduce the number of
vehicle miles traveled. [9J-
5.0 I 9(4)(c)6]
Policy T-2.4
Public transportation will be
encouraged through
implementation of local
transit service and its
incorporation in to the
Town Center, as identified
on the Future Land Use
Plan Map. [9J-
5.0l9(4)(c)12]
Imolemented?
Yes
Relevant
Yes
Yes, through the Yes
implementation of urban
design guidelines
Yes
Yes
Yes, ongoing, as local Yes
transit service and ridership
mcreases
98
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 1I1.B.2 Transportation Element Objective T-2 Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy Implemented? Relevant
Policy T-2.5 Yes, internal altemative Yes
Through implementation of routes to Biscayne
linking local streets to Boulevard are being
provide residents with realized such as the
internal alternative routes, extension of Miami
local traffic will be Gardens Drive east of
encouraged to use Biscayne Boulevard, NE
alternative routes developed 27th Avenue and NE 18Sth
to protect the inteITegional Street and the extension of
and intrastate functions of NE 213'h Street easterly
the Florida Intrastate from Biscayne Boulevard
Highway System. [9J-
5.019(4)131
3.
Objective T-3
Objective 3 of the Transportation Element is as follows: "As part of the implementation of
the programs outlined in this element coordination of the transportation system with the
Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization, Florida Transportation Plan, and the
Florida Department of Transportation Adopted Work Program will be evaluated annually
as part ofthe annual update of the conCUITency management system. [9J-S.OI9(4)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Annual review of Miami-Dade
Metropolitan Planning Organization and FOOT adopted S-year work programs. Number of
capital improvements that support the development and enhancement of intennodal
tenninals."
The City, as with all other municipalities in Miami-Dade County, receive and review both
the MPO and FOOT adopted S-year work program. There are no capital improvements that
support the development or enhancement of intennodal tenninals in the City. Additionally,
as part of the work program process a high degree of intergovernmental coordination is
achieved.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective T-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (T-3.1 through T-3.3) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IILB.3 below:
99
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.B.3 Transportation Element Objective T-3 Achievement Status
Poliçy
Policy T-3. I
Through the annual
evaluation of the plans and
programs of the other
applicable agencies
applicable roadway and
transit service
improvements for future
multi-modal needs will be
identified and addressed.
r9J-5.0l9(4)(c)8]
Policy T-3.2
Upon adoption of
element, and
Intergovernmental
Coordination Element,
transportation coordination
related mechanisms,
appropriate agreements, and
strategies will be developed
to implement the area wide
transportation, land use,
parking, and other
provisions of the multi-
modal plan. [9J-
5.01 9(4)(c) I I]
Policy T-3.3
.Through implementation of
this element and required
agency coordination
mechanisms, appropriate
strategies will be developed
to address improvements to
the Aventura Mall transit
tenninal and development
of a Town Center
intennodal tenninal, as well
as access to aviation, rail
and seaport facilities. [9J-
5.019(4)(c)14]
Imnlemented?
Yes, the Work Programs are Yes
reviewed and assessed
annually
Yes, mechanisms,
this agreements and other
the strategies have been put in
place to better coordinate
local, county, regional, state
and federal agencies
Yes, see Policy T-3.2
100
Relevant
Yes, with changes to delete
reference to adopted since
Elements have been
adopted
Yes
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
4.
Objective T-4
Objective 4 of the Transportation Element is as follows: "Through coordination of the
City's multi-modal transportation plan with the applicable public transit service and the
Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization, efficient public transit service will be
determined by the ridership. [9J-5.019(4)(b)4]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "By 2005, increase public transit
ridership by 10%."
Since its inception in 1999 the City's Shuttle Bus service has served over 457,138 people
on four bus routes within the City. In addition, overall County public transit ridership has
increased through better coordination of intra- and inter-city public transit services. It is
suggested that this measure be changed to include information on the City's shuttle bus
service due to the fact that Miami-Dade Transit is responsible for Countywide Transit
service. References to the year and percentage increase should be deleted.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective T-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (T -4.1 through T -4.7) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table !lLBA below:
Table 111.8.4 Transportation Element Objective T-4 Achievement Status
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
PolicyT-4.1 Yes, delete reference to Yes
Within one year of adoption timettame as the local
of the Comprehensive Plan, transit system was
the City shall implement a implemented in 1999 and
,local public transit system. substitute maintain for
[9J-5.019(4)(c)91 implement
Policy T-4.2 Yes Yes
The City's local transit
system shall operate
exclusively within the
Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area (TCEA).
101
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.B.4 Transportation Element Objective T-4 Achievement Status cont.
PoliIT ImDlemented? Relevant
Policy T-4.3 Yes Yes
Transit service shall be
linked to major trip
attracters and generators,
and the transportation
disadvantaged. Transit
service shall be located such
that they are safe and
convenient to transit users.
Policy T -4.4 Yes Yes
Transit service will be
located in areas which the
future land use map will
support transit service, such
as town center, transit
tenninals, commercial areas
and higher density
residential areas.
Policy T-4.5 Yes Yes
Within exclusive public
transit corridors main
entrances of business shall
be oriented to transit stops.
Policy T-4.6 Yes, on an ongoing basis Yes
Sidewalks shall link through the Capital
residential development to Improvements Program.
,transit stops and shelters.
Policy T-4.7 Yes, required as part of Yes
Transit shelters, according development order approval
to the City's approved
design, shall be provided at
the time of development by
the property owner.
5.
Objective T-5
Objective 5 of the Transportation Element is as fol1ows: "Through implementation of the
Future Land Use Plan describing land use densities and intensities, existing and future
rights-of-way, such as the eastern extension of Miami Gardens Drive and the realignment
ofNE 29th Avenue, will be protected trom building encroachment. [9J-5.019(4)(b)5]"
102
DRAFT
City of Aventura 200S Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 200S Draft
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Protection of Miami Gardens Drive
easterly extension and the realignment of NE 29th Avenue rights-of-way from building
encroachment."
Rights-of-way have been secured for the roadway projects and have been ongoing and
considered in various work programs for a number of years. Development of these roadway
segments is in process.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective T-S, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (T-S.l) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IlLB.S below:
Table III.B.5 Transportation Element Objective T-5 Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyT-S,1 Ongoing Yes
In coordination with the
Miami-Dade Metropolitan
Planning Organization, and
the Florida Department of
Transportation rights-of-
way acquisition timetables
and protection mechanisms
will be established for the
easterly extension of Miami
Gardens Drive and the
realignment of NE 29th
Avenue. r9J-S.019(4)(c)41
103
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
11I.c. Parks and Recreation Element
1.
Objective PR-l
Objective I of the Parks and Recreation Element is as follows: "Through implementation
of the adopted Recreation and Open Space Element public access to the City's identified
recreation sites will be ensured."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Public access available to all
recreational sites."
All existing public recreational sites have adequate public access and future sites will be
consistent with this objective. Please see Chapter II.E. and Table II.E.!. for further
discussion and quantification of how the City measures and monitors access to recreation
sites.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective PR-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (PR-I.I and PR-I.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.C.1 below:
Table III.C.l Parks and Recreation Element Objective PR-l Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
PolicyPR-l.1 Yes Yes
The City will designate
existing City park property,
any acquired park property,
and any appropriate natural
. habitats for public use.
Policy PR-1.2 Yes, for example, in Yes
In coordination with the conjunction with the
future land use plan, and the community center a
Conservation and Coastal waterfront walkway with
Management Element shore seating was provided to
access will be maintained or ensure public access
improved where possible;
currently there are no
beaches within the City
limits.
2.
Objective PR-2
Objective 2 of the Parks and Recreation Element is as follows: "Through implementation
of the adopted Parks and Recreation and the Capital Improvements Elements, and the
104
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
concurrency management system the City wil1 coordinate the provision of public and
private resources to meet recreation demands within one year of Plan adoption."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Continuation of park dedication
requirements."
Pursuant to the requirements of the CIE, Concurrency Management System and Chapter 31
Land Development Regulations Article XI Development Standards of General Applicability
developments must adhere to dedication requirements in order to maintain the City's
adopted LOS for parks and recreation. In addition, as described in Chapter II.E" the City
collects a Park Impact Fee to ensure that new development pays its fair share of the costs
associated with providing recreation and open space.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective PR-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (PR-2.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted, A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.c.2 below:
Table III.C.2 Parks and Recreation Element Objective PR-2 Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy PR-2,1 Yes, delete reference to Yes
At the time of this adoption time of this adoption
of the Parks and Recreation
Element there are no
recreation facility
deficiencies, however,
through implementation of
the concurrency
management system the
City will ensure that
facilities are developed
concurrently with the
impacts of new
development.
3.
Objective PR-3
Objective 3 of the Parks and Recreation Element is as follows: "Annually, as part of the
City's budget, and capital improvements planning the City will address parks and recreation
facility needs to ensure that they are adequately and efficiently provided,"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of annual Capital
Impfovements Programs that consider recreation and open space needs."
IDS
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
The current 2004/2009 crp has as one of its functional categories Beautification and Parks
Facilities. The budget for this category is approximately 13% of the total of $33.5 million
and includes maintenance, beautification and park development. The Waterways Park
development represents approximately $4.1 million of the total. Please see Chapter II.E.
for more information.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective PR-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (PR-3.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IILC.3 below:
Table III.C.3 Parks and Recreation Element Objective PR-3 Achievement Status
Policy ImDlemented? Relevant
Policy PR-3.1 Yes, but delete reference to Yes
Within one (1) year of Plan one year of plan adoption
adoption, the City will and will develop
develop land development
regulations to include
appropriate definitions for
open space needs, and
standards.
4.
Objective PR-4
Objective 4 of the Parks and Recreation Element is as follows: "Through implementation
of the adopted Parks and Recreation Element, and the concurrency management system the
City will ensure the provision of open space by public agencies, and private enterprise."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Acres of open space. Policy 4.1"
As noted on Table ILA.2., the City has 257.07 acres ofrecreation open space identified on
its Future Land Use Plan Map, including public and private open space. In order to
determine the amount of recreation and open space that is available for use by residents fOf
concurrency purposes, the City counts public parks at 100 percent, private recreation
facilities at 50 percent, and marinas and golf course at 25 percent. Based on this formula,
the City's existing recreation and open space acreage is 114. The City is therefore
exceeding its recreation and open space Level of Service standard by 3804 acres. Please
see Chapter II.E. for more information,
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective PR-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (PR-4.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted, A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table mCA below:
106
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.c.4 Parks and Recreation Element Objective PR-4 Achievement Status
Poliçy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy PR-4.1 Yes Yes
The City adopts a level of
service requiring 2.75 acres
of net usable park land per
1,000 residents,
implemented by the
concurrency management
system.
107
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.D. Housing Element
I.
Objective H-I
Objective I of the Housing Element is as follows: "Within one year of Plan adoption,
provide the framework for a housing program that encourages the creation and preservation
of affordable housing for all current and anticipated future Aventura residents. [9J-
5.010(3)(b)l]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of programs developed that
encourage or publicize affordable housing opportunities,"
The City coordinates with both the Miami-Dade County Housing Agency and the Office of
Community and Economic Development to make infonnation on affordable housing
opportunities and programs available on an as needed basis. The reference to one year of
plan adoption should be deleted.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (H-1.I through H-1.5) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table Ill.D.1 below:
Table III. .1 Housmg E ement Objective H-l Achievement Status
Poli¡:y Imolemented? Relevant
Policy H-1.I Yes, partially, the City Yes
Through implementation of coordinates with Miami-
the housing program and Dade County
the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element
A ventura will coordinate
with appropriate private and
non-profit agencies to
improve housing
production.
[9J-5.010(3(c)11
Policy H-1.2 Yes Yes
Through the comprehensive
planning process and the
development of the Land
Development Regulations
(LDRs) a streamlined
pennitting process will be
established; providing for
efficient review with
minimal delays and costs.
D
108
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.D.l Housing Element Objective H-t Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy
Policy H-1.3
The City of Aventura will
provide to those residents
and individuals employed
within the City:
1. access to information
pertaining to county wide
programs to aide in job
training,
2. day-care facilities,
3. English language courses
(ESOL) and high school
equivalent (GED) which are
currently provided by the
following agencies:
. Children and Families
. Miami-Dade College
. Miami-Dade County
Department of Human
Services
. Miami-Dade
Schools
Policy H-1.4
The City of Aventura shall
actively participate in the
joint Florida Department of
Community Affairs/South
Florida Regional Planning
Council "Regional
Affordable Housing
Strategy".
Public
Implemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, ongoing,
process
still
In Yes
109
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.D.I Housing Element Objective H-I Achievement Status cont.
Poli!;Y
Policy H-I.5
Once the final
recommendations of the
joint Florida Department of
Community Affairs/South
Florida Regional Planning
Council "Regional
Affordable Housing
Strategy" are issued, the
City shall incorporate these
recommendations into a
citywide affordable housing
policy, to the maximum
extent consistent with
existing land use, design,
urban servtce,
transportation,
environmental and social
conditions in the City,
including consideration of
applicable goals, objectives
and policies. This policy
will be incorporated in the
fonn of an amendment to
the adopted comprehensive
plan. The amendment will
be initiated within StX
months, or the first
available amendment cycle,
following completion of the
"Regional Affordable
Housing Strategy."
2.
Objective H-2
Imolemented?
Yes, ongoing, still in Yes
process The South Florida
Regional Planning Council
has fonned an action
committee which to date
has held one meeting
Relevant
Objective 2 of the Housing Element is as follows: "Through the comprehensive planning
process and the development of LDRs a code enforcement system to eliminate substandard
housing, encouraging the rehabilitation or improvement of existing housing, while
accounting for potentially historically significant housing will be established in LOR's. [9J-
5.010(3)(b)2], [9J-5.010(3)(b)5]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Adoption of Land Development
110
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Regulations that establishes a code enforcement system that will aid in eliminating
substandard housing, encourages the rehabilitation of existing housing, and identifies
potentially historically significant housing."
The City has adopted regulations to implement this objective through Chapter 2
Administration Article V Code Enforcement and Chapter 31 Land Development
Regulations Article VI Archaeological and Historic Landmarks.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (H-2. I and H-1.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IlI.D.2 below:
Table III D
Policy
Policy H-2.1
Aventufa does not contain
any historically significant
housing at this time,
however, the City
recognizes its responsibility
to ensure that the quality,
stability, and maintenance
of the housing stock be
addressed in the City's
housing program. [9J-
5.010(3)(c)31
Policy H-2.2
The following
classifications will be used
to detennine the condition
of the housing stock, once
the condition of a structure
is detennined the
appropriate conservation,
rehabilitation and
demolition strategy will be
implemented. [9J-
5.010(3)(c)4]
I. Good/Standard: Structure
is in good state of repair;
well painted; eaves, soffits
and gutters are in a good
state of repair; windows,
doors, and exterior walls all
in good condition. Slight
.2 HOUSIDI! Element ObiectIve H-2 Achievement Status
Imnlemented? Relevant
Yes, partially, because the Yes
City does not contain any
historically significant
housing
Yes, ongoing with Yes
detenninations being made
by Code Enforcement
III
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
defects can be repaired by
the homeowner.
2,
Repair/Deteriorated:
Structures needing paint;
minor repair to roof, soffits,
eaves or gutters required;
minor repair to doors,
windows or exterior walls
required. These units have
one (I) or more majof
defects which indicate a
prolonged lack of regular
maintenance and cannot
usually be repaired by the
homeowner. However, the
repairs are still
economically feasible to
complete and rehabilitate
the structure to the standard
condition.
3.
Repair/Dilapidated:
Structures which appeared
to need major repairs to
roof, windows, doors, and
exterior walls. These units
possess one (I) or more
critical defects which
prevent the safe and
adequate shelter of its
occupants and providing no
feasible alternative to
demolition,
Minor
Major
3.
Objective H-3
Objective 3 of the Housing Element is as follows: "Due to the value of land, and the
limited undeveloped land available within Aventura it is difficult to detel1Tline the level of
affordable housing sites that will be accessible, however, because of the unifol1Tl value of
the land any affordable units provided will be distributed. There are no sites available for
mobile homes. [9J-5.010(3)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of affordable housing units."
112
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
The affordable housing program is managed by Miami-Dade County since the City does
not have one. According to the Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, there are no
public or assisted housing units in the City. Although the City does offer a range of
housing types and costs but affordability is limited due to the fact that the median sales
price is $445,500 and the median gross rent is $1,256.00. Chapter IJ.B. further discusses
the City's housing needs and options, and makes recommendations to improve the delivery
of a full range of housing types affordable to all income groups.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (H-3, I and H-3.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IIJ.D.3 below:
Table III.D.3 Housing Element Objective H-3 Achievement Status
Policy
PolicyH-3.1
Through implementation of
the housing program, and
establishment of the LDRs,
appropriate criteria allowing
diverse housing types will
be developed, including the
provision of services to
support the housing stock
through the concurrency
management ordinance.
A ventura is an urban area,
therefore, there are no rural
uses or need for farmworker
households. [9J-
S.01O(3)(c)51
Policy H-3.2
Through implementation of
the Future Land Use Plan
and implementing LDRs
sufficient densities are
delineated to allow
affordable housing. Due to
the extent of existing
development sites
appropriate for affordable
housing are limited.
r9J-S.OIO(3)(c)] I]
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes, the LDRs allow a
diversity of housing types
Yes
Yes, partially, due to the Yes
rising cost of housing
affordable housing is
limited
113
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
4.
Objective H-4
Objective 4 of the Housing Element is as follows: "Through the implementation of the
Future Land Use Plan and the LDRs, adequate categories to allow group homes and foster
care facilities licensed or funded by the Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative
Services will be implemented by LDRs. [9J-5.010(3)(b)4]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Enactment of Land Development
Regulations that allow group homes and foster care facilities licensed or funded by the
Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services."
Group homes, which are regulated by Chapter 419, F.S. are pennitted in certain zoning
districts. Additionally, other uses such as assisted living facilities, adult day care and
nursing homes are allowed by Chapter 31 Land Development Regulations Article Vll Use
Regulations.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (H-4.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IILDA below:
Table III.D.4 Housing Element Objective H-4 Achievement Status
Polkv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy H-4.l Yes Yes
Through the
implementation of the
Future Land Use Plan and
the LDRs, Aventura will
encourage the establishment
of group homes and foster
care facilities in a manner
consistent with Chapter
419, F.S. to guide the
development of these
licensed facilities in a non-
discriminatory manner.
Based on the concurrency
management system
adequate infrastructure and
public facilities will be in
place. r9J-5.01O(3)(c)61
114
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
5.
Objective H-5
Objective 5 of the Housing Element is as follows: "In the event that the implementation of
the housing program results in the elimination of substandard occupied housing the City of
Aventura will provide relocation housing to those displaced, as necessary and required. [9J-
5.010(3)(b)6]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of relocation homes
provided."
The City does not have a housing or relocation program established. However, the
Community Development Department will coordinate with the Miami-Dade County
Housing Agency and Office of Community and Economic Development in order to
facilitate assistance to displaced households.
[n order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-5, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (H-5.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IILD.5 below:
Table III.D.5 Housing Element Objective "-5 Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy H-5.1 No, not applicable Yes
The City of Aventura will
provide appropriate
relocation housing for any
displaced individuals.
r9J-5.010(3)(c)91
6.
Objective "-6
Objective 6 of the Housing Element is as follows: "Upon plan adoption, and as part of the
on-going formulation of the City of Aventura's operating policies and procedures, an
affordable housing implementation program shall be maintained. [9J-5.010(3)(b)7)]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Creation of housing implementation
program consistent with the following policies."
The City does not have a housing implementation program but will assist as needed with
the Miami-Dade County programs.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective H-6, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (H-6.1 and H-6.2) have been or are
115
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table II1.D.6 below:
Table III.D.6 Housing Element Objective H-6 Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyH-6.1 Yes, partially, Miami-Dade Yes
Where applicable the City County is the coordinating
will utilize, and in a agency
coordination effort,
encourage housing
providers to utilize federal,
state and county subsidy
programs.
[9J-5.010(3)(c)71
Policy H-6,2 No, the City does not have a Yes
Due to the unusually high housing program and does
property values, coupled not need to consider an
with limited vacant land, interlocal agreement but
the City of Aventura's will assist Miami-Dade
housing program may County as needed
require the City to consider
entering into an interlocal
agreement to provide a
framework for the provision
of affordable housing. [9J-
5.01O(3)(c)lO]
116
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
1I1.E. Infrastructure Element
Intrastructure Subsection
1.
Goal I, Objective I
Objective I of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal I is as follows:
"The City of Aventura shall continue to coordinate service to ensure the orderly and
efficient provision of water and sewer services at adopted levels of service."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "New land uses not connected to public
water supply." All land uses in the City are connected to the public water supply, and new
uses require connection as per the City's land development regulations and Concurrency
Management Program.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective II-I.1, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (II-1.I.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table m.E.I below:
Table III.E.1 Infrastructure Element Objective II-I.I Achievement Status
Polit;Y Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy II-I. I. I Yes, all new uses are Yes
All new uses within the connected to the public
City shall be connected to a water supply. Also, there is
public water supply. no area of the City where
Exceptions may be the density is less than two
provided for residential uses units per acre.
at a density no greater than
two units per acre, where
primary drinking water
quality standards as
specified in the Florida
Administrative Code can be
met without treatment and
the groundwater is free
from saltwater intrusion.
2.
Objective 11-1.2
Objective 2 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal I is as follows:
"The City of Aventura shall continue to coordinate service with a provider who maintains
procedures to ensure that any facility deficiencies are corrected and that adequate facility
capacity will be available to meet future needs."
117
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Maintaining adopted levels of
services."
The City and its respective service providers (Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer, Solid
Waste and Transit Departments and North Miami Beach Public Utilities) have ensured
adequate facility capacity to meet the City's needs. Please see Policy CI-2.4 for the City's
Level of Service Standards.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective II-1.2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (II- 1.2. I through II- 1.2.6) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E.2 below:
T bl III E 2 I f
EI
Db'
II 1 2 A h'
S
a e n rastructure ement l]CctIve -. c levement latus
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyII-1.2.1 Yes Yes
To assure an adequate level
of service, potable water
and sanitary sewer facilities
shall meet the level of
service standards, as
adopted by Miami-Dade
County Water and Sewer
Department and the City of
North Miami Beach, the
City's current service
provider.
Policy II- I .2,2 Yes, delete reference to date Yes, with changes
By 2000, the City of and refer to Miami-Dade
A ventura shall explore the County Water and Sewer
adopted levels-of-service Department as also
for nonresidential flows reviewing LOS
within the City.
Policy II-I.2.3 Yes Yes
Except as provided by
Objective I and the
supporting policies, no
development order
authorizing new
development or a
significant expansion of an
existing use shall be issued
for any area of the City
which is served by a potable
118
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
water or sanitary sewer
facility which does not meet
the standards in Policy 2.1
or will not meet these
standards concurrent with
the completion of the
development. In any case
where these federal, state,
or county standards
referenced in Policy 2.1 are
revised, a reasonable time
for compliance with the
new standards shall be
allowed.
Policy II-1.2.4
The provider shall maintain
procedures and programs to
monitor levels of service of
each facility for use by
agencies which issue
development orders or
pennits.
Policy II-l.2.5
All wastewater treatment
operations will comply with
federal and state regulations
for overflows.
Policy II-I.2.6
The City shall continue to
coordinate with a provider
who shall continue the
expansion of existing water
and wastewater treatment
plants to meet demand
through the year 20 15.
3.
Objective 11-1.3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Objective 3 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal I is as follows:
"The City of Aventura shall protect the health of its residents and preserve its
environmental integrity by reducing the proportion of residences and commercial
establishments within the City using private wastewater treatment facilities. The City of
Aventura, in conjunction with the Miami-Dade County shall discourage the new or
continued use of such facilities through the strict application of the Plan and Land
Development Regulations."
119
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "New land uses not connected to public
sanitary sewer supply."
The City does not allow new land uses that would not be connected to the public sanitary
sewer collection system, and has not allowed any since the date of adoption. The City will
prohibit new septic tanks. Also, change "supply" to "collection system".
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective 11-1.3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (11-1.3.1 through 11-1.3.3) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E.3 below:
Table III.E.3 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-1.3 Achievement Status
Poli¡;y
Policy 11-1.3.1
Aventura shall prohibit the
use of septic tanks in soils
that are not suitable for such
use. Throughout the City,
additional septic tanks
should not be permitted for
the disposal or discharge of
industrial or other non-
domestic waste nor should
they be permitted where
seasonally high water table
will impair proper
functioning. Septic tanks
should be avoided where
private wells are in use.
Policy 11-1.3.2
Anywhere that the use of
existing private wells,
interim wastewater
treatment plants, or septic
tanks pose a threat to the
public health or the
environmental integrity of
A ventura, the City shall
assert its authority to
require the connections to
the public water supply or
to the public sewer system.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes, with changes, septic
tanks should no longer be
allowed in the City
Yes
Yes
Yes, with changes Since
Miami-Dade County
DERM and Water and
Sewer should have the
authority to require
connections
120
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.3 Infrastructure Element Objective II-1.3 Achievement Status cont.
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy 1I-1.3.3 Yes Yes, with changes since
If the City detennines that a Miami-Dade County
septic tank(s) is/(are) DERM and Water and
degrading surface water Sewer should have the
and/or ground water the authority to require
property owner shall obtain connections
central sewer service within
90 days, unless otherwise
approved by the City
Commission.
4.
Objective II-l.4
Objective 4 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal I is as follows:
"The City shall develop and implement a comprehensive water conservation program to
ensure that a sufficient, economical supply of fresh water is available to meet current and
future demand for potable water without degrading the environment."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Reduce per capita water consumption
by 10% by 2005."
Infonnation that would allow precise measurement of this Objective specific to the City
does not exist. However, Miami-Dade County's 2003 Comprehensive Development
Master Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report indicates that gallons per capita per day has
declined in the County from 179 in 1995 to 159 in 2002, an II percent decrease. Due to
this being a more regional issue, the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department through
Chapter 32 Water and Sewer Regulations, the Miami-Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management through Chapter 24 Environmental Protection and
the South Florida Water Management District have set goals to reduce per capita water
consumption. The City promotes strategies to reduce water consumption through its land
development regulations, public infonnation programs, and ongoing coordination with
these agencies. Moreover, the Florida Building Code requires water conserving fixtures.
Update reference to date.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective II-lA, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (1I-1.4.1 through 1I-1.4.3) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IILEA below:
121
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.4 Infrastructure Element Objective II-l.4 Achievement Status
Policv
Policy II-1.4.l
The City's newsletter shall
be used to promote an
educational program for
residential, commercial and
industrial consumers which
will discourage waste and
conserve water.
Policy II-1.4.2
Enforce requirements, and
establish new requirements
and procedures as needed,
to assure that low water
usage plumbing fixtures are
used in all new buildings or
in conjunction with
permitted renovations in
accord with the South
Florida Building Code,
Miami-Dade County
addition, as may be
amended from time to time,
and the Florida's Water
Conservation Act, Section
553.14, F.S. Improved
procedures for plumbing
inspections and mechanisms
for approving products for
installation shall be
considered by the City's
Building Division.
Policy II-IA.3
The City of Aventura
Community Services
Department shall take all
necessary steps to ensure
compliance with the City's
landscape regulations, and
shall establish mechanisms
to monitor and measure the
effectiveness of the
ordinance and its major
provisions.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, through the City's Yes, update South Florida
Building Department, Building Code to Florida
Miami-Dade County and Building Code
the Florida Building Code
Yes, through Chapter 31 Yes
Land Development
Regulations Article X
Landscaping Requirements
122
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
5.
Objective 11-1.5
Objective 5 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal I is as follows:
"The City of Aventura shall undertake timely efforts to expand traditional sources ofraw
water and develop new raw water sources to meet the City's level of service standards for
water supply."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Implementation or utilization of
reused water, should it become available."
To date, there has been no reuse of gray water by either public or private entities within the
City. The City should encourage Miami-Dade County and the South Florida Water
Management District to expand such programs.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective 11-1.5, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (11-1.5.1 and 11-1.5.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E.5 below:
Table III.E.S Infrastructure Element Objective 11-1.5 Achievement Status
Policv
Policy 11-1.5.1
The City of Aventura shall
encourage, Miami-Dade
County in the development
of its future potable water
supplies, to the maximum
extent feasible, utilize
methods which preserve the
integrity of the Biscayne
Aquifer, protect the quality
of surface water and related
ecosystems, and comply
with the land use and
environmental protection
policies of the Miami-Dade
County CDMP, the
Strategic Regional Policy
Plan for South Florida, and
the State Comprehensive
Plan.
Implemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
123
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Policy II-1.5.2 Yes Yes
When reclaimed water
becomes available, the City
shall consider its use on
public and private
properties. Currently, the
Miami-Dade Water and
Sewer Department is
responsible for
implementing any reuse that
is deemed by the County to
be economically feasible.
6.
Goal 2, Objective 1
Objective I of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal 2 is as follows:
"Protect ground and surface water resources from degradation, provide for effective
surveillance for pollution and clean up polluted areas to meet all applicable federal, State
and County ground and surface water quality standards."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Continuation of the Stonnwater
Utility Program."
The City maintains involvement in the County's Stonnwater Utility Program, in
compliance with this Objective.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective I, a brief assessment
of whether or not the supporting policies (11-2.1.1 and 11-2.1.2) have been or are being
,implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table I1I.E.6 below:
Table III.E.6 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.1 Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy 11-2.1.1 Yes, ongoing through Yes
Aventura's Stonnwater Stonnwater Drainage
Utility Program shall fund Projects in the City's
the identification and Capital Improvements
retrofitting of deteriorated Program
stonn sewer systems and
positive outfalls and the
proper maintenance of
stonnwater systems.
124
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report- July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.6 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.1 Achievement Status cont.
Poli~ Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy II-2.1.2 Yes, through the City and Yes
By 2003, industries and DERM. Delete date as
businesses which generate ongoing
and/or handle more than
fifty (50) gallons of
hazardous industrial wastes
per year shall be identified
and monitored.
Coordination among
agencies that reqUIre
reporting of hazardous
wastes shall be improved.
7.
Goal 2 Objective 2
Objective 2 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal 2 is as follows:
"The aquifer recharge and water storage capacity of presently undeveloped areas shall be
maintained or increased. Additionally, the City shall protect against environmental damage
such as altering hydrocyc1es."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Post-development surface runoff rate
not to exceed pre-development surface runoff rate of discharge." The City's land
development regulations include pervious area, landscape, retention and drainage
requirements and standards to ensure that this Objective is met.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective II-2.2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (11-2.2.1 through II-2.2.4) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E,7 below:
Table III.E.7 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.2 Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy II-2.2.1 Yes, through the City's Yes
The aquifer-recharge values Chapter 31 Land
of wetland areas shall be Development Regulations
maintained and, where and DERM Chapter 24
feasible, enhanced or
restored.
125
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.7 Infrastructure Element Objective II-2.2 Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy
Policy 1I-2.2.2
All future development and
redevelopment shall use
retention, infiltration and
detention systems to retain
to the maximum extent
feasible, the full runoff
trom a one in five year
stonn and minimize the use
of impermeable surfaces. In
the event that an emergency
overflow is provided, a
minimum of the first inch of
runoff shall be retained on-
site. Exceptions to the first
inch criteria will be
reviewed on a case-by-case
basis.
Policy 11-2.2.3
Water conserving irrigation
and other landscape
practices such as Xeriscape
shall be used wherever
feasible. Through its site
and landscape reviews,
A ventura shall ensure that
appropriate native and
,xeriscape plant materials
are used, particularly where
public water is used to
watef lawns, golf courses
and landscaped green
spaces.
Policy 11-2.2.4
The City shall consider
participation in water reuse
demonstration projects that
are developed.
8.
Goal 2 Objective 3
Imnlemented?
Yes, through the City's Yes
Chapter 31 Land
Development Regulations
and DERM Chapter 24
Relevant
Yes, through the City's Yes
Chapter 31 Land
Development Regulations
Article X Landscape
Requirements. Miami-Dade
County Chapters 18A
Landscape Ordinance and
24 Environmental
Protection and the South
Florida Water Management
District
No, not currently,
Objective 11-1.5
see Yes
Objective 3 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal 2 is as follows:
"A ventura shall continue to develop and implement storm water master plans, identify and
126
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
eliminate system deficiencies in City maintained drainage facilities; coordinate the
extension of facilities to meet future demands throughout the City; and maintain and
improve water quality."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Water quality elimination of
deficiencies, maintaining levels of service."
The City through the County Stormwater Management Program continues to eliminate any
existing deficiencies. In furtherance of this objective, the City has $1.6 million worth of
improvements scheduled in the 2004-2009 Capital Improvement Program.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective 11-2.3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (11-2.3.1 and 11-2.3.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E.8 below:
Table III.E.8 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.3 Achievement Status
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy 11-2.3.1 Yes Yes
The Stormwater
Management (Drainage)
Level of Service (LOS)
standards for A ventura
contains both a Flood
Protection (FP) and Water
Quality (WO) component.
Policy 11-2.3.2 Yes, through the Yes
The City of Aventura shall Storm water Management
work with Miami-Dade Program
County and the South
Florida Water Management
District to better identify the
developed urban areas
within the City that do not
have protection from a one
in ten year storm.
9.
Goal 2, Objective 4
Objective 4 of the Infrastructure Element Infrastructure Subsection Goal 2 is as follows:
"A ventura shall protect and preserve the biological and hydrological functions of the
wetlands identified in the Land Use Element. Future impacts to the biological functions of
publicly and privately owned wetlands shall be mitigated. Publicly acquired wetlands shall
be restored and managed for their natural resource, habitat and hydrologic values."
127
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of acres and condition of
identified wetlands."
The City contains approximately 35 acres of wetlands which are considered to be in good
condition.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective II-2.4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (II-2.4.1 and II-2.4.2) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IILE.9 below:
Table III.E.9 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.4 Achievement Status
PoIi~ Imolemented? Relevant
Policy II-2.4.l Yes Yes
The degradation or
destruction of wetlands
shall be limited to activities
that I) are necessary to
prevent or eliminate a threat
to public health, safety or
welfare; or 2) are water
dependent, clearly in the
public interest and no other
reasonable alternative exists
or; 3) are carried out in
accordance with an
approved basin
.management plan or; 4) are
in areas that have been
highly disturbed or
degraded and where
restoration of a wetland
with an equal or greater
value in accordance with
federal, State and local
regulations is feasible.
Habitats critical to
endangered or threatened
species shall not be
destroved.
128
DRAFT
Cily of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 11I.E.9 Infrastructure Element Objective 11-2.4 Achievement Status cont.
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy II-2.4.2 Yes Yes
Off-road vehicles shall not
be allowed In publicly
owned and managed
wetlands identified in the
adopted Land Use Element
unless there are pennitted
facilities or areas specified
for their use.
10. Aquifer Recharge Subsection, Objective t
Objective I of the Infrastructure Element Aquifer Recharge Subsection is as follows: 'The
City shall support the efforts of the County to identify significant ground water resources
and protect them through land use controls, public acquisition, easements or other
appropriate methods."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Aquifer water quality."
The Miami-Dade County DERM and the South Florida Water Management District
monitor aquifer water quality. According to the Miami-Dade County EAR, the
Norwood/Offler well field, the closest well field to the City of Aventura, met water quality
health based drinking water standards for approximately 99.7 percent of the laboratory
samples collected (45 exceedances out if 15,014 samples collected between 1995 and
2002). The 45 exceedances were due to high iron content.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective IAR-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (IAR-l.l through IAR-I.4) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E.lO below:
Table III.E.tO Infrastructure Element Objective IAR-t Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy IAR-l.l Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
The City shall implement a County and SFWMD
program to monitor
groundwater supply
conditions in conjunction
with the County and the
South Florida Water
Management District.
129
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.lO Infrastructure Element Objective IAR-l Achievement Status cont.
Polky
Policy IARl.2
The City, in conjunction
with Miami-Dade County,
shall develop and adopt
minimum environmental
standards regarding: prime
recharge area protection,
water table manipulation,
and well field drawdown
standards.
Policy IAR-1.3
The City shall institute a
comprehensive program
responsible for educating
businesses and residents of:
the County's current water
conservation policies, the
fragility of the aquifer,
methods to reuse and
conserve water, well
abandonment problems and
rules, and benefits of
drought resistant plants
(xeriscape).
Policy IAR-1.4
The City shall adopt
policies to protect the
. Biscayne aquifer. These
shall include policies which
address:
I. Public wellfield
landfill siting
2. Siting of industrial land
uses which use hazardous
materials or generate
hazardous waste
3. Siting of hazardous waste
collection facilities for
households.
4. Additional protection of
the aquifer from saltwater
intrusion
5. If necessary, support the
Imolemented?
Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
County and SFWMD
Relevant
Yes, with the assistance of Yes
programs created by
Miami-Dade County and
the SFWMD
Yes, through Chapter 31
Land Development
Regulations and policies
adopted by Miami-Dade
County particularly in
Chapter 24 Environmental
and Protection and other
chapters generally
Yes
130
DRAFT
City of Avenlura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
expansion of the Hazardous
Material Emergency
Res onse Team
11.
Solid Waste Subsection Objective 1
Objective I of the Infrastructure Element Solid Waste Subsection is as follows: "The City
shall ensure that the public health, sanitation and environmental protection will be
maintained by continuing to franchise with private haulers for areas of the City currently
being served by private haulers."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Availability of solid waste service for
every business and residence."
The majority of all businesses and residences within the City are served by private waste
haulers, as per the Concurrency Management Program, land development regulation, and
Code of Ordinances. The exceptions are the Hospital District and Country Club Estates.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective ISW-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (ISW-l.l and ISW-1.2) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.E. II below:
Table IIl.E.11 Infrastructure Element Objective ISW-1 Achievement Status
Poli~ Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ISW-l.l No, because the majority of Yes, the Study is on-going.
By 2000, in order to serve the City is served by private Change the date referenced
the residents of Aventura in waste haulers, exceptions in the Policy to 2008.
a more efficient manner the are the Hospital District and
City shall study and Country Club Estates.
consider assuming the
responsibility of solid waste
services that are currently
being serviced by Miami-
Dade County,
131
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.E.lllnfrastructure Element Objective ISW-l Achievement Status cont.
Policy
Policy ISW-1.2
The County Solid Waste
Management System, which
includes County-owned
solid waste disposal
facilities and those operated
under contract with the
County for disposal, shall,
for a minimum of five (5)
years, collectively maintain
a solid waste disposal
capacity sufficient to
accommodate waste flows
committed to the system
through long-term interlocal
agreements or contracts
with municipalities and
private waste haulers, and
anticipated non-committed
waste flows. Aventura will
adopt the LOS established
by Miami-Dade County at a
minimum disposal capacity
of five (5) years, based
upon a total waste
generation of seven (7)
, pounds per person per day.
Imnlemented?
Yes, also see the October Yes
2004 Cycle Applications to
Amend the Miami-Dade
County Comprehensive
Plan and the Capital
Improvements Element for
more details about the
City's concurrency
management program.
Relevant
132
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.F. Capital Improvements Element
1.
Objective CI-l
Objective I of the Capital Improvements Element is as follows: "Upon adoption of this
Plan, the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) shall provide for necessary replacement of
existing facilities, upgrading of facilities when necessary to maintain adopted level of
service (LOS) standards, and for new tàcility investments which are needed and affordable.
[9J-S.016(3)(b)l]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Adoption of CIE which replaces or
upgrades existing facilities and maintains the adopted level of service standards."
The Capital Improvements Element through the Capital Improvement Program, which is
updated annually, provides a long-tenn (S-year) plan of proposed capital expenditures
($ I 4.3 million for the 200S/2010 CIP period), the means and methods of financing and a
schedule of priorities for implementation. One of the goals is to maintain the adopted LOS
Standards.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CI-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CI-l.l through CI-1.S) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.F.1 below:
Table III.F.l Capitallmprovements Element Objective CI-l Achievement Status
PoIi¡:y lmoIemented? Relevant
Policy CI-1.I Yes, ongoing Yes
Capital expenditures
identified in elements of the
Comprehensive Plan In
excess of $SO,OOO will be
included in the Five-year
Schedule of Improvements
of this Element.
Policy CI-I.2 Yes, ongoing Yes
The City will continue to
adopt an annual capital
budget which contains the
projects fi'om the Five-year
Schedule of Improvements
for the corresponding year.
r9J-S.016(3)(c)71
133
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
(-
Table III.F.1 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-l Achievement Status
cont.
Poli~
Policy CI-I.3
Aventura will manage its
long-tenn general
obligation debt in such a
manner that the ratio of the
debt service millage to the
City millage does not
exceed 10 percent. [9J-
5.016(3)1
Policy CI-I.4
In planning for
implementing
infrastructure
Aventura will
recognition
requirements
expanded
educational and
facilities.
Policy CI-I.5
By 2001, the City of
A ventura shall conduct a
feasibility study to consider
the location of a multi-
purpose public facility m
the north area of the City.
The facility is envisioned to
.be a joint use facility, which
may include a public works
storage and maintenance
area, shelter and public
park. Said park is to be
designed to afford its use as
a staging area in case of a
natural disaster, including
major stonns and
hurricanes.
and
its
needs,
give explicit
to the
of new or
public
health
2.
Objective CI-2
ImDlemented?
Yes
Yes, ongoing
Yes, partially, delete
reference to 2001
Waterways Park could stage
but has no public works
facilities. Since the
majority of the City's public
works are contracted to
private sources, they are not
necessary.
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, with changes to reflect
the fact that public works
facilities are not needed.
Objective 2 of the Capital Improvements Element is as follows: "Upon adoption of this
Plan land use decisions will be made in the context of available fiscal resources such that
134
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
scheduling and providing capital facilities for new development will not degrade adopted
service levels. [9J-5.0l6(3)(b)(4)]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Land use decisions made that do not
degrade service levels."
Pursuant to Rule 9J-5 no land use decisions shall be made which would degrade the
adopted service levels. The City has not approved any such applications. The City
continues to have the fiscal resources available to provide any needed capital facilities.
Delete "Upon adoption of this plan."
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CI-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CI-2.l through CI-lA) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IILF.2 below:
Table III.F.2 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-2 Achievement Status
Poli9'
Policy CI-2.l
The capital facilities and
infTastructure implications
of land use and
development plan
implementation will be
analyzed and set forth with
attention to the following:
a) safety improvements and
elimination of hazards;
b) elimination of below-
standard conditions and
capacity deficits;
c) demonstrated linkage
between projected growth'
and facility service area;
d) trade-off between
supporting new growth or
redevelopment;
e) financial feasibility,
including operating costs;
f) coordination with the
capital programming of
other public agencies; and
g) contractual and/or
mandated obligations.
Imolemented?
Yes, ongoing
Relevant
Yes
135
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.F.2 Capital Improvements Element Objective Cl-2 Acbievement Status
cant.
Policy
Policy CI-2.2
Service and facility impacts
of new development must
be identified and quantified
so that sufficient public
facilities will be planned
and programmed to be
available when needed. All
development orders
authorizing new, or
significant expansion of
existing urban land uses,
shall be contingent upon the
provision of services at the
levels of service which meet
or exceed the adopted LOS
standards except as
otherwise provided in the
concurrency management
system of the ClE.
[9J-5.016(3)(c)6]
Policy CI-2.3
Development Orders that
were reviewed for
concurrency and approved,
by Miami-Dade County,
.prior to the adoption of this
Comprehensive Plan shall
be considered vested unless
or until such a
determination expires.
[9J-5.016(3)(c)51
Implemented?
Yes, ongoing
Relevant
Yes
Yes, ongoing, the City after Yes
incorporating vested
development orders which
had received prior
development approvals
from Miami-Dade County
and has a listing of such
properties
136
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.F.2 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-2 Achievement Status
cont.
Poliçy
Policy CI-2.4
The Five-Year Capital
Improvements Program, or
the City's contract
providers as
appropriate, shall
incorporate the identified
capital investments from
each functional element and
will be based on the
following LOS standards:
Potable Water Supply,
Minimum Fire Flow, Land
Use Gallons per Minute,
Sanitary Sewer, Solid
Waste, Traffic Circulation,
Mass Transit, Parks and
Recreation, Drainage,
Pollutant Target Criterion,
Police Protection, Fire
Protection.
[9J-5.016(3)(c)4]
3.
Objective CI-3
Implemented?
Yes, the 2005/2010 CIP has
five functional categories
for projects which include
any capital improvements
for meeting any levels of
servIce
Relevant
Yes, see Chapter II.D. and
¡I.E. and IV., Financial
Feasibility and Levels of
Service, for documentation
of how the City has met its
adopted Level of Service
standards
Objective 3 of the Capital Improvements Element is as follows: "Future development will
be permitted only when the adopted level of service standards for those services listed in
,the CIE will be upgraded or maintained at adopted levels of service assuring that adequate
fiscal resources are made available including, the proportionate cost of improvements
necessitated by the development. [9J-5.016(3)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Maintenance of adopted levels of
service. "
As stated previously, the City has the fiscal resources for maintaining the adopted levels of
service required for new development. The City is meeting its adopted Level of Service
standards for all services. Please see Chapter ILD. and II.E. and IV., "Financial Feasibility
and Levels of Service Standards", for more information about how the City has met its
adopted Level of Service standards.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CI-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (CI-3.1) has been or is being
137
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.F.3 below:
Table III.F.3 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-3 Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CI-3.1 Yes, funding mechanisms Yes
Appropriate funding are in place
mechanisms will be adopted
and applied by Aventura in
order to assure the fiscal
resources to maintain
acceptable levels of service.
Such funding mechanisms
include impact fees, user
fees, special tax districts,
general obligation bonds,
and special purpose
authorities, or others as
appropriate and feasible.
r9J-5.0l6(3)(c)81
4.
Objective CI-4
Objective 4 of the Capital Improvements Element is as follows: "Annually, the City will
prepare a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) analyzing all anticipated capital
expenditures and identifying associated funding sources. [9J-5.016(3)(b)1 & 4]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Preparation of annual Capital
. Improvements Program in confonnity with the adopted policies."
The City annually prepares and adopts its Capital Improvements Program in compliance
with this Objective. The annual CIP (current 2005/2010) has anticipated the needs for
capital expenditures and identified all funding sources and plans. Please see Chapter IV.,
Financial Feasibility and Level of Service Standards", for more infonnation about the
City's Capital Improvements Program.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CI-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CI-4.1 through CI-4.5) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.F.4 below:
138
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.F.4 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-4 Achievement Status
Poliçy
Policy CI-4.1
Future capital expenditures
necessitated by changes in
population, changes in
development, growth,
redevelopment or changes
in economic base will be
calculated and included in
the Capital Improvement
Program update process.
r9J-5.016(3)(c) 11
Policy CI-4.2
The City will perfonn all
capital improvements in
accordance with an adopted
Capital Improvement
Program.
Policy CI-4.3
The classification of items
as capital or operating will
be detennined by two
criteria - cost and
frequency. Generally, a
capital project has a "useful
life" of more than one year
and a value of $2,500 or
more, or for office
, equipment $500 or more.
Policy CI-4.4
The City will coordinate
development of the capital
improvement budget with
the development of the
operating budget. Future
operating costs associated
with new capital
improvements will be
projected and included in
the operating forecasts.
Imolemented?
Yes, ongoing
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
139
Relevant
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.F.4 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-4 Achievement Status
cant.
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CI-4.5 Yes Yes
The first year of the five-
year capital improvement
program will be used as the
basis for fonnal fiscal year
appropriations during the
annual budget process.
Policy CI-4.6 Yes Yes
The City will maintain all
of its assets at a level
adequate to protect the
City's capital investment
and to minimize future
maintenance and
replacement costs. [9J-
5.016(3)(c)31
Policy CI-4. 7 Yes Yes
The City will identify the
estimated cost of capital
projects and prepare a
funding projection that
considers revenues and
operating costs to be
included in the Capital
Improvement Program
document that is submitted
to the City Commission for
approval.
r9J-5.016(3)(c)9]
Policy CI-4.8 Yes Yes
The City will detennine the
most appropriate financing
method for all new projects.
Policy CI-4.9 Yes Yes
If appropriate, the City will
attempt to maintain a mixed
policy of pay-as-you-go and
borrowing against future
revenues for financing
capital projects.
140
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.FA Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-4 Achievement Status
cont.
Poli~y Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CI-4.! 0 Yes Yes
The City will maintain
ongoing maintenance
schedules relating to road,
sidewalk, drainage and
utility system
improvements.
Policy CI-4,!! Yes Yes
The City will address and
prioritize infrastructure
needs on the basis of
protecting the health, safety
and welfare of the
community.
PolicyCI-4.l2 Yes Yes
A CIP preparation calendar
shall be established and
adhered to.
PolicyCI-4.l3 Yes Yes
Capital projects will
confonn to the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy CI-4.!4 Yes Yes
Long-tenn borrowing will
not be used to fund current
operations or nonnal
. maintenance.
Policy CI-4.l5 Yes Yes
The City will strive to
maintain an unreserved
general fund balance at a
level not less than 7.5% of
the annual general fund
revenue.
!4l
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.F.4 Capital Improvements Element Objective CI-4 Achievement Status
cont.
Poliçy Implemented? Relevant
Policy CI-4.16 Yes Yes
If new project appropriation
needs are identified at an
interim period during the
fiscal year, the funding
sources will be identified
and mid-year budget
amendments will be utilized
to provide formal budgetary
authority. In addition,
budget amendments may be
utilized to increase
appropriations for special
capital projects.
5.
Concurrency Management System Subsection
The Growth Management Act requires local governments to amend its land development
regulations to incorporate specific and detailed provisions which shall provide that public
facilities and services meet or exceed the LOS standards established in the Plan's Capital
Improvements Element and are available when needed for the development.
The City of Aventura shall enact by ordinance, a concurrency management system which
accomplishes the statutory requirements. Administration of the required program involves
the establishment of methods and capabilities to monitor outstanding development
commitments and service demands posed by such commitments, plus the existing,
programmed and projected capacities of all pertinent urban service facilities or systems.
The City has enacted a concurrency management system which meets and exceeds the
statutory requirements. Please see Chapter IV., "Financial Feasibility and Levels of
Service", for more information.
Table III.F.5 Capital Improvements Element Concurrency Management System
Subsection Achievement Status
Concurrency Management
System
Relevant
Yes
142
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.G. Intergovernmental Coordination Element
1.
Objective IC-I
Objective I of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is as follows: "Maintain and
improve coordination of planning, development and impact assessment among
governmental entities with applicable responsibilities."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number and significance of
comments made to and responses received from reviewing agencies in conjunction with
review of amendments to the Aventura Comprehensive Plan and the comprehensive plans
of the other entities. Usage of infoffi1al or foffi1al mediation when necessary to resolve
disputes."
The City has in place the mechanisms for coordination with local, county and regional
agencies such as Miami-Dade County and the South Florida Regional Planning Council,
and receives and make comments on an on-going basis. The City has never had an
amendment turned down due to review agency comments. The processes have served the
City well during the planning period.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective IC-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (IC-l.l through IC-1.l6) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.G.I below:
Table III.G.l Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-l Achievement
Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
,Policy IC-l.l Yes Yes
Make full use of the
coordination mechanisms
built into the
intergovernmental review
and comment provisions of
the Local Government
Comprehensive Planning
and Land Development
Regulations Act to seek
consistency between the
Aventura Comprehensive
Plan and the local
comprehensive plans of
adjacent Miami-Dade
municipalities of North
143
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Miami Beach, Sunny Isles
Beach and Golden Beach;
Broward, and Miami-Dade
Counties; and the adjacent
municipality of Hallandale,
within Broward County.
Policy IC-I.2
A ventura shall consider
compatibility with adopted
land use plans of adjacent
municipalities as a factor in
reviewing proposed changes
to the Aventura Future Land
Use Plan map or to a
municipal plan.
Policy IC- 1.3
Provide for County-city and
city-city exchange of
notification and infonnation
of requests for change of
zoning within the vicinity of
the unincorporated area and
other municipal boundaries.
Policy IC-I.4
Make use of infonnal or
fonnal mediation processes
when possible to resolve
disputes arising from
amendments to the
Aventura's Comprehensive
,Plan.
Policy IC-1.5
Encourage the development
of a regional forum to
address the needs and
strategies for providing and
developing public services
and facilities as well as to
enable intergovernmental
review of regionally
significant public facilities
which involve locally
unwanted land uses.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, regional planning Yes
council process in place but
to date has not been utilized
by the City
Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
County and the South
Florida Regional Planning
Council
144
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.G.t Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-t Achievement
cont.
Poli~ Implemented? Relevant
Policy IC-\.6 Yes, partially, Special Yes
Support the establishment Transportation System
of a coordinated regional established by the County
transit system for the but is not truly regional in
transportation nature and would be within
disadvantaged. the purview of Miami-Dade
Transit
Policy IC-1.7 No, the South Florida Yes
A ventura shall work Regional Planning Council
cooperatively with other has created a committee to
local governments to complete a Regional
identify opportunities for Affordable Housing
affordable housing. Strategy
Policy IC-\.8 No, local affordable Yes
Encourage the housing program funding
establishment of joint cycles would be
funding cycles for federal, coordinated by Miami-Dade
state and local affordable County
housing programs.
Policy IC-1.9 Yes, ongoing Yes
The City of Aventura shall
coordinate its plans with the
Miami-Dade County School
Board and other units of
local government providing
services but not having
regulatory authority over
.the use ofland.
PolicyIC-I.IO Yes, ongoing Yes
The City of Aventura shall
coordinate any and all spoil
disposal sites with Miami-
Dade County, the South
Florida Water Management
District, the Anny Corps of
Engineers, or any other
entity involved with the
designation of new dredge
spoil disposal sites.
145
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.G.llntergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-! Achievement
cont.
Poliçy
Policy IC-l.ll
The City shall establish
joint planning areas in
coordination with Miami-
Dade County and adjacent
municipalities prior to
initiating the process of
annexing new land into the
City or changing
Aventura's municipal
boundaries.
Policy IC-1.l2
The City shall coordinate
the siting of municipal
facilities of countywide
significance (including
those facilities typically
considered to be locally
unwanted land uses) with
Miami-Dade County,
adjacent municipalities, and
other relevant federal, state
and local governmental
agencies.
PolicyIC-1.13
The City shall provide
notice of Comprehensive
Plan amendments, zoning
changes, variances to the
City's Land Development
Regulations, special
exceptions or other land use
approvals requiring a public
hearing to owners of record
of real property and
adjacent local governments
in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the
City's Land Development
Regulations without regafd
to municipal boundaries.
Imnlemented?
No, no new annexation Yes
requests have been initiated
by the City but would be
coordinated with Miami-
Dade County pursuant to
Chapter 20 Annexations and
Incorporations
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, public notices are sent Yes
to owners of record within a
radius of 300 feet and to
adjacent local governments.
146
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.G.llntergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-l Achievement
cont.
Polifcl'
PolicyIC-I.14
The City shall continue to
identify those zoning
districts in its Land
Development Regulations
in which public schools are
an allowed use, and shall
add, delete or modify
zoning districts in a manner
as to promote the
compatibility of public
schools across the broadest
possible spectrum of zoning
classifications.
Policy IC-1.lS
The City shall encourage
the establishment of new
public schools within its
boundaries by promoting
the dedication of land and
infrastructure by of
residential and
nonresidential land, and will
actively consult with the
Miami-Dade County School
District during the process
of dedication to maximize
,the benefits of dedication to
the school district while
minimizing costs to the
developer.
Policy IC-1.l6
The City shall enter into
cooperative agreements
with adjacent jurisdictions
and the providers of urban
services within the City
where such arrangements
are agreeable to both parties
and beneficial to the
equitable and efficient
delivery of services.
ImDlemented?
Yes, the City has identified Yes
those districts in Chapter 31
Land Development
Regulations Article VII Use
Regulations
Relevant
Yesthe City established the Yes
Aventura City of
Excellence Charter School
in 2003. The school
currently
includes an elementary
school with a middle school
wing under construction.
The middle school site was
obtained from a private
developer via development
incentives.
Yes
Yes
147
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
2.
Objective IC-2
Objective 2 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is as follows: "Coordinate with
local, regional, and state entities with responsibilities in the establishment of Level of
Service standards."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Continued use of Level of Service
Standards as contained in the Capital Improvements Element of the A ventura
Comprehensive Plan until properly amended."
The City continues to coordinate with the appropriate agencies which have established the
levels of service and continues to utilize those standards, and uses the Level of Service
standards contained in the Capital Improvements Element. Please see Chapter IV.,
"Financial Feasibility and Levels of Service", for more infonnation.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective IC-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (IC-Z.l and IC-Z.Z) have been or are
being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table 1II.G.2 below:
Table III.G.2 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-2 Achievement
Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ICI-2.1 Yes Yes
A ventura shall continue to
establish Level of Service
standards for local services.
Policy IC-Z.2 Yes, in coordination with Yes
Impacts on facilities of Miami-Dade County and
,state, regional and Miami-Dade County Public
municipal governments Schools
shall be included in impact
fee ordinances which may
be established by Aventura.
These impact fees shall be
applied to those geographic
areas which will benefit
trom the facilities funded by
the fees. The areas which
each impact fee shall apply,
shall be detennined by the
City Commissioners at the
time said fee is established.
148
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3.
Objective IC-3
Objective 3 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is as follows: "Encourage the
use of interlocal agreements and municipal boundary changes to improve coordination of
local development and the effective and efficient delivery oflocal services."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of interlocal agreements
which improve coordination for municipal services."
The City has a total of 25 interlocal agreements, including mutual aid agreements, transit
agreements, School Board agreements, and storm water utility agreements.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective IC-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (IC-3.l through IC-3.3) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.G.3 below:
Table III.G.3 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-3 Achievement
Status
PoliG' Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ICI-3.1 Yes, ongoing Yes
Promote the use of County-
City interlocal agreements
to provide for extra
jurisdictional service
deliveries where efficiency
and effectiveness can be
enhanced.
Policy IC-3.2 Yes, ongoing Yes
Encourage the
establishment of formal
agreements among the
necessary governmental
bodies to implement
coordinated planning for the
development of public
facilities and services.
Policy IC-3.3 Yes, ongoing Yes
Development activities shall
adhere to the guidelines,
policies and provisions of
applicable interlocal
agreements.
149
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
4.
Objective IC-4
Objective 4 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element is as follows: "Ensure adequate
and timely shelter within the region for those residing in hurricane evacuation areas."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Continued participation by City
Departments in regional planning meetings that address emergency management issues."
The City continues to participate in emergency management meetings at the county and
regional levels. Additional coordination is needed. See Chapter IILC. for more
infonnation.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective IC-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (IC-4.l through IC-4A) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table III.GA below:
Table III.G.4 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-4 Achievement
Status
PoIiçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ICI-4.! Yes, FOOT has established Yes
Encourage local electronic messaging along
governments and federal, certain regional corridors
state and regional agencies such as 1-95
to protect the population by
developing a system of
emergency communication
on roadways.
Policy IC-4.2 Yes, ongoing, over 25 Yes
Promote the establishment interlocal agreements have
and maintenance of mutual been established
aid agreements among local
governments to protect the
population.
150
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.G.4 Intergovernmental Coordination Element Objective IC-4 Achievement
Status cont.
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy lC-4.3 Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
Encourage local, regional, County Department of
state and federal agencies Emergency Management
and organizations to work
together in evaluating the
existing criteria for
designating places for
shelter. Such criteria should
include but not be limited
to: locations of shelter;
structural integrity of
shelter; space provided per
person; and availability of
essential provisions.
Policy IC-4.4 Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
Promote the coordination County Department of
by federal, state and Emergency Management
regional agencies of a
public infonnation and
awareness program
concerning various types of
hazards and appropriate
response.
151
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.H. Conservation and Coastal Management Element
1.
Coastal Management Objective 1
Objective I of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: 'The City will continue to meet or exceed the minimum air
quality standards established by the Department of Environmental Protection. [9J-
5.013(2)(b)l]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Maintenance or improvement of air
quality within the Miami-Fort Lauderdale air shed." Miami-Dade County's Department of
Environmental Resources Management has established 14 air monitoring stations
throughout the County. As noted in Miami-Dade County's 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report, since 1995 no National Ambient Quality Standards were exceeded in the County,
including in the City of Aventura. Therefore, this Objective has been achieved.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-l, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (CCMCM-l.I) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.H.1 below:
Table III.H.1 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-1
Achievement Status
Poli~ Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-l.l Yes Yes
The City shall maintain
compliance with its traffic
level of service standard
thereby avoiding congestion
that would adversely impact
air quality.
2.
Coastal Management Objective 2
Objective 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "As part of the internal consistency requirement of the
Comprehensive Plan elements the conservation efforts to protect water sources and waters
that flow into estuarine waters or oceanic waters will be coordinated with the Intì-astructure
Element, on site drainage standards will ensure that private properties retain at least the
first inch of stonnwater on site and pennit no more run-off after development than before
development. [9J-5,013(2)(b)2] and [9J-5.012(3)(b)2]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of penn its issued that comply
with adopted drainage levels of service."
152
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
All pennits issued by the City comply with the adopted drainage levels of service. The
monitoring measure should be modified to state that no pennits are issued if they do not
comply with drainage levels of service.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-2.1 and CCMCM-2.2) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table lII.H.2 below:
Table III.H.2 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-2
Achievement Status
Policy
Policy CCMCM-2.1
Through implementation of
the land use plan and
implementing land
development regulations
sufficient restrictions will
be in place to direct,
activities and land uses
known to affect the quality
and quantity of identified
water sources adversely,
away from these sources,
including natural
groundwater recharge areas,
wellhead protection areas
and surface waters used as a
source of public water
. supply. Implementation of
the Stonnwater Utility
Program will ensure that the
stonn sewer system
standards will be
maintained as delineated in
the Infrastructure Element.
[9J-5.0I3(2)(c)I and 6] and
r9J-5.012(3)(c)I and 21
Policy CCMCM-2.2
A ventura will adhere to and
promote emergency water
conservation efforts III
accordance with the South
Florida Water Management
District's plan.
Imolemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
153
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3.
Coastal Management Goal Objective 3
Objective 3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Through implementation of the land use plan and subsequent
land development regulations the remaining native vegetative communities, and
appropriate minerals and soils conditions will be conserved and implementation
mechanisms will be developed. [9J-5.013(2)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Adoption of land development
regulations that protect native vegetative communities, including environmentally sensitive
land." The City's land development regulations include the Conservation District (Section
31-142), and include provisions for the protection of environmentally sensitive lands in the
City.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-3.l and CCMCM-3.2) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.3 below:
Table III.H.3 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-3
Achievement Status
Polit;Y ImDlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-3.l Yes, partially, because there Yes
Currently, there are no areas is no mineral extraction in
within the City limits that the City
are suitable for mineral
extraction, and due to the
level of existing and
expected development it is
not expected that there will
be any, however, it is
recognized that
conservation, protection and
appropriate use of natural
resources IS necessary.
r9J-5.013(2)(c)21
154
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.3 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-3
Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-3.2 Yes, through Conservation Yes
Through implementation of zoning and Land Use
the land use plan and designations.
implementing land
development regulations
any remammg native
vegetative communities,
including environmentally
sensitive lands, will be
protected trom development
activities. [9J-5.013(2)(c)3]
and r9J-5.0l3(2)(c)9]
4.
Coastal Management Objective 4
Objective 4 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Through its intergovernmental coordination mechanisms
Aventura will work to conserve, protect and appropriately use marine habitat, wildlife
habitat, wildlife and fisheries consistent with the South Florida Regional Planning Council
Policy Plan, and any applicable state or federal regulation, the City will adopt conservation
procedures as part of its land development regulations. [9J-5.013(2)(b)4]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Adoption of conservation regulations
consistent with the stated objective." The City's Future Land Use Element and land
development regulations include the Conservation District (Section 31-142), and include
. provisions for the protection of environmentally sensitive lands in the City.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-4.1 through CCMCM-4.6)
have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A
summary of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.4 below:
155
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table In.HA Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-4
Achievement Status
Poliçy Implemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-4.! Yes Yes
Those known development
activities that adversely
affect the survival of
endangered and threatened
wildlife will be restricted in
a manner consistent with
applicable state and federal
regulations.
[9J-5.0!3(2( c)51
Policy CCMCM-4.2 Yes Yes
By the adoption of the
City's conservation
ordinance natural functions
of existing soils, fisheries,
wildlife habitats, rivers,
bays, lakes, harbors, marine
habitats, including wetlands
and estuarine marshes will
be protected.
[9J-5.013(2)(c)6]
Policy CCMCM-4.3 Yes Yes
As part of the internal
consistency requirement of
the Comprehensive Plan
elements areas identified in
the Parks and Recreation
Element as existing natural
reservations will be
protected.
[9J-5.0!3(2)(c)7]
Policy CCMCM-4.4 Yes, modify to add Miami- Yes
Based on the determinations Dade County regulations
made by the City's
conservation regulations
environmentally sensitive
lands will be designated,
[9J-5.013(2)(c)9]
156
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.4 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-4
Achievement Status cont.
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-4.5 Yes Yes
In an effort to protect
natural resources, hazardous
wastes will be handled in a
manner consistent with
applicable state and federal
regulations.
r9J- 5.013(2)(cHOl
Policy CCMCM-4.6 Yes Yes
In an effort to further the
goals and objectives of the
Conservation Subelement,
and consistent with the
policies established by the
Intergovernmental
Coordination Element the
City of A ventura will
cooperate with adjacent
local governments in the
common effort to protect
natural resources and the
environment.
r9J-5.0 13(2)( c)81
,5.
Coastal Management Objective 5
Objective 5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Realizing that there is limited remaining coastal wildlife habitat
in Aventura, such remaining areas shall be protected from development and when practical
enhanced by development. [9J-5.012(3)(b)l]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Activities of coastal wildlife habitat
protected or enhanced by development."
Modify monitoring measure to replace "Activities" with "acres". The number of acres
protected or enhanced is approximately 35.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-5, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-5.1 through CCMCM-5.4)
157
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A
summary of this analysis is provided in Table Il1.H.5 below:
Table III.H.S Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-S
Achievement Status
Policv
Policy CCMCM-5.1
The City shall prohibit
dredging or filling that
would result In the
destruction of grass/algae
flats, hard bottom or other
benthic communities in any
waters within the City limits
unless permitted by other
regulatory agencies.
Policy CCMCM-5.2
The City shall prohibit the
deposit of solid waste or
industrial waste including
spent oils, gasoline by-
products or greases
accumulated at garages,
filling stations and similar
establishments that create a
health or environmental
hazard upon any vacant,
occupied or unoccupied
premises, parkway or park,
and in any canal, waterway
or bay within the City
limits.
Policy CCMCM-5.3
The City shall not issue
building permits for any
development which does
not meet adopted
storm water management
(drainage) levels of service.
Policy CCMCM-5.4
In order to remedy pre-
incorporation drainage
deficiencies, the City of
A ventura shall continue to
impose a stormwater utility
fund.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, ongoing,
Yes
158
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
6.
Coastal Management Objective 6
Objective 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Preserve the existing and planned sites for water-dependent uses;
assure that any related marina construction or expansion meets appropriate location
standards.[9J-5.0 12(3)(b)3]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of sites available for water-
dependent uses." According to the City's "Inventory of Sites Providing Public Waterfront
Access" there are approximately 21 sites (parcels). See Chapter II.E. for more
information.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-6, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (CCMCM 6.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.H.6 below:
Table 111.8.6 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-6
Achievement Status
Poli¡:y Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-6.1 Yes, but delete reference to Yes
Any new marina, marina within one year of plan
expansion or similar water- adoption
dependent use shall meet
certain criteria: [9J-
5.012(3)(c)9] which shall be
incorporated into the Land
Development Regulations
within one year of Plan
adoption.
7.
Coastal Management Objective 7
Objective 7 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection responds to [9J-5.012(3)(b)(4] which addresses beach and dune systems.
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan. as
there are no beaches or dune systems in the City,
Table 111.8.7 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Subsection
Achievement Status
1m lemented? Relevant
N/A
No
159
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
8.
Coastal Management Objective 8
Objective 8 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Limit City funds for inti-astructure within the city limits that
would have the effect of directly subsidizing development which is significantly more
intensive than authorized by this Plan. [9J-5.012(3)(b)5 and 6]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Amount of funds expended that
directly subsidized development that is more intense than authorized by the Plan." Since
the date of adoption, no funds have been expended by the City that directly subsidized
development that is more intense than authorized by the Plan.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-8, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (CCMCM 8.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table IILH.8 below:
Table III.H.8 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-8
Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-8.1 Yes Yes
The City shall limit its
funding of public
infrastructure expansion if
such funding and such
expansion would have the
effect of directly
subsidizing a specific
private development that is
, significantly more intensive
than authorized by this
Plan.
r9J-S.012(3)(c)71
9.
Costal Management Objective CCMCM-9
Objective 9 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Maintain or reduce the current estimated hurricane evacuation
clearance time ofless than 12 hours. [9J-5,012(3)(b)7]"
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Improvement or maintenance of
estimated hurricane evacuation clearance time ofless than 12 hours."
160
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
As noted in Chapter II.C., the City is meeting its required hurricane evacuation clearance
time standard of 12 hours. Please see Chapter II.C. for more information.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-9, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-9.1 and CCMCM-9.2) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.9 below:
Table III.H.9 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-9
Achievement Status
Poli~ Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-9.1 Yes, hurricane evacuation Yes
The City shall maintain and pick up points are denoted
implement the strategy in by signage throughout the
the event of a hurricane of City and further instruction
the established "pick up is available on the City's
points" to facilitate the website
evacuation. www.citvofaventura.com
r9J-5.012(3)(c)41
Policy CCMCM-9.2 Yes Yes
The City shall maintain the
adopted levels of service on
the local roadways based on
the future land use plan to
achieve a reasonable
evacuation time.
r9J-5.012(3)(c)41
10.
Coastal Management Objective 10
Objective 10 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "The City of Aventura shall provide immediate response to post
hurricane situations in concert with a post-disaster redevelopment plan which will reduce
or eliminate the exposure of human life and public and private property to natural
hazards."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
However, the City has post-disaster recovery plans in place. Please see Chapter [I.C. for
more information.
[n order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-IO, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-IO.I through CCMCM-
10,20) have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted.
A summary of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.l 0 below:
161
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table In.H.I0 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status
Poli¡;y
Policy CCMCM-I 0.1
The current Miami-Dade
County Hurricane
Procedures Plan shall be
modified to comply with the
policies under this
objective, and shall contain
step-by-step details for
post-disaster recovery
operations.
Policy CCMCM-I 0.2
After a hurricane but prior
to re-entry of the population
into evacuated areas, the
City Commission shall meet
to hear preliminary damage
assessments, appoint a
Recovery Task Force and
consider a temporary
moratorium of building
activities not necessary for
the public health, safety and
welfare.
Policy CCMCM-I 0.3
The Recovery Task Force
shall include the City
Manager, Community
Development Director,
Building Official,
Community Services
Director and other staff
members as directed by the
City Commission. Staff
shall be provided by the
departments whose
directors are Task Force
members. The Task Force
shall be terminated after
implementing its
responsibility under Policy
10.6.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, ongoing
Yes
162
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.IO Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy
Policy CCMCM-IOA
The Recovery Task Force
shall review and decide
upon emergency building
permits; coordinate with
Miami-Dade County, State
and Federal officials to
prepare disaster assistance
applications; analyze and
recommend to the City
Commission hazard
mitigation options including
reconstruction or relocation
of damaged public
facilities; develop a
redevelopment plan; and
recommend amendments to
the comprehensive plan,
Miami-Dade County
Hurricane Procedure Plan
and other appropriate
policies and procedures.
Policy CCMCM-IO.5
Immediate repair and clean-
up actions needed to protect
,the public health and safety
include repairs to potable
water, wastewater and
power facilities; removal of
building and/or vegetative
debris; stabilization or
removal of structures about
to collapse; and minimal
repairs to make dwellings
habitable such as minor roof
repairs and other
weatherproofing! securi ty
measures. These actions
shall receive first priority in
permitting decisions. Long
term redevelopment
Imolemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
163
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
activities shall be postponed
until the Recovery Task
Force has completed its
tasks.
Policy CCMCM-IO.6 Yes Yes
The Recovery Task Force
shall propose
comprehensive plan
amendments which reflect
the recommendations in any
interagency hazard
mitigation reports or other
reports prepared pursuant to
Section 406 of the Disaster
Relief Act of 1974 (PL93-
288).
Policy CCMCM-IO.7 Yes, through the Florida Yes
If rebuilt, structures which Building Code
suffer damage in excess of
fifty (50) percent of their
appraised value shall be
rebuilt to meet all current
requirements, including
those enacted since
construction of the
structure.
Policy CCMCM-I 0.8 Yes Yes
Structures which suffer
recurring damage to pilings,
foundations or load-bearing
walls shall be required to
rebuild landward of their
current location to modify
the structure to structurally
enhance the structure,
institute or mitigation
measures or delete the areas
most prone to damage.
Policy CCMCM-IO.9 Yes Yes
Following a natural disaster
and prior to the
implementation of long-
tenn development, the City
shall evaluate options for
damaged public facilities.
164
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table In.H.tO Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
Poli~
Policy CCMCM-10.10
Structures which are
damaged in excess of fifty
percent (50%) of their
current replacement value
shall be required to be
rebuilt to meet all current
land development
requirements as determined
by the City Building
Official.
Policy CCMCM-10.II
The long-term physical
reconstruction of the City of
Aventura after a major
disaster shall be III
conformity with the land
use element of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and
the land use regulations
used to implement it. Any
proposed amendment to the
Future Land Use Map shall
contain an analysis of its
effect on long-term physical
reconstruction.
Policy CCMCM-IO.12
The City shall utilize certain
criteria to distinguish
between immediate repair
and clean up actions and
long-term redevelopment
subsequent to a natural
disaster for Pot a b I e
Water Facilities,
Wastewater Facilities,
Drainage Facilities,
Roadway Facilities and
Habitable Structures.
Implemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, see also Policies Yes
CCMCM-IO.4 and.6
Yes
Yes
165
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.0.10 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
Policy
Policy CCMCM-IO.13
When undertaking post-
disaster redevelopment
activities, development
permits may be waived for
short term recovery
measures such as:
emergency repairs to
streets, water, electricity or
other utilities to restore
service; removal of debris;
and public assistance
matters including temporary
shelter or housing.
PolicyCCMCM-IO.14
Repair and Clean Up. In
planning post-disaster
redevelopment activities,
factors to be considered in
order to protect the public
health and safety shall
include:
I. Repairs to potable water,
wastewater and power
facilities.
2. Removal of debris.
3. Stabilization or removal
of structures in a perilous
condition.
4. Minimal repairs to make
structures habitable.
These considerations shall
receive first priority in
determining the
appropriateness of
emergency building
permits. Long-term
redevelopment activities
shall be postponed until the
Recovery Task Force has
coordinated immediate
clean-up operations.
Imolemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
166
DRAFT
City of Áventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.I0 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
PoliIT
Policy CCMCM-I 0.15
Pennitting Decision
Priorities. Immediate
recovery actions needed to
protect the public health and
safety shall take priority in
pennitting decisions.
PolicyCCMCM-10.16
The applicable provisions
of the South Florida
Building Code relating to
hurricane precautions,
inspections and pennitting
are hereby adopted by
reference.
PolicyCCMCM-10.17
The City adopts the
following criteria relating to
consideration of relocating
public infrastructure,
cognizant of the City's
geographic limitations and
development status:
I. The land upon or under
which the infrastructure
existed is gone or
, reconfigured so that
replacement is not possible
technically or financially as
detennined by the City
Commission.
2. The cost of repairs or
retrofitting versus relocation
costs.
3. Opportunities arising out
of acquisition of land by the
City or other governmental
entity.
Imolemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes, but delete reference to Yes
South
Yes
Yes
167
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.I0 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
PoIiIT
PolicyCCMCM-IO,]8
Notwithstanding the
preceding policies, no
regulation, pennitting
procedure or post disaster
redevelopment planning
shall be approved or applied
to property, as the case may
be, so as to constitute a
taking or inordinately
burden an existing use of
real property or a vested
right to a specific use of real
property within the meaning
of the Bert J. Harris, Jr.
Private Property Rights
Protection Act, Chapter 95-
181, Laws of Florida,
codified as Section 70.00],
Florida Statutes.
PolicyCCMCM-]O,]9
The City recognizes that
certain vested development
rights may exist for
property within the City.
The City will consider such
, claims after petition is made
to the City and, after due
public hearings, the City
Commission may grant
approval to the request. The
documentation for a claim
shall follow the procedures
found in Section 2-114.],
Code of Metropolitan Dade
County, Florida.
Implemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes, but amend to reference
Section 31-3 of the City of
Aventura Code of
Ordinances as well.
168
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.I0 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
10 Achievement Status cont.
Polky Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-IO.20 Yes Yes
The City shall prepare a
local mitigation strategy in
accordance with the
guidelines provided in the
Local Mitigation Strategy:
A Guidebook for Florida
Cities and Counties and will
be used to fulfill the
requirements of Rule 9J-
5,012, F.A.c. relating to
post disaster planning,
repair, and reconstruction.
11.
Coastal Management Objective 11
Objective II of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Protect, preserve, and sensitively reuse historic and
archaeological sites."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan,
although it would be logically measured by quantifying the number of historic or
archaeological sites protected and preserved in the City. There are no historic or
archaeological resources or sites in the City.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-ll, a brief
,assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-II.1 and CCMCM-ll.2)
have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A
summary of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.II below:
Table III.H.ll Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
11 Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyCCMCM-II.1 Yes, although no historic Yes
The City of A ventura shall resources exist, standards
establish perfonnance have been through Chapter
standards for the 31 Land Development
development and sensitive Regulations Article VI
reuse of historic resources.
However, until such time as
these standards are adopted
169
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
the City shall utilize Miami-
Dade County's applicable
regulations.
PolicyCCMCM-II.2 Yes Yes
The City shall work with
Miami-Dade County to
ensure that historic
structures and
archaeological sites are not
destroyed unless they are
damaged by a hurricane or
otherwise rendered beyond
reasonable use and repair.
12.
Coastal Management Objective-12
Objective 12 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Coastal Management
Subsection is as follows: "Shoreline uses shall be prioritized within the City of A ventura,
giving priority to water-dependent uses."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
The City has incorporated provisions for water-dependent uses into its land development
regulations, however, and maintains public access on approximately 21 parcels. Please see
Chapter ILE. for more information.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMCM-12, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMCM-12.1 though CCMCM-
12.7) have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A
summary of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.12 below:
Table III.H.12 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
12 Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyCCMCM-12.1 Yes Yes
Shoreline uses within
A ventura shall be
prioritized according to the
following order:
I. conservation uses;
2. water-dependent uses;
3. water-related uses;
4. uses not dependent or
related to shoreline access.
170
DRAFT
City of Áventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.12 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMCM-
12 Achievement Status cont.
Poli4;Y Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMCM-12.2 Update reference to date Yes
Prior to 2001, the City shall
conduct a survey of land
uses on parcels adjacent to
marine waters. The survey
shall include the location,
acreage and linear feet of
shoreline for each use.
Policy CCMCM-12.3 Yes Yes
The Future Land Use Map
shall not be amended when
such amendment would
decrease the ratio of
conservation uses to all
other shoreline uses.
Policy CCMCM-12.4 Yes Yes
Amendments to the Future
Land Use Plan Map shall
not reduce the proportion of
shoreline properties
dedicated to water-
dependent uses or reduce
the access of water-
dependent uses to such
properties.
Policy CCMCM-12.5 Yes Yes
Amendments to the Future
Land Use Plan Map shall
not reduce the proportion of
shoreline pfoperties
dedicated to water-related
uses or reduce the access of
water-related uses to such
properties.
Policy CCMCM-12,6 Yes Yes
New multi-family
residential development,
contiguous to the shoreline,
shall be water dependent,
water related, or at a
minimum shall include
environmentally compatible
171
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
shoreline access facilities
such as walkways, piers,
and viewing areas with
landscaping grouped or
spaced for views of and
from the water.
PolicyCCMCM-12.7 Yes Yes
Within the Town Center,
shoreline and canal access
easements shall be obtained
whenever possible and
additional sites sought to
provide public access for
water related activities that
are consistent with the
Town Center concept.
13.
Conservation Objective 1
Objective I of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City shall continue to meet or exceed minimum air quality
standards for recognized air pollutants."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of violations of air quality
standards."
Air quality standards are monitored by Miami-Dade County DERM which has established
14 air monitoring stations throughout the County. As noted in the County's 2003 EAR,
since 1995 no National Ambient Quality Standards were exceeded in the County, including
in the City of A ventura.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-l.l and CCMC-1.2) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table nLH, 13 below:
Table III.H.13 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-l
Achievement Status
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-I.I Yes Yes
The City shall continue to
support the air quality
monitoring and pollution
control programs of the
County and State.
172
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.13 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-l
Achievement Status cont.
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-I.2 Yes, requirements through Yes
With the cooperation of the Miami-Dade County
State, County and regional Chapter 24 Environmental
regulatory authorities, the Protection
City shall continue to
require pollution control
devices on all major point
sources of air pollution
which are located within the
Citv.
14.
Conservation Objective 2
Objective 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City shall maintain local surface and ground water quality to
equal to or better than existing levels for recognized pollutants."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of violations of water quality
standards."
According to the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Report for the
period 10/8/2002 - 10/8/2003, to date there have been no violations of water quality
standards in the City.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-2.1 through CCMC-2.13)
have been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A
summary of this analysis is provided in Table IILH.14 below:
Table III.H.14 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-2
Achievement Status
Policv Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-2.1 No, the City is not situated Yes
The City shall continue to near a well field protection
participate in area wide area but continues to
wellfield protection and support the regulatory
regulatory activities of activities of Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade County. County.
173
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.8.14 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-2
Achievement Status cont.
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-2.2 Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
The City shall consider County Chapter 24
developing a procedure to Environmental Protection
standardize the review of all
local users or potential
water contaminants by the
appropriate County or State
regulatorv agencies.
Policy CCMC-2.3 Yes, through Chapter 31
The City shall enforce and, Land Development
where appropriate, improve Regulations and Chapter 24
development regulations to Environmental Protection
require all new
development, or substantial
redevelopment, to provide
on-site retention or
detention of at least the first
inch of rainfall.
Policy CCMC-2.4 Yes Yes
The City shall coordinate
with the Florida Department
of Transportation to replace
existing direct discharge
drainage outfalls with
drainage retention ponds.
Policy CCMC-2.5 Yes Yes
,The City shall continue to
support the water quality
regulatory programs of the
State of Florida, Miami-
Dade County and the South
Florida Water Management
District.
Policy CCMC-2.6 Yes Yes
The City shall promote
periodic area-wide
waterway clean-up
I programs.
174
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.0.14 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-2
Achievement Status couto
Policy
Policy CCMC-2.7
The City shall consider, in
coordination with the
County and other regulatory
agencies, implementing a
canal maintenance dredging
program to eliminate
polluted sediments, to
reduce resuspension of
sediments through proper
dredging, and to improve
tidal flushing.
Policy CCMC-2.8
The City shall continue to
require sanitary sewer waste
disposal as a condition of
project and permit approval
and water services.
Policy CCMC-2.9
The City shall continue to
enforce development
regulations that require the
channelization of
stormwater run-off through
vegetation prior to entering
a receiving; water body.
,Policy CCMC-2.1 0
The City shall stay apprised
of continued advances in
street sweeping technology
with regard to feasible and
effective mechanisms to
remove roadway
contaminants; in the event
that the technology
emerges, the City shall
consider the individual or
shared purchase of the
machinery.
Imnlemented?
Yes, in coordination mainly Yes
with Miami-Dade County
Public Works Department
Yes
Yes, through Miami-Dade Yes
County Chapter 24
Environmental Protection
Yes
175
Relevant
Yes
Yes
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.8.14 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-2
Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-2.11 Yes Yes
The City shall require
sanitary sewer wastewater
collection as a condition for
the provision of potable
water customer services.
Policy CCMC-2.12 Yes Yes
The City shall coordinate
with appropriate regional
and state water management
agencies to restrict (or ban)
the use of phosphate
fertilizers.
Policy CCMC-2.13 Yes Yes
The City shall continue to
review and where necessary
require environmental
review and approval of
occupational licenses for
those businesses
categorized as users of
potential groundwater
contammants.
15.
Conservation Element Objective 3
,Objective 3 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City shall, to the maximum extent feasible, protect all
remaining areas of substantial native upland and wetland vegetation and eliminate
undesirable exotic tree species."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of acres of vegetation
removed and not replaced. Number of acres of exotic species removed." The City enforces
landscaping requirements, including prohibitions on exotic species removal, through its
implementation of Section 31-221 of its Code of Ordinances. Data which would allow
precise measurement of this Objective is not available; however, it is assumed that exotic
species have been removed through the on-going enforcement of these requirements on a
case by case basis.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-3.1 through CCMC-3.6) have
176
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.IS below:
Table In.H.IS Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-3
Achievement Status
Poli¡;x
Policy CCMC-3.l
Cognizant of prior
development approvals or
other vested rights, the City
shall require a detailed flora
and fauna survey on any
site subject to a
development proposal and
any size greater than 10
acres in size. Based on
survey results, mlcro-
preserves may be required
oriented to preservation of a
minimum 25% of all native
plant communities which
occur on-site. Habitat shall
be preserved with intact
canopy, understory and
ground cover.
Policy CCMC-3.2
Outright preservation of
existing, non-exotic trees on
any existing vegetated site
,shall be preferred over "cut
and replace" preservation
techniques.
Policy CCMC-3.3
The City shall enforce,
where appropriate,
development regulations
which require shoreline
vegetation buffer strips,
restrict the amount or
location of site clearing,
maintain natural drainage
flows and require the
removal of on-site exotic
tree species.
Imolemented?
Yes, as per Chapter 31-221, Yes
Landscaping Requirements
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
177
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Policy CCMC-3.4
A buffer zone of native
upland vegetation should be
required and maintained
around wetland and
deepwater habitats which
are preserved, restored or
recreated on-site. The buffer
zone may consist of
preserved or planted
vegetation but should
include canopy, understory
and ground cover of native
species onlv.
Policy CCMC-3.5
While discouraging clear
cutting poor to
development, the City
should consider developing
a long teon program to
remove all stands of non-
native, exotic vegetation
such as Australian Pine,
Brazilian Pepper, and
Melaleuca trees and
replacement with native
species.
Policy CCMC-3,6
The City shall require
,native vegetation species to
satisfy at least 50% of all
site landscaping
requirements as a condition
of development or peonit
approval.
16.
Yes, through land Yes
development regulations for
Conservation districts and
Section 31-221,
Landscaping Requirements
Yes, through Section 31- Yes
221, Landscaping
Requirements
Yes, through Section 31- Yes
221, Landscaping
Requirements
Conservation Objective 4
Objective 4 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City shall, to the maximum extent feasible, preserve natural
areas which serve as habitat for endangered and threatened plant and animal species."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Number of acres of natural areas
178
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
preserved." Approximately 566.6 acres in the City have been zoned Conservation, and
preserved accordingly.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-4, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (CCMC-4.l) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.H.16 below:
Table 111.8.16 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-4
Achievement Status
PoIi.:y
Policy CCMC-4.l
In the event that a site
survey indicates the
existence of a representative
plant or animal species
designated as endangered or
threatened on Federal, State
or Florida Committee on
Rare and Endangered Plants
and Animal lists, the
developer shall prepare a
plan in consultation with the
Florida Game and
Freshwater Fish
Commission and the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service
for protecting the resident
population. Preservation
,should be provided to the
satisfaction of the City in
consultation with the
Federal and State a~encies.
Imolemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
17.
Conservation Objective 5
Objective 5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "To reduce per capita water consumption rates by at least 10%
through 2005."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Per capita water consumption."
179
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Information that would allow precise measurement of this Objective specific to the City
does not exist. However, Miami-Dade County's 2003 Comprehensive Development
Master Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report indicates that gallons per capita per day has
declined in the County from 179 in 1995 to 159 in 2002, an II percent decrease. Due to
this being a more regional issue, the Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department through
Chapter 32 Water and Sewer Regulations, the Miami-Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management through Chapter 24 Environmental Protection and
the South Florida Water Management District have set goals to reduce per capita water
consumption. The City promotes strategies to reduce water consumption through its land
development regulations, public information programs, and ongoing coordination with
these agencies. Moreover, the Florida Building Code requires water conserving fixtures.
Update reference to date.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-5, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-5.1 through CCMC-5.4) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.17 below:
Table III.H.17 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-S
Achievement Status
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-5.1 Yes, and with Miami-Dade Yes
The City shall promote Water and Sewer
water conservation Department
strategies through the use of
educational brochures and
presentations to students
and interested groups.
Policy CCMC-5.2 Yes Yes, delete date
Prior to 2005, the City shall
consider funding, either
individually or
cooperatively, at least one
xeriscape demonstration
project.
Policy CCMC-5.3 Yes Yes
To promote water
conservation and reduce the
offshore runoff of pesticides
and fertilizer, the City shall
require the augmented use
of xeriscape concepts and
native vegetation in new
developments adjacent to,
or near, shoreline locations
180
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
as a condition of
development or permit
approval.
Policy CCMC-5.4 No No, delete
In conjunction with the
Miami-Dade Water and
Sewer Department, the City
shall explore the feasibility
of installing a transmission
line from the North Dade
Wastewater Treatment Plant
to convey recycled
wastewater for irrigation
use at Tumberry Golf
Course and Founders Park.
18.
Conservation Objective 6
Objective 6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as fo\1ows: "The City sha\1 continue to minimize the potential damage from
flooding and the loss oflocal soil resources."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Amount of property damage due to
flooding." Although there is not data that would allow precise measurement of this
Objective, flood damage in the City is de minimus due to the sandy soil conditions and
adequate stormwater drainage.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-6, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-6.l through CCMC-6.5) have
. been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table IIl.H.18 below:
Table III.H.18 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-6
Achievement Status
Poli~ Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-6.1 Yes Yes
The City shall continue to
coordinate the enforcement
of minimum finished floor
flood elevation criteria as
identified by the Federal
Emergency Management
Administration.
181
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.H.18 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-6
Achievement Status
Poli~y Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-6.2 Yes Yes
The City shall enforce local
drainage system
requirements as specified in
the Drainage sub-element of
the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy CCMC-6.3 Yes Yes
The City shall support the
flood control policies as
provided in the Drainage
sub-element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy CCMC-6.4 Yes Yes
The City shall support the
timely maintenance of
regional drainage system
features including structure
repairs and replacement and
maintenance dredging of
drainage canals by the
responsible governing
agency.
Policy CCMC-6.5 Yes Yes
During site clearing and
development preparation
stages, the City shall require
erosion control fencing, soil
moisturizing, seeding,
mulching and/or other best
management techniques to
be performed by the
developer to control soil
erosIOn.
19.
Conservation Objective 7
Objective 7 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City of Aventura shall increase public awareness of the
presence of manatees."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
The City does, however, provide information about manatee protection as appropriate in its
182
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Public Infonnation and awareness programs, and work with regulating agencies in ensuring
that signage is posted in manatee areas.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC- 7, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-7. I through CCMC-7.4) have
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted, A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table IILH.19 below:
Table III.H.I9 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-7
Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC- 7.1 Yes Yes
The City shall use the
City's newsletter to
annually remind the public
of presence of manatees.
Policy CCMC- 7.2 Yes, through assistance Yes
The City shall either obtain from DERM
or create an educational
pamphlet regarding manatee
protection measures.
Policy CCMC- 7.3 Yes Yes
The manatee protection
pamphlet shall be
distributed by the City's
Marine Patrol anytime a
boat is stopped.
Policy CCMC- 7.4 Yes Yes
The Manatee Protection
,Pamphlet shall be offered to
private marinas within the
City for distribution.
20.
Conservation Objective 8
Objective 8 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "Secure the provision of potable water in sufficient quantity to
meet present and projected needs commensurate with reasonable anticipated demand." The
City and its respective service providers (Miami-Dade County Water and Sewer
Department) to ensure the provision of potable water in sufficient quantities to meet the
City's needs. Please see Chapter IV., "Financial Feasibility and Levels of Service", for
more infonnation.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-8, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-8.1 through CCMC-8.6) have
183
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table IIl.H.20 below:
Table 111.0.20 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-8
Achievement Status
Policv
Policy CCMC-8.!
The City of Aventura has
no current or projected
well fields; therefore a
wellfield protection
ordinance will not be
necessarv.
Policy CCMC-8.2
Upon Plan adoption, in
order to comply with
policies of the South Florida
Water Management District
directed toward
conservation of potable
water supply and to achieve
a reduction in the current
rates of water consumption
certain perfonnance
standards shall apply.
Policy CCMC-8.3
The City of Aventura shall
continue to cooperate with
local, regional, state and
federal agencies for the
management of fresh water
resources to maintain
adequate fresh water
supplies during dry periods
and to, when practicable,
conserve water.
Policy CCMC-8.4
The City of Aventura shall
continue to cooperate with
W ASD and the South
Florida Water Management
(SFWMD) for the
implementation of water
demand management
policies and programs.
Imnlemented?
Relevant
N/A
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
184
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.8.20 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-8
Achievement Status cont.
PolillY Implemented? Relevant
Policy CCMC-8.5 Yes Yes
The City of Aventura shall
continue to require
compliance with all
applicable federal, state,
regional and county water
Qualitv standards.
Policy CCMC-8.6 Yes Yes
The City of Aventura shall
cooperate with W ASD and
the SFWMD to conserve
water resources during
emergencies.
21.
Conservation Objective 9
Objective 9 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element Conservation
Subsection is as follows: "The City of A ventura shall continue to protect surface waters
within the Biscayne Bay Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) area."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
However, the City, in conjunction with such regulatory agencies as the Miami-Dade
County Department of Environmental Resources Management, South Florida Water
Management District, Biscayne Bay Management Committee, Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, works to reduce point and
non-point source pollutant loading into surface waters. The City complies with the
requirements of its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency in operating its sanitary storm sewer discharge system.
As noted in Miami-Dade County's EAR, the Miami-Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management is working with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection on the establishment of anti-degradation targets, but these targets
have yet to be promulgated. The Miami-Dade EAR further states that while water quality
data obtained through the Biscayne Bay Partnership Initiative and the Biscayne Bay
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program indicates that the quality of Biscayne Bay
waters remains high, the quality of discharge waters remains suspect, and that the impacts
of programs designed to reduce pollutant loading into the Bay will not be known until the
next EAR cycle.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective CCMC-9, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (CCMC-9.1 and CCMC-9.2) have
185
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
been or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary
of this analysis is provided in Table III.H.21 below:
Table III.H.21 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Objective CCMC-9
Achievement Status
Policy
Policy CCMC-9.l
The City of Aventura shall
continue to require that all
penuits for new
construction meet or exceed
the Biscayne Bay SWIM
criteria by ensuring that all
penuits are approved by the
Miami-Dade County
Department of
Environmental Resources
Management prior to being
issued.
Policy CCMC-9.2
The City of Aventura shall
continue to require that all
penuits for redevelopment
or reconstruction meet or
exceed the Biscayne Bay
SWIM criteria by ensuring
that all penuits are
approved by the Miami-
Dade County Department of
Environmental Resource
. Management prior to being
issued.
ImnIemented?
Relevant
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
186
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
111.1. Economic Development Element
1.
Objective ED-I
Objective I of the Economic Development Element is as follows: "By 2000, the City shall
identify areas for improvement in the development approval process."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
The City has continued to update and enhance the land development regulations since
approval of Chapter 31 Land Development Regulations on July 13, 1999. The land
development regulations have been amended 12 times since 1999. The City has, however,
worked to refine its land development regulations. The reference to the date needs to be
deleted.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective ED-I, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (ED-l.I through ED-IJ) have been or
are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table m.Ll below:
Table III.I.1 Economic Development Element Objective ED-I Achievement Status
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy ED-I. I Yes Yes
The review should consider
all facets of the
development approval
process, from the fonnal
applications to
identification for targeted
businesses and report their
,finding to the City
Commission.
Policy ED-1.2 Yes Yes
The development approval
process shall be examined
to identify opportunities for
streamlining to remove any
steps that are duplicative or
candidates for
consolidation.
187
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table 111.1.1 Economic Development Element Objective ED-I Achievement Status
cont.
Poli¡;y Implemented? Relevant
Policy ED-I.3 Yes Yes
The Community
Development Department
should identify emerging
development trends such as
Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design
(CPTED) and new
urbanism design techniques
for consideration for and
inclusion within the land
development code.
2.
Objective ED-2
Objective 2 of the Economic Development Element is as follows: "Prior to 200 I, the City
of Aventura shall convene a meeting between the City, the Aventura Marketing Council
and the recently fonned A ventura Chamber of Commerce to discuss the preparation of a
unified approach to marketing the City and business attraction."
There is no monitoring measure identified for this objective in the Comprehensive Plan.
However, the City meets and coordinates with the Aventura Marketing Council and other
economic development agencies as appropriate on a regular and ongoing basis to promote
marketing and economic development efforts.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective ED-2, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (ED-2.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.I.2 below:
Table 111.1.2 Economic Development Element Objective ED-2 Achievement Status
Policy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ED-2.1 Yes Yes
The attraction of new
businesses to A ventura is a
function best delivered
through a coordinated and
cooperative effort
developed cognizant of
other's proposed programs.
188
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
3,
Objective ED-3
Objective 3 of the Economic Development Element is as follows: "By 2001, the City of
Aventura shall study and review the possibility of creating a Community Redevelopment
Agency (CRA)."
The City has not identified a need for the establishment of a redevelopment agency,
although it is focusing on redevelopment needs in several areas. Please see Chapter II.A.
for more infonnation.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective ED-3, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policy (ED-3.1) has been or is being
implemented and its continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this analysis is
provided in Table III.1.3 below:
T bl III 13 E
'0
EI
Ob'
EO 3 A h'
s
a e .. conollllC eve opment ement 1.lechve - c levement tatus
PoliIT Imolemented? Relevant
Policy ED-3.1 Yes, the Study was No
The study area for a CRA conducted and the
shall include some portion, establishment ofa CRA was
if not all, of the Hospital detennined to be not
area, the Thunder Alley feasible.
area, and/or the Biscayne
Boulevard corridor.
189
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
III.J. Urban Design Element
I.
Objective UD-l
Objective 1 of the Urban Design Element is as follows: "Within one year of adoption of the
Plan, enact Land Development Regulations that implement the concept contained in the
Urban Design Element."
For each objective, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a monitoring measure. The
monitoring measure for this objective is as follows: "Adoption of Land Development
Regulations that enact Urban Design Element concepts."
Delete reference to one year. The City has implemented the urban design concepts
specifically in the Town Center area which is now under development. Town Center
designations have been created in the Comprehensive Plan and land development
regulations, and are being implemented. Please see Chapter ILAI. for more infonnation.
In order to further evaluate the City's success in achieving Objective UD-l, a brief
assessment of whether or not the supporting policies (00-1.1 through UD-1.I2) have been
or are being implemented and their continued relevance was conducted. A summary of this
analysis is provided in Table IlI.J.I below:
Table III.J.l Urban Design Element Objective UD-l Achievement Status
Policv Imnlemented? Relevant
Policy UD-I.I Yes Yes
In order to encourage
redevelopment, mixed use
development will be
encouraged within areas
targeted for redevelopment.
Policy UD-l.2 Yes Yes
The schematic land use
patterns displayed on the
study area maps within this
Element are for reference
only and do not depict exact
locations or precise land use
ratios within the subject
areas. However, they do
represent the City's desire
to mix land uses within
these areas.
190
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table III.J.t Urban Design Element Objective UO-t Achievement Status cont.
Poliçy Imolemented? Relevant
Policy UD-I.3 Yes, ongoing Yes
Eliminate obstacles to
redevelopment and infill
development presently
found in Land Development
Regulations,
Policy Uo-l.4 Yes Yes
During plat and site plan
review, transit-oriented
design concepts will be
considered and encouraged.
Policy UD-1.5 Yes Yes
Core commercial areas shall
be designed to include lush
tropical landscaping and for
safe and convenient access
by all modes of
transportation, including
bus service, bicycles and
pedestrians.
Policy UO-I.6 Yes, where practical Yes
Small parks (less than 5
acres) are encouraged
throughout the City to
provide auto free zones for
residents and needed visual
breaks of green within
.Aventura's urban
framework.
Policy UD-I.7 Yes, see City's Yes
The location of parking, Beautification Program
curb cuts, walkways, bike within the Capital
lanes, signage, lighting, and Improvements Program
landscape treatments shall
be coordinated to provide
maximum user safety, while
improving the
comprehensive aesthetic
appearance of A ventura,
191
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Table lII.J.l Urban Design Element Objective UD-! Achievement Status cont.
Policy Imnlemented? Relevant
PolicyUO-I.8 Yes, requirement for Yes
The City of A ventura shall underground utilities in land
encourage the proper development regulations
placement of public and and Code of Ordinances
private utilities underground
within the right of way or
easements.
Policy UO-1.9 Yes Yes
The design of structured
parking, within mixed use
development, is encouraged
to include opportunities for
retail or office uses at the
street level.
PolicyUO-I.IO Yes Yes
The design and placement
of public buildings should
follow the urban design
concepts of pulling the
building close to the front
property line and placing
parking at the rear of the
site with ample shade and
landscape treatments.
Policy UO-1.11 Yes, see Chapter 31 Land Yes
To assist private developers, Development Regulations in
. the City shall prepare its entirety
roadway edge treatment
guidelines that describe and
illustrate proper planning
and design for right of way
and private property
ITontage.
PolicyUO-I.12 Yes, ongoing Yes
The City shall embark on a
process of mapping and
classification of
environmental resources
that exist within the City, to
ascertain the need fOf
co nserv a ti onl pres erv ati on.
192
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
CHAPTER IV.
COMMUNITYWIDE ASSESSMENT
An important requirement for the Evaluation and Appraisal Report is a comparison of how
conditions in the community have changed between the date of the previous EAR and
present. The following topics are addressed in this Chapter: population growth and
changes in land area, as per S. 163,3191 (2)(a), F.S.; the extent of vacant land, as per S.
163.3191 (2)(b), F.S.; the location of development in relation to location of development
as anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan, as per S. 163.3191 (2)(d), F.S.; the extent to
which those services with Level of service standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan
do not meet the standards, and an analysis and evaluation of the City's ability to fund new
or expanded infrastructure necessary to correct the deficiencies, and to provide for future
growth at acceptable levels of service, as per S, 163.3191 (2)(c), F.S; the success and
failure of coordinating residential development and public school planning, as per S.
163.3191 (2)(k), F.S.; and relevant changes in growth management laws (State
Comprehensive Plan, the requirements of Chapter 163, Part II, the minimum criteria
contained in Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code and the Strategic Regional Policy
Plan for South Florida) since the date of the previous EAR for consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan, as per S. 163.3191 (2)(t), F.S.
193
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
A. Population Changes, Vacant Land, Changes in Land Area, and Location of
Development in Relation to Aventura Comprehensive Neighborhood Plan
With a 2000 population of 25,267, Aventura is the eighth most populous municipality in
Miami-Dade County. Although it was not incorporated until 1995, between 1990 and
2000, the City's population increased from 15,375 to 25,267, a 67 percent increase. The
cities of Hialeah Gardens and Medley are the only municipalities in Miami-Dade County
that grew at a faster rate during that period. By 201O, the City's population is anticipated to
increase to 32,925, an increase of 30 percent since 2000. By 2015, it is projected that its
population will increase to 37,307 (48% above the 2000 Census), and by 2025, it is
projected that it will increase to 46,329 (83% above the 2000 Census)34. It should be
noted, however, that these estimates are based on historic and current population figures
and growth trends, and do not reflect local conditions. The City is rapidly approaching
build-out, and its future development potential and population growth is limited by the
scarcity of vacant and developable land. For these reasons, the City estimates that its
population will cap out at around 32,925, the year 2010 population estimate.
Figure ILA.4. and Table ILA.4. in Chapter ILA. identify the location and status of the
104.5 acres of vacant land in the City. Because the remainder of the City is already
developed, it is anticipated that most of the future development and redevelopment in the
City will occur on these parcels. Please see Chapter ILA. for more discussion.
Although the development and redevelopment that has occurred in the City has been
generally consistent with the City's adopted Future Land Use Plan Map, there have been a
number of amendments to the Map since the last EAR. These Map changes are
administered as per the procedures outlined in Article IV., "Comprehensive Plan", of the
land development regulations. Large-scale applications to amend the CNP are accepted
semiannually. The City reviews and analyzes the application, and prepares a
recommendation to the designated local planning agency, the City Commission. The City
Commission, acting as the LPA and final decision making body, conducts the required
public hearings, The City adheres to State requirements in its Comprehensive Plan
amendment process.
Since the date of adoption, there have been 12 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan's
Future Land Use Plan Map, totaling 66.76 acres. A total of: 5.66 acres were amended from
Medium/High Density Residential to Business and Office; 1.99 acres were amended from
Medium/High Density Residential to Town Center; 9.49 acres were amended from
Medium Density Residential to Business and Office; 7.42 acres were amended from Town
Center to Business and Office; 15.44 acres were amended from Parks and Recreation to
Business and Office; 2.85 acres were amended from Industrial and Office to Medium/High
Density Residential; 3.4 acres were amended from Business and Office to Parks and
Recreation, and; 12.65 acres were amended trom Business and Office to Medium High
Density Residential.
34 University of Florida Shimberg Center for Affordable Housing, Affordable Housing Needs Assessment,
2003
194
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
B.
Level of Service Analysis and Financial Feasibility
The City of Aventura has adopted Level of service standards in its Comprehensive Plan.
Through the implementation section of the Capital Improvement Element of the
Comprehensive Plan, the City ensures that future land development regulations and City
policies are consistent with the City's ability to provide the capital facilities required to
maintain adopted Level of Service Standards, including those needed to maintain or
enhance the quality oflife within the city.
As noted in its Comprehensive Plan Capital Improvements Element, the City's Capital
Improvement Program delineates the City's capital needs for designated planning periods.
The Capital Improvement Program is amended on an annual basis, and the first year of the
Capital Improvement Program is adopted into the City's annual Capital Budget. The City's
adopted Capital Improvements Program, which identifies capital projects, funding,
location, and the projected schedule, is included into this document as Appendix B. The
Capital Improvements Program includes current and future projects for a five year planning
period, including the amount and source of funding, and establishes priorities for future
capital projects. Although projects beyond the five year planning period are not identified
in the Capital Improvements Program, the City does evaluate projected deficiencies that
might exist beyond the planning period. As noted below, future transportation deficiencies
are projected to exist by 2025. Please see Ill.D. for more infonnation.
1.
Sanitary Sewer
LOS Standard - Systems wastewater treatment plans shall operate with a physical capacity
of no less than average daily sewage flow; effluent shall meet all federal, State and County
standards; system capacity shall collectively maintain capacity to collect and dispose of
102 percent of average daily per capita sewage system demand for previous five years.
The sanitary sewer network within the City of A ventura is an interconnected county-wide
system. The City cooperates with Miami-Dade County W ASAD to jointly develop
methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and
capacity.
According to the County's 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, in 2003 the systemwide
capacity of the County's wastewater treatment system was 352.50 million gallons per day,
which exceeded average daily demand of 310.81 million gallons per day. Moreover, the
County has maintained adequate system capacity to meet demand between 1995 and 2005.
The County has programmed $1.3 billion in capital sanitary sewer projects to ensure its
ability to continue to provide the capacity needed to address existing and projected demand
for sanitary sewer service,J5
The City, through its pennitting processes and land development regulations, and
coordination with the County, ensures that adequate wastewater transmission capacity
35 Miami-Dade County Adopted Evaluation and Appraisal Report, Miami-Dade County Department of
Planning and Zoning
195
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
exists to serve new development and redevelopment. Moreover, the City analyzes impacts
of certain development proposals (rezonings, changes in Future Land Use designations,
etc.) through the performance of concurrency management analyses as per the Concurrency
Management System. The City has met its Level of Service Standard for sanitary sewer
between the date of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit development or
redevelopment due to sanitary sewer capacity issues. The County's programmed capital
improvements and the City's continued implementation of land development regulations,
permitting processes, and the concurrency management system should ensure that the
adopted Sanitary Sewer Level of Service Standard is met through the planning periods.
The City does not anticipate any problems in meeting its sanitary sewer Level of Service
standard by 2015 or 2025.
2.
Potable Water Transmission Capacity
LOS Standard - Treatment system shall operate with a rated maximum daily capacity
which is no less than 2 percent above maximum daily flow for preceding year, and an
average daily capacity two percent above the average daily per capita system demand for
the preceding five years. Water shall be delivered to users at a pressure no less than 20
pounds per square inch and no greater than 100 pounds per square inch. Minimum Fire
Flow standards - Single Family Estate Density (n/a) - 500 gallons per minute (gpm);
Single Family and Duplex Residential on Minimum Lots if 7,599 s,f. (n/a) - 750 gpm;
Multi-Family Residential - 1,500 gpm; Hospital/Schools - 2,000 gpm; Business and
Industry - 3,000 gpm. Water quality shall meet all federal, State and County primary
standards for potable water. Systemwide storage capacity for finished water shall equal no
less than IS percent of systemwide average daily demand.
The potable water network within the City of Aventura is an interconnected county-wide
system. The City cooperates with Miami-Dade County WASAD, the North Miami Beach
Water and Sewer Department, and Miami-Dade Fire Rescue to jointly develop
methodologies and procedures for biannually updating estimates of system demand and
capacity, and to ensure sufficient capacity to serve development needs.
According to Miami-Dade County's 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report36, in 2003 the
capacity of Miami-Dade County's water system was 454.77 million gallons per day, which
exceeded average daily demand of 346.10 million gallons per day and provided adequate
capacity to meet and exceed the City's Level of Service standard. The EAR further
reported that no areas of fire flow deficiency existed in the City of Aventura. Miami-Dade
County currently has programmed $883 million in water capital improvements projects in
order to ensure its ability to continue to provide the capacity needed to address existing and
projected demand for potable water. Based on this information, the City does not
anticipate any problems in meeting and exceeding its potable water Level of Service
standard by 2015 or 2025.
36 Miami Dade County Adopted 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, Miami-Dade Department of Planning
and Zoning
196
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
The City, through its permitting processes and land development regulations, and
coordination with the County, ensures that adequate potable water capacity exists to meet
the adopted Level of Service Standard. Moreover, the City analyzes impacts of certain
development proposals (rezonings, changes in Future Land Use designations, etc.) through
the performance of concurrency management analyses as per the Concurrency
Management System, The City has met its Level of Service Standard for potable water
between the date of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit development or
redevelopment due to potable water capacity issues. The County's programmed capital
improvements and the City's continued implementation of land development regulations,
permitting processes, and the concurrency management system should ensure that the
adopted Potable Water Level of Service Standard is met through the planning periods. The
City does not anticipate any problems in meeting its Potable Water Level of Service
standard by 2015 or 2025.
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, requires the preparation ofa lO-year Water Supply Facilities
Workplan by local governments with water supply facility responsibilities. The City does
not have water supply responsibilities, as it receives its water supply through the Miami-
Dade Water and Sewer Department and the City of North Miami Beach Water and Sewer
Department. Therefore, the City will support Miami-Dade County and the City of North
Miami Beach in their implementation of the Water Supply Facilities Workplan requirement
as appropriate, and other County and City of North Miami Beach efforts to ensure that the
City's water supply needs are met.
3.
Recreation and Open Space
LOS Standard - 2.75 acres of public parks per 1,000 residents
In order to determine the amount of recreation and open space that is available for use by
residents for concurrency purposes, the City counts public parks at 100 percent, private
recreation facilities at 50 percent, and marinas and golf course at 25 percent. Based on this
. formula, the City's existing recreation and open space acreage is 114. The City is therefore
exceeding its recreation and open space Level of Service standard by 38.4 acres.
The City has met its Level of Service Standard for recreation open space between the date
of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit development or redevelopment
due to recreation and open space issues. The City anticipates that it will continue to meet
this standard through 2025 through the acquisition of required park land and open space
through its Parks Impact Fee, general funds, grants, and other methods. Moreover, the City
analyzes impacts of certain development proposals (rezonings, changes in Future Land Use
designations, etc.) through the performance of concurrency management analyses as per the
Concurrency Management System. Please see Chapter ILE. for more information.
197
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - JuIy 2005 Draft
4.
Solid Waste Collection Capacity
The County Solid Waste Management System, which includes County-owned solid waste
disposal facilities and those operated under contract with the County for disposal, shall, for
a minimum of five years, collectively maintain a solid waste disposal capacity sufficient to
accommodate waste flows committed to the system through long-range interlocal
agreements or contfacts with municipalities and private waste haulers and anticipated non-
committed waste flows.
The City requires that developers contract with private waste haulers for solid waste
disposal services. Miami-Dade County provides the disposal facilities for solid waste
collected in the City. According to the County's 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report,
the County's existing solid waste disposal system has the capacity to meet solid waste
disposal demand through 2011. The County has programmed $75.83 million in capital
solid waste disposal projects to address existing and projected demand, and to further
expand capacity, The City has met its Level of Service Standard for solid waste between
the date of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit development or
redevelopment due to solid waste collection capacity issues. The City therefore does not
anticipate any problems in meeting its solid waste Level of Service standard by 2015 or
2025.
The City, through its permitting processes, land development regulations, and concurrency
management system, ensures that adequate solid waste collection capacity exists to meet
the adopted Level of Service Standard. Moreover, the City analyzes impacts of certain
development proposals (rezonings, changes in Future Land Use designations, etc.) through
the performance of concurrency management analyses as per the Concurrency
Management System.
5.
Drainage
LOS Standard - The City's drainage Level of Service standard contains both a flood
'protection and water quality component. The minimum acceptable flood protection Level
of Service standards for Aventura shall be protection from the degree of flooding that
would result for a duration of one day from a ten year storm, with exceptions in previously
developed canal basins where additional development to this base standard would pose
risks to existing development. All structures shall have the lowest floor, including
basement, elevated no lower than one foot above the level of the base flood elevation or
eighteen inches above the highest point of the adjacent road crown elevation, whichever is
higher. The Water Quality Level of Service standard shall be met when the average annual
for each of the identified National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System pollutants does
not exceed the target criteria for such pollutants within a canal basin or sub-basin.
Under the City's Concurrency Management System, issuance of any development permit
shall require compliance with the drainage Level of Service Standard while incorporating
water quality considerations in accordance with the City's NPDES permit. Moreover, the
City analyzes impacts of certain development proposals (rezonings, changes in Future Land
198
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Use designations, etc.) through the performance of concurrency management analyses as
per the Concurrency Management System. The City has met its Level of Service Standard
for drainage between the date of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit
development Of redevelopment due to drainage issues. The City therefore does not
anticipate any problems in meeting its drainage standard by 2015 or 2025.
The City, in conjunction with such regulatory agencies as the Miami-Dade County
Department of Environmental Resources Management, South Florida Water Management
District, Biscayne Bay Management Committee, Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, works to reduce point and non-point source
pollutant loading into surface waters. The City complies with the requirements of its
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency in operating its sanitary storm sewer discharge system.
As noted in Miami-Dade County's EAR, the Miami-Dade County Department of
Environmental Resources Management is working with the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection on the establishment of anti-degradation targets, but these targets
have yet to be promulgated. The Miami-Dade EAR further states that while water quality
data obtained through the Biscayne Bay Partnership Initiative and the Biscayne Bay
Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program indicates that the quality of Biscayne Bay
waters remains high, the quality of discharge waters remains suspect, and that the impacts
of programs designed to reduce pollutant loading into the Bay will not be known until the
next EAR cycle.
6.
Traffic Circulation
The City's adopted Level of Service standards for transportation are: a minimum peak
period LOS of E on State and City roads where no public mass transit exists; where mass
transit having headways of 20 minutes or less is provided, roadways shall operate at no
greater than 120 percent of their capacity, and; where extraordinary transit service such as
commuter rail or express bus service exists, parallel roadways within Y2 mile shall operate
. at no greater than ISO percent of their capacity.
An express bus service is provided in the City between Aventura Mall and Golden Glades,
and along Biscayne Boulevard. The Level of Service standards for roadways are based on
the following definitions:
. LOS A - tree flow traffic operations at average travel speeds;
. LOS B - stable flow with other users in traffic stream;
. LOS C - uncongested with other users causing significant interactions;
. LOS D - congested stable flow with major delays;
. LOS E - very congested with traffic at or near capacity, and;
. LOS F - extremely congested with breakdown flows.
In order to determine the current levels of service on roadways in A ventura, level of service
information was taken from the Miami Dade County MPO 2030 Long Rang Transportation
Plan, which is the official transportation planning document for Miami-Dade County. It
199
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
specifies all transportation projects to be planned, designed or constructed within this time
horizon. It utilizes a complex modeling structure which integrates the most recent Census
data and traffic information, It then distributes and projects trips, volumes and levels of
service in the future. A new LRTP is developed every five years. This becomes the basis
for determining and prioritizing transportation needs. To be eligible for federal dollars,
projects must first be part of this plan.
Information indicates that at the time of the counts: Ives Dairy Road was operating at LOS
F, William Lehman Causeway was operating at LOS B, Biscayne Boulevard was operating
at LOS F, and Country Club Drive, Aventura Boulevard, Waterways Boulevard, and NE
34th Avenue, were all operating at LOS B or better. Overall, this examination determined
that there is capacity remaining on the roadway network (nearly an extra travel lane's
worth, or 2,000 trips). Nonetheless, based on the most recent available data, the City is not
meeting its roadway Level of Service standards on Biscayne Boulevard or Ives Dairy Road.
Figure III.D.l in Chapter 11.0. shows the projected levels of service on the city's roadways
during the planning period. As can be seen, it is projected that by 2030: William Lehman
Causeway will be operating at LOS B; Aventura Boulevard will be at LOS D, and; Country
Club Drive will be mainly at LOS E, with the links approaching the William Lehman
Causeway at LOS F. NE 34th Avenue will be at LOS F and Waterways Boulevard will be
at LOS E. Ives Dairy Road and Biscayne Boulevard will continue to operate at LOS F.
Therefore, it is projected that the City will not be meeting its roadway Level of Service
standards for portions of Country Club Drive, Ives Dairy Road, or Biscayne Boulevard in
2030.
Miami-Dade County's Urban Infill Area (UIA), which includes the City of Aventura, is
designated as a Transportation Concurrency Exemption Area, and is exempt from
transportation concurrency requirements. The City has therefore not had to delay or
prohibit development or redevelopment due to transportation concurrency issues between
the date of adoption and 2005. Please see Chapter I1.D. for the City's recommendation to
address its traffic circulation Level of Service during the planning period.
7.
Mass Transit
The City accepts Miami-Dade County's Mass Transit Level of Service as stated in the
1997 CDMP Capital Improvements Element and Mass Transit Subelement, which states:
the average combined population and employment density along the corridor between the
existing transit network and area of expansion exceeds 4,000 per square mile, and the
corridor is .05 miles on either side of the necessary new route extensions of the area for
expansion; it is warranted that there is sufficient demand to warrant service; the service is
economically feasible, and; the expansion to transit services into new areas is not
detrimental to existing or planned services in higher density areas with greater need.
Miami-Dade County's Mass Transit Level of Service standards has been updated to state
that al areas within the Urban Development Boundary with a combined resident and work-
force population of more than 10,000 persons per square mile shaU be provided with
200
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
minimum peak-hour mass transit service having 60-minute headways and an average route-
spacing of one mile. According to the County's 2003 Evaluation and Appraisal Report, all
areas of Miami-Dade County, including the City of Aventura, are meting or exceeding the
adopted LOS standard for mass transit. The City has met its Level of Service Standard for
mass transit between the date of adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit
development or redevelopment due to mass transit capacity issues. The City does not
anticipate any problems in meeting its mass transit Level of Service standard by 2015 or
2025.
8.
Police Protection
The City's Police Protection Level of Service Standard does not include numerical
measures, but references establishment of Police Impact Fee. As noted in Chapter II.E.,
between 1997 and 2005 the number of sworn police officers in the City of Aventura
increased from 49 to 76. The City's crime rate has decreased rapidly during that period, as
is demonstrated on Table II.E.3 in Chapter II.E.
In order to maintain and improve the quality of its police services, and ensure that new
development pays its fair share for increased police services that will be necessitated by
such development, the City collects a Police Fee as per Article IV., Division 5 of its Code
of Ordinances. Under these requirements, developers must pay $96.47 per residential unit
and $.140 per square foot of non-residential development. Between FY 04 and FY 09, it is
projected that the police impact fee will generate revenues of $614,250. These funds are
eannarked for capital outlay items such as new equipment necessitated by increased
demand.
The City has met its Level of Service Standard for police protection between the date of
adoption and 2005, and has not had to delay or prohibit development or redevelopment due
to police protection issues. The City does not anticipate any problems in meeting its police
protection Level of Service standard by 2015 or 2025.
9.
Fire Protection
The City's Fire Protection Level of Service Standard is the County's standard for the
provision of fire-rescue services to the City. As noted in Chapter II.E., fire service in the
City of Aventura is provided by the Miami-Dade County Fire Rescue Department. The
City coordinates with the County in order to maintain and improve the quality of fire
rescues service that it provides to the City and its residents. The average fire rescue
response time in Miami-Dade County is currently estimated to be between eight and nine
minutes. The average response time in the City is six to eight minutes.37
37 City of Aventura, Emergency Services Response, City Commission Workshop Agenda, Apri121, 2005
201
DRAFT
c.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Coordination of Land Use and Public School Planning
The City of Aventura has coordinated its Comprehensive Plan with existing and planned
public schools as per statutory requirements since the date of adoption. As prescribed, the
School Board would provide the City with a letter asking for a finding of consistency with
the Comprehensive Plan before acquisition of school sites within the City, and the City
would respond in the required timetrame. Additionally, the School Board has provided the
City with copies of its Five Year Plans.
1.
Interlocal Agreement for Joint Public School Facility Planning
In February 2003 the City, along with 28 other municipalities, Miami-Dade County and
Miami-Dade County Public Schools entered into the Interlocal Agreement for Public
School Facility Planning In Miami-Dade County. This far-reaching collaborative
agreement, which was mandated by Sections 163.31777 and 1013.33 of the Florida
Statutes, allows for better coordination in the educational facilities decision making
process.
Key requirements of the Interlocal Agreemen¡38 are outlined as follows:
.
The establishment of a staff working group comprised of the County
Mayor/Manager and/or his designee, the School Board Superintendent and/or his
designee, and City Mayors/Managers and their designees to meet on an annual basis
to: discuss issues and formulate recommendations regarding public school issues;
provide M-DCPS with input and recommendations on the Educational Facilities
Plan, Educational Plant Survey, and the need for new facilities and expansion,
renovation, and closure of existing facilities; and to identify opportunities for the
co-location and/or shared-use of civic and school facilities.
.
The coordination of a joint annual workshop with elected officials of the School
Board, County, and municipalities to discuss public school issues.
.
The development of coordinated projections of the amount, type, and distribution of
population growth.
.
Expansion ofM-DCPS' standing School Site Planning and Construction Committee
by four (4) voting members to include "a floating member of the most impacted
municipality to which the agenda item relates", a "representative appointed by the
Miami-Dade County League of Cities", a representative trom Miami-Dade County,
and "a member ofthe residential building industry".
38 lnlerlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County, 3/05/03
202
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
.
The County and municipalities must invite a non-voting representative appointed by
the School Board to attend meetings of the local planning agencies at which
development requests that will impact public school enrollments are considered.
.
The County and municipalities must notify M-DCPS of proposed land use
applications and development proposals that affect student enrollment.
2.
Charter Schools
[n 1996, the State of Florida enacted legislation that provided for the creation of charter
schools, non-profit corporations that are typically operated by a group of parents, teachers,
an organization, a municipality, universities, and/or a combination of more than one group.
There are many reasons to establish a charter school but as outlined in the Board Rule the
major reasons are: to improve student learning, to increase learning opportunities for all
students with special emphasis on expanded learning experiences for academically low
achieving students; to encourage use of innovative learning methods; to increase choices of
learning opportunities for students; to establish a new fonTI of accountability for schools; to
require the measurement of learning outcomes and create innovative measurement tools; to
make the school the unit for improvement; and to create new professional opportunities for
teachefs.39
A charter school is bound by the requirements of Sections 228.056, 230.22 and .23, Florida
Statutes and Miami-Dade County School Board Rule 6Gx 13.6A.I.47 and must be reviewed
and approved by the School Board. They are also fully recognized public schools.
On August 25, 2003, the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School opened as the first
municipally sponsored charter school in Miami-Dade County. Located at 3333 NE 188
Street, the Aventura City of Excellence Charter School serves up to 600 students between
kindergarten and fifth grade. In its short history the school has become an important
component of the community, and a source of great civic pride. Its success is evidenced by
a return rate of over 99 percent and A rating. The school operates as a City Department,
'and its Principal reports to the City Manager. The school demonstrates the City's
commitment to ensuring the quality of life of existing and future residents. The City is
currently expanding the Aventura City of Exce\1ence Charter School to serve 6th grade
students by 2005, 7th grade students by 2006, and 8th grade students by 2007 increasing the
student capacity to 900.
3.
Miami-Dade County Working Group on Public Schools Overcrowding Relief
The City of A ventura faces a number of specific challenges regarding public schools. As a
result of current development and redevelopment trends, the City's population is
expanding, as is the demand for school facilities. A number of the County's school
facilities are overcrowded, and new schools cannot be provided quickly enough to meet the
demand for new student stations. As noted earlier, the City has few remaining vacant and
39 The School Board of Miami-Dade County, Florida Board Rules
203
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
developable parcels, which limits the availability of land for new school construction. In
response to the overcrowding problem that is plaguing many County schools, in September
2003 Miami-Dade County and the Miami-Dade School Board established the Miami-Dade
County Working Group on Public Schools Overcrowding Relief.
In October 2004, the task force adopted a final report for submission to the Miami-Dade
Board of County Commissioners and School Board. Key recommendations include:
levying additional documentary stamp fees on the sale or resale of homes for school
construction; exempting the cost of a parking garage trom the cost per student station
restriction when building a new facility; establishing criteria for allowing the conversion of
non-school structures into public education facilities; revising the educational "amenities"
that are required at public schools to save time, money and space; siting schools along
existing and future transit corridors; pufsuing Educational Facilities Benefit Districts in
areas of substantial growth; and periodic review of the County Educational Facilities
Impact Fee Ordinance.
Of particular interest to the City of A ventura are strategies to reduce the land requirements
for public schools, which would otherwise preclude new schools from being constructed in
many areas of the City. Allowances for multi-story schools, the location of schools along
transit corridors, promoting the joint use of facilities, and allowing the conversion of non-
school structures into public education facilities are all examples of strategies to provide
new or expanded public schools despite the scarcity of vacant, developable land.
4.
Educational Facilities Impact Fee
Miami-Dade County's Educational Facilities Impact Fee imposes an impact fee on new
residential development throughout the County in order to offset some of the costs of
providing student stations to accommodate the additional demand for student stations
created by such development. An ongoing concern with the Educational Facilities Impact
Fee is that the County's three designated benefit districts are too large to ensure that
moneys collected are expended at the schools most directly impacted by the development.
A key recommendation of the Miami-Dade County Working Group on Public Schools
Overcrowding Relief calls for the periodic review of the Public Educational Facilities
Impact Fee Ordinance. Refining the benefit districts to ensure the equitable distribution of
impact fees should be a paramount issue in the City's review of the Ordinance.
204
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
D.
Consistency with Growth Management Laws
Section 163.3191 (2)(f), F.S., requires that the Evaluation and Appraisal Report evaluate
relevant changes in growth management laws since the date of the Comprehensive Plan's
adoption for consistency with the Aventura Comprehensive Plan. This evaluation was
conducted based on the date that the Comprehensive Plan (1998). The following
summarizes the results of this review.
1.
State Comprehensive Plan
The City of Aventura's adopted Comprehensive Plan and proposed 2005 Evaluation and
Appraisal Report were reviewed in order to ensure consistency with the adopted State of
Florida Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, Florida Statutes). This review indicates that the
adopted City of Aventura's Comprehensive Plan and proposed EAR are in compliance with
and address the intent of applicable State Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and
policies. No additional amendments to address compliance with the State Comprehensive
Plan are deemed to be necessary at this time.
2.
Chapter 163, Florida Statutes
A table indicating the manner in which the City of Aventura is addressing the requirements
of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, that were in place as of 2004 is attached as Appendix C.
In addition, in May 2005 the State of Florida adopted additional amendments to Chapter
163 and its growth management requirements. The 2005 amendments were separately
reviewed to identify impacts to the Comprehensive Plan. Please see Chapters 11.0. and
II.E. for the City's response to the new requirements regarding Transportation Concurrency
Exception Areas, public school concurrency, and public school facilities elements. In
addition, the new requirements direct that the City's Capital Improvements Program be
adopted into the Capital Improvements Element, and that the City's Comprehensive Plan
be amended annually to reflect Capital Improvements Program updates. Based on a review
'of the Table in Appendix C. and the 2005 amendments, the following additional
Comprehensive Plan amendments are recommended:
a.
Future Land Use Element
Recommendation lV.D.1. It is recommended that the Future Land Use Element be
amended to include a new Policy under Objective 5 to address criteria for ensuring
compatibility of new development or redevelopment with military installations, as required
by s. 163.3177, F.S. The Policy should note that while there are no military installations
within Or proximate to the City at present, the City will adhere to State statutory
requirements to ensure compatibility of new development and redevelopment with military
operations if a military installation is located within or within one-half mile of its
boundaries in the future.
205
DRAFT
b.
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Coastal Management and Conservation Element
Recommendation IV.D.Z. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Conservation Objective 8 of the Coastal Management and Conservation Element to provide
for the following:
c.
.
The City shall support, as appropriate, Miami-Dade County and the City of North
Miami Beach in their development and implementation of the Water Supply
Facilities Workplan required by Florida Statute, and the water conservation efforts
of other agencies.
Capital Improvements Element
Recommendation IV.D.3. The City's Capital Improvements Program (Appendix B)
should be fonnally adopted into the City's Capital Improvements Element, and future
updates to the Capital Improvements Program should be adopted into the Comprehensive
Plan by amendment on an annual basis.
d.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Recommendation IV.D.4. Policy 1.1 states that Aventura will make full use of
coordination mechanisms to ensure consistency between its Comprehensive Plan and the
comprehensive plans of adjacent jurisdictions. It is recommended that this Policy be
amended to insert "and any Campus Master Plan that will impact or be impacted by the
City" at the end of the Policy".
Recommendation IV.D.5. In addition, it is recommended that new policies providing
for the following be included under Objective I.
.
In accordance with the adopted "Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility
Planning in Miami-Dade County", the City shall participate as appropriate in
Miami-Dade County Public School's School Site Planning and Construction
Committee, and shall seek, where feasible and mutually acceptable, to collocate
schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers
to the extent possible.
.
The City shall utilize the procedures called for in the "Interlocal Agreement for
Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County" and Sections 1013.33,
F.S., in order to evaluate the appropriateness of prospective public school sites
within the City.
. The City will annually review Miami-Dade County Public School's Tentative
District Educational Facilities Plan and the 5-Year Workplan, as provided for in the
"Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County".
This review will include an analysis of the Tentative District Educational Facilities
206
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Plan and the 5-Year Workplan's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and the
identification of any necessary Comprehensive Plan amendments.
It is recommended that new policies be added under Objective 2 of the Intergovernmental
Coordination Element to provide for the following:
.
The City shall support, as appropriate, Miami-Dade County's development and
implementation of the Water Supply Facilities Workplan required by Florida
Statute, and the water conservation efforts of other agencies.
3.
Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code
A table indicating the manner in which the City of Aventura is addressing the requirements
of Rule Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, is attached as Appendix D. Based on a
review of this Table, the following amendments are recommended.
a.
Intergovernmental Coordination Element
Recommendation IV.D.6. Policy l.l states that Aventura will make full use of
coordination mechanisms to ensure consistency between its Comprehensive Plan and the
comprehensive plans of adjacent jurisdictions. It is recommended that this Policy be
amended to insert "and any Campus Master Plan that will impact or be impacted by the
City" at the end of the Policy".
4.
Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida
The City of Aventura's adopted Comprehensive Plan was reviewed to ensure consistency
and compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of South Florida Regional Planning
Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan of South Florida (SRPPSFj, which was adopted
on June 7, 2004 and became effective on July 7, 2004. This review indicates that the City's
adopted Comprehensive Plan is in compliance with and addresses the intent of the
SRPPSF, as revised, and that no further amendments are needed to ensure consistency.
207
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
CHAPTER V.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The following Chapter includes a complete listing of the Evaluation and Appraisal Report
recommendations by Element. These recommendations are made as a result of the
evaluation and appraisal of the Aventura Comprehensive Plan that is documented in
Chapters II., III., and IV. Please refer to these chapters for more infonnation about the
reasons that specific recommendations are being made,
A.
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
Amend the Future Land Use Element as follows:
Recommendation LU-I. A number of the major issues facing the City, including
building heights, concerns over the intensity of development, and ensuring compatibility
between existing neighborhoods and new development and redevelopment, must be
addressed through the City's land development regulations, It is therefore recommended
that a new Objective and policies be added to the Future Land Use Element to state that by
2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to provide
a cohesive blueprint for development and redevelopment in the City. The revised land
development regulations shall address strategies to:
. accommodate growth while maintaining neighborhood integrity;
. ensure appropriate height and site development requirements and design guidelines;
. ensure appropriate transitions and linkages between different neighborhoods and
uses;
encourage more walkable neighborhoods;
buffer neighborhoods and existing development from the encroachment of
incompatible uses;
limit the intensity of future development and redevelopment in a manner that is
consistent with current development patterns, and that minimizes further negative
impacts to the City's infrastructure, traffic congestion, hurricane evacuation
clearance times, and quality oflife, and;
prevent redevelopment of a parcel in a manner that would significantly increase its
existing intensity or density, unless redevelopment of said parcel will implement
specific development and redevelopment goals that are Of that might be established
for particular areas.
.
.
.
.
Recommendation LU-2. Policy l.l defines the City's residential land categories. It is
recommended that Policy 1.1 be amended to the following:
. under the Medium Density land use category delete "authorizes apartment
buildings ranging" and replace with "allows a range in density". Also, add the
following to the end of the second sentence ", but may also include single family
detached, duplexes, triplexes and quadruplexes"
. under the Medium-High Density category delete "authorizes apartment buildings
ranging from" and replace with "allows a range in density". Add the following new
sentences: "The type of housing structure typically pennitted in this category
includes low, medium and high-rise apartments, but may also include single family
208
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
detached, duplexes, triplexes, quadruplexes and townhouses. Additionally, the
height of buildings and attainment of densities approaching the maximum shall
also be contingent on the ability of the developer to ensure appropriate transitions
and buffers with the surrounding neighborhood, and to alleviate impacts that will
adversely impact service levels and quality of life."
Recommendation LU-3. Policy 1.2 defines the City's non-residential land use
categories. It is recommended that Policy 1.2 be amended to:
.
Add text to the Business and Office Category to state that the maximum intensity
allowable on a given site shall also be contingent on the ability of the developer to
ensure appropriate transitions and buffers with the surrounding neighborhood, and
to alleviate impacts that will adversely impact service levels of service and quality
of life;
.
Add text to the Town Center Category to clarify that such centefs are not intended
to be Regional Activity Centers, but are instead intended to primarily serve the
City's existing and future residents and businesses, and;
.
Add a Water Category which clarifies that areas designated Water provide
numerous benefits to the City of A ventura and are an important component of the
City's multi-modal transportation network, stormwater drainage infrastructure, and
natural and built environments. It should specify that the use of these areas shall be
limited to recreational and commercial boating facilities (including water taxis and
ferries), the provision of open space and urban relief, recreation, waterways,
wetlands, flood control, stormwater drainage and storage, and natural resource
protection and enhancement, and comply with the requirements of Chapter 24,
"Environmental Protection...", of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. It
should further state that development in or above such areas in a manner that will
diminish these functions shall be prohibited, and that development and
redevelopment adjacent to these areas shall include provisions to enhance these
functions where appropriate,
Recommendation LU-4. Policy 2, I states that in planning and designing development
and redevelopment, the City shall enforce the guidelines contained in the Comprehensive
Plan's Urban Design Element. It is recommended that this Policy be revised to replace the
reference to "Urban Design Element" with "redevelopment plans, the Redevelopment
Element, and land development regulations".
Recommendation LU-S. Policy 2.4 addresses the designation of sites and use of
landscaping materials in public projects, an important consideration in development and
redevelopment. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to call for the use of native
landscaping materials where feasible and appropriate in public projects,
Recommendation LU-6. Objective 3 states that decisions regarding the location,
extent, and intensity of future land use in Aventufa will be based on environmental
209
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
conditions and the financial feasibility of providing services at levels that meet or exceed
adopted levels of service by 2005. lt is recommended that this Policy be amended to
update the date to 20 IS, and to expand the text to also state that decisions regarding the
location, extent and future land use in Aventura will be based on compatibility with and the
minimization of adverse impacts on existing neighborhoods, and the ability to maintain the
hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12 hours or less.
Recommendation LV-7. Policy 3.1 states that development orders authorizing new or
significantly expanded land uses shall be contingent upon the provision of services at or
above adopted level of service standards specified in the Capital Improvement Element. It
is recommended that this Policy be amended to add "and the ability to maintain the
hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12 hours or less" after "Element".
Recommendation LV-8. Objective 5 states that by 2005 Aventura shall reduce the
number of existing uses that are inconsistent with the uses designated in the Future Land
Use Plan Map. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to update the date to 2015,
and to state that the City shall continue to reduce the number of land uses inconsistent with
the uses designated on the LUP Map.
Recommendation LV-9. Policy 5.1 identifies a number of factors that the City will
consider in evaluating compatibility among proximate land uses. It is recommended that
this Policy be amended to include the existing character and function of the surrounding
neighborhood, consistency with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and
specific neighborhood development and redevelopment plans in the list of factors to be
considered in compatibility evaluations.
Recommendation LV-IO. Policy 5.2 states that residential neighborhoods shall be
protected trom the intrusion of uses that will disrupt the neighborhood. [t is recommended
that this Policy be amended to remove the word residential, as all neighborhoods should be
provided with this protection, regardless of function.
Recommendation LV-II. It is recommended that the Future Land Use Element be
amended to include a new Policy under Objective 5 to address criteria for ensuring
compatibility of new development or redevelopment with military installations, as required
by s. 163.3177, F.S. The Policy should note that while there are no military installations
within or proximate to the City at present, the City will adhere to State statutory
requirements to ensure compatibility of new development and redevelopment with military
operations if a military installation is located within or within one-half mile of its
boundaries in the future.
Recommendation LV-l2. Objective 6 states that upon adoption of the Comprehensive
Plan, all public and private activities regarding the use, development and redevelopment of
land shall be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's goals, objectives, and policies. It is
recommended that this Policy be amended to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan
has been adopted.
210
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Recommendation LV-B. Policy 8.1 calls for the City to establish opportunities to
amend the Comprehensive Plan. It is recommended that this Policy be amended to reflect
the City's established procedures for Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Recommendation LV-14. Policy 8.2 specifies the criteria by which applications to
amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be evaluated. It is recommended that "impacts on the
City's ability to maintain the hurricane evacuation clearance times of 12 hours or less" be
added to the list of criteria.
Recommendation LV-IS. Policy 9.1 states that the City shall maintain and enhance
regulations governing the use and development ofland. It is recommended that this Policy
be amended to include protecting and minimizing negative impacts to the character and
function of the surrounding neighborhoods to the list of items that are regulated by the land
development regulations.
Recommendation LV-16. Policy 9.3 states that the City shall enact land development
regulations within one year of adopting its Comprehensive Plan. It is recommended that
this Policy be updated to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan and land
development regulations have been adopted, but may be amended ITom time to time.
Recommendation LV-17. Objective I I states that upon adoption of the Plan, the
location, design and management of development and redevelopment shall ensure the
protection of natural resources and systems. It is recommended that this Objective be
amended to reflect the fact that the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted.
Recommendation LV-IS. Objective 12 states that the City shall coordinate its coastal
planning area population densities with the South Florida Regional Planning Council and
Miami-Dade County Office of Emergency Management. It is recommended that this
Objective be amended to state that the City shall coordinate its coastal planning area
population densities with the South Florida Regional Planning Council, Miami-Dade
County Office of Emergency Management, and adjacent jurisdictions.
Recommendation LV-19. Policy 12.1 states that all proposed Comprehensive Plan
amendments that increase population density shall be analyzed for impacts on hurricane
evacuation routes and times included in the 1996 South Florida Regional Hurricane
Evacuation Study. It is recommended that this Policy be revised to state that the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments that increase population density shall be analyzed for
impacts on hurricane evacuation routes and times based on the best and most recent
available South Florida Regional Planning Council data regarding hurricane evacuation
clearance times in the City.
Recommendation LV-20. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Objective 12 stating that by 2007, the City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to
ensure that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in hurricane evacuation
clearance time formulas, and encourage the use of consistent evacuation clearance time
standards by northeast Miami-Dade County municipalities,
211
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Recommendation LU-21. It is recommended that Policy FLU-13.! be amended to
delete "by December 31, 1999", and amended to read "The City shall continue to
coordinate".
Recommendation LU-22. Amend the Future Land Use Plan Map to delete the proposed
Community Facility depicted adjacent to the proposed Park in the northwest area of the
City (Hospital District).
212
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
B.
TRANSPORT AnON ELEMENT RECOMMENDA nONS
Amend the Transportation Element as follows:
Recommendation T-l. Add a new Objective to the Transportation Element stating
that by 2007, the City shall review and amend its land development regulations in order to
provide a cohesive blueprint for development and redevelopment in the City, ensure that
new development and redevelopment does not further degrade transportation levels of
service within the City, and enhance mobility options for existing and future residents.
Recommendation T-2. Add a new Policy under Objective 1 stating that beginning in
2006, the City shall annually evaluate the impact of its Transportation Concurrency
Exception Area on Strategic Intermodal System facilities and the adopted level of service
standards of transportation facilities that are funded in accordance with Section 339.2812,
F.S. If it is determined that the Transportation Concurrency Exception Area is no longer
adequate, the City shall explore the implementation of more impactful transportation
management tools.
Recommendation T-3. Add a new Policy under Objective 1 of the Transportation
Element stating that the City will continue to identity projects to support and fund mobility,
enhance alternative modes of transportation, and ensure connectivity in its Capital
Improvements Program in accordance with Section 163.3180, F.S.
Recommendation T-4. Add a new Policy under Objective I stating that beginning in
2006, the City shall evaluate the impacts of proposed development and redevelopment on
its transportation system, Strategic Intermodal System facilities, and the adopted level of
service standards of transportation facilities that are funded in accordance with Section
339.2812, F.S., and identify strategies to alleviate or mitigate such impacts.
Recommendation T-5. Add a new Policy under Objective 1 stating that by 2007 the
City will develop impacts fees and other methods by which developers can mitigate
impacts to the transportation system by contributing funds for alternative modes of
transportation, particularly the expansion, operation and maintenance of the Circulator
System.
Recommendation T-6. Amend Policies 1.1 and 1.2 to replace the references to the
"Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Plan, Traffic Circulation Subelement
1997, Objective 1 Policy IB" with "Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development
Master Plan".
Recommendation T-7. Amend Policy 3.2 to delete "upon adoption of this element
and the Intergovernmental Coordination Element".
Recommendation T-8. Amend the Monitoring Measure under Objective 4 to delete
or update the reference to the year and percent.
213
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Recommendation T-9.
the Comprehensive Plan".
Amend Policy 4.1 to delete "within one year of adoption of
214
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
c.
PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT
Amend the Parks and Recreation Element as follows:
Recommendation PR-l. Objective 2 states that the City will coordinate the provision
of public and private resources to meet recreation demands within one year of Plan
adoption. It is recommended that this Objective be amended to state that the City will
continue to coordinate the provision of public and private resources to meet recreation
demands, and that the reference to "within one year of Plan adoption" be deleted.
Recommendation PR-2. Policy 2.1 states that there were no recreation system
deficiencies at the date of the Comprehensive Plan's adoption. It is recommended that this
Policy be amended to state that the City will continue to ensure that it meets and exceeds its
established Level of Service Standard for Recreation and Open Space through the
Concurrency Management System, the collection of Park Impacts Fees, and other
strategies.
Recommendation PR-3. Policy 3.1 states that the City will develop land development
regulations to include appropriate definitions of open space needs and standards. It is
recommended that this Policy be amended to state that the City will continue to ensure that
open space requirements for new development and redevelopment are met through the
implementation and enforcement of its land development regulations.
215
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
D.
HOUSING ELEMENT
Amend the Housing Element as follows:
Recommendation H-l. Objective I and its policies address strategies to create and
preserve affordable housing for all existing and future City residents. It is recommended
that a new Policy be added under Objective I to state that the City shall support public and
private sector efforts to provide an adequate supply of housing units that are affordable to
households of all incomes in proportions that are reflective of the housing demand and
needs. It should further state that developers are encouraged to provide a variety of
housing types, including housing affordable to City residents of all income levels, in
residential projects and communities.
Recommendation H-2. Objective 3 addresses the availability of sites for affordable
housing, and states that due to the scarcity of land and high land values, affordable housing
units will be distributed. It is recommended that this Objective be amended to state that
"due to high and increasing property values and the scarcity of developable land, the City
will coordinate with the private sector in order to encourage the provision of a variety of
housing types, including housing affordable to City residents of all income levels, in
residential and Town Center communities throughout the City".
Recommendation H-3. Policy 3.1 states that the land development regulations will
include appropriate criteria to allow diverse housing types. It is recommended that this
Policy be amended to add "including housing affordable to City residents of all income
levels" after "type".
216
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
E.
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Amend the Infrastructure Element as follows:
Recommendation I-I. Amend Policy 2.2 under Infrastructure Goal I, Objective 2 to
delete "by 2000," and to read "The City of Aventura and Miami-Dade Water and Sewer
Department".
Recommendation 1-2. Amend Policy 1.2 under Infrastructure Goal 2, Objective I to
delete "by 2003," and to read "shall continue to be identified".
Recommendation 1-3.
to update the date to 2008.
Amend Policy 1.1 under the Solid Waste Goal, Objective I,
217
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
F.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Amend the Capital Improvements Element as follows:
Recommendation CI-l.
Amend Objective CI-I to delete "upon adoption of the Plan".
Recommendation CI-2. Amend Policy CI-1.5 to delete "by 2001", and to delete the
reference to public works facilities.
Recommendation CI-3. Objective 2 states that land use decisions will be made in the
context of available fiscal resources in order to ensure that scheduling and providing capital
facilities for new development will not degrade adopted service levels. It is recommended
that this Objective be amended to include "or negatively impact hurricane evacuation
clearance times".
Recommendation CI-4. Policy 2.1 states that capital facilities and infrastructure
implications ofland use and development plan implementation will be analyzed based on a
number of factors, including elimination of below standard conditions and capacity deficits.
It is recommended that this Policy be amended to include "maintenance or reduction of
hurricane evacuation clearance times" in the list of factors, and to delete "upon adoption of
the Plan".
Recommendation CI-5. Objective 3 states that future development will be permitted
only when adopted levels of service standards for services listed in the Capital
Improvements Element will me upgraded or maintained. It is recommended that this
Policy be amended to state that "future development will be pem1itted only when adopted
levels of service standards for services listed in the Capital Improvements Element will be
upgraded or maintained or when demonstrated negative impacts on hurricane evacuation
clearance times will be mitigated by ensuring that adequate fiscal resources are made
available, including the proportionate costs of improvement necessitated by the
development".
Recommendation CI-6. The City's Capital Improvements Program (Appendix A)
should be formally adopted into the City's Capital Improvements Element, and future
updates to the Capital Improvements Program should be adopted into the Comprehensive
Plan by amendment on an annual basis.
218
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
G.
INTER GOVERNMENT AL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Amend the Intergovernmental Coordination Element as follows:
Recommendation IC-I. Objectives I and 3 of the Intergovernmental Coordination
Element, and policies thereunder, address joint land use planning with other jurisdictions,
It is recommended that new policies be added under Objective I and Objective 3 to call for
increased coordination with adjacent jurisdictions to ensure compatible development and
redevelopment, and address the unique challenges and opportunities that face northeast
Miami-Dade and southeast Broward counties.
Recommendation IC-2. Objective 1 addresses coordination with other local
governments to identify opportunities for affordable housing. It is recommended that a
new Policy stating that the City shall incorporate the recommendations of the joint Florida
Department of Community Affairs/South Florida Regional Planning Council "Regional
Affordable Housing Strategy" in its Comprehensive Plan, as appropriate, after the final
recommendations are issued.
Recommendation IC-3. Objective 4 states that the City will ensure adequate and
timely shelter within the region for residents of evacuation areas. It is recommended that
this Objective be revised to state that the City will coordinate with the appropriate agencies
to implement strategies to maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times to 12 hours of
less, ensure that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in hurricane evacuation
clearance time formulas, and ensure adequate and timely evacuation routes and shelter
within the region for residents of evacuation areas.
Recommendation IC-4. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Objective 4 stating that the City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to ensure
that updated data and methodologies are being utilized in hurricane evacuation clearance
time formulas, and encourage the use of consistent evacuation clearance time standards by
northeast Miami-Dade County municipalities.
Recommendation IC-5. Policy 1.1 states that Aventura will make full use of
coordination mechanisms to ensure consistency between its Comprehensive Plan and the
comprehensive plans of adjacent jurisdictions. It is recommended that this Policy be
amended to insert "and any Campus Master Plan that will impact or be impacted by the
City" at the end ofthe Policy".
Recommendation IC-6. In addition, it is recommended that new policies providing
for the following be included under Objective 1.
.
In accordance with the adopted "Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility
Planning in Miami-Dade County", the City shall participate as appropriate in
Miami-Dade County Public School's School Site Planning and Construction
Committee, and shall seek, where feasible and mutually acceptable, to collocate
219
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
schools with other public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers
to the extent possible,
.
The City shall utilize the procedures called for in the "lnterlocal Agreement for
Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County" and Sections 1013,33,
F.S., in order to evaluate the appropriateness of prospective public school sites
within the City.
. The City will annually review Miami-Dade County Public School's Tentative
District Educational Facilities Plan and the 5- Year Workplan, as provided for in the
"lnterlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning in Miami-Dade County".
This review will include an analysis of the Tentative District Educational Facilities
Plan and the 5-Year Workplan's consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and the
identification of any necessary Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Recommendation IC-7. It is recommended that new policies be added under
Objective 2 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to provide for the following:
.
The City shall support, as appropriate, Miami-Dade County's and North Miami
Beach's development and implementation of the Water Supply Facilities Workplan
required by Florida Statute, and the water conservation efforts of other agencies.
Recommendation IC-S. Policy 1.1 states that A ventura will make full use of
coordination mechanisms to ensure consistency between its Comprehensive Plan and the
comprehensive plans of adjacent jurisdictions. It is recommended that this Policy be
amended to insert "and any Campus Master Plan that will impact or be impacted by the
City" at the end of the Policy".
220
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
H.
CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Amend the Conservation and Coastal Management Element as follows:
Recommendation CCM-l. Delete the reference to "within one year of Plan adoption" in
Policy 6.1 under the Coastal Management Goal.
Recommendation CCM-2. Objective 10 and policies 10.1 through 10.20 address the
City's post-disaster redevelopment plan. It is recommended that Objective lObe amended
to state that the City shall implement pre- and post-emergency procedures in accordance
with its adopted Emergency Procedures Manual, as it is amended from time to time. The
policies thereunder should be replaced by policies that reflect the currently adopted plan
and procedures, as outlined in this Chapter II.c., and to also reference Section 31-3 of the
Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances in Policy 10.9.
Recommendation CCM-3. Objective 12 of the Conservation & Coastal Management
Element, and policies 12.1 through 12.7, address protection of the City's shorelines and
water dependent uses. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under Objective 12 to
state that the use of areas designated Water on the Future Land Use Plan Map shall be
limited to recreational and commercial boating (including water taxis and ferries), the
provision of open space and urban relief, recreation, stonnwater drainage, and natural
resource protection and enhancement, and comply with the requirements of Chapter 24,
"Environmental Protection... ", of the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances. It should
further state that development in or above such areas in a manner that will diminish these
functions shall be prohibited.
Recommendation CCM-4. Delete the reference to "prior to 200 I" in Policy 12.2 under
the Coastal Management Goal, Objective 12.
Recommendation CCM-5. Update the date in Objective 5 under the Conservation Goal
to 2015.
Recommendation CCM-6. Delete the reference to "prior to 2005" in Policy 5.2 under
the Conservation Goal.
Recommendation CCM-7. Delete Policy 5.4 under Objective 5 of the Conservation
Goal, as it is no longer applicable or relevant.
Recommendation CCM-8. It is recommended that a new Policy be added under
Conservation Objective 8 of the Coastal Management and Conservation Element to provide
for the following:
.
The City shall support, as appropriate, Miami-Dade County and the City of North
Miami Beach in their development and implementation of the Water Supply
Facilities Workplan required by Florida Statute, and the water conservation efforts
of other agencies.
221
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
Recommendation CCM-9. Delete the reference to "upon Plan adoption" from Policy 8.2
under the Conservation Goal.
222
DRAFT
City of A ventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
I.
REDEVELOPMENT ELEMENT
Consolidate and expand the Economic Development and Urban Design eIements into a
new Redevelopment Element that ineIudes goals, objectives and policies that provide for
the fonowing:
Recommendation R-l. By 2007, the City shan review and amend its land
development regulations in order to provide a cohesive blueprint for development and
redevelopment in the City. The revised land development regulations shan address
strategies to:
. accommodate growth while maintaining neighborhood integrity;
. ensure appropriate height and site development requirements and design guideIines;
. ensure appropriate transitions and linkages between different neighborhoods and
uses;
. encourage more walkable neighborhoods;
. buffer neighborhoods and existing development from the encroachment of
incompatible uses;
. Iimit the intensity of future deveIopment and redeveIopment in a manner that is
consistent with current development patterns, and that minimizes further negative
impacts to the City's infrastructure, traffic congestion, hunicane evacuation
clearance times, and quaIity ofIife, and;
. prevent redevelopment of a parcel in a manner that would significantly increase its
existing intensity or density, unless redevelopment of said parcel wiII implement
specific deveIopment and redevelopment goals that are or that might be established
for particular areas.
Recommendation R-2. The City shan coordinate with the private sector and other
agencies as appropriate, to implement strategies to market the City of Aventura as a
location for new businesses, promote the retention and expansion of existing
businesses, ensure an adequate supply of non-residential land uses to address economic
development goals, provide services and employment opportunities to existing and
future residents, and coordinate economic development, development, and
redevelopment goals;
Recommendation R-3. By 2007, the City shan refine development/design guidelines
through the land development regulations for the Town Center that provides for its
redeveIopment as a design-unified downtown that primarily serves City residents. The
Town Center shan be characterized by a mixture of different urban functions integrated
horizontany and verticany, multi-modal transportation access and circulation, and high
quality urban design;
Recommendation R-4. By 2007, the City shan review and amend its land
development regulations in order to reduce potential development/redeveIopment
intensities on the Biscayne Boulevard conidor. The City should also evaluate
strategies to improve the Biscayne Boulevard conidor through cohesive design and
deveIopment patterns, the appropriate redevelopment of underutilized parcels.
223
DRAFT
City of Aventura 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal Report - July 2005 Draft
CHAPTER VI.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SUMMARY
In 1998, the State of Florida revised the statutory requirements for the EAR to allow local
governments to base their analysis on the key local issues that they are facing. In order to
comply with these requirements, and in recognition of the complicated and diverse range of
planning issues that the City of Aventura is currently facing, the City initiated its EAR
process with a public workshop on December 16, 2004, and conducted an interagency
scoping meeting with members of State, regional and County agencies and representatives
of adjacent municipalities on December 20, 2004. A Local Planning Agency Workshop
was conducted on April 25, 2005.
Based on input received via this process, the City of Aventura identified six major issues
for inclusion in the EAR. On January 14,2005 the City provided the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) with a request for a Letter of Understanding regarding these
issues, and the City's proposed Scope of Work (Appendix A). On February 2,2005, DCA
provided the City with a Letter of Understanding agreeing to the proposed issues and
Scope.
224
APPENDIX A. DCA LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING
AND SCOPE OF WORK
RECEIVED
'[
"
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT
OF
COMMUNITY
COMMUN'TY OEVELO?MUH
AFFAIRS
H Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home'
lEO BUSH
Go",,"or
THADDEUS L COHEN, AlA
Secreta')'
February 2, 2005
Ms. Joanne Carr AICP, Director
City of Adventura Planning Department
19200 West Country Club Drive
Adventura, Florida 33180
Dear Ms. Carr:
The Department of Community Affairs has reviewed your letter of January 14, which
outlines the scope of work for the preparation ofthe City's Evaluation and Appraisal Report
(EAR). The Department agrees with the summary of the issues as set forth in the attached
document. This letter serves as confinnation of our understanding. In addition to the items set
forth in the scope, the City may wish to address the need to update the Capital Improvement
Schedule in the EAR.
We greatly appreciate the effort you have shown in developing the EAR scoping issues
for the City. We look forward to continued success as the City prepares its EAR. If you or your
staff have any questions or need additional assistance, please contact Roger Wilburn, Principal
Planner, at (850) 922-1822.
S~~
Charles Gauthicr, AICP
Chief of Comprehensive Planning
CG/de
Enclosure
cc: Carolyn Dekle, Executive Director, South Florida Regional Planning Council
Diane 0' Quinn Williams, Director, Miami-Dade Planning Department
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TAllAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone, 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX, 850.921.07811Suncom 291.0781
In Ierne I address, httD,lIwww.dca.slale.fl.u5
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN fIELD Offlcr
2796 """'" H"hw'Y, 5"" 212
...",h"',fl33050-2227
COMMUNITY PLANNING
2555 Sh,rn". 0,. 'O"M'"
T,ilo"""", fl3239').2100
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2555 Sh"",'" 00' Bo,""""
Toiloh,,"", fl32399.2100
,"'"."'..".
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT
2555 Sh,rn". 00' Bo,""'"
;,,:~.h::~:'~ 32399.2100
City of
A v en tufa
Government Centet
19200 West Country Club Drive
Aventura, Florida 33180
JEFFREY M. PERLOW
MAYOR
Mr. Charles Gauthier
Florida Department of Community Affairs
Division of Community Planning
Bureau of Local Planning
2555 Shumard Oaks Blvd.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
COMMISSIONERS
lEV AUERBACI<
JAY R. BESKIN
KEN COHEN
BOB DIAMOND
HARRY HOUBERO
MANNY GRQS$MAN
January 14, 2005
ERIC M. SoROKA
CITy MANAGER
RE:
Key Planning Issues for Aventura Evaluation and Appraisal Report
Dear Mr. Gauthier:
On December 16, 2004 the City of Aventura held a public workshop in order to
identify and discuss the key planning issues that should be addressed in the
2005 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). On
December 20, 2004, the City held an interagency scoping meeting with members
of State, regional and County agencies and representatives of adjacent
municipalities to receive input on the key planning issues identified at the
December 20, 2004 workshop, and identify additional issues that should be
, addressed. A list of attendees at the interagency scoping meeting is attached to
,: 'this letter,
Enclosed please find the list of major issues that the City proposes to address in
its 2005 Comprehensive Plan Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) (Appendix
A), and the City's proposed Scope of Work for addressing these issues and other
requirements of Section 163.3292 (2), F.S. (Appendix B.), We hereby request
that the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) provide the City with a Letter of
Understanding agreeing to the proposed issues and Scope, and/or advising of
any necessary additions/revisions.
DCA Scoping Letter.doc
PHONE: 305-466-8900 . FAX: 305-466-8939
www.CÎr1ofaventufa.com
Mr. Charles Gauthier
January 14, 2005
Page 2
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please contact Jerry Bell or Alex
David with Bell David Planning Group at (305) 215-6302 if you have any
questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
~
Joanne Carr, AICP
Planning Director
Enclosures
cc:
Eric M. Soroka, ICMA-CM, City Manager
Dan Evans, DCA
Bob Daniels, SFRPC
Bell David Planning Group
DCA Seeping Letter.doc
2
APPENDIX A.
CITY OF AVENTURA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
IDENTIFIED MAJOR ISSUES
ISSUE
1. Development and Redevelopment
The City of Aventura is substantially developed.
Nonetheless, development remains a major issue due
to regional growth pressures, initiatives to redirect
development to established urban areas, and the need
to develop and/or reexamine plans for specific areas
(i.e. Town Center, the Hospital District).
MAJOR
~
Yes
COMMENTS
Identify existing and projected development and
redevelopment that is occurring in the City, or that
has occurred since the Comprehensive Plan was
adopted, Review plans, proposals and projects
that have been prepared for particular areas.
Identify unmet redevelopment needs, and the
redevelopment potential of underutilized areas
(including shopping centers along Biscayne
Boulevard). Evaluate the characteristics of
development that is occurring in the City (i,e.
densities, Floor Area Ratios, etc.) to compare
development intensities to zoning. Address the
impacts of development and redevelopment
occurring in the City on neighboring jurisdictions
and vice versa. In particular, the implications of the
Development of Regional Impact at Gulfstream Park
in neighboring Hallandale Beach should be
examined.
-
ISSUE
~
2. Housing
Increased property values and costs are making
housing in the City prohibitive to many households.
The availability of housing that is affordable and
appropriate for existing and future households of all
income levels is therefore a major issue. Specific
concerns include the availability of housing to
accommodate employees of existing and future
businesses, the diminishing rental housing stock that
is resulting from condominium conversions and
barriers to homeownership.
3. Emergency Management
Aventura is a coastal community, and emergency
management and hurricane preparedness are on-
going concerns. Specific issues include the impacts of
development and redevelopment, in particular the
density of such development on emergency
management efforts, particularly, the ability of the
transportation system to handle evacuation needs, and
coordination those needs in a consistent manner with
other jurisdictions. Terrorism and homeland security is
a major important concern, particularly with regards to
regional activity centers such as the Aventura Mall.
MAJOR
~
Yes
Yes
2
COMMENTS
Review University of Florida Shimberg Center
Affordable Housing Needs Assessment as well as
other data sources (Le, Brookings Institute and
Harvard University studies) to gauge the City's
existing and projected housing needs. Evaluate
increases in property values. Evaluate the housing
stock in the Hospital area, and the availability of
housing to accommodate existing and projected
hospital workers. Evaluate strategies to link housing
with transportation. Quantify condominium
conversions and the resulting impacts to the City's
rental housing stock. Examine strategies to increase
housing opportunities within the redevelopment
context.
Describe the adopted Standards
for hurricane evacuation times in the City, and the
methodology for developing these standards.
Evaluate the consistency of these standards with
those of adjacent municipalities, and the City's
emergency management plans in a regional context,
Evaluate roadway levels of service as related to
evacuation needs, particularly along Interstate 95
and Biscayne Boulevard, and other important east
¡west routes. Evaluate existing and proposed
evacuation, emergency management, homeland
security, and post-disaster recovery plans.
ISSUE
4. Transportation
As a densely developed urban center in a fully
developed area of Miami Dade County, the City
experiences significant traffic congestion. Aventura
has been extremely progressive in the provision of
transportation options to its citizens, yet there are
several areas that need to be addressed. The City's
existing and future residents need enhanced mobility
options through a variety of transportation modes. In
addition, transportation issues such as additional
transit linkages, pedestrian connectivity, traffic noise,
signalization and signage issues, and impacts on
neighborhoods) need to be addressed,
MAJOR
§§!!g
Yes
3
COMMENTS
Aventura has been at the forefront of progressive
municipal transportation planning in Miami-Dade
County, particularly for a city of its size. To have more
of an impact, the needs now are to search for more
regional solutions to the transportation issues that cross
the tightly spaced political boundaries. The City should
evaluate the transportation system, from a multi-modal
perspective, in partnership or coordination, (if possible)
with the neighboring municipalities. This analysis
should examine the location and feasibility of a variety of
transportation enhancements including pedestrian
facilities, bicycle paths, additional transit linkages and
routes, use of marine facilities for water taxis, enhanced
capacities on roadways, as well as parking and
intermodal facilities. The City should identify specific
problem locations, including areas of congestion areas,
of inadequate signage, and areas of the city and
adjacent municipalities that would benefit from additional
connectivity (particularly the area west of Biscayne
Boulevard). Aventura in concert with its municipal
neighbors should work with the County and Regional
bodies, particularly, Miami Dade County, the MPO
FDOT to further evaluate and advocate the potential for
premium transit services along the FEC (North) corridor.
The City should Identify and support potential funding
sources to address the City's transportation needs in
addition to the funding provided through the People's
Transportation Plan. The City should review and
address the need for alternative transportation Qrowth
" management approaches such as Transportation
,- Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) or Multi-
Modal Transportation Districts.
5. Intergovernmental Coordination Yes Identify the City's interlocal agreements with other
jurisdictions, and the effectiveness of the City's
The City of Aventura is impacted by development in intergovernmental coordination processes and
adjacent jurisdictions, and vice versa. Moreover, a procedures. In particular, evaluate the effectiveness of
number of other governmental agencies have the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility
jurisdiction within the City, and control services and Planning in Miami-Dade County. The regional
facilities that directly impact the quality of life of transportation system and projects in adjacent
existing and future residents (Le. public schools). municipalities have an impact on the City, and should be
Better coordination needs to occur between the City, examined from the intergovernmental coordination
neighboring jurisdictions, and other governmental standpoint.
agencies having jurisdiction within the City to achieve
mutually beneficial Qoals, and mitiaate imoacts.
4
ISSUE MAJOR COMMENTS
ISSUE?
6. Quality of Life Yes Evaluate the City's inventory of parks, schools (public,
private and charter), and other facilities and services
Due to on-going development pressures and important to the quality of life of existing and future
competing needs, the City is challenged to maintain residents, Identify potential strategies to maintain,
and improve the high quality of life of existing and enhance, or improve these services (Le. charter
future residents, businesses, and visitors through the schools, developer incentives) as appropriate.
provision of necessary infrastructure and services
such as parks, public safety, public facilities, schools,
and pedestrian and other transportation facilities.
5
APPENDIX B.
CITY OF AVENTURA 2005 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT
SCOPE OF WORK
The following Scope of Work will be conducted by the City of Aventura to
complete and adopt the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) by December 1,
2005, and address the requirements of Section 163.3191 (2), F.S.:
I.
Evaluation of Major Issues:
A. For purposes of the City of Aventura's EAR submittal, the following major
issues have been identified. A more detailed description of these issues is
attached as Appendix A. The City of Aventura will analyze these issues for their
potential social, economic, and environmental impacts. S. 163.3191(2)(e), F.S,
1. Development and Redevelopment
2. Housing
3. Emergency Management
4. Transportation
5, Intergovernmental Coordination
6, Quality of life
B, The City of Aventura will evaluate the plan objectives within each element
as they relate to the major issues identified above and detailed in Appendix A.
The City will identify, where appropriate, unforeseen or unanticipated changes in
circumstances which have resulted in problems or opportunities with respect to
the major issues identified in that element. S. 163.3191 (2)(g), F.S.
C. The City of Aventura will identify and summarize actions or corrective
measures, including plan amendments, necessary to address the major issues
identified above and detailed in Appendix A. This identification shall include, as
appropriate, new population projections, revised planning timeframes, revised
future plan maps and/or map series, an updated capital improvements element,
and any new or revised goals, objectives and policies for major issues identified
with each element. S. 163.3191 (2)(i), F.S.
II.
Community-wide Assessment
A. The City of Aventura will provide a summary of data and analysis
comparing current conditions of the Land Use Element with conditions in 1998
(the date the Comprehensive Plan was adopted), To the extent possible, tables,
maps, and illustrations will be used. This data and analysis will include, at a
minimum:
1.
Population growth and changes in land area. S. 163.3191 (2)(a),
F,S.
Extent of vacant and undevelopable land. S. 163.3191 (2)(b), F.S.
2.
3.
Location of development in relation to location of development as
anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan, S. 163.3191 (2)(d), F.S.
B, The City of Aventura will identify the extent to which those services with
level of service standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan do not meet the
standards. The City will analyze and evaluate its ability to fund new or expanded
infrastructure necessary to correct the deficiencies, and to provide for future
growth at acceptable levels of service. This work will be done in conjunction with
the update to the Capital Improvements Element. S. 163.3191 (2)(c), F.S,
C. The City of Aventura will evaluate relevant changes in growth
management laws (State Comprehensive Plan, the requirements of Chapter 163,
Part II, the minimum criteria contained in Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative
Code and the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for South Florida) since 1998 for
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. Based on this assessment plan
revisions will be recommended, if necessary. S. 163,3191 (2)(f), F.S.
D. The City of Aventura will evaluate the successes and shortcomings of
each Comprehensive Plan Element. Successes and shortcomings will be briefly
summarized in narrative format on an element-by-element basis using tables,
illustrations and maps to the extent possible. S, 163.3191 (2)(h) F,S.
;' E. The City of Aventura will briefly summarize the public participation
program and activities undertaken during preparation of the EAR. S. 163.3191
(2)0), F.S.
F, The City of Aventura will evaluate the success or failure of coordinating
future land uses and residential development with the capacity of existing and
planned public schools, and coordinating the planning and siting of new schools.
S. 163.3191 (2)(k), F.S.
2
APPENDIX B. CITY OF A VENTURA 2005 - 2010
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
" ,
City of A ventura
Capital Improvement Program
2005/06 - 2009/10
" ,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2005/06 -2009/10
CITY OF A VENTURA
CITY COMMISSION
Mayor Susan Gottlieb
Commissioner Zev Auerbach
Commissioner Bob Diamond
Commissioner Harry Holzberg
Commissioner Billy Joel
Commissioner Michael Stern
Commissioner Luz Urbaez Weinberg
CITY MANAGER
Eric M. Soroka
DEPARTMENT DIRECTORS
Weiss Serota Helfman Pastoriza & Guedes, P.A., City Attorney
Harry M. Kilgore, Finance Support Services
Robert M. Shennan, Community Services
Teresa M. Soroka, City Clerk
Thomas Ribel, Police Chief
Joanne Carr, Planning Director
Mariano Fernandez, Building Director/Official
Dr. Katherine Bray Murphy, Charter School Principal
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Commission
City of Aventura
Aventura, Florida 33180
Enclosed herein is the proposed City of Aventura Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) for the fiscal period October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2010 and the
proposed Capital Budget for the Fiscal period October 1, 2005 through
September 30, 2006.
This document represents an update of the CIP that was originally prepared for
the five year cycle of 2004 to 2009. The update process is important for the CIP
to become a continuing and ongoing planning/implementation process. The last
four years of last year's program were reevaluated in light of unanticipated
needs, cost revisions, new project priorities and the financial condition of the City.
In addition, the CIP was updated to add new projects in the fifth year (2009/10) to
complete the cycle. Projects included within the framework of the program were
based on input from Commissioners, staff, City consultants and citizens.
. The primary goal of the Capital Improvement Program is to develop a long-term
,} , plan of proposed capital expenditures. the means and methods of financing, and
a schedule of priorities for implementation. The program forms the foundation for
governmental participation in the development process and represents a
commitment by the community toward the achievement and maintenance of a
desirable high quality of life. The facilities and service provided by the City
government are intended to offer the greatest citizen benefit and reflects the
City's identified needs, desires, and financial capabilities,
It is important to stress that the CIP is a planning tool to evaluate infrastructure
needs of the City as well as the financial capabilities of the City. In order to
determine the impact of the CIP on the City's future operating budget, the City
Commission and residents will be provided with the benefits of a CIP document
which serves as a point of reference and includes an estimated long-term budget
plan.
Each year the CIP document will be updated and an additional fiscal year will be
added to complete the cycle. The CIP thus becomes a continuing and ongoing
process.
The following represents the significant revisions or modifications to the
proposed CIP compared to the prior document:
. Added Founders Park Improvements - $415,000.
. Added Miami Gardens Drive Extension Upgrades- $300,000.
. Added Country Club Drive Tennis Court Improvements - $70,000.
. Added NE 207th Street Beautification Upgrades- $60,000.
. Added Yacht Club Drive Seawall Improvements - $100,000.
. Added NE 29th Street Lighting Improvements - $140,000.
. Added NE 190th Street Resurfacing - $140,000.
. Added Hospital District Road Resurfacing - $300,000
The proposed 2005 - 201O Capital Improvement Program includes 22 projects in
5 functional categories with a total value of $14,294,037- The following
represents the percentage of total funding that each functional category has been
allocated: Beautification & Parks Facilities (38%), Transportation, Drainage and
Infrastructure Improvements (28%), Capital Equipment Purchase and
Replacement (18%), Information/Communication Technology (15%) and Public
Buildings and Facilities Improvements (1%).
Major emphasis was placed on the following projects:
. Waterways Park Development
. Transportation, Street Lighting & Safety Improvements
. Stormwater Drainage Improvements
. Citywide Beautification Improvements
. Park Maintenance Projects
4,350,000
2,540,694
1,465,000
577,000
485,000
In order to improve the 911 response to public safety services in our community,
I have requested the Police Department to study the possibility of establishing
our own E911 system with the Police Communications Center becoming a Public
Safety Answering Point. After the report is complete and if approved by the City
Commission, the revenues and costs associated with the proposed E911 will be
included in future CIP documents.
The program contains a detailed funding plan that forecasts revenues necessary
to fund both the Capital Improvement Program and the operating budgets over
the next five years. The proposed funding plan is based on the assumption that
operating expenditures can be maintained at certain percentage increases and
revenue increases at specified rates.
It is significant to note that the funding plan has little financial impact on residents
and the community. Importantly, it continues to establish an ongoing mechanism
to address the City's infrastructure needs. No increase in the operating ad
valorem tax rate is recommended during the five year period. If operating
expenditures increase at a higher rate than expected, unanticipated events
reduce key revenue sources, or an unforeseen emergency occurs during the five
year period an operating ad valorem tax rate increase may be required. It should
be made clear that the funding plan is based on a series of projections and
assumptions. If events occur that revise the projections and assumptions, the
financing plan will have to be updated and amended.
I am proud of the many accomplishments and the support the City Commission
and residents have shown in the implementation of the capital projects since the
incorporation of the City. Our beautification projects, Government Center,
Community Recreation Center, Charter School, transportation improvements and
many other community enhancements continue to exhibit our commitment to
excellence and professionalism. This document serves many purposes.
Importantly it serves as an aid to the residents in providing a better
understanding of the City's long-term capital needs and how the City intends to
meet these demands. It also details our continuing efforts to address the needs
and concerns of the citizens of Aventura while making prudent financial decisions
which contribute to the City's long term financial health.
The preparation and formulation of this document could not have been
accomplished without the dedicated efforts of all Department Directors and their
staff. Their professional efforts have assisted in the preparation of this important
planning program.
I request and recommend that you take the following actions regarding the
proposed 2005 - 2010 Capital Improvement Program:
1. Hold a workshop to review the CIP document.
2. Transmit copies of the CIP summary document to the public.
3. Hold a public hearing to conceptually adopt the final CIP document, by
resolution, for implementation.
All questions relating to the CIP should be referred to my attention.
Respectfully submitted,
Eric M. Soroka
City Manager
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2005 - 2010
HIGHLIGHTS
. Development and construction of the expanded 6 acre Waterways Park facility on NE
213th Street.
. A total of $415,000 in improvements to Founders Park that includes the expansion of
the parking lot, playground equipment and a water splash pad play area.
. Implementation of $1,004,700 Traffic Video Monitoring Program which provided for the
installation of cameras at key intersections to allow the Police Department to monitor
and respond to traffic conditions.
. Utilizes a stormwater utility program to correct and improve drainage along roadways for
certain areas of the City. A total of $1,465,000 worth of improvements will be completed
during the five year period.
. Implementation of $440,000 of transportation improvements that includes street lighting
for NE 29th Avenue and Miami Gardens Drive Extension and a new bus shelter at NE
213th Street.
. A total of $577,000 of Citywide beautification improvements including median
landscaping is funded to continue to fulfill our goal of being the most beautiful City in
South Florida. Major improvements include: NE 207th south swale area, Miami Gardens
Drive Extension, and Biscayne Boulevard Median (NE 209-212 St).
. Road maintenance projects that total $1,000,000 to resurface asphalt and enhance
safety are included for NE Aventura Boulevard, Yacht Club Drive, Williams Island Road,
NE 190th Street and the Hospital District.
'.' Provides the necessary equipment to continue to provide high quality and effective
, police services
. Continues the implementation of technology improvements and management
information systems to enhance the productivity and efficiency of city operations.
. Ensures that the tools of production, vehicles, equipment and technology, are available
for city operations.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2005 - 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
PAGE
Purpose of the Capital Improvement Program
Legal Authority
Development of the Capital Improvement Program
2
2
Capital Improvement Program Policies
Preparing the Capital Budget
3
4
Locating a Specific Capital Project
Reading the Program Schedules
4
5
OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
Summary of Recommended Projects
Summary of Major Programs
6
6
Summary of Proposed Appropriations by Funding Source
Summary of Project by Location and Year
7
8
FUNDING PLAN
Introduction
9
9
Debt vs. Pay As You Go Financing
Required Separation of Funding Sources
10
11
Summary of Financing Plan Model
Proposed Financing Plan General Fund
Proposed Financing Plan Transportation fund
Proposed Financing Plan Park Development Fund
12
16
Proposed Financing Plan Police Impact Fee Fund
Proposed Financing Plan Stormwater Utility Fund
17
18
19
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND FUNDING SCHEDULES
Beautification and Park Facilities Improvements
Transportation, Drainage and Infrastructure Improvements
21
29
Public Buildings and Facilities Improvements
Information/Communications Technology
36
39
Capital Equipment Purchase and Replacement
45
~(> e'\"~
G?J, of Exec\\!
INTRODUCTION
City of Aventura
INTRODUCTION
This section describes what a Capital Improvement Program is and the process for
developing the City of Aventura Capital Improvement Program and Capital Budget. This
introduction also explains how to locate a specific project in this document.
PURPOSE OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is to establish a long term plan
of proposed capital expenditures, the means and methods of financing, and a schedule
of priorities for implementation. In order to determine the impact on the City's operating
budget, debt service and the general trend of future expenditures, the City Commission
will be provided with the advantage of a CIP document as a point of reference and
estimated long term budget plan. In accordance with the State's Growth Management
Act, the City is required to undergo this process in order to meet the needs of its
Comprehensive Plan.
The CIP is an official statement of public policy regarding long-range capital
development in the City of Aventura. A capital improvement is defined as a capital
expenditure of $2,500 and office equipment expenditure of $500 or more, resulting in
the acquisition, improvement or addition to fixed assets in the form of land, buildings or
improvements, more or less permanent in character, and durable equipment with a life
expectancy of more than one year.
The CIP lists proposed capital projects to be undertaken, the year in which they will be
started, the amount expected to be expended in each year and the method of financing
these projects. Based on the CIP, a department's capital outlay portion of the annual
Operating Budget will be formulated for that particular year. The CIP document also
communicates to the citizens, businesses and interested parties the City's capital
priorities and plan for implementing projects.
The five-year CIP is updated annually to add new projects in the fifth year, to re-
evaluate the program and project priorities in light of unanticipated needs, and to revise
recommendations to take account of new requirements and new sources of funding.
Capital Improvement programming thus becomes a continuing part of the City's
budgeting and management procedures.
The annual capital programming process provides the following benefits:
1.
The CIP is a tool for implementing the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2.
The CIP process provides a mechanism for coordinating among projects
with respect to function, location, and timing.
3.
The yearly evaluation of project priorities ensures that the most crucial
projects are developed first.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 1
City of Aventura
4.
The CIP process facilitates long-range financial planning by matching
estimated revenue against capital needs, establishing capital expenditures
and identifying the need for municipal borrowing and indebtedness within
a sound long-range fiscal framework. The sound fiscal policy that results
from this process will have a positive impact on the City's bond rating,
5.
The impact of capital projects on the City's operating budget can be
projected.
6.
The CIP serves as a source of information about the City's development
and capital expenditures plan for the public, City operating departments,
and the City Commission.
LEGAL AUTHORITY
A capital programming process to support the comprehensive plan is required by the
Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulations,
incorporated as Chapter 163, Florida Statues.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The City's capital programming process began in December when operating
departments were required to prepare requests for all proposed capital projects
anticipated during the period of 2005 - 2010. A CIP Preparation Manual and related
forms were distributed to all departments for this purpose.
In February, departmental prioritized project requests were submitted to the City
Manager's Office. Department Directors were asked to justify projects in terms of
benefits derived, necessity to health, safety and welfare of the City, enhancement to
City plans and policies, need of residents and funding. Projects were prioritized on the
basis of Urgent, Necessary, Desirable, and Deferrable.
The City Manager reviewed departmental requests and conducted individual meetings
with Department Directors. The departmental requests were prioritized and the five-
year schedule of projects was compiled into document form by the City Manager. The
methods of financing and revenue sources were then prepared by the Finance Support
Services Director and City Manager and were incorporated into the CIP document. At
this point, the proposed CIP is submitted to the City Commission and public for review.
In order to facilitate public involvement, public hearings and community meetings will be
held to unveil and review the CIP document prior to the adoption of a Resolution
approving the CIP in principle.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 2
City of Aventura
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM POLICIES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10
Annually, the City will prepare a five-year capital improvement program
analyzing all anticipated capital expenditures and identifying associated
funding sources. Future capital expenditures necessitated by changes in
population, changes in development, growth, redevelopment or changes
in economic base will be calculated and included in the Capital update
process.
The City will perform all capital improvements in accordance with an
adopted capital improvement program.
The classification of items as capital or operating will be determined by
two criteria - cost and frequency. Generally, a capital project has a .useful
life" of more than one year and a value of $2,500 or more, or for office
equipment $500 or more.
The City will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget
with the development of the operating budget. Future operating costs
associated with new capital improvements will be projected and included
in the operating forecasts.
The first year of the five-year capital improvement program will be used as
the basis for formal fiscal year appropriations during the annual budget
process.
The City will maintain all of its assets at a level adequate to protect the
City's capital investment and to minimize future maintenance and
replacement costs.
The City will identify the estimated cost of capital projects and prepare a
funding projection that considers revenues and operating costs to be
included in the Capital Improvement Program document that is submitted
to the City Commission for approval.
The City will determine the most appropriate financing method for all new
projects.
If appropriate, the City will attempt to maintain a mixed policy of
pay-as-you-go and borrowing against future revenues for financing capital
projects.
The City will maintain ongoing maintenance schedules relating to road,
sidewalk and drainage system improvements.
The City will address and prioritize infrastructure needs on the basis of
protecting the health, safety and welfare of the community.
A CIP preparation calendar shall be established and adhered to.
Capital projects will conform to the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Long-term borrowing will not be used to fund current operations or normal
maintenance.
The City will strive to maintain an unreserved general fund balance at a
level not less than 7.5% of the annual general fund revenue.
If new project appropriation needs are identified at an interim period during
the fiscal year, the funding sources will be identified and mid-year budget
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 3
City of Aventura
amendments will be utilized to provide formal budgetary authority. In
addition budget amendments may be utilized to increase appropriations
for specific capital projects.
PREPARING THE CAPITAL BUDGET
The most important year of the schedule of projects is the first year. It is called the
Capital Budget and is adopted separately from the five year program as part of the
annual budget review process.
Based on the CIP, each department's capital outlay portion will be formulated for that
particular year. Each year the CIP will be revised and another year will be added to
complete the cycle. Capital Improvement Programming thus becomes a continuing part
of the City's budget and management process.
The Capital Budget is distinct from the Operating Budget. The Capital Budget
authorizes capital expenditures, while the Operating Budget authorizes the expenditure
of funds for employee salaries, supplies, and materials.
Through the City's amendment process, changes can be made to the adopted Capital
Budget during the fiscal year. A request for amendment is generated by an operating
department based on an urgent need for new capital project or for additional funding for
a previously approved project. The request is reviewed by the Finance Support
Services Director and City Manager and, if approved by the City Manager, a budget
amendment is presented to the City Commission.
LOCATING A SPECIFIC CAPITAL PROJECT
The Capital Improvement Program is divided into five program areas as follows:
Beautification and Parks (BP)
Transportation, Drainage and Infrastructure Improvements (TDI)
Public Buildings and Facilities (PBF)
Information/Communication Technology (lCT)
Capital Equipment Purchase & Replacement (CE)
Each project in the Capital Improvement Program has a unique project number. This
project number appears at the beginning of the individual project descriptions and the
Summary by Year tables. The first digit refers to functional category priority number
assigned by the City Manager. The final digits outline the individual department
requesting the project. For example, project TDI-1-CS is Transportation, Drainage and
Infrastructure Improvements project number one which was requested by the
Community Services Department.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 4
City of Aventura
READING THE PROGRAM SCHEDULES
Detailed information about each capital project is presented in the section titled "Capital
Improvement Program Project Descriptions and Funding Schedules". The section is
arranged by program area and functional category and includes a description of each
project and the funding schedules. Project timetables for each functional category are
indicated in the Summary by Year tables.
The funding schedules are based on the funding needed to complete an individual
project. A project's funding may continue for several years depending on the
development timetable. Each program has a separate Funding Plan Table that outlines
the revenue sources proposed to fund project expenditures.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 5
City of Aventura
OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDED PRO.JECTS
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED PROJECTS
The proposed 2005 - 2010 Capital Improvement Program includes 22 projects in 5
functional categories with a total value of $14,294,037. The following represents the
percentage of total funding that each functional category has been allocated:
Beautification & Parks Facilities (38%), Transportation, Drainage and Infrastructure
Improvements (28%), Capital Equipment Purchase and Replacement (18%),
Information/Communication Technology (15%) and Public Buildings and Facilities
Improvements (1%).
SUMMARY OF MAJOR PROGRAMS
The following table presents a summarized breakdown of the costs of the various
projects recommended for funding categorized by major function for each of the five
years covered by the Capital Improvement Program.
Table 1
Capital Improvement Program
2005/06-2009/10
Summary By Function
p ram 2005106 2006107 2007108 2008109 2009/10 TOTAL
--.. p- ......... 2,....'" $ 2,183,'" $ ...... $ $ $ '412,'"
--,-...., 1,130,." 1,1""'" "',000 ..~... "','" ...."..
-""Æ
....... Bu""" .. FocIl".. 7"'" 7"'"
-- "2,"" """ 3&2,'" 427,'" 3&7,160 2,202,100
--GOY
127,07' 041,210 6>7,388 4"'" 677,6&0 2,600,743
Tota'o .....,... $ '117,710 $ 1,600,388 $ 1,4>7,'" $ 1,634,710 $ "'_037
" '"
..
PubliC Bulldlngo
1%
T..noporlatlon,
O,,'noge &
'__UN
28'.
8o0_n & Pa"a
38%
Capital Improvement Program 2005.2010
Page 6
City of Aventura
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS BY FUNDING SOURCE
The following table reflects the distribution of all proposed projects to the funding source
or mechanism, which is appropriate for funding the projects for each of the five years of
the program.
Table 2
Capital Improvement Program
2005/06-2009/10
Summary By Funding Source
Funding Source 2005106 2006107 2007108 2008109 2009/10 TOTAL
Gelleral 2,440,125 3,678,290 851,368 787,550 854,710 8,612,043
Police Impact Fees 178,500 99,500 108,000 55,000 90,000 531,000
Stonnwater Utility 515,000 600,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 1,465,000
Parks Developmellt 1,000,000 75,000 0 0 0 1,075,000
Grants 0 350,000 350,000
Transportation Fund 560,994 315,000 300,000 545,000 540,000 2,260,994
$ 4,694,619 $ 5,117,790 $ 1,509,368 $ 1,437,550 $ 1,534,710 $ 14,294,037
The proposed funding plan involves a commitment to 'pay as you go" annual
appropriations established in yearly budgets and reducing the reliance on long term
debt.
Funding Source Summary
Transportation Fund
16%
Stonnwater Utility
10%
. . 'fill
/ ...
Park Development
7%
" ""
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 7
City of Aventura
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS BY LOCATION AND YEAR
The following outlines the major projects by location and the year they are proposed to
be funded:
Table 3
Capital Improvement Program
2005/06-2009/10
Summary By Location
Location
Founders Pari< Improvemants
WaImways Pari< Development
Country Club Drive Tennis Court
NE 29" Avenue Improvements
NE 'Z1" Avenue Connector
MIami Gardens Drive Improvemants
NE 209 & Biscayne Blvd Madlan
H08pital District Area
Yacht Club Drive
NE 1- Street Improvemants
NE 207" Street
Williams Island Road
Aventurs Blvd
Traffic VIdeo Monitoring System
NE 213"' Street Outfall
Improvements
Community Center Improvements
Beautification Transportation Street
Improvements Improvements Lighting
Drainage
Improve
Pari<
Improve
2005-2007
200S-2007
2005106
Facilities
Improve
2006107
2005106
2005106
2006107
2005106
2005106
2006-08
2009110
2007/08
2005106
2OO8tO9
2005106
2OOS-2009
2006/07
2005106
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 8
City of Aventura
FUNDING PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In order for a Capital Improvement Program to be an effective management planning
tool, the program must include not only a compilation of major capital needs and their
costs but also a financing plan for the entire life of the program. This financing plan
must include an analysis of the available resources which will be used to fund not only
the Capital Improvement Program itself but the required operating expenses and debt
service requirements of the City.
In order to ensure that the financing plan is complete in every respect, the plan
formulation process must include:
1.
A projection of revenues and resources which will be available to fund
operating and capital expenditures during the life of the Capital
Improvement Program.
2.
A projection of future years' operating expenditure levels which will be
required to provide ongoing services to City residents.
3.
Once the Capital Improvement Program projects have been evaluated, a
determination is made of the projects to be funded and the timing of the
cash outflow for each project. The information is then tabulated to
determine the amounts required to fund the Capital Improvement Program
for each year.
From the information obtained in 1 through 3 above, the additional
resources required to fund the CIP will be determined and a decision will
be made on whether the program is to be financed by the issuance of
debt, on a pay-as-you-go basis or some combination of the two.
'the financing plan prepared in such a manner will be as accurate as possible and
should be an informative document to all City residents. However, due to the uncertainty
involved in projecting operating cost increases, the community's desire for service
increases and the inflow of resources over a five year period, the financing plan
presented should be viewed as a theoretical framework to be adjusted each year based
on the most recent information available at that time. This will be accomplished by
updating the financing plan each year, adopting operating and capital budgets, and
ordinances to implement fee structures which will be required to fund the program each
year.
4.
DEBT VS PAY-AS-YOU-GO FINANCING
Debt financing through the issuance of long term bonds is most appropriate when:
1.
There are a small number of relatively large dollar value projects.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 9
City of Aventura
2.
The large projects cannot be broken into segments and the costs
distributed over a larger time frame without impairing the usefulness of the
project.
3.
The projects are non-recurring.
4.
Assets acquired have a relatively long useful life which equals or exceeds
the life of the debt.
Through long term bond financing, the costs of a project having a long useful life can be
shared by future residents who will benefit from the projects.
In contrast, pay-as-you-go financing is most appropriate for a Capital Improvement
Program which includes:
1.
A large number of projects having a relatively small dollar value.
2.
Projects which can be broken into phases with a portion completed each
year without impairing the overall effectiveness of the project.
3.
Projects which are of a recurring nature.
4.
Projects where the assets acquired will have relatively short useful lives.
The primary advantage of pay-as-you-go financing is that the interest costs and costs of
bringing a bond issue to market can be avoided. However, if inappropriately used, this
financing plan may cause tax rates and fee structures to increase suddenly and may
result in current residents paying a greater portion of projects which benefit future
residents.
If"! summary, the choice of the appropriate financing plan will be contingent upon an
'analysis of the projects to be included in a Capital Improvement Program.
REQUIRED SEPARATION OF FUNDING SOURCES
In order to comply with accepted governmental accounting practices and to ensure
compliance with City Codes and any related Bond Indentures, the analysis and
financing plan contained herein will be presented within their respective funds. Projects
funded on a pay-as-you-go basis will directly relate to the Capital Fund Budget from
where the source of funding is derived. Each of these Budgets will appear in the Annual
Operating and Capital Improvement Budget, which is adopted each year. Those funds
are currently represented as follows:
1.
General Fund
2.
Transportation and Street Maintenance Fund
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 10
City of Aventura
3. Police Impact Fee Fund
4. Park Development Fund
5. Stormwater Utility Fund
In accordance with accounting, legal and intemal revenue requirements, all
projects to be completed with the proceeds received from the sale of Bonds or loans will
be accounted for in a Capital Construction Fund or Stormwater Utility Fund. In addition,
capital outlay for the Charter Elementary School is included in a separate Budget
adopted by the City Commission.
SUMMARY OF FINANCING PLAN MODEL
Detailed funding plans for individual funds of the City are enclosed herein in the
following sections. The following represents an overview of the major points of the
recommended funding plan:
1. Utilize .pay - as - you - go' financing through annual appropriations to fund the total
five year amount of $14,294,037. No additional debt is recommended.
2. Utilize funding from impact fees and grants in the amount of $1,956,000 to assist in
the funding of the Waterways Park and police equipment.
3. No increase in the operating ad valorem tax rate is recommended during the five
year period. However, if operating expenditures increase at a higher rate than
expected, unanticipated events reduce key revenue sources, or an unforeseen
emergency occurs during the five year period an operating ad valorem tax rate
increase may be required. It should be made clear that the funding plan is based on
a series of projections and assumptions. If events occur that revise the projections
and assumptions, the financing plan will have to be updated and amended,
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 11
City of Aventura
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
GENERAL FUND
After evaluating the nature of the various projects that are included in the City's General
Capital Improvement Program, it was decided that pay-as-you-go would be most
appropriate for funding the program.
FINANCING PLAN TABLES
Based on this decision, the analysis which follows is aimed at developing a financing
plan which will allow the City to fund General Government Services operating
expenditures and all projects recommended for funding in the General Capital
Improvement Program for each year of the program.
Table 1 presents a five (5) year projection of resources which will be available for
General Government Services. Unless shown by an asterisk (*), the amount projected
for each revenue is based on the tax rate or fee structure in effect during the 2004/05
fiscal year. Revenue descriptions followed by an asterisk (*) were computed based on a
projected increase in the rate structure as discussed in the assumption of projections.
Table 2 presents a five (5) year projection of required operating expenses for General
Government Services which utilize the cost data as outlined in the assumption of
projections.
Table 3 is a recap of resources available to fund the General Capital Improvement
Program based on projected revenues and expenditures and the proposed Capital
Improvement Program appropriations for the five (5) years of the program. Please note
that this analysis assumes that all available resources not needed to fund current
operating expenditures will be transferred to the Capital Improvement Program Fund
and that any balance in the Capital Improvement Program Fund will remain in the
Capital Improvement Program. Through this process, the City will be able to accumulate
é¡J reserve which would be used to fund unexpected capital outlays or to fund future
years' programs.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 12
City of Aventura
PROJECTION OF RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES
2OO4I2GO5 2OO&J2OOC _7 2GCI7/2OO11 2GCII/2ØO1I 2009110
CURRENT YEAR REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR
GENERAL GOVERMENT SERVICES
NJ VALOREM TAXES $11,757,000 $13,772,882 $14,392,602 $15,040,331 $15,717,1" $18,287,247 (0)
FPLFRANClftSE""S 1,822,000 1,876,660 1,932,960 1,990,949 2,050,877 2,112,197 (b)
FRANCHISE FEES 300,000 309,000 318)70 327,818 337,653 347,782 (0)
UT1UTYTAXES 5,602,000 5,770,080 5,943,152 5,121,457 5,305,100 6,494,253 (d)
CfTY OCCUPATIONAL UCENSES 700,000 707,dOO 714,070 721,211 728,423 735,707 (0)
BUlL""'" RELATEO REVENUE 1,300,000 850,000 650,000 500,000 SOO,OOO 500,000 (ry
STATE SHAREO REVENUES-UNRESTRICTEO 308,500 319,298 330,473 342,039 354,011 366,401 (9)
HAI.J' CENT SALES TAX 1,545,000 1,598,075 1,655,043 1,712,969 1,772,923 1,834,975 (h)
CHARGES FOR SERVICES 798,000 825,930 854,838 884,757 915,723 947,774 (i)
FINES AND FORFEITURES 220,000 226,800 233,398 240,400 247,812 255,040 01
CHARTER SCHOOL LAND LEASE PAYMENTS 11,000 56,000 104,000 (')
c;HARTER SCHOOL BUILDING LEASE PAVMENTS 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 ('I
IoISC. REVENUES 50,000 50.000 50,000 50,000 50.000 50.000
"'TEREST ON IllVESTIIENTS 110.000 100,000 103,500 107,123 110.672 114.752
COUNTY OCCUPAT""'AL UCENSES 25000 25,000 25000 25 000 25 000 25000
TOTAL CURRENT YEAR R""",,UES $24.537,500 $26.431.505 $27,453,374 $28,325,053 $26,421.140 $30,405,129
TRANSFERS FROM TRANSPORTAnON FUND 604.500 629,535 851.306 673.839 697,161 721.299
TRANSFERS FROM SCHOOL FUND 30.000 33,000 34.155 35,350 36,588 37,""8
TRANSFERS FROM STORJIWATER unUTY 204,375 212,353 220,847 229,681 238,868 248,423
TOTAL AVAILABLE $ 25,370,375 $ 27 306.393 $ 28,359 683 $ 29.263,924 . 30.393,758 $ 31412,720
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
NOTES TO ASSUMPTION OF PROJECTIONS
Ad valorem Tax revenue net of any tax increase will grow at the rate of 4.5%.
FPL Franchise Fees from Dade County will grow at the rate of 3% per year.
Franchise fees will grow at the rate of 3 % per year.
Utility taxes will grow at the rate of 3% per year.
Occupational Licenses will grow at the rate of 1.0% per year.
Building related revenues will decrease beginning in 2005/06 and level off at $500,000
per year in 2007.
(g)
(h)
State shared revenues will grow at the rate of 3.5% per year.
Half-cent sales tax will grow at the rate of 3,5% per year.
(i)
Charges for services will grow at the rate of 3.5% per year.
0)
(k)
Fines & foñeitures will grow at the rate of 3% per year.
Represents payments from the Charter School Fund Budget to reimburse the General
Fund for a portion of debt service payments for the land for the elementary school and
funds provided for the construction of the proposed middle school.
Page 13
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
city of Aventura
TABLE 2
PROJECTION OF OPERATING EXPENDITURES FOR GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVlCE8
DEPARTMENT 2......6 2005100 2006107 2007108 2008101 2001110
Ctty Commission $111,122 $ 114,160 $ 116,444 $ 118,773 $ 121,1'" $ 123,571
QfIIce at the City "o""ge' 723,835 781,742 844,281 911,824 984,770 1,063,551
Finance Support ....Ices 1,188,871 1,260,221 1,361,036 1,"'9,921 1,587,515 1,714,515
L..ol 238,000 242,760 247,515 252,588 257,519 252,771
CIty..- 262,898 253,930 306,844 331,n5 357,570 386,283
Public Safety 9,078,277 10,258,453 11,181,714 12,188,068 13,163,113 14,216,153
Community Development 1,"'7,464 1,367,464 1,341,524 1,295,185 1,221,992 1,145,872
Community .....,1... 4,388,454 4,715,770 5,343,032 5,7TO,475 5,232,112 5,730,581
Non - Oepartmentol 1,306,840 1,411,367 1,524,298 1,636,521 1,751,517 1,893,531
TOTAL PROJECTED OPERATING EXPENOITURES
GENERAL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES $ 18,742,561 $ 20,455 887 $ 22,288,590 $ 23,976,609 $ 25,587,456 $ 27,537,040
Go""" Fund Tronot........ Debt.....ce 1,365,000 1,365,000 1,365,000 1,365,000 1,365,000 1,365,000
_I Fund Tronot.... 2CIOO Debt ""Ice "'6,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000 510,000
-- Fund Tron""'" 2002 Debt....... 400,000 416,000 416,000 416,000 415,000 415,000
TOTAL PROJECTED DE8T SERVICE REOUIREMENTS 2,250,000 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000
TOTAL PROJECTED EXPENDITURES $ 20,992,561 $ 22,745,887 $ 24,556,590 S 26,288,609 S 27,977,456 S 29,827,040
NOTES TO ASSUMPTION OF PROJECTIONS
Operating expenditures will increase by 9.1% in 2005/06 and between 7%
to 8.9% thereafter.
The following chart illustrates that half of the operating budget is committed to
providing public safety services,
Communltr Se<vlees
23%
,'.,. ,
, ' ' .. .
"~ '
,J ",'
" ,.. '
Commission/Logal
2%
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 14
city of Aventura
TABLE 3
RECAP OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES vs PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
2005106 2006107 2007/06 2008109 2009/10
TOTAl PROJECTED AVAILABLE RESOURCES $27,306,393 $29,359,683 $29,263,924 $30,393,758 $31,412,720
PROJECTED OPERATING EXPENDITURES 20455887 22 266 590 23976609 25687456 27 537,040
SUBTOTAl 6,850,505 6,093,093 5,287,316 4,706,301 3,875,680
lESS DEBT SERVICE REQUIREMENTS 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000 2,290,000
TRANSFER TO GENERAl CAPITAl IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM 4,560,505 3,803,093 2,997,316 2,416,301 1,585,680
BALANCE FROM PREVIOUS YEAR 9216,643 11,336,923 11,461726 13,607,674 15,236,425
TOTAl AVAIlABLE RESOURCES FOR CIP 13777048 15140,016 14,459042 16023975 16822,105
PAY-AS-YOU-GO PROPOSED APPROPRIATION - CIP 2,440,125 3,678,290 851,368 787,550 854,710
BAlANCE IN CIP - END OF YEAR
$11,336923
$11461,726
$13,607,674
$15,236,425
$15,967395
$35,000,000
$5,000,000
.. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. -
.. " --
.. .. ..
.. ..
- -- .. .. Revenues
.. -
- - Expenditures
-"-CIP
-Fund Balance
--.-"--'-"-.
- "-------------------
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
2005106
2006107
200708
2008109
2009/10
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 15
city of Aventura
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
TRANSPORTATION FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
This fund was established to account for restricted revenues and expenditures which by
State Statute and County Transit System Surtax Ordinance are designated for
transportation enhancements, street maintenance and construction costs. Expenditures
will either be accounted for in the General Fund by designating specific expenditure
accounts in the Community Services Department and the Capital Improvement Program
or in this fund by designating specific Capital projects.
This table reflects the anticipated revenues available and the proposed appropriations.
TABLE 4
TRANSPORTATION AND STREET MAINTENANCE FUND
RECAP OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES AND PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
SUMMARY BY YEAR
200412005 200512006 200612007
REVENUES
LOCAL OPTION GAS TAX
INTEREST EARNINGS
STATE SHARED REVENUES-RESTRICTED
CARRYOVER
COUNTY TRANSIT SYSTEM SURTAX
TOTAL REVENUES
460,000
3,600
141,000
75,000
749,000
1A28,500
LESS TRANFER TO GENERAL FUND
Less Transit Service Improvements II
Less Transit Service Improvements I
Total For Capital
_,500
194,000
630,000
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
ProiecITltle
476,100
7,600
145,935
60,000
763,980
1,453,515
629,535
50,000
201,760
572,220
492,764
7,500
151,043
11,226
779,250
1,441,792
651,306
156,103
209,830
424,552
2004/2005 200512006 200612007
76,000
Transportation System and Traffic Improveme
Street LIghting Improvements
, ~ Resurfacing Program
200,000
370,000
95,994
225,000
240,000
140,000
100,000
200712008 2008I20O9
510,010
7,600
156,329
109,552
794,-
1,578,237
673,839
162,347
218,224
523,827
527,861
7,600
161,801
223,827
810,742
1,731,730
697,161
168,841
226,953
638,775
200,000
200712OG8 200812009
425,000
100,000
120,000
200912010
546,336
7,600
167,464
125,412
826,957
1,673,668
721,299
175,595
236,031
540,743
200912010
100,000
0
440,000
Totals
S 570,000 S 560,994 S 316,000 S 300,000 S 645,000 S 540,000
Balance
S 60,000 S 11,226 S 109,552 S 223,827 S 93,775 S
743
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 16
city of Aventura
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND
The Park Development Fund is used to account for revenues specifically earmarked for
capital improvements to the City's park system. Impact fees from new development
become a funding source for future park development plans. For purposes of this five
year plan, impact fees will be utilized to assist in funding the Waterways Park project.
This fund will also be used to account for the grant funding obtained for the proposed
park improvements.
Table 5
Recap of Available Resources and Proposed Appropriations
Park Development Fund
CIP 2005/06-2009/10
Revenues 2005/06 2006/07
Park Impact Fees $1,000,000 $75.000
Grants Q 350000
Total Available Resources for CIP 1,000,000 425.000
Proposed Appropriations $1 000 000 $425 000
Balance $0 $0
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 17
City of Aventura
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
POLICE IMPACT FEE FUND
This fund was created to account for impact fees derived from new development and
restricted by Ordinance for Police Capital Improvements. This fund will provide a
funding source to assist the City in providing police capital improvements required by
growth.
The proposed revenues derived from the Police Impact Fee Fund for the five year
period is $531,000. Major capital outlay items include new equipment purchases
required by growth in the police department.
Table 6 reflects the anticipated revenues available and the proposed appropriations for
these fund for the fIVe year period.
Table 6
Recap of Available Resources and Proposed Appropriations
Police Impact Fee Fund
CIP 2005/06 -2009/10
Revenues 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Police Impact Fees $178,500 $ 99,500 $108,000 $55,000
Total Available Resources $178,500 $ 99,500 $108,000 $55,000
for CIP
Proposed Appropriations $178,500 $ 99,500 $108000 $55.000
Balance $0 $0 $0 $0
2009/10
$90,000
$90,000
$90000
$0
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 18
city of Aventura
PROPOSED FINANCING PLAN
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
The City of Aventura is responsible for stormwater management activities within the
corporate boundaries. Dade County was responsible for stormwater facility constriction,
operation and maintenance prior to the incorporation of the City. The County provided a
very limited level of stormwater maintenance. Many drainage and flooding problems
existed in the City that required major capital improvements.
In order to address the deficiencies and develop an ongoing maintenance program, a
Stormwater Utility Fund was created. The Fund generates revenues for stormwater
management costs, permitting and capital improvements from a source other than the
General Fund, gas taxes or ad valorem taxes. The Utility relies on user fees charged to
residents and businesses for generating revenues.
The City has recognized the need and importance of taking a pro-active approach
toward stormwater management. The stormwater drainage improvements contained in
the five year Capital Improvement Program were based on a complete survey of all
areas of the City conducted by the Community Services Department together with the
City's consulting engineers.
The Fund will be responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance costs, as well as
capital improvements. The yearly operating expenses will be made by the General
Fund and reimbursed by the Stormwater Utility Fund as a transfer of revenue.
Table 7 reflects the anticipated revenues available and the proposed appropriations for
the Stormwater Utility Fund for the five year period.
A total of $2,105,000 worth of stormwater drainage projects will be completed during the
five year period. The monthly rate charged to users per unit was $2.50 for 2004/05. It is
'"ót recommended that the fee be increased during the next five years.
DADE COUNTY MUNICIPALITIES STORMWATER UTILITY RATES
Coral Gables $3.50 Golden Beach $12.00
Hialeah $2.50 Homestead $ 1.25
Key Biscayne $5.00 Medley $ 2.50
Miami $3.50 Miami Beach $ 2.50
Miami Shores $2.50 North Miami $ 2.50
North Miami Beach $2.50 South Miami $ 2.50
Sweetwater $2.50
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 19
City of Aventura
TABLE 7
RECAP OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES V$ PROPOSED APPROPRIATIONS
STORMWATER UTILITY FUND
2004/05 2005105 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009110
Custome' Data:
ProjectedNo.ofBmableERUs(1) 30,000 30,750 31,519 31,992 32,471 32,798
Monthly Rate Per ERU $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50 $2.50
Revenues:
Gross Stormwater Ut,ity Billin9s (2) $900,000 $922,500 $945,583 $959,748 $974,142 $983,884
less: Uncollectibies (3) -45,000 -48,125 -47,278 -47,987 -48,707 -49,194
Cany Over of Surplus 0 10,425 159,447 238,884 688982 1,305,528
$ 855,000 $ 888,800 $ 1,057,731 $ 1,148,843 $ 1,594,397 $ 2,240,218
Operating Expenses: (4)
Operation & Maintenance 131,593 138,857 142,331 148,024 153,945 160,103
Administration
Data Management 10,124 10,124 10,529 10,960 11,388 11,844
WASD Bi~ng 20,274 21,085 21,928 22,806 23,718 24,666
Financial Management 12,167 12,654 13,160 13,888 14,234 14,803
Miscellaneous Items(GIS, NPDES Pennitting) 30,417 31,634 32,899 34,215 35,584 37,007
Total Operating Expenses $204,676 $212,353 $220,847 $229,881 $238,868 $248,423
Repayment to General Fund
Available rOl' CIP & Debt Service $ 660,425 $ 874,447 $ 836,884 $ 918,982 $ 1,355,528 $ 1,991,795
Annual CIP Expenditures: 640,000 515,000 600,000 250,000 50,000 50,000
Annual S",plus/(Deficit): $ 10,425 $ 159,447 $ 236,884 $ 688,982 $ 1,305,528 $ 1,941,795
NOTES TO ASSUMPTION OF PROJECTIONS
(1) Projected ID grow at an annual rate ot 2005-7-2,5%, 1.5% thereafter
(2) Equals Projected No, of Billable ERUs multiplied by the Monthly Rate Per ERU, - the ,esuft annualized,
(3) Equals 5% of Gross Stonnwater Utility Bimngs In Yea, Shown.
(4) Indudes Operation and Maintenance, Administration, Revæw of Existing Account Data Costs.
Projected to continue to grow at an annual rate of 4%.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 20
City of Aventura
BEAUTIFICATION AND PARK FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
This section includes beautification projects and improvements to the City of Aventura's
park system and recreational facilities. There are 4 projects in the Capital Improvement
Program, which total $5,412,000. Special emphasis was given to implementing an
ongoing beautification program, developing additional park sites and upgrading existing
facilities.
Policies
The City of Aventura's investment in improvements to the City park system is based on
the following policies:
Goal:
Provide adequate and accessible parks and facilities to meet the
recreational needs of all current and future residents.
. Provide a variety of quality recreation facilities that will meet the needs of all
age groups within the City and enhance the overall environmental
characteristics of the area.
. Maximize the utilization of all public facilities through the provision of variety in
the type offacility offered,
. Provide exerciselwalking paths to enhance the physical well being of
residents.
. Provide recreational facilities on the basis of 2.75 acres per 1,000 population.
. Encourage the integration of recreational facilities into the development of
residential, commercial, industrial, and open space land uses.
Goal:
Update the 5-year CIP on a yearly basis.
. Provide parks whereby residents have access to neighborhood parks within 2
mile radius and community parks which serve the entire City.
Goal:
Increase Safety Standards
. Provide for adequate security measure including limited access facilities.
. Replace dangerous equipment and eliminate visual barriers to reduce
opportunities for crime.
. Employ vandal-resistant equipment and facilities.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 21
City of Aventura
Maintain a Parks Usage Plan to protect the City's investment in the park
system and insure the resident's safety.
Goal:
Protect and preserve environmentally sensitive land and water areas.
. Preserve and enhance open space with environmental impact.
Existina Facilities
There is 29.0 acres of open space and public park land in the City.
Aventura Founders Park was opened in November 1998. This 11 acre site located on
West Country Club Drive and NE 190 Street includes both active and passive
recreational opportunities. The park encompasses the following components: Jogging
Path, tennis courts, gated entries, One ball field w/ dugouts and backstops, Restroom
Buildings, Decorative Fencing, Playground, picnic area, passive play areas, baywalk,
landscaping, two parking lots, multi-purpose plaza areas, signage, benches, and
security lighting.
The Country Club Drive ExerciselWalking Path contains 5.5 acres that is classified
as open space recreation area. This facility is used by residents for both recreational
and exercise purposes.
Waterways Park was acquired by the City in 1998 from a private developer. This 1 acre
site was previously constructed by a private developer. The City is in the process of
acquiring 6 additional acres. The park is currently under design for a major expansion.
Arthur I Snyder Memorial Park was purchased in 1998. This 3.5 acre site was one of
the last remaining waterfront undeveloped parcels in the City. This site contains the
Community/Recreation Center. Open passive and sitting areas are available at this
location.
Veterans Park was acquired by the City from a private developer in 2001. This 2 acre
site is located on NE 31st Avenue. Facilities and amenities include: parking lot; 1.5 acre
open playfield area; playground facilities; landscaping with shade trees; .5 acre pet
exercise area; separate entrance for visitors with pets; drinking fountains for pets and
people and "pooper scooper" stations.
Prior Accomplishments
The following projects have been completed or are scheduled for completion as of the
2004/05 fiscal year:
Project Title Year
Conceptual Design of Aventura Founders Park 1996/97
Design of Country Club Drive Exercise Safety Improvements 1996/97
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 22
City of Aventura
Purchase of 5.5 acres for Aventura Founders Park
Bus Shelter & Bench Replacements
Aventura Blvd Beautffication Improvements
Northern Entrance Beautffication Improvements
Aventura Founders Park Development
Country Club Drive ExerciselWalking Path Improvements
NE 183rd Street Beautification Improvements
NE 34 Avenue Beautification Improvements
Library Landscaping Project
Huber Tract Open Space Land Purchase
NE 2071h Street Beautification Improvements
Country Club Dr. Exercise Path Safety Improvements
NE 190th Street Beautification Improvements
Biscayne Boulevard Phase I Beautification Improvements
FEC Landscape Buffer
NE 191st Street Beautification Improvements
Waterways Park Improvements
Founders Park Improvements
Biscayne Boulevard Phase II Beautffication Improvements
NE 185th Street & NE 28th Ave Beautification Improvements
NE 213th Street Beautification Improvements
Aventura Blvd. Entrance Features
Community/Recreation Center Conceptual Design
Community Recreation Center Development
Expanded Waterways Park Purchase
Biscayne Boulevard Phase II Beautification Improvements
Country Club Drive Beautification Improvements
Newsparer Racks
NE 188t Street Beautification Improvements
Yacht Club Way Beautification Improvements
William Lehman Causeway Beautffication Improvements
Veterans Park Development
Park Facilities/Open Space Recreation
1996/97
1996/97, 1997/98, 1998/99
1999/00,2000/01,2001/02
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1998/99
1998/99
1998/99,2004/05
1998/99
1998/99
1998/99
1998/99
1999/00
1999/00,2001/02,2002/03
2003/04
1999/00
1999/00
2001/02
2001/02
2000/01
2001/02
2003/04
2001/02
2002/03
2002/03, 2003/04
2002/03
2003/04
2003/04, 2004/05
2003/04
The estimated current population for the City of Aventura is 28,200. The City's
Comprehensive Plan recommended standard is 2.75 acres of park and recreation land
for every 1,000 potential residents. The amount of park and recreation land required by
the park standards for this population is 77.6 acres. In calculating the number of
recreation acres the city has available for use by residents, public private, golf courses
and marinas are accounted for at a different degree depending on accessibility to
citizens ofthe City. Assuming that public facilities can be accounted for at 100%, private
recreation facilities at 50%, and marinas and the golf course at 25%, the City existing
and proposed recreation areas total 114. Therefore. no deficiency exists under the
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 23
City of Aventura
City's standards. Table PFOS1 contains an inventory of existing and proposed
recreation and open space areas. The City owns 29 park/open space acres.
Although a deficiency in the provision of recreation/open space does not exist, the City
desires to increase access to public facilities and providing recreational opportunities for
all residents by constructing additional park facilities.
The major park facility improvement outlined in the 2005/06 - 2009/10 relates to the
providing a new park and maintenance projects. The projects are included in the
detailed project descriptions and a funding schedule that follows. (See Tables 1 and 2).
The completion of the five - year Capital Improvement Program for parks/open space
recreational facilities will provide the City residents with a well rounded recreational and
park system geared toward meeting the needs of today and tomorrow.
Table PFOS 1
CITY OF AVENTURA
Recreation/Open Space Inventory
TYPE FACILITY
Public Recreation Areas
C Country Club Drive ExerciselWalking path
C Arthur I Snyder Memorial Park
N Veterans Park
N Waterways Park
N Aventura Founders Park
ACRES
5.5
3.5
2.0
7.0
1.1J!
APPLICABLE ACRES
5.5
3.5
2.0
7.0
1.1J!
Public Recreation Subtotal
29.0
29.0
Private Recreation Areas
': ' Private Recreation Sijes
Marina Complexes
GoltCourses
Private Recreation Subtotal
Total Recreation Areas
C = Community Park
N = Neighborhood Park
. = Undeveloped
305.18
31.81
2.35
50.79
84.95
113.95
63.61
9.40
203.17
276.18
Citywide Beautification Program
In December of 1996, the City Commission approved the landscape design concepts to
be utilized with the implementation of a Citywide Beautification Program. This major
undertaking, addresses median and right of way landscaping throughout the public
areas within the City, and was adopted as one of the City's budget priorities and goals.
The landscape design includes the planting of an assortment of palm trees, including
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 24
City of Aventura
date palms at the City's entrances and coconut and royal palms on various medians
throughout the City, as well as shade trees such as live oaks.
With this Beautification Program, the City Commission has fulfilled its long-term goal of
creating the signature of the City and establishing its reputation as "the most beautiful
City in South Florida". The actual construction of these projects will be ongoing until all
of the improvements to the various areas within the City are complete.
The following areas have been completed or are scheduled for completion as of the
2004/05 fiscal year:
Aventura Boulevard, Northern City Entrance, NE 207th Street, NE 183rd Street, NE 185th
Street & 28th Avenue, NE 190th Street, NE 191't Street, NE 29th Avenue, NE 187th
Street, NE 188th Street, NE 213th Street, Biscayne Boulevard and FEC Landscape
Buffer, Aventura Boulevard Entrance Features, Country Club Drive, Yacht Club Way,
William Lehman Causeway and the Library Landscaping Project
Funding Plan
Funding for the proposed beautification and park facilities will be provided by the
proceeds from the following revenue sources:
Total Category Budget
Fundina:
General Fund
Park Impact Fees
Grants
$5,412,000
$3,987,000
1,075,000
350,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 25
city of Aventura
TABLE 1
PROPOSED BEAUTIFICATION AND PARK FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 200S106. 2009110
SUMMARY BY YEAR
, .."", , '.:
BP1 w",-" Pm De_m...' CM . 2,000,000 2,350,000 . ',3S0,ooo
BP2 Fo"",",", P.", Improwm"'" CS 215,000 200,000 <15,000
BP3 C- Be_n Imp"""","'" CS 83,500 "3,500 60,000 5T1,OOO
BP' Cooomy Club T...n;, Coun 1m"""",. cs 10,000 10000
T",",' . 2,368,500 . 2,983,500 ' 60,000 ' . . 5,"',000
TABLE 2
PROPOSED BEAUTIFICATION AND PARK FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FDR 2005106. 2009110
FUNDING PLAN
l.,c
BP1 Watetwayo Patk Devetopment CM ',350,000 1,000,000 ' 3,000,000 350,000
BP2 Found"", Pm Im >'Oveme"" CS "5,000 15,000 :>40,000
8P3 C- _'"""ovem..." CS 511,000 571,000
BP' CoonbyClubT...ni,Courtlmpmw. CS 10,000 10 000
T""'" 5"'2,000 . 1,015,000 . 3,981,000 . . 350,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 26
City of Aventura
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1 -CM
Waterways Park Development
2005106 $2,000,000 2006107 $2,350,000
This project includes developing and expanding the current Waterways Park. The 6
acre site would include a multipurpose sports field. playground, basketball court, fitness
trail, parking and restroom facilities.
en
~
-0
~
~
;;,§ ~---------~
~ ~ I 1--- 8-~ -""-- "- 'j':'
---- ,aJ í '
,,¡..I 2J1= \1
~ , I ¡;~ " ~ i " ,
Ç)' 0 »"'" "-
~ I-ê -"- --- :i!,~J '"
'\_--t'--'I\ - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ --
l' ] i -,
~~' \ 2JF I
(2 ~ I '- 5 -iì3 . U -~ -A'-' --~:""_,
:z: -< , ~ /' - -J-'-.i'
Ç,tL 'j ~ ~oa__-J_// '1'-"
"'-
. -'10 '
--",;;T¡J ---m':':-,-'-' . N . '10 V>
.' F"'tZ-"-
. rgU)-
, ""':W-9?-_~_n
-0- --.. - n- -- -- ------ - ----- ---------- ------.... -- ---- -----n--- -- -- - - -- ---- -- -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - --- - -- ---- - ----- ..-- - - -- - - - ---
2-CS
Founders Park Improvements
2005106 $215,000 2006107 $200,000
This project consists of maintenance projects, replacing and updating playground
equipment.
2005106
Parking Lot Expansion
Special Event Tents
Two Soccer Goal Sets
Replace Office Furniture
Holiday Lighting Improvements
Add Swing set
170,000
3,500
4,500
5,000
19,500
12,500
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 27
City of Aventura
2006/07
Construct Water Splash pad Play Area
$200,000
--- -- --------- ------- ---- ---- -------------------- -- - ------- ---- -- ---- -- -- -- ---- - - - - ---- - --------------- ---- ------ - - - - - - ----
3-CS
Citywide Beautification Improvements
2005/06 $83,500 2006/07 $433,500 2007/08 $60,000
This project consists of implementing the landscaping and beautification concepts
approved by the City Commission-
2005/06 NE 207 South Swale 75,000
Purchase 3 Benches and Trash Cans 8,500
2006/07 Purchase 3 Benches and Trash Cans 8,500
Miami Gardens Extension 300,000
Biscayne Boulevard Median (NE 209-212 St) 125,000
2007/08 NE 207th St (NE 34 Ave eastward to end) 60,000
----- ------ -- ---- ---- --- --- ---------- -- -------- - - -- ------ ---- -- ----- - --- - -- -- - - -- - --- -- -- - --- ---- ---- ---- - --- ---- -- ------ --
4-CS
Country Club Drive Tennis Court Improvements
2005/06 $$70,000
This project involves improvements to the tennis facilities that the City leases from the
Fairmont Country Club- The improvements include tennis court renovations,
windscreens, fencing, water fountain, shade awnings and trash facilities.
-------- - ---------------------- ---- -------------------- ------------ ------------------ ---- ---- -------- -------- -------- ------
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 28
City of Aventura
TRANSPORTATION, DRAINAGE AND INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS
This section includes improvements to the City of Aventura's transportation system,
roadways, drainage system, sidewalks, pedestrian pathways, street lighting and other
infrastructure improvements. There are 4 improvement projects in the Capital
Improvement Program, which total $4,005,694. Special emphasis was given to
correcting drainage deficiencies, Miami Gardens Drive extension project, 185th Street
connector project, installation of traffic video monitoring devices, improving safety
through street lighting and addressing maintenance considerations-
The projects outlined in this section have been developed based on a survey of all
areas of the City, with respect to the improvement items, by the Community Services
Department; City's consulting engineer and staff. The projects were prioritized
according to the urgency of the improvements needed and age of the areas to be
improved.
Policies
The City of Aventura's investment in improvements to the City's transportation system,
roads, sidewalks, street lighting and drainage system is based on the following policies:
Goal: Utilize the Stormwater Utility Fund to provide revenue sources to fund
drainage improvements contained in the CIP.
. Coordinate area-wide storm water developments with major street improvements.
. Provide adequate storm drainage as defined by present standards for different types
of areas of the City.
,. , Upgrade areas of the City to conform to present drainage standards to eliminate
, flood prone areas.
Goal: Improve local roads to meet road safety requirements and serve the
transportation needs of the City.
. Systematically provide local street improvements throughout the City based upon
the existing condition and age of the street and the cost of maintenance of the street.
. Provide an adequate road transportation network that meets or exceeds the capacity
rating outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.
. Implement improvements to meet safety standards.
Improve safety by installing street lighting on all appropriate public roadways.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 29
City of Aventura
Provide walkways and sidewalks to improve the safety of residents traveling
throughout the City.
. Accept the dedication of private roads throughout the City in accordance with the
Policy governing the conversion of private roads to public roads as outlined in
Resolution No, 97-05.
Existing Facilities
The following is a list of current public roads under the jurisdiction of the City:
NE 185th Street NE 27th Court
NE 28th Place NE 28th Avenue
NE 29th Avenue NE 29th Court
NE 29th Place NE 30th Avenue
NE 34th Avenue NE 187th Street
NE 188th Street NE 19Oth Street
NE 191st Street NE 192nd Street
NE 193rd Street Aventura Boulevard
West Country Club Drive North Country Club Drive
East Country Club Drive NE 201 Terrace
NE 203rd Street NE 205th Street
NE 206th Street NE 207th Street
NE 208th Street NE 208th Terrace
NE 209th Street NE 211111 Street
NE 213th Street NE 214111 Terrace
NE 214th Street NE 183m Street
Yacht Club Drive Turnberry way
Prior Accomplishments
Since the inception of the Capital Improvement Program, the following projects have
Qeen completed or are scheduled for completion as of the 2004/05 fiscal year:
Project Title
Country Club Drive Drainage Improvements
Sidewalk Installation - Southside of Lehman Causeway
Pedestrian Safety Study
Aventura Boulevard Street Lighting Improvements
NE 183rd Street & Drainage Improvements
NE183rd Street Lighting Improvements
NE 207111 Street Lighting Improvements
North Aventura Stormwater Collector (213th Street)
Pedestrian Transportation Circulation Safety Improvements
NE 190th Street Lighting Improvements
South Aventura Stormwater Collector
Sidewalk Improvements & Replacements
NE 34th avenue Street Lighting Improvements
Year
1996/97
1996/97
1996/97
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1997/98
1998/99
1998/99
1998/99, 1999/00,2000/01
1999/00
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 30
City of Aventura
NE 18Sth Street & NE 28th Avenue Improvements
Safety Improvements - Country Club Drive
NE 30th Avenue Drainage Improvements
NE 213th Street Lighting Improvements
NE 34th Avenue Safety/Road Improvements
Biscayne Lake Gardens Area Drainage Improvements
NE 1881h Street, Lighting & Drainage Improvements
Country Club Drive Improvements
NE 190 Street Drainage Improvements
Yacht Club way Drainage and Lighting Improvements
NE 31st Avenue Decorative Street Lighting
Extension of Lehman Causeway Westbound Service Road
Illuminated Street Signs
Hospital District NE 213St Street Drainage Connector
Hospital District north Collector
NE 207th Street Resurfacing
Traffic Video Monitoring Program
Directional Signs
Road. Drainage and Infrastructure Improvements
1999/00
1999/00
2000/01
2000101
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2002/03
2002/03
2003/04
2003/04
2003/04
2003/04
2003/04
2004/05
2004/05
2004/05
2004/05
The City incorporated in November of 1995, prior to that time the area of the City was
under the jurisdiction of Dade County. Condominium Associations or Dade County
maintained the roads and rights-of-way. The City entered into an Interlocal Agreement
with Dade County that transferred the jurisdiction of all public roads and rights-of-ways
to the City. In January of 1997 the City assumed the maintenance of all public roads
and rights-of-way. The City's consulting engineers conducted an extensive evaluation
of the City's infrastructure including roadways, drainage, sidewalks and streetlighting.
The study indicated that major improvements were necessary for storm drainage and
street lighting. Most of the infrastructure deficiencies have been addressed with the
çompletion ofthe original 5 year CIP which began in 1997/98.
'In January 1997, the City Commission by Resolution No. 97-05 adopted a Policy
governing the conversion of private roads to public roads. The Williams Island Road
project was the first roadway conversion to implement the provisions of the Policy as it
relates to drainage, street lighting and safety improvements.
Major emphasis was also placed on improving street lighting and replacing FPL cobra
head lights with decorative lighting fixtures in areas that the rights-of-way could
accommodate the new light fixtures. During the 1997/98 fiscal year the City in
cooperation with several developers entered into an Agreement to construct the North
Aventura Stormwater Collector (213th Street), 3 years ahead of schedule and at a cost
savings of $1,000,000. In 1999 the south collector was completed using a similar
private-public partnership. During 2002, NE 34th Avenue was connected to the north
collector. During 2003, Biscayne Lakes Garden area and NE 29th Avenue was
connected to the north connector. In 2004 the City embarked on the first phase of the
drainage improvements for the Hospital District.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 31
City of Aventura
Projects outlined herein can be also be classified as drainage improvements and road
resurfacing in accordance with established maintenance schedules. All infrastructure
upgrades of roadways will be coordinated with other projects to prevent multiple paving
projects or pavement cuts.
Funding Plan
Funding for the proposed roadway, drainage and infrastructure improvement projects
will be provided by the following sources:
Total Category Budget
Funding:
Transportation Fund
Storm Water Utility Fund
General Fund
$ 4,005,694
$2,260,994
1 ,465,000
279,700
Tables 1 and 2 showing these improvement projects and funding schedules are
followed by detailed project descriptions.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 32
City of Aventura
TABLE 1
PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION, DRAINAGE AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005106- 200911 0
SUMMARY BY YEAR
TOI1 Stormwa1er D",¡nago Imp,"""ment CS $ 515,000 $ 600,000 $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 1,465,000
TDI2 Street Lighting Im"""",",enls CS 225,000 140,000 365,000
nans- System . T_~
TO/3 Improvemenls CS 150,694 300,000 200,000 425,000 100,DOO 1,175,694
TO,. Road Resulfacing Prog",m CS 240,000 100,000 100,000 120,000 440,000 1,000,000
Totals
$ 1,130,694 $ 1,140,000 $
550,000 $
595,ODO $ 5on,OOO $ 4,005,694
TABLE 2
PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION, DRAINAGE AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005106- 2009110
FUNDING PLAN
~~;~~G~~I;,::~;~~~:~'-:~;;~7F~ÌJ~~~~:1,~:t¿i::fi~f¥.r?:,;:',; - ii:'. ;:; :::::",
..,_...... ~....
" ,
TDI1 Stormwale< D,..;nago Imp,"""ment CS 1,465,000 1,465,000
TDI2 Street Ughting Improvemenls CS 365,000 365,000
T",ns..-on System . T_~
TD\3 Improvements CS 1,175,694 279,700 B95,994
TOI4 Road Ros_dng Prog",m CS 1,000,000 1,000,000
Totals $ 4,005,694 $ 1,465,000 $ 279,700 $ 2,260,994
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 33
City of Aventura
1-CS
Stormwater Drainage Improvements
2005/06 $515,000 2006/07 $600,000
2008/09 $50,000 2009/10 $50,000
PROPOSED PROJECTS
2007/08 $250,000
Based on the Stormwater Master Plan prepared by the City's consulting engineers, the
projects included address drainage improvements in the Hospital district The Hospital
district system will be connected to NE 213 Street (North Aventura Stormwater
Collector).
Àdditional projects included provide for ongoing annual minor drainage improvements.
Most projects include the cost of resurfacing the affected roadways.
2005/06 Hospital District North Collector 415,000
Yacht Club Drive Seawall Improvements 100,000
2006/07 NE 213th Street Outfall Update 400,000
Remove Weir Gate from NE 30 Avenue 200,000
2007/08 Drainage Improvements 50,000
NE 190 Street Drainage Improvements 200,000
2008/09 Drainage Improvements 50,000
2009/10 Drainage Improvements 50,000
--------------- -------------- ------ -- -- ---------- -------- ------ - --------------- - _____m_---------- ---- ------ ---- -- --------
2-CS
$treet Lighting Improvements
2005/06 $225,000 2006/07 $140,000
This project provides for the installation of decorative streetlights in certain areas. The
lights will provide safe, well-lighted roadways that are aesthetically pleasing.
2005/06
Miami Gardens Drive Improvements
225,000
2006/07
NE 29th Avenue
140,000
.... - - ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- - - - ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - -- -- - - ---- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - -- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- - - - --- -- -- -- - -- ---.
3-CS
Road Resurfacing Program
2005/06 $240,000 2006/07 $100,000 2007/08 $100,000
2008/09 $120,000 2009/10 $440,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 34
City of Aventura
This project consists of resurfacing roadways that are not included in the Stormwater
Drainage Improvements. The roads represent the most critical areas as determined by
the Community Services Department.
2005/06 Aventura Boulevard 240,000
2006/07 Yacht Club Drive Eastbound Lanes 100,000
2007/08 Yacht Club Drive Westbound Lanes 100,000
2008/09 Williams Island Road 120,000
2009/10 NE 190111 Street 140,000
Hospital District 300,000
--------------- ------------------------------- --- ---------- ---------- ---- ------ -- ---- ---- -- ---------- -- ---- ------ - - ---- - ---
4-CS
Transportation System and Traffic Improvements
2005/06 $150,694 2006/07 $300,000 2007/08 $200,000
2008/09 $425,000 2009/10 $100,000
This project includes improvements to the City's transportation and traffic system
including bus shelters- A major component of this project is the implementation of the
Traffic Video Monitoring Program which provides for the installation of cameras at key
intersections to allow for the Police Department to monitor and respond to traffic
conditions-
2005/06
Traffic Video Monitoring Program
Lehman Causewa¥! Biscayne Blvd (1)
Sidewalks NE 185 Street Connector
54,700
95,994
'~006/07
Traffic Video Monitoring Program 225,000
Aventura Mall/Aventura Blvd/lves Dairy Road
and Biscayne Blvd (5)
Install Shelter at NE 213th St 75,000
2007/08 Traffic Video Monitoring Program 200,000
Country Club Drive (4)
2008/09 Traffic Video Monitoring Program 425,000
NE 20ih Street (2), NE 213111 Street (2)
NE183rd Street and NE 31st Ave. (1)
2009/10 Traffic Video Monitoring Program Updates 100,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 35
City of Aventura
PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
Capital projects in this functional category include providing improvements to existing
facilities in the City. The Capital Improvement Program includes 2 projects totaling
$74,500.
Policies
The City's investment in improvements to public buildings and operational facilities is
based on the following policies:
. Provide easily accessible services to City residents and adequate parking for City
facilities.
. Repair and maintain all buildings and facilities in proper order to increase life of said
facilities.
. Provide facilities for future growth of the City and services generated by such
growth.
Existina Facilities
Map 1 shows the location of the City of Aventura's Government Center, and the Dade
County Fire Rescue Station and Library Branch.
Prior AccomDlishments
The following projects have been completed or are scheduled for completion as of the
2004/05 fiscal year:
Proiect Title
Government Center/Police Station Needs Assessment Study
Government Center Land Purchase
Ðesign of Govemment Center/Police
'Construction of Government Center
Purchase of Charter Elementary School Property
Construction of Charter Elementary School
Community Center Improvements
Construction of Middle School Wing to Charter School
Year
1996/97
1997/98
1997/98
1999/00, 2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04, 2004/05
2004/05
Fundina Plan
Funding for the proposed Public Buildings Projects will be provided by the following
sources: Total Category Budget $74,500
Fundina:
General Fund
$74,500
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 36
City of Aventura
TABLE 1
PROPOSEO PUBLIC BUILOING AND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005J06 - 2009110
SUMMARY BY YEAR
"-,"'-'-;'- --';-""- ~:.n
PBF' Comm"ni1yCent'" Improwments CS $ ",SOD 24,500
PBF2 Holiday lighting tor Government Center CS SO,ooo 50000
Total, $ 74,500 $ $ $ $ $ 74,500
TABLE 2
PROPOSED PUBLIC BUILDING AND FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005ItJ6 - 2009110
FUNDING PLAN
PBF' Commenlty Center Improwments CS $ 24,500 $ 24,500
PHF2 Holiday lighting tor Gowmment Center CS SO,OOO SO,OOO
Total, $ 74,500 $ $ $ $ 74,SOO $
"
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 37
City of Aventura
....
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1-CS
Community Recreation Center Improvements
2005/06 $24,500
This project consists of providing equipment and improvements at the Community
Recreation Center.
2005/06
10 Tables and Chair Carts
Furniture for Waiting Area in West Lobby
5 Mats for Gymnastics
Replace 10 Card Printer
Parking Lot Security Cameras
$3,500
4,000
2,000
5,000
10,000
----- -------------- ---- -- -------------- ----- - -------- -- ------------- --- -- -------- -------- ----- --------- -------- ------ -- ----
2-CS
Holiday Lighting for Government Center
2005/06 $50,000
Project includes additional wiring and GFI outlets for the installation of holiday lighting.
h___- - -- ------------ -------- ---- --- - -- ---- ---- -- -- ------ ------- - -------- ----- - -- ------ ------ ----------- --- - --- ------------
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 38
City of Aventura
INFORMATION/COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
This functional category includes improvements to the City of Aventura's
information/communication systems, data processing and the automation of certain
operations by utilizing the latest technology to enhance productivity and efficiency.
There are 8 projects totaling $2,202,100.
Policies
The City of Aventura's investment in communication and computer projects is based on
the following policies:
. Continue the implementation upgrade of the Management Information System for all
key City operations to automate functions and improve efficiency and productivity.
Improve and maintain City-wide radio communications capabilities for Police
operations.
. Develop and maintain computerized capabilities of the various City departments and
information systems.
Utilize the latest state of the art technology including the use of the Internet for the
delivery of services.
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 39
City of Aventura
TABLE 1
PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS EQUIPMENT
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005106 - 2009110
SUMMARY BY YEAR
ICT8
PoI'ce Compute.. Systems PO 174,500 190,000 140,000 140,000 1«,150 7BB,650
Central Comput", S",em FFS 145,000 98,000 63,000 115,000 60,000 48',000
Radio P,""'aoo . Ra~acement PO 219,000 126,000 129,000 141,000 143,000 75B,OOO
Computer Eq'ipment FSS 8,000 6,000 8,000 6,000 B,OOO 36,000
Compute, Eq"p"",nt CM ',000 ',000 2,000 10,000
Compute' Eq'ip"""" CS 22,950 1B,OOO 12,000 4,000 ',000 60,950
Computer Eq"pment CD 19,500 B,OOO 8,000 21,000 B,OOO 64,500
Comput"' Eq~pment CC 3,000 3,000
Totals $ 592,950 $ '53,000 $ 362,000 $ '27,000 $ 367,150 $ 2,202,100
ICT'
ICT2
ICT3
ICT.
ICT5
ItT"
Icn
TABLE 2
PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS AND COMPUTERS EQUIPMENT
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005106 - 2009110
FUNDING PLAN
~
~
CC1 Police Compute" S",ems PD1
CC2 Ce"',aI Computer S",em FFS1
CC3 Radio P,""'ase' Re~acernent PD2
CC4 Comput", Eq"pment FSS2
CC5 Com put"' Eq"pmen! CM2
CC6 Comput", Equipment CS11
CC7 Comput", Eq"pme'" CO2
'I:¿8 Compute, Eq,'pme'" CC1
Totals
7B6,650
788,650
'81,000
4B',OOO
758,000
758,000
36,000
36,000
10,000
10,000
60,950
60,950
64,500
64,500
~
$ 2,202,100
3,000
$ 2,202,100
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 40
City of Aventura
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1 - PD
Police Computers Systems
2005/06 $174,500 2006/07 $190,000 2007/08 $140,000
2008/09 $140,000 2009/10 $144,150
This project consists of purchasing computer equipment and software that utilizes the
latest technology for the Police Department.
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Upgrades
Replace 12 Mobile Laptops
10 Desktop Computers
Air card Replacements
4 Computer/Multi Monitors
Plasma monitor for GPS
Driver License Swipes
5 Ticket Printers
50,000
65,000
25,000
7,500
15,000
6,000
3,000
3,000
65,000
25,000
50,000
50,000
Replace 12 Mobile Laptops
10 Desktop Computers
Replace AS 400
Upgrades
Upgrades
Replace 12 Mobile Laptops
10 Desktop Computers
50,000
65,000
25,000
50,000
65,000
25,000
Upgrades
Replace 12 Mobile Laptops
10 Desktop Computers
Upgrades
Replace 12 Mobile Laptops
10 Desktop Computers
50,000
65,000
24,150
----- -- ---- ---- -- ---- ---- ------ ---- ------ -- -- -- ------------------- --- ------ ---- --- - -- - - ---- ----- ---- --- -- ---- ------ -- ---- --
2 - FS
Central Management Information System
2005/06 $145,000 2006/07 $98,000 2007/08 $63,000
2008/09 $115,000 2009/10 $60,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 41
City of Aventura
This project consists of purchasing new and replacement computer hardware and
software that utilize the latest technology for the City's general information management
system, which is used by all City Departments.
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Software/Lice nses/U pg rades
Servers/ Security/UPS/Switches
AS 400 Upgrades
MS Exchange Implementation
Video Webserver
Backup Antenna for City Radio
Softwa re/L icenses/U pg rades
Servers/ Security/UPS/Switches
AS 400 Upgrades
Software/L icenses/U pg rades
Servers/ Security/UPS/Switches
AS 400 Upgrades
Backup Devices
Softwa re/Ucenses/U pg rades
Servers/ Security/UPS/Switches
AS 400 Upgrades
Softwa re/Ucenses/U pg ra d es
Servers/ Security/UPS/Switches
AS 400 Upgrades
10,000
37,000
5,000
15,000
10,000
68,000
15,000
78,000
5,000
15,000
33,000
5,000
10,000
30,000
30,000
55,000
25,000
30,000
5,000
------- ---- ------ -- -- ------ -- - - -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- ---- - ----- -- ---- ------ -- - - - ------ --- -- ---- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- - - -- - - - - -- -- ----
3-PD
~adio Purchase & Replacement
2005/06 $219,000 2006/07 $126,000 2007/08 $129,000
2008/09 $141,000 2009/10 $143,000
This project consists of purchasing equipment to establish and maintain an 800 Mhz
police radio system to improve communications and purchase new radios for projected
additional personnel in the Police Department and replace radios that may become
damaged or become inoperative during the five-year period.
2005/06
2006/07
10 Handheld & 10 Mobile Radios
800 Mhz Radio System Upgrades
Convert Switch to Digital
ESK encryption for 800 Mhz
10 Handheld & 10 Mobile Radios
800 Mhz Radio System Upgrades
73,000
50,000
60,000
36,000
76,000
50,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 42
City of Aventura
2007/08 10 Handheld & 10 Mobile Radios 79,000
800 Mhz Radio System Upgrades 50,000
2008/09 10 Handheld & 10 Mobile Radios 81,000
800 Mhz Radio System Upgrades 60,000
2009/10 10 Handheld & 10 Mobile Radios 83,000
800 Mhz Radio System Upgrades 60,000
- -- ---- - ----- ---- ------ ---------- -- -- -- ---- - ----- ------ ---- ---- -------------- - - -- ---- - --- - --- - --------- -- -- - - ---- - - - -- - - ---
4 - FSS
Computer Equipment
2005/06 $8,000 2006/07 $6,000
2008/09 $6,000 2009/10 $8,000
2007/08 $8,000
This project includes the replacement of existing equipment for the various employees
of the department
--- ---- ------ ---------- ---- ------ -- -- -- -- - - ------ - - ---- -------- -- ---- -- ------ -- -- ---- -- -- - --- ---- -- ---- ----- --- - - - --- - - - ---
5-CM
Computer Equipment
2005/06 $4,000 2006/07 $4,000
2007/08 $2,000
This project consists of upgrading computer equipment in the Office of the City
Manager.
n_- - -- -- - - -- - - ---- ---- -- ---- - - - - -- -- -- ---- -- -- - - - - ---- -- --- --- -- --- - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - -- -- -- - --- -- - -- - - -- - --- - - - - - - - - - -- -- - ---
6-CS
- Computer Equipment
2005/06 $22,950 2006/07 $18,000
2008/09 $4,000 2009/10 $4,000
2007/08 $12,000
This project consists of purchasing and upgrading computer equipment in the
Community Services Department
2005/06
9 Computers
GIS Updates
Replace Large Format Printer
Digital Camera
18,000
3,500
1,000
450
2006/07
9 Computers
18,000
2007/08
6 Computers
12,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 43
City of Aventura
2008/09
2 Computers
4,000
2009/10
- ---- -------------------- ------ -------- -- ------ ---- -- ---- ---- ---- -- -- -- -- ---- - ----- -- ---- ---- -- ------ ------ -- -- -- -- --------
2 Computers
4,000
7-CD
Computer Equipment
2005/06 $19,500 2006/07 $8,000
2008/09 $21,000 2009/10 $8,000
2007/08 $8,000
This project consists of computer upgrades, replacement printers and the
implementation of field computers for code compliance and building inspections for the
Community Development Department
2005106
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Replace 4 Computers
Replace 3 Printers
Replace 1 Line Printer
Plotter
6,000
1,000
3,500
9,000
6,000
500
1,500
Replace 4 Computers
Replace 1 Printers
Replace 1 Line Printer
Replace 4 Computers
Replace 1 Printers
Replace 1 Form Printer
6,000
500
1,500
7,500
500
4,000
9,000
Replace 5 Computers
Replace 1 Printers
Replace 1 Line Printer
Plotter
Replace 4 Computers
Replace 1 Printers
Replace 1 Form Printer
6,000
500
1,500
--- ---- -------- ---- ---- - ----------------- -- ---- ---- -- ---- ------ ---- ------- - ---- -------- ------ ---- ---- - - -- -- - - -- -- -- -- -- ----
8-CC
Computer Equipment
2006/07 $3,000
This project consists of upgrading and replacing computer equipment in the City Clerk's
Office-
Page 44
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
City of Aventura
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASES AND REPLACEMENTS
This section includes projects relating to Capital Equipment Purchases and
Replacements for all operating departments. There are a total of 4 projects totaling
$2,599,743.
Policies
The City Aventura's investment in capital equipment purchases and replacements is
based on the following policies:
Goal: Provide capital equipment that will meet the needs of all departments in
order to maintain the efficiency and productivity of providing municipal services to the
residents of the City.
. Replace all present equipment that is required when they become unusable, unsafe
or when maintenance costs outweigh the total cost of replacement.
. Develop and maintain an "Equipment Evaluation and Replacement Guide" to
determine replacement schedules and costs.
. Purchase more economical and multi-functional vehicles.
. Purchase new equipment that will increase productivity and reduce personnel and
maintenance costs.
. Maintain all City assets at a level adequate to protect the City's capital investment
and to minimize future maintenance and replacement costs.
Pro Dosed CaDital EauiDment Purchase And ReDlacement
'Most projects outlined in the 2005/06 to 2009/10 Capital Improvement Program are
either pertaining to vehicles or operational equipment. These 4 projects, worth
$2,599,743 are displayed in Table 1.
Detailed project descriptions and a funding schedule follow. The CIP guidelines provide
that capital equipment shall be defined as either having a useful life of more than one
year and/or a value of $500 or more.
Fundina Plan
Funding for the proposed Capital Equipment Purchase and Replacement Projects will
be provided by annual appropriations from the following sources:
Total Category Budget
$2,599,743
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 45
City of Aventura
FundinQ:
General Fund
Police Impact Fee Fund
$2,068,743
$ 531,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 46
City of Aventura
TABLE 1
PROPOSEO CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPLACEMENT
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2005/00 - 20<)9110
SUMMARY BV VEAR
l"J~JfIìir;,';';-r:rli::;ð,\;:¡~'l:i::~T,;.:;;JIi:i!i.t;:;::~.l':W'~;:r~:l':J\1{1¡;l:¡':;H,'~,,~;, -' ,I,¿,
CE' Vehide Pu<chase . Replacements PD 346,200 375,590 402,268 342,000 453,260 ',919,318
CE2 Equipment Pu<chase and Replacement PD 178,50<) 99,500 108,000 55,000 90,000 531,000
CE3 Equipment Pu<Chase and Replacement CS 17,500 25,000 '8,000 '3,500 74,000
'CE4 Equipment Pu<Chasa and Replacemant CD 3,275 48,700 2,'00 550 20,800 75,425
Totals 527,975 $ 54',29<J $ 537,368 $ 4'5,550 $ 577,560 $ 2,599,743
TABLE>
PROPOSED CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND REPLACEMENT
PROJECTS SCHEDULED FOR 2004/05 - 2008/09
FUNDING PLAN
~W]3~i!\"':
CE1
Vahlele Pu<Chase . Replacements
PD
',919,3'8
',9'9,3'8
CE2
Equipment Pu<Chase and Replacement PD
531,000
531,000
CE3
Equipment Pu<Cha.. and Raplacement CS
74,000
74,000
CE4
Equipment Pu<Chase and Replacement CD
75,425
75,425
Totals
$ 2,599,743
$ 2,068,?43
531,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 47
City of Aventura
PROPOSED PROJECTS
1 - PD
Vehicle Purchase & Replacements
2005/06 $346,200 2006/07 $375,590 2007/08 $402,268
2008/09 $342,000 2009/10 $453,260
This project consists of purchasing police vehicles to accommodate new employee
additions and establish a vehicle replacement program in the Police Department.
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
Replace 12 Patrol Vehicles
Replace 4 Wheel Drive Vehicle
$313,200
33,000
$322,590
22,000
9,000
22,000
Replace 12 Patrol Vehicles
Replace Command Post Minivan
Replace Wave Runner
Replace SRO SUV
Replace 12 Patrol Vehicles
Replace Crime Scene Van
Prisoner Van
$332,268
37,000
33,000
$342,000
Replace 12 Patrol Vehicles
Replace 12 Patrol Vehicles
Replace 4 Wheel Drive Vehicle
Replace Crime Prevention Van
Replace 2 Motorized Carts
$352,260
36,000
45,000
20,000
---.-.- .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- .-.---.-.-.-.-.- .-.-.- .-.-.-.- .-.-. -.- .-. -.- .-.-.-. -.-. - .-.-. -.-.-.-.-.-.-. - .-.-.-.-.-. -. - .-.-.-
'2:'PD
Equipment Purchase and Replacement
2005/06 $178,500 2006/07 $99,500 2007/08 $108,000
2008/09 $55,000 2009/10 $90,000
This project consists of purchasing equipment for the Police Department. The following
is a breakdown of the items to be replaced:
2005/06
3 Laser Units for Motors 12,000
Replace 15 vests 9,500
Replace 2 Projectors 6,000
12 Overhead light bars, Sirens & Cages 66,000
Replace Marine Patrol Boat 60,000
Additional security equipment 25,000
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 48
City of Aventura
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
10 Sirens & Cages
Replace 10 vests
Replace 6 radar units
Marine patrol engine replacement
SMART Trailer
51,000
6,500
18,000
12,000
12,000
10 Sirens & Cages
Replace 10 SWAT vests
Replace 15 vests
Replace 4 radar units
Equip Prisoner Van
51,000
25,000
10,000
12,000
10,000
55,000
10 Sirens & Cages
Replace 10 vests
10 Light bars, sirens and cages
Replace 2 boat engines
7,000
57,000
26,000
--------- ---- -- ----- - ---- - ----- ---- -- -- -------- ---- - - ---- -------- - --- ------------ -- -- -- ------ ------ ---- ---- ---- - --- --------
3 - CS
Equipment Purchase and Replacement
2006/07 $17,500 2007/08 $25,000 2008/09 $18,000
2009/10 $13,500
This project consists of the replacement of equipment that has become inefficient,
defective, or unusable and to add new equipment to provide improved services in the
Community Services Department The following is a breakdown of the items to be
purchased:
2006/07 Pickup Truck 17,500
'2007/08 Utility Vehicle 25,000
2008/09 Pickup Truck 18,000
2009/10 Replace Sedan 13,500
- -- -------------- ------ ---- -- ---- -------- -- - - -- ---- ------ --- ----- --- --- - --- ------ -- - - ------ -- ---- ------ -------- -- ------- - --
4-CD
Equipment Purchase and Replacement
2005/06 $3,275 2006/07 $48,700 2007/08 $2,100
2008/09 $550 2009/10 $20,800
This project consists of the addition of equipment or the replacement of equipment that
has become inefficient, defective, or unusable in the Community Development
Department The following is a breakdown of the items to be replaced:
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 49
City of Aventura
2005/06 3 File Cabinets
Parcel Maps
2006/07 Utility Vehicle
Pickup Truck
2007/08 2 File Cabinets
1 Vertical file
2008/09 Bookcase
2009/10 Pickup Truck
1,700
1,575
28,700
20,000
1,500
600
550
20,800
---------- --------- ---------- ------ -- -- ---------- -- - - ---- - --- ---------- -- ---- - - - - ---- - --- -- -- -- -- ---- - --- -- - - ---- -- -- -- - ---
Capital Improvement Program 2005-2010
Page 50
APPENDIX C. CONSISTENCY OF A VENTURAL COMPREHESNIVE PLAN
WITH CHAPTER 163, FLORIDA STATUTES
Appendix C. Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. 1998-2004 163, F.S. Citations N/A* Addressed Amendment Needed
(where/how) By Element
1998: ICh. 98-75, s.14; Cb.146, ss. 2-5: Ch. 98-176 ss. 2-6 and 12-15' Ch. 98-258 ss.4-51
I Exempted brownfield area amendments from the twice- 163.3 I 87(1)(g) Procedural
a-vear limitation.
2 Required that the capital improvements element set 163.3177(3)(a)4 Capital Improvement
forth standards for the management of debt. Element, Program
(Appendix A)
3 Required inclusion of at least two planning periods at 163.3 I 77(5Xa) Procedural
least 5 vears and at least 10 vears,
4 Allowed multiple individual plan amendments to be 163.3 I 84(3)(d) Procedural
considered tol!ether as one amendment cycle.
5 Defined optional sector plan and created section 163.3164(31)& Procedural
163.3245 allowing local governments to address DR! 163.3245
issues within certain identified I!eowaphic areas.
6 Established the requirements for a public school 163.3177(12) Procedural, no Public
facilities element, Schools Element
(voluntarY)
7 Established the minimum requirements for imposing 163.3180(12), [now X
school concurrencv Sec. (13)1
8 Required DCA adopt minimum criteria for the 163.3180(13), [now X
compliance determination of a public school facilities Sec. (14)]
element imoosing school concurrencv,
9 Required that evaluation and appraisal reports address 163.3191(2)(i) Evaluation and
coordination of the comp plan with existing public Appraisal Report and
schools and the school district's 5-year work program Intergovernmental
Coordination Element
10 Amended the definition of "in compliance" to include 163.3 I 84(1)(b) Procedural
consistencv with Sections 163.3180 and 163.3245.
Appendix C, Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. 1998-2004 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
(where/how) Bv Element
11 Required DCA to maintain a file with all documents 163.3184(2), (4), & X Procedural
received or generated by DCA relating to plan (6)
amendments and identifY; limited DCA's review of
proposed plan amendments to written comments, and
required DCA to identifY and list all written
communications received within 30 days after
transmittal of a proposed olan amendment.
12 Allowed a local government to amend its plan for a 163.3187(6Xb) Procedural
period of up to one year after the initial determination of
sufficiency of an adopted EAR even if the EAR is
insufficient.
13 Substantially reworded Section 163.3191, F,S., related 163.3191 Evaluation and
to evaluation and appraisal renorts, Appraisal Report
14 Changed the population requirements for municipalities 163.3 I 77(6)(i) X
and counties which are required to submit otherwise
optional elements,
1999: ICh. 99-251, ss.65-6, aDd 90' Ch. 99-378, ss. 1,3-5, aDd 8-9, Laws of Floridili
15 Required that ports and local governments in the coastal 163.3178(7) X
area, which has spoil disposal responsibilities, identifY
dredlZe disoosal sites in the comp plan.
16 Exempted from the twice-per-year limitation certain port 163.3187(1 )(h) X
related amendments for port transportation facilities and
projects eligible for funding by the Florida Seaport
Transportation and Economic Development Council.
17 Required rural counties to base their future land use 163.317(6)(a) X
plans and the amount of land designated industrial on
data regarding the need for job creation, capital
investment, and economic development and the need to
stremrthen and diversitv local economics.
18 Added the Growth Policy Act to Ch. 163, Part II to 163.2511,163.25,14, Procedural
promote urban infill and redevelopment. 163.2517, 163.2520,
163,2523,163.2526
2
Appendix C, Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Cbanges to Cbapter 163, F.S. 1998-2064 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
(wbere/bow) Bv Element
19 Required that all comp plans comply with the school 163.3177(6Xa) Future Land Use
siting requirements bv October 1, 1999. Element, Policv 1.3
20 Made transportation facilities subject to concurrency. 163.3180(1Xa) Transportation
Element,
Concurrency
requirements
21 Required use of professionally accepted techniques for 163.3180(1)(b) Transportation
measuring level of service for cars, trucks, transit, Element,
bikes and pedestrians. Concurrency
requirements
22 Excludes public transit facilities from concurrency 163.3180(4)(b) Transportation
requirements. Element,
Concurrency
requirements
23 Allowed multi-use ORIs to satisfy the transportation 163.3180(12) Procedural
concurrency requirements when authorized by a local
comprehensive plan under limited circumstances.
24 Allowed multi-modal transportation districts in areas 163.3180(15) Procedural
where priorities for the pedestrian environment are
assigned bv the plan.
25 Exempted amendments for urban infill and 163.31879(1)(h) & (i) Procedural
redevelopment areas, public school concurrency from
the twice-per-year limitation.
3
Appendix C. Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. 1998-2004 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
(where/how) By Element
26 I Defined brownfield designation and added the 163.3220(2) Procedural
assurance that a developer may proceed with
develooment unon receint of a brownfield desilDlation.
2000: ICh. 2000-158, ss. 15-17. Ch. 2000-284, s.l, Ch. 2000-317, s. 18. Laws of Florida 1
27 Repealed Section 163.3184(lIXc), F.S., that required Procedural
funds from sanction for non-compliant plans go into the
Growth Management Trust Fund,
28 Repealed Section 163.3187(7), F.S. that required Procedural
consideration of an increase in the annual total acreage
threshold for small scale plan amendments and a report
bv DCA.
29 Repealed Sections 163.3191(13) and (15), F.S. Procedural
30 Allowed small scale amendments in areas of critical 163.3187(1)(c)l.e X
state concern to be exempt from the twice-per-year
limitation only ifthev are for affordable housimz.
31 Added exemption of sales from local option surtax 163.25 I 7«3)(j)2 Procedural
imposed under Section 212.054, F.S., as examples of
incentives for new development within urban infill and
redevelopment areas.
2001: ICb. 2001-279, s.641
32 I Created the rural land stewardshio area orolll'am. TI63.3177(lI)(d) I X I I
2002: ICb. 2002-296, ss. 1-11, Laws of Florida 1
33 Required that all agencies that review comprehensive 163.3174 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental
plan amendments and rezoning include a nonvoting Coordination Coordination Element
representative of the district school board. Element, Interlocal amendments
Agreement for Public
School Facilities
Planning
34 Required coordination of local comprehensive plan 163.3177(4)(a) Procedural Intergovernmental
with the regional water supply plan, Coordination Element
amendment
35 Plan amendments for school-siting maps are exempt 163.3177(6)(a) Procedural
from s. 163.3187(I)'s limitation on freauencv.
4
Appendix C, Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. 1998-2004 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
(where/how) Bv Element
36 Required that by adoption of the EAR, the sanitary 163.3 I 77(6)(c) X
sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water and natural
groundwater aquifer recharge element consider the
regional water supply plan and include a 10-year work
plan to build the identified water supplv facilities.
37 Required consideration of the regional water supply 163.3 I 77(6)(d) Conservation and
plan in the preparation of the conservation element. Coastal Management
Element amendment
38 Required that the intergovernmental coordination 163.3 I 77(6)(h) Intergovernmental
element (ICE) include relationships, principles and Coordination Element
guidelines to be used in coordinating comp plan with amendment
regional water supplv plans.
39 Required the local governments adopting a public 163.3177(6)(h)4 X
educational facilities element execute an interlocal
agreement with the district school board, the county,
and non-exemptinl! municioalities.
40 Required that counties larger than 100,000 population 163.3 I 77(6)(h) 6,7 & Interlocal Services
and their municipalities submit a interlocal service 8 Delivery Agreement
delivery agreements (existing and proposed, deficits or
duplication in the provisions of service) report to DCA
by January 1,2004. Each local government is required
to update its ICE based on the findings of the report.
DCA will meet with affected parties to discuss
stratel!ies to remedv anv deficiencies or duolications.
41 Required local governments and special districts to 163.3177(6)(h)9 Procedural
provide recommendations for statutory changes for
annexation to the Legislature by Februarv 1,2003.
42 Added a new section 163.31776 that allows a county to 163.31776 X
adopt an optional public educational facilities element
in cooperation with the armlicable school board.
5
Appendix C, Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to Chapter 163, F.S. 1998-2004 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
(where/how) By Element
43 Added a new section 163.31777 that requires local 163.31777 Intergovernmental Intergovernmental
governments and school boards to enter into an Coordination Coordination Element
interlocal agreement that addresses school siting, Element, Interlocal amendments
enrollment forecasting, school capacity, infrastructure Agreement for Public
and safety needs of schools, schools as emergency School Facilities
shelters, and shann!! of facilities. Planning
44 Added a provision that the concurrency requirement for 163.3180(4)(c) Concurrency
transportation facilities may be waived by plan requirements
amendment for urban infill and redevelopment areas.
45 Expanded the definition of "affected persons" to 163.3 I 84«1)(a) Procedural
include property owners who own land abutting a
chan!!e to a future land use maD.
46 Expanded the definition of "in compliance" to include 163.3 I 84«1)(b) Procedural
consistency with Section 163.31776 (public educational
facilities element).
47 Streamlined the timing of comprehensive plan 163.3184 (3, 4, 6, 7 Procedural
amendment review. and 8)
48 Required that local governments provide a sign-in form 163.3184(l5)(c) Procedural
at the transmittal hearing and at the adoption hearing for
oersons to orovide their names and addresses.
49 Exempted amendments related to providing 163.3187(l)(k) Procedural
transportation improvements to enhance life safety on
"controlled access major arterial highways" from the
limitation on the frequency of plan amendments
contained in s.163.3187(Î).
6
Appendix C, Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment
Chapter 163, (where/how) Needed By
F.S. 1998- Element
2004
50 Required EAR's to include: 163.3191(2)(1) Evaluation and
0 Consideration of the appropriate regional water supply plan, Appraisal
and Report/City not in
0 An evaluation of whether past reductions in land use densities Coastal High Hazard
in coastal high hazard areas have impaired property rights of Area
current residents where redevelopment occurs.
51 Allowed local governments to establish a special master process to 163.3215 Procedural
assist the local governments with challenges to local development
orders for consistencv with the comprehensive plan.
52 Created the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Certification 163.3246 Procedural
Program to allow less state and regional oversight of comprehensive
plan process ifthe local government meets certain criteria.
53 Added a provision to Section 380.06(24), Statutory Exemptions, that 163.3187(1) Procedural
exempts from the requirements for developments of regional impact,
any water port or marina development if the relevant local
government has adopted a "boating facility siting plan or policy"
(which includes certain specified criteria) as part of the coastal
management element or future land use element of its comprehensive
plan. The adoption of the boating facility siting plan or policy is
exempt from the limitation on the frequency of plan amendments
contained in s. 163.3 187(1).
54 Prohibited a local government, under certain conditions, from 163.3]94(6) Procedural
denying an application for development approval for a requested land
use for certain proposed solid waste management facilities.
12003: [Ch. 03-1,ss.14-J5;.ch. 03-162,s. l;ch.n~3-261,8:1~8;ch.()3-28(j,s:~I,_La\Vs.of'FI~~~a.1J
7
Appendix C. Consistency with Chapter 163, F.S.
Changes to 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment
Chapter 163, F.S. (where/how Needed By
1998-2004 Element
55 Creates the Agricultural Lands and Practices Act. 163.3162 X
(2): Provides legislative findings and purpose with respect to
agricultural activities and duplicative regulation.
(3): Defmes the tenns "fann," "farm operation," and "farm
product'. for purposes of the act.
(4): Prohibits a county ITom adopting any ordinance, resolution,
regulation, rule, or policy to prohibit or otherwise limit a bona fide
fann operation on land that is classified as agricultural land.
(4)(a): Provides thatthe act does not limit the powers ofa county
under certain circumstances.
(4)(b): Clarifies thaI a farm operation may not expand its
operations under certain circumstances.
(4)( c): Provides that the act does nollimit the powers of certain
counties.
(4)(d): Provides that certain county ordinances are not deemed to
be a duplication ofrenulation.
56 Changes "State Comptroller" references to "Chief Financial Procedural
Officer."
57 Provides for certain airports 10 abandon DR! orders. X
58 Amended to confonn to the repeal ofs. 235.185 and the enactment 163.3 J776(J)(b)(2)-(3) Procedural
of similar material in s. 1013.35.
59 Amended to conform to the repeal of ch. 235 and the enactment of 163.37111~~)~C~) (2)(e)-(I), Procedural
similar malerial in ch. 1013. (3)(c), (4), 6 (b
I 2004: [Ch. 04-5, s. II; ch. 04-37, s. I; ch. 04-230, ss. 1-4; ch. 04-372, ss. 2-5; ch. 04-381, ss. 1-2; ch. 04-384, s. 2, Laws of Florida.] I
60 (10): Amended to confonn to the repeal of the Florida High-Speed 163.3167 Procedural
Rail Transportalion Act, and the creation ofthe Florida High-
Speed Rail Authority Act.
(13): Created to require local governments to identiJÿ adequate
water supply sources to meet future demand.
(14): Created to limit the effecl of judicial determinations issued
subsequent to certain development orders pursuant to adopted land
develoDment reeulations.
8
Appendix C. Consistency with Chapter 163, F,S,
Changes to 163, F.S. Citations ~ N/A Addressed Amendment
Chapter 163, F.S. (where/how Needed By
1998-2004 Element
61 (1): Provides legislative findings on the compatibility of development with military Creates X
Installations. 163.3175.
(2): Provides for the exchange of infonnation relatíng to proposed land use decisions
between counties and local governments and military installations.
(3): Provides for responsive comments by the commanding officer or hislher designee.
(4): Provides for the county or affected local government to lake such comments into
consideration.
(5): Requires the representative of the military installation to be an ex-officio, nonvoting
member of the county's or local government's land planníng or zoning board.
(6): Encourages the commanding officer 10 provide infonnation on community planning
assistance !!!'ants.
62 163.3177 163.3177 Future Land Use
(6)(a): Element Amendment
. Changed to require local governments to amend the future land use element by June 30,
2006 to ínclude criteria to achieve compatibility with military installations.
- Changed to specifically encourage rural land stewardship area designation as an
overlay on the future land use map.
(6)(c):
- Extended the deadline adoption of the water supply facilities work plan amendment
until December I, 2006; provided for updatíng the work plan every five years; and exempts
such amendment from the limitation on frequency of adoption of amendments.
(10)(1): Provides for the coordination by the state land planning agency and the
Department of Defense on compatibility issues for military installations.
(ll)(d)(l): Requires DCA, in cooperation with olher specified state agencies, to provide
assistance to local governments ín implementing provisions relating to rural land
stewardship areas.
(l1)(d)(2): Provides for multicounty rural land stewardship areas.
(l1)(d)(3)-(4): Revises requirements, including the acreage threshold for designatíng a
rural land stewardship area.
(l1)(d)(6)(j): Provides that transferable rural land use credits may be assigned at
differenl ratios according to the natural resource or other beneficial use characteristics of
the land.
(11)(e): Provides legislative findings regarding mixed-use, high-density urban infill and
redevelopment projects; requires DCA to provide technical assistance to local
governments.
(11)(1): Provides legislative findíngs regarding a program for the transfer of development
rights and urban in fill and redevelopment; requires DCA to provide technical assistance
to local governments.
9
Changes to 163, F.S. Citations N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Chapter 163, (where/how) By Element
F.S. 1998-2004
63 (I): Provides legislative findings with respect to the shortage of Creates Procedural
affordable rentals in the state. 163.31771.
(2): Provides definitions,
(3): Authorizes local governments to permit accessory dwelling units in
areas zoned for single family residential use based upon certain rrodings.
(4): Provides for certain accessory dwelling units to apply lowards
satisfying the affordable housing component of the housing element in a
local government's comprehensive plan.
(5): Reauires the DCA to report to the Le~islature.
64 Amends the definition of "in compliance" to add language referring to the l63.3l84(IXb) X
Wekiva Parkwav and Protection Act.
65 (l )(ro): Created to provide that amendments to address criteria or 163.3187 Procedural
compatibility of land uses adjacent to or in close proximity to military
installations do not count toward the limitation on frequency of amending
comprehensive plans.
(I)(n): Created to provide that amendments to establish or implement a
rural land stewardship area do not count toward the limilation on
freouencv of amendin~. comprehensive Dlans.
66 Created to provide that evaluation and appraisal reports evaluate 163.319l(2)(n) X No military installations
whether criteria in the land use element were successful in achieving land within or proximate to
use compatibilitv with military installations. Citv
10
APPENDIX D. CONSISTENCY OF A VENTURA COMPREHESNIVE PLAN
WITH RULE CHAPTER 9J-5, F.A.c.
Appendix D. Consistency with Rule 9J-5, F.A.C.
Changes to Rule 9J-S, F.A.C. 1989-2004 9J-S, F.A.C. N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Citations (WherelHow) By Element
October 20, 1998
I Established requirements for the Public School Facilities Element for 9J-5,025 X
Public School Concun-ency for local governments that adopt schoo]
concurrencv.
March 21, 1999
2 Defined Dublic transit and stonnwater management facilities. 9J-5,003 Procedural
3 Revised the definitions of affordable housing, coastal planning area, port 9J-5.003 Procedural
facility, and wetlands.
4 Repeal the definitions of adjusted for family size, adjusted gross income, 9J-5,003 Procedural
development, hi¡¡ ¡ recharge area or Prime recharge area, mass transit.
5 Revised provisions relating to adoption by reference into the local 9J-5.005(2)(g) Procedural
comprehensive Dlan. and /8)(j)
6 Repealed transmittal requirements for proposed evaluation and appraisal 9J-5,0053(2), Procedural
reports, submittal requirements for adopted evaluation and appraisal through (5)
reports, criteria for determining the sufficiency of adopted evaluation and
appraisal reports, procedures for adoption of evaluation and appraisal
reports.
Note: Transmillal requirements for proposed evaluation and appraisal
reports and submillal requirements for adopted evaluation and appraisal
reoorts were incoroorated Rule Chanter 9J-J J, F,A.C
7 Repealed conditions fOf de minimis impact and referenced conditions in 9J-5.0055(3)6 Procedural
Subsection 163.3]80(6), F.S.
8 Required the future land use map to show the transportation concurrency 9J-5.006(4) Transportation
exception area boundaries of such areas have been designated and areas Element
for possible future municinal incoenoration.
9 Required objectives of the Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Stormwater 9J-5.011(2) Inftastructure
Management, Potable Waster and Natura] Groundwater Aquifer Element
Recharge Element to address protection of high recharge and prime
recharge areas.
10 Repealed the Intergovernmental Coordination Element process to 9J-5.0 I 5(4) X Procedural,
determine if development proposals would have significant impacts on Intergovernmental
other local governments or state or regional resources or facilities, and Coordination
provisions relating to resolution of disputes, modification of Element
development orders, and the rendering of development orders to the
DeDartment of Communi tv Affairs mCA).
Appendix D. Consistency with Rule 9J.5, F.A.c'
Changes to Rule 9J-S, F.A.C. 198!1-2004 9J-S, F.A.C. N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Citations (WherelHow) By Element
II Clarified that local governments not located within the urban area of a 9J-5.019(1) X
Metropolitan Planning Organization are required to adopt a Traffic
Circulation Element and that local governments with a population of
50,000 or less are not required to prepare Mass Transit and Ports,
Aviation and Related Facilities Elements.
12 Required objectives of the Transportation Element to: 9J-5.019(4)(b) X
0 Coordination the siting of new, or expansion of existing ports,
airports, or related facilities with the Future Lane Use, Coastal
Management, and Conservation Elements;
0 Coordination surface transportation access to ports, airports, and
related facilities with the traffic circulation system;
0 Coordination ports, airports, and related facilities plans with
plans of other transportation providers; and
Ensure that access routes to ports, airports and related facilities are
I properly intellfated with other modes of transportation.
13 Required policies of the Transportation Element to: 9J-5.019(4((c) Applicable
0 Provide for safe and convenient on.site traffic flow; requirements in
0 Establish measures for the acquisition and preservation of public Element
transit rights-of-way and corridors;
0 Promote ports, airports and related facilities development and
expansIOn;
0 Mitigate adverse structural and non-structural impacts from
ports, airports and related facilities;
0 Protect and conserve natural resources within ports, airports and
related facilities;
0 Coordinate intermodal management of surface and waster
transportation within ports, airports and related facilities; and
Protect ports, airports and related facilities from encroachment of
incomoatible land uses.
14 Added standards for the review of land development regulations by the 9J-5.022 Procedural
Department.
15 Added criteria for determining consistency of land development 9J-5.023 Procedural
regulations with the comnrehensive nlan.
16 Dermed I!enerallanes. 9J-5.003 Procedural
17 Revised the definition of "marine wetlands". 9J-5.003 Procedural
2
Appendix D. Consistency with Rule 9J-5, FAC.
Changes to Rule 9J-5, F.A.c. 1989-2004 9J-5, F.A.C. N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Citations (WberelHow) By Element
18 Repeal the definition of "nublic facilities and services". 9J-5,003 Procedural
19 Revised procedures for monitoring, evaluating and appraising 9J-5.005(7) Procedural
implementation of local comnrehensive plans.
20 Repealed requirements for evaluation and appraisal reports and 9J-5.0053 Procedural
evaluation and aooraisal amendments.
21 Revised concurrency management system requirements to include 9J-5.005(1) X
orovisions for establishment of nub lie school concurrencv. and (2)
22 Authorized local governments to establish multimodal transportation 9J-5.0055(2)(b) Procedural, no
level of service standards and established requirements for multimodal and (3)(c) district established
transportation districts.
23 Authorized local governments to establish level of service standards for 9J-5.0055(2)(c) Transportation
general lanes of the Florida Intrastate Highway System within urbanized Element
areas, with the concurrence of the Denartment of Transportation,
24 Provide that public transit facilities are not subject to concurrency 9J-5.0055(8) Concurrency
requirements. Management System,
Procedural
25 Authorized local comprehensive plans to pennit multi-use developments 9J-5.0055(9) Procedural
of regional impact to satisJY the transportation concurrency requirements
by payment ofa nronortionate share contribution.
26 Required the future land use map to show multimodal transportation 9J-5.006(4) Voluntary, not
district boundaries, if established. established
27 Authorized local governments to establish multimodal transportation 9J-5.006(6) Voluntary, not
districts and, if established, required local governments to establish established
desiWl standards for such districts.
28 Required data for the Housing Element include a description of 9J-5,010(1)(c) Housing Element,
substandard dwelling units and repealed the requirement that the housing Evaluation and
inventory include a locally detennined definition of standard and Appraisal Report
substandard housing conditions.
29 Authorized local governments to supplement the affordable housing 9J-5.10(2)(b) Housing Element,
needs assessment with locally generated data and repealed the Evaluation and
authorization for local governments to conduct their own assessment. Appraisal Report,
Voluntary
3
Appendix D. Consistency with Rule 9J-5, F.A.C.
Changes to Rule 9J-5, F.A.c. 1989-2004 9J-5, F.A.C. N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Citations (WherelHow) Bv Element
30 Required the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to include 9J-5.015(3)(b) Intergovernmental
objectives that ensure adoption of interlocal agreements within one year Coordination
of adoption of the amended Intergovernmental Coordination Element Element; no school
and ensure intergovernmental coordination between all affected local concurrency
governments and the school board for the purpose of establishing requirement
requirements for Dublic school concurrency.
31 Required the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to include: 9J-5.015(3)(c) Intergovernmental
a Policies that provide procedures to identify and implement joint Coordination
planning areas for purposes of annexation, municipal Element
incorporation and joint infrastructure service areas;
a Recognize campus master plan and provide procedures for
coordination of the campus master development agreement;
a Establish joint processes for collaborate planning and decision-
making with other units of local government;
a Establish joint processes for collaborative planning and decision
making with the school board on population projections and
siting of public school facilities;
a Establish joint processes for the siting of facilities with county-
wide significance; and
AdoDtion of an interlocal alll'eement for school concurrencv.
32 Required the Capital Improvements Element to include implementation 9J-5.016(4)(a) X Intergovernmental
measures that provide a five-year financially feasible public school Coordination
facilities program that demonstrates the adopted level of service Element
standards will be achieved and maintained and a schedule of capital
improvements for multimodal transportation districts, if locally
established.
33 Required the Transportation Element analysis for multimodal 9J-5.019(3) No multimodal
transportation districts to demonstrate that community design elements transportation district
will reduce vehicle miles of travel and support an integrated, multi- established
modal transDortation svstem.
34 Required Transportation Element objectives for multimodal 9J-5.019(4) No multimodal
transportation districts to address provision of a safe, comfortable and transportation district
attractive pedestrian environment with convenient access to public established
transDortation.
4
Appendix D. Consistency with Rule 9J-5, F,AC,
Changes to Rnle 9J-5, F.A.C. 1989-2004 9J-5, F.A.C. N/A Addressed Amendment Needed
Citations (WherelHow) By Element
35 Authorized local governments to establish level of service standards for 9J-5.0l9(4)(c) Aventura is a
general lanes of the Florida Intrastate Highway System within urbanized Transportation
areas, with the concurrence of the Department of Transportation. Concurrency
Exception Area
5
Published Dailv
MIAMI, FLORIDA
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF DADE
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared:
MARlA ANGEL
Who on oath that she is
ADVERTISING OFFICE MANAGER
Of the Miami Herald Publishing Company, a daily newspaper at Miami in Dade County,
Florida; that the advertisement for: {!/4 . /~'---I/'l-.~
was published in said newspaper in the issue of: ~
rf¡¡DAj / ¿JUly It;¡ 2-{lOr:- I the /t-1'-Mr1I' JlerCt/lc/
Affiant further says that the Miami Herald is a newspaper published at Miami, in the said
Dade County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously
published in said Dade County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class
mail matter at the post office in Miami, in said Dade County, Florida, for a period of one
year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement.
~
Mt--- ." ~ C--'
u
Sworn to and subscribed before me
AD. 2005
I .... .. ....,
Ll8A HIRNANDIEZ .
.~ - ÞOO382381 i
. 1/,.. _211112009:
i ~ ~ -_(800)432"'254:
: '.,~,!:i.. FIo""aNotar¡AS$n.loc ¡
I............................................,
%
'_C'!'y
, , . CìTY OF AVENTURA
NOTICE OF HEARING OF lOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
, ON THE DRAFT 2005 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT ("EAR") OFTHECITY'S COMPRE!iENSIVE PLAN
, AND'-
NOTicE OF RESOLUTION REQUESTING THATTHE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OFCOMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OFTHE EAR TO
THE SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
Public Notice is hereby given that the Aventura City Commission,
sitting as the City of Aventura Local Planning Agency, wiil meet in
apublic hearing on Tuesday, July 26,2005 at 10 a.m. to review and
receive comment on thedrah 2005 Evaluation and Appraisal
Report ("EAR"), for the City's Comprehensive Plan and to
recommend, by motion, to the City Commission that the drah EAR
be transmitted .for preliminary review and comment. Ail interested
parties are encouraged to participate by either appearing at the
hearing of the Local Planning Agency or by sending written
comments to the City of Aventura, 19200 West Country Club Drive,
Aventura, Fiorida, 33180.
Immediately foilowing the Local Planning Agency meeting, the City
Commission of the City of Aventura, as the governing body, wiil
consider at a public hearing adoption of the foilowing Resolution.
- .
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY Of' 'AVENTUR:A:,FLORIDA,
ADOPTING THE MOTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
TO TRANSMIT THE DRAfT EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL
REPORT" OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE, PLAN FOR
PRELIMINARY REVIEW AND COMMENT; REQUESTING THAT
THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
DELEGATE THE SUFFICIENCY REVIEW OF,THE EVALUATION
AND APPRAISAL .REPORT (EARL OF - THE CITY'S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT,"A" TO THE
SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL PLANNING:,COUNCIL. (¡¡FRPC)
PtlRSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS,'OF-THE ,LOCAL
GOVERNMENT "COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND' LAND
~~~€¿~~~~~~:'EGULATION ACT; AND ~.ROVIDING fOR AN
The above described Public Hearings wiil be held commèn<;¡ng at
10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, July ?6,2005 at City ,of Av Ontura
Government Center, 19200, West Country Club Drive,Aventura,
Florida, 33180. The proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report
and the proposed Resolution may be inspected, by the public at the
Office of the City Clerk at the address above. Interested parties
may appear at the Public Hearings and be heard, with respect to
the proposed Evaluation and Appraisal Report and/or Resolution.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, ail
persons who are disabled and who need special accommodations
to participate in this proceeding because of that disability, should
contact the Office of the City Cierk, (305) 466-8901, not later than
two lJusiness days prior to such proceedings. '
If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the City
Commission, as Local Pianning Agency or as the governing body,
with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, that
person will need a record of the proceedings and, for such
purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. '
Teresa M. Soroka, MMC, City Clerk